Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

An Approach to Detect Abnormal Submissions for CodeWorkout Dataset

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2407.17475 v1 pith:IFJLQWX4 submitted 2024-06-28 cs.CY cs.AIcs.SE

classification cs.CYcs.AIcs.SE
keywords datastudentsabnormaldetectlearningproblemprogrammingrecommendations
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Students interactions while solving problems in learning environments (i.e. log data) are often used to support students learning. For example, researchers use log data to develop systems that can provide students with personalized problem recommendations based on their knowledge level. However, anomalies in the students log data, such as cheating to solve programming problems, could introduce a hidden bias in the log data. As a result, these systems may provide inaccurate problem recommendations, and therefore, defeat their purpose. Classical cheating detection methods, such as MOSS, can be used to detect code plagiarism. However, these methods cannot detect other abnormal events such as a student gaming a system with multiple attempts of similar solutions to a particular programming problem. This paper presents a preliminary study to analyze log data with anomalies. The goal of our work is to overcome the abnormal instances when modeling personalizable recommendations in programming learning environments.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. The Failure of Plagiarism Detection in Competitive Programming

    cs.CY 2025-05 conditional novelty 3.0 of 10

    Code similarity detectors miss obfuscated or AI-generated submissions in competitive programming, so the author recommends combining automated screening, manual review, and oral interviews.

Pith tools