pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.31925 · v1 · pith:IGCRGKHVnew · submitted 2026-06-30 · ✦ hep-th · cond-mat.stat-mech· gr-qc

Fate of "Space-like singularities" in c=1 Matrix Model

Pith reviewed 2026-07-01 04:07 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-th cond-mat.stat-mechgr-qc
keywords c=1 matrix modelspace-like singularitiesdouble scaling limitquantum quenchesThomas-Fermi approximationfermion picturephase space densityaction-angle variables
0
0 comments X

The pith

Space-like singularities in the c=1 matrix model are artifacts of the strict double scaling limit.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper realizes time-dependent backgrounds from two-dimensional string theory as quantum quenches in the c=1 matrix model while retaining non-linear potential terms. In the fermion picture under the Thomas-Fermi approximation, the phase space density matches double-scaled results at early times but deviates once the IR wall matters at times of order log N. Folds then proliferate on the Fermi surface with a characteristic winding time of order (log N)^2, densely covering the allowed phase space region. At late times the density oscillates rapidly around a time-independent, angle-independent value, while coarse-graining in angle space yields power-law relaxation to equilibrium with a universal exponent largely independent of initial details. A sympathetic reader cares because the result indicates that apparent singularities can be smoothed by effects outside the strict double scaling limit.

Core claim

Realizing the backgrounds via quantum quenches that keep non-linear terms, the phase space density evolves such that early-time behavior near the potential maximum agrees with the double-scaled theory, yet at later times the IR wall induces proliferating folds that cover phase space densely; action-angle variables then show rapid oscillations around a time-independent equilibrium, with coarse-grained density relaxing as a power law with universal exponent, establishing that space-like singularities are an artifact of the strict double scaling limit.

What carries the argument

Thomas-Fermi evolution of the phase space density in the fermion picture, analyzed via action-angle variables to track late-time oscillations and coarse-grained relaxation.

If this is right

  • Early-time behavior near the potential maximum matches the double-scaled theory before the IR wall intervenes at order log N.
  • Folds proliferate with winding time of order (log N)^2 and densely cover the allowed phase space region.
  • The phase space density oscillates rapidly around a time-independent and angle-independent value at late times.
  • Coarse-grained density in angle space relaxes to a time-independent equilibrium as a power law with universal exponent independent of most initial-state details.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Finite-N corrections outside double scaling may provide a general mechanism for resolving apparent singularities in other holographic duals with time-dependent backgrounds.
  • The universal relaxation exponent suggests a possible connection to ergodic mixing in classical phase space that could be checked in simpler integrable systems.
  • The final equilibrium state offers a candidate for a non-singular string-theory interpretation of the quenched background that could be tested via worldsheet correlators.

Load-bearing premise

The Thomas-Fermi approximation accurately captures the late-time dynamics of the phase space density in the fermion picture of the matrix model.

What would settle it

A direct numerical evolution of the matrix model eigenvalues or phase space density beyond the double scaling limit that fails to show power-law relaxation or retains persistent space-like regions at times much larger than (log N)^2 would falsify the claim.

read the original abstract

A class of time dependent backgrounds in two dimensional String Theory leads to superluminal Liouville walls on the worldsheet. In the dual double scaled $c=1$ matrix model these backgrounds involve eigenvalues leaking out to infinity, and the collective field fluctuations become strongly coupled along space-like regions, resembling singularities. We realize these backgrounds as results of quantum quenches in the matrix model, retaining non-linear terms in the matrix potential, thus departing from a double scaling limit. Working in the fermion picture in a Thomas-Fermi approximation, we show that while the early time behavior of the phase space density near the maximum of the potential agrees with that obtained in the double scaled theory, at times of the order $(\log N)$ the effect of the IR wall becomes significant. At later times, with a characteristic winding time of order $(\log N)^2$, folds on the fermi surface proliferate and eventually cover the allowed region in phase space densely. Using action-angle variables, we show that the phase space density oscillates around a time independent and angle independent value rapidly at late times. A coarse-grained density in the angle space relaxes to a time independent equilibrium value as a power law with a universal exponent largely independent of the details of the initial state. Thus, the appearance of a space-like singularity is an artifact of the strict double scaling limit. We comment on the interpretation of the final state in String Theory.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper claims that space-like singularities appearing in time-dependent backgrounds of 2D string theory (dual to eigenvalue leakage in the c=1 matrix model) are artifacts of the strict double-scaling limit. Realizing these backgrounds via quantum quenches that retain nonlinear terms in the matrix potential, the authors work in the fermion picture under the Thomas-Fermi approximation. Early-time evolution near the potential maximum matches the double-scaled theory, but the IR wall becomes important at times ~log N; at later times ~ (log N)^2 folds proliferate on the Fermi surface, densely covering phase space. Using action-angle variables the phase-space density is shown to oscillate rapidly around a time- and angle-independent value, so that a coarse-grained density relaxes to equilibrium as a power law with a universal exponent largely independent of initial conditions. The final state is interpreted in string theory.

Significance. If the central result holds, the work supplies a concrete dynamical mechanism by which apparent space-like singularities are resolved once the double-scaling limit is relaxed, replacing them with a coarse-grained equilibrium reached by phase-space mixing. The explicit use of action-angle variables to extract the universal power-law relaxation and the demonstration that the exponent is largely initial-state independent are technical strengths that make the argument falsifiable and reproducible within the semiclassical framework.

major comments (2)
  1. [fermion picture / Thomas-Fermi approximation (late-time analysis)] The central claim that the space-like singularity is an artifact rests on the Thomas-Fermi (semiclassical fluid) description remaining valid once folds proliferate and cover phase space densely at times of order (log N)^2. The manuscript provides no quantitative estimate of the time at which 1/N quantum corrections, tunneling near the potential maximum, or strong-coupling fluctuations in the collective field become O(1) and invalidate the hydrodynamic evolution; without such an estimate the late-time relaxation and the power-law exponent cannot be trusted.
  2. [quantum quench realization] The mapping from the superluminal Liouville-wall backgrounds to a specific quantum quench that retains the full nonlinear matrix potential is stated but not derived in detail. The initial phase-space density used for the subsequent Thomas-Fermi evolution is therefore not explicitly connected to the world-sheet data, leaving the early-time matching to the double-scaled theory dependent on an unverified identification.
minor comments (2)
  1. [late-time relaxation] The notation for the coarse-grained density in angle space and the precise definition of the winding time should be introduced with an equation number rather than only in prose.
  2. [discussion] A brief comparison of the obtained power-law exponent with any existing numerical or analytic results in the literature on fermionic matrix models would strengthen the universality claim.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading, positive assessment of significance, and constructive comments. We address the major points below.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: [fermion picture / Thomas-Fermi approximation (late-time analysis)] The central claim that the space-like singularity is an artifact rests on the Thomas-Fermi (semiclassical fluid) description remaining valid once folds proliferate and cover phase space densely at times of order (log N)^2. The manuscript provides no quantitative estimate of the time at which 1/N quantum corrections, tunneling near the potential maximum, or strong-coupling fluctuations in the collective field become O(1) and invalidate the hydrodynamic evolution; without such an estimate the late-time relaxation and the power-law exponent cannot be trusted.

    Authors: We agree that a quantitative estimate of the validity regime would strengthen the central claim. In the revised manuscript we will add an explicit estimate: the time at which 1/N corrections become O(1) scales as exp(c (log N)^2) for some positive c, parametrically later than the winding time (log N)^2 at which the power-law relaxation is observed. This follows from the exponential growth in the number of folds and the semiclassical condition that the local de Broglie wavelength remain small compared with the fold spacing. We will also note that a full non-perturbative analysis lies beyond the present semiclassical treatment. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [quantum quench realization] The mapping from the superluminal Liouville-wall backgrounds to a specific quantum quench that retains the full nonlinear matrix potential is stated but not derived in detail. The initial phase-space density used for the subsequent Thomas-Fermi evolution is therefore not explicitly connected to the world-sheet data, leaving the early-time matching to the double-scaled theory dependent on an unverified identification.

    Authors: The manuscript sketches the mapping via early-time matching of the Fermi-surface evolution (Section 2). We acknowledge that a more explicit derivation is needed. In the revision we will expand this section to derive the initial phase-space density directly from the world-sheet Liouville-wall trajectory, thereby making the connection to the quantum-quench parameters and the early-time double-scaled limit fully explicit. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation is self-contained

full rationale

The paper realizes the backgrounds as quantum quenches retaining nonlinear potential terms (departing from double scaling), then evolves the fermion phase-space density in the Thomas-Fermi approximation. Early-time behavior near the potential maximum is shown to match the double-scaled case, while late-time fold proliferation (at winding time ~ (log N)^2) and subsequent rapid oscillations in action-angle variables leading to coarse-grained power-law relaxation are computed directly from the hydrodynamic equations. No load-bearing self-citation, no fitted parameter renamed as prediction, and no ansatz or uniqueness result imported from prior author work; the absence of singularity emerges from the explicit late-time dynamics rather than by construction from the input.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the validity of the Thomas-Fermi approximation for describing phase space evolution and the assumption that the backgrounds can be realized as quantum quenches retaining non-linear terms.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Thomas-Fermi approximation for phase space density
    Used to describe the evolution of the fermionic system in the matrix model at various time scales.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5799 in / 1367 out tokens · 59935 ms · 2026-07-01T04:07:44.064469+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

41 extracted references · 41 canonical work pages · 27 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    String Theory in Two Dimensions

    For reviews and references to the original literature see I. R. Klebanov, “String theory in two-dimensions,” In *Trieste 1991, Proceedings, String theory and quantum gravity ’91* 30-101 and Princeton Univ. - PUPT-1271 (91/07,rec.Oct.) 72 p [hep-th/9108019]; S. R. Das, “The one-dimensional matrix model and string theory,” In *Trieste 1992, Proceedings, Str...

  2. [2]

    Strings from Tachyons

    J. McGreevy and H. L. Verlinde, “Strings from tachyons: The c=1 matrix reloaded,” JHEP12, 054 (2003) doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2003/12/054 [arXiv:hep-th/0304224 [hep-th]]; E. J. Martinec, “The Annular report on noncritical string theory,” [arXiv:hep-th/0305148 [hep-th]]; I. R. Klebanov, J. M. Maldacena and N. Seiberg, “D-brane decay in two-dimensional string ...

  3. [3]

    The c=1 String Theory S-Matrix Revisited

    B. Balthazar, V. A. Rodriguez and X. Yin, “Thec= 1 string theory S-matrix revisited,” JHEP 1904, 145 (2019) doi:10.1007/JHEP04(2019)145 [arXiv:1705.07151 [hep-th]]; B. Balthazar, V. A. Rodriguez and X. Yin, “Long String Scattering in c=1 String Theory,” JHEP1901, 173 (2019) doi:10.1007/JHEP01(2019)173 [arXiv:1810.07233 [hep-th]]; B. Balthazar, V. A. Rodri...

  4. [4]

    Fixing an Ambiguity in Two Dimensional String Theory Using String Field Theory,

    A. Sen, “Fixing an Ambiguity in Two Dimensional String Theory Using String Field Theory,” JHEP03, 005 (2020) doi:10.1007/JHEP03(2020)005 [arXiv:1908.02782 [hep-th]]. A. Sen, “Divergent=⇒complex amplitudes in two dimensional string theory,” JHEP02, 086 (2021) doi:10.1007/JHEP02(2021)086 [arXiv:2003.12076 [hep-th]] A. Sen, “D-instantons, string field theory...

  5. [5]

    Time-dependent backgrounds of 2D string theory

    S. Y. Alexandrov, V. A. Kazakov and I. K. Kostov, “Time dependent backgrounds of 2-D string theory,” Nucl. Phys. B640, 119-144 (2002) doi:10.1016/S0550-3213(02)00541-2 [arXiv:hep-th/0205079 [hep-th]]

  6. [6]

    Backgrounds of 2D string theory from matrix model

    S. Alexandrov, “Backgrounds of 2-D string theory from matrix model,” [arXiv:hep-th/0303190 [hep-th]]

  7. [7]

    Matrix Cosmology

    J. L. Karczmarek and A. Strominger, “Matrix cosmology,” JHEP04, 055 (2004) doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2004/04/055 [arXiv:hep-th/0309138 [hep-th]]

  8. [8]

    Closed String Tachyon Condensation at c=1

    J. L. Karczmarek and A. Strominger, “Closed string tachyon condensation at c = 1,” JHEP05, 062 (2004) doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2004/05/062 [arXiv:hep-th/0403169 [hep-th]]

  9. [9]

    Collective Field Description of Matrix Cosmologies

    M. Ernebjerg, J. L. Karczmarek and J. M. Lapan, “Collective field description of matrix cosmologies,” JHEP09, 065 (2004) doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2004/09/065 [arXiv:hep-th/0405187 [hep-th]]

  10. [10]

    Hartle-Hawking Vacuum for c=1 Tachyon Condensation

    J. L. Karczmarek, A. Maloney and A. Strominger, “Hartle-Hawking vacuum for c=1 tachyon condensation,” JHEP12, 027 (2004) doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2004/12/027 [arXiv:hep-th/0405092 [hep-th]]. – 29 –

  11. [11]

    Particle Production in Matrix Cosmology

    S. R. Das, J. L. Davis, F. Larsen and P. Mukhopadhyay, “Particle production in matrix cosmology,” Phys. Rev. D70, 044017 (2004) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.70.044017 [arXiv:hep-th/0403275 [hep-th]]

  12. [12]

    Spacelike boundaries from the c=1 Matrix Model

    S. R. Das and J. L. Karczmarek, “Spacelike boundaries from the c=1 matrix model,” Phys. Rev. D71, 086006 (2005) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.71.086006 [arXiv:hep-th/0412093 [hep-th]]

  13. [13]

    Open String Descriptions of Space-like Singularities in Two Dimensional String Theory

    S. R. Das and L. H. Santos, “Open string descriptions of space-like singularities in two dimensional string theory,” Phys. Rev. D75, 126001 (2007) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.75.126001 [arXiv:hep-th/0702145 [hep-th]]

  14. [14]

    Matrix Model and Time-like Linear Dilaton Matter

    T. Takayanagi, “Matrix model and time-like linear dilaton matter,” JHEP12, 071 (2004) doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2004/12/071 [arXiv:hep-th/0411019 [hep-th]]; A. Strominger and T. Takayanagi, “Correlators in time - like bulk Liouville theory,” Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.7, no.2, 369-379 (2003) doi:10.4310/ATMP.2003.v7.n2.a6 [arXiv:hep-th/0303221 [hep-th]]; Y. Hikid...

  15. [15]

    A two-dimensional string cosmology,

    V. A. Rodriguez, “A two-dimensional string cosmology,” JHEP06, 161 (2023) doi:10.1007/JHEP06(2023)161 [arXiv:2302.06625 [hep-th]]. V. A. Rodriguez, “The torus one-point diagram in two-dimensional string cosmology,” JHEP07, 050 (2023) doi:10.1007/JHEP07(2023)050 [arXiv:2304.13043 [hep-th]]

  16. [16]

    On time-dependent backgrounds in 1 + 1 dimensional string theory,

    B. Balthazar, J. Chu and D. Kutasov, “On time-dependent backgrounds in 1 + 1 dimensional string theory,” JHEP03, 025 (2024) doi:10.1007/JHEP03(2024)025 [arXiv:2311.17992 [hep-th]]

  17. [17]

    Superluminal Liouville walls in 2d String Theory and space-like singularities,

    S. R. Das, S. D. Hampton and S. Liu, “Superluminal Liouville walls in 2d String Theory and space-like singularities,” JHEP05, 070 (2026) doi:10.1007/JHEP05(2026)070 [arXiv:2509.12778 [hep-th]]

  18. [18]

    Quantum quench in matrix models: Dynamical phase transitions, Selective equilibration and the Generalized Gibbs Ensemble

    G. Mandal and T. Morita, “Quantum quench in matrix models: Dynamical phase transitions, Selective equilibration and the Generalized Gibbs Ensemble,” JHEP10, 197 (2013) doi:10.1007/JHEP10(2013)197 [arXiv:1302.0859 [hep-th]]

  19. [19]

    Quantum quench inc= 1matrix model and emergent space-times,

    S. R. Das, S. Hampton and S. Liu, “Quantum quench inc= 1matrix model and emergent space-times,” JHEP04, 107 (2020) doi:10.1007/JHEP04(2020)107 [arXiv:1910.00123 [hep-th]]

  20. [20]

    Quantum quench and thermalization of one-dimensional Fermi gas via phase space hydrodynamics

    M. Kulkarni, G. Mandal and T. Morita, “Quantum quench and thermalization of one-dimensional Fermi gas via phase space hydrodynamics,” Phys. Rev. A98, no.4, 043610 (2018) doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.98.043610 [arXiv:1806.09343 [cond-mat.stat-mech]]

  21. [21]

    Folds, Bosonization and non-triviality of the classical limit of 2D string theory

    S. R. Das and S. D. Mathur, “Folds, bosonization and nontriviality of the classical limit of 2-D string theory,” Phys. Lett. B365, 79-86 (1996) doi:10.1016/0370-2693(95)01307-5 [arXiv:hep-th/9507141 [hep-th]]

  22. [22]

    D branes in 2d String Theory and Classical limits

    S. R. Das, “D-branes in 2-d string theory and classical limits,” doi:10.1142/9789812702340_0026 [arXiv:hep-th/0401067 [hep-th]]

  23. [23]

    Developments in 2D String Theory

    A. Jevicki, “Exact results in collective string field theory,” PRINT-91-0358 (BROWN); “Development in 2-d string theory,” doi:10.1142/9789814447072_0004 [arXiv:hep-th/9309115 [hep-th]]; – 30 – A. Jevicki, “Nonperturbative collective field theory,” Nucl. Phys. B376, 75-98 (1992) doi:10.1016/0550-3213(92)90068-M

  24. [24]

    Exact Correlators of Giant Gravitons from dual N=4 SYM

    S. Corley, A. Jevicki and S. Ramgoolam, “Exact correlators of giant gravitons from dual N=4 SYM theory,” Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.5, 809-839 (2002) doi:10.4310/ATMP.2001.v5.n4.a6 [arXiv:hep-th/0111222 [hep-th]]

  25. [25]

    Structure of loop space at finite N,

    R. de Mello Koch and A. Jevicki, “Structure of loop space at finite N,” JHEP06, 011 (2025) doi:10.1007/JHEP06(2025)011 [arXiv:2503.20097 [hep-th]]; R. de Mello Koch and A. Jevicki, ‘Hilbert space of finite N multi-matrix models,” JHEP11, 145 (2025) doi:10.1007/JHEP11(2025)145 [arXiv:2508.11986 [hep-th]]; R. de Mello Koch, A. Jevicki, G. Kemp and A. Rudra,...

  26. [26]

    Gravitational dynamics from collective field theory,

    R. de Mello Koch, “Gravitational dynamics from collective field theory,” JHEP10, 151 (2023) doi:10.1007/JHEP10(2023)151 [arXiv:2309.11116 [hep-th]]

  27. [27]

    Finite [q-Oscillator] Description of 2-D String Theory

    A. Jevicki and A. van Tonder, “Finite [Q oscillator] representation of 2-D string theory,” Mod. Phys. Lett. A11, 1397-1410 (1996) doi:10.1142/S0217732396001405 [arXiv:hep-th/9601058 [hep-th]]

  28. [28]

    Exact operator bosonization of finite number of fermions in one space dimension

    A. Dhar, G. Mandal and N. V. Suryanarayana, “Exact operator bosonization of finite number of fermions in one space dimension,” JHEP01, 118 (2006) doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2006/01/118 [arXiv:hep-th/0509164 [hep-th]]; A. Dhar and G. Mandal, “Bosonization of non-relativistic fermions on a circle: Tomonaga’s problem revisited,” Phys. Rev. D74, 105006 (2006) doi:...

  29. [29]

    Exact lattice bosonization of finite N matrix quantum mechanics and c = 1,

    G. Mandal and A. Mohan, “Exact lattice bosonization of finite N matrix quantum mechanics and c = 1,” JHEP03, 210 (2025) doi:10.1007/JHEP03(2025)210 [arXiv:2406.07629 [hep-th]]

  30. [30]

    Classical Fermi Fluid and Geometric Action for $c=1$

    A. Dhar, G. Mandal and S. R. Wadia, “Classical Fermi fluid and geometric action for c=1,” Int. J. Mod. Phys. A8, 325-350 (1993) doi:10.1142/S0217751X93000138 [arXiv:hep-th/9204028 [hep-th]]; A. Dhar, G. Mandal and S. R. Wadia, “Nonrelativistic fermions, coadjoint orbits of W(infinity) and string field theory at c = 1,” Mod. Phys. Lett. A7, 3129-3146 (1992...

  31. [31]

    Nonlinear bosonization of Fermi surfaces: The method of coadjoint orbits,

    L. V. Delacretaz, Y. H. Du, U. Mehta and D. T. Son, “Nonlinear bosonization of Fermi surfaces: The method of coadjoint orbits,” Phys. Rev. Res.4, no.3, 033131 (2022) doi:10.1103/PhysRevResearch.4.033131 [arXiv:2203.05004 [cond-mat.str-el]]

  32. [32]

    Worldsheet Duals to One-Matrix Models

    A. Giacchetto, R. Gopakumar and E. A. Mazenc, “Worldsheet Duals to One-Matrix Models,” [arXiv:2604.03126 [hep-th]]

  33. [33]

    Open-Closed-Open Triality Beyond Matrix Models

    E. A. Mazenc and D. Sarkar, “Open-Closed-Open Triality Beyond Matrix Models,” [arXiv:2605.02885 [hep-th]]

  34. [34]

    Classical limit of (1+1)-dimensional string theory,

    J. Polchinski, “Classical limit of (1+1)-dimensional string theory,” Nucl. Phys. B362, 125-140 (1991) doi:10.1016/0550-3213(91)90559-G – 31 –

  35. [35]

    The Quantum Collective Field Method and Its Application to the Planar Limit,

    A. Jevicki and B. Sakita, “The Quantum Collective Field Method and Its Application to the Planar Limit,” Nucl. Phys. B165, 511 (1980) doi:10.1016/0550-3213(80)90046-2

  36. [36]

    String Field Theory and Physical Interpretation ofD= 1Strings,

    S. R. Das and A. Jevicki, “String Field Theory and Physical Interpretation ofD= 1Strings,” Mod. Phys. Lett. A5, 1639-1650 (1990) doi:10.1142/S0217732390001888

  37. [37]

    Gravitational Scattering in the c = 1 Matrix Model

    For a discussion and references to the earlier literature, see M. Natsuume and J. Polchinski, “Gravitational scattering in the c = 1 matrix model,” Nucl. Phys. B424, 137-154 (1994) doi:10.1016/0550-3213(94)90092-2 [arXiv:hep-th/9402156 [hep-th]]

  38. [38]

    Brezin, C

    E. Brezin, C. Itzykson, G. Parisi and J. B. Zuber, Commun. Math. Phys.59, 35 (1978) doi:10.1007/BF01614153

  39. [39]

    Excitations and interactions in d = 1 string theory,

    A. M. Sengupta and S. R. Wadia, “Excitations and interactions in d = 1 string theory,” Int. J. Mod. Phys. A6, 1961-1984 (1991) doi:10.1142/S0217751X91000988; D. J. Gross and I. R. Klebanov, “Fermionic string field theory of c = 1 two-dimensional quantum gravity,” Nucl. Phys. B352, 671-688 (1991) doi:10.1016/0550-3213(91)90103-5; G. W. Moore, “Double scale...

  40. [40]

    Interacting Theory of Collective and Topological Fields in 2 Dimensions

    J. Avan and A. Jevicki, “Classical integrability and higher symmetries of collective string field theory,” Phys. Lett. B266, 35-41 (1991) doi:10.1016/0370-2693(91)90740-H; J. Avan and A. Jevicki, “Interacting theory of collective and topological fields in two-dimensions,” Nucl. Phys. B397, 672-704 (1993) doi:10.1016/0550-3213(93)90190-Z [arXiv:hep-th/9209...

  41. [41]

    Bosonization for Beginners --- Refermionization for Experts

    See e.g. J. von Delft and H. Schoeller, “Bosonization for beginners: Refermionization for experts,” Annalen Phys.7, 225-305 (1998) doi:10.1002/(SICI)1521-3889(199811)7:4<225::AID-ANDP225>3.0.CO;2-L [arXiv:cond-mat/9805275 [cond-mat]]; S. Rao and D. Sen, “An Introduction to bosonization and some of its applications,” [arXiv:cond-mat/0005492 [cond-mat]]. – 32 –