Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Fact-Checking Meets Fauxtography: Verifying Claims About Images

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1908.11722 v1 pith:IHPWQBCG submitted 2019-08-30 cs.CL cs.AIcs.CVcs.IR

classification cs.CLcs.AIcs.CVcs.IR
keywords claimsfact-checkingimagesclaimdatasetimagenumberresearch
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

The recent explosion of false claims in social media and on the Web in general has given rise to a lot of manual fact-checking initiatives. Unfortunately, the number of claims that need to be fact-checked is several orders of magnitude larger than what humans can handle manually. Thus, there has been a lot of research aiming at automating the process. Interestingly, previous work has largely ignored the growing number of claims about images. This is despite the fact that visual imagery is more influential than text and naturally appears alongside fake news. Here we aim at bridging this gap. In particular, we create a new dataset for this problem, and we explore a variety of features modeling the claim, the image, and the relationship between the claim and the image. The evaluation results show sizable improvements over the baseline. We release our dataset, hoping to enable further research on fact-checking claims about images.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. XFacta: Contemporary, Real-World Dataset and Evaluation for Multimodal Misinformation Detection with Multimodal LLMs

    cs.CL 2025-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    XFacta is a new real-world, post-January-2024 multimodal misinformation dataset from X, and evaluations show that MLLM detectors need external evidence, especially image-to-text evidence, with multi-step reasoning per...

Pith tools