REVIEW 2 cited by
ALMA: Alignment with Minimal Annotation
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Recent approaches to large language model (LLM) alignment typically require millions of human annotations or rely on external aligned models for synthetic data generation. This paper introduces ALMA: Alignment with Minimal Annotation, demonstrating that effective alignment can be achieved using only 9,000 labeled examples -- less than 1% of conventional approaches. ALMA generates large amounts of high-quality synthetic alignment data through new techniques: diverse prompt synthesis via few-shot learning, diverse response generation with multiple model checkpoints, and judge (reward model) enhancement through score aggregation and self-distillation. Using only a pretrained Llama3 base model, 5,000 SFT examples, and 4,000 judge annotations, ALMA achieves performance close to Llama3-Instruct across diverse alignment benchmarks (e.g., 0.1% difference on AlpacaEval 2.0 score). These results are achieved with a multi-round, self-bootstrapped data synthesis and training recipe that continues to improve for 10 rounds, surpassing the typical 3-round ceiling of previous methods. These results suggest that base models already possess sufficient knowledge for effective alignment, and that synthetic data generation methods can expose it.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
PEDANTIC: A Dataset for the Automatic Examination of Definiteness in Patent Claims
PEDANTIC provides the first public dataset of 14k patent claims labeled with examiner-cited reasons for indefiniteness, along with baselines showing LLMs still lag logistic regression on binary prediction.
-
SelfCite: Self-Supervised Alignment for Context Attribution in Large Language Models
SelfCite uses context-ablation probability differences as a self-supervised reward to improve LLM sentence-level citations, raising LongBench-Cite citation F1 from 73.8 to 79.1.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.