REVIEW 3 cited by
Invisible Prompts, Visible Threats: Malicious Font Injection in External Resources for Large Language Models
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Invisible Prompts, Visible Threats: Malicious Font Injection in External Resources for Large Language Models
read the original abstract
Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly equipped with capabilities of real-time web search and integrated with protocols like Model Context Protocol (MCP). This extension could introduce new security vulnerabilities. We present a systematic investigation of LLM vulnerabilities to hidden adversarial prompts through malicious font injection in external resources like webpages, where attackers manipulate code-to-glyph mapping to inject deceptive content which are invisible to users. We evaluate two critical attack scenarios: (1) "malicious content relay" and (2) "sensitive data leakage" through MCP-enabled tools. Our experiments reveal that indirect prompts with injected malicious font can bypass LLM safety mechanisms through external resources, achieving varying success rates based on data sensitivity and prompt design. Our research underscores the urgent need for enhanced security measures in LLM deployments when processing external content.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
ShareLock: A Stealthy Multi-Tool Threshold Poisoning Attack Against MCP
ShareLock applies Shamir's threshold scheme to distribute poisoning payloads across multiple MCP tool descriptions, achieving information-theoretic secrecy and over 90% average attack success rate in multi-tool scenarios.
-
CrackedPDFs: A Controlled Benchmark for Hidden Prompt Injection in PDFs
A 29,322-PDF controlled benchmark shows that a hybrid structural-plus-text detector finds hidden PDF prompt injections under paired evaluation (0.960 F1; 100% pair ranking), while text-only baselines fail.
-
CrackedPDFs: A Controlled Benchmark for Hidden Prompt Injection in PDFs
A document-aware hybrid detector that inspects PDF structure before text flattening outperforms text-only guardrails and structural-only models on a new 29,322-file controlled hidden-prompt-injection benchmark.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.