Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 3 minor 58 references

Spin selectivity induced by non-collinear spins in Rashba wires

T0 review · 2 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-08-05 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A Rashba quantum wire with two non-collinear spin channel states acts as a spin filter even with time-reversal symmetry and no dephasing.

desk verdict The mechanism is real and the idealized derivation is clean, but the quantitative spin-polarization numbers are not established because the numerical averaging ignores transmission-probability weighting. read the letter →

arxiv 2608.00599 v1 pith:IN7BZJWZ submitted 2026-08-01 cond-mat.mes-hall cond-mat.mtrl-scicond-mat.otherphysics.app-phquant-ph

Luciano Jacopo D'Onofrio , Maria Teresa Mercaldo , Mario Cuoco , Carmine Ortix This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mes-hallcond-mat.mtrl-scicond-mat.otherphysics.app-phquant-ph PACS 72.25.-b73.63.Nm71.70.Ej
keywords spinselectivityRashbaspin-orbitcouplingnon-collinearspinsquantumwiretime-reversalsymmetrypolarizationorbitaleffectInAsnanowire
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper claims that ordinary Rashba quantum wires can filter electron spins without magnetism, magnetic contacts, or dephasing, provided the two right-moving channel states at the Fermi energy have non-collinear spin directions. It shows analytically that when such non-collinear states propagate coherently through the wire, unpolarized incoming electrons acquire a nonzero average outgoing spin polarization. The paper then identifies how to engineer this condition: adding a pseudospin degree of freedom, such as a subband, orbital, or valley index, to a Rashba-coupled system makes the channel spins non-collinear. Model calculations for two-subband InAs nanowires and for oxide nanowires with orbital Rashba coupling predict net spin polarizations of order 10 percent.

What carries the argument

The key object is the pair of right-moving Fermi-level states with non-collinear spin directions, parameterized by the polar angle alpha and azimuthal angle beta between their spin vectors. Coherent propagation through the wire gives the two channels momentum-dependent phases e^{ik1x} and e^{ik2x}; the resulting relative phase makes the transmitted superposition spin-dependent, and averaging over all incoming spin directions leaves a nonzero mean spin polarization whenever alpha is not pi. In the concrete designs, non-collinearity is engineered by a pseudospin channel: an intersubband mixing term proportional to S_x tau_y in two-subband InAs nanowires, and an orbital Rashba coupling k_x L_y

What would settle it

Measure the transmitted spin polarization of an unpolarized, zero-magnetic-field current through a ballistic two-subband InAs nanowire with the paper's parameters (10 micrometer length, Fermi energy 2.5 meV above the upper Kramers doublet). If the outgoing polarization is zero, or if a control device with collinear channel spins gives the same result, the non-collinearity mechanism is contradicted.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that spin-selective transport in time-reversal-symmetric one-dimensional systems does not require phase decoherence: it follows from the non-collinearity of same-velocity spin states at the Fermi level. For two right-moving channel states with relative spin angle alpha, unpolarized electrons acquire a net outgoing spin polarization whenever alpha is not pi, because the coherent superposition of the two channels inside the wire produces interference that biases the transmitted spin. The antiparallel case alpha = pi, which is the only case realized in a single-mode Rashba wire, gives exactly zero average polarization. By coupling the spin to a pseudospin degree of freedom,

Load-bearing premise

Electrons must traverse the wire with a fixed relative phase between the two channel states; dephasing removes the interference term that produces the spin polarization.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Two-subband InAs nanowires with realistic parameters and length near 10 micrometers should transmit unpolarized currents with a net spin polarization of about 10 percent.
  • Oxide nanowires can show comparable spin filtering even when atomic spin-orbit coupling is only a few meV, so heavy elements are not required.
  • Spin selectivity can occur at zero magnetic field and without time-reversal symmetry breaking, contradicting the older view that a single-mode Rashba wire cannot filter spins.
  • The strength of the effect is tunable through Rashba coupling, intersubband or interorbital mixing, crystal-field parameters, and Fermi-level position.
  • The mechanism gives a general design principle: any Rashba-coupled one-dimensional system with an additional valley, sublattice, or orbital degree of freedom is a candidate spin filter.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A direct experimental signature would be a wire-length dependence of the transmitted spin polarization through the (k1 - k2)d phase; measuring this oscillation would separate the coherent mechanism from dephasing-assisted spin selectivity, which the paper explicitly does not invoke.
  • The same non-collinearity condition should apply to multi-valley nanowires, carbon nanotubes with valley degeneracy, or other pseudospin-bearing one-dimensional conductors, suggesting testable analogues outside semiconductor and oxide platforms.
  • Because the polarization depends on the relative phase accumulated between channels, gating or strain that shifts the Rashba splitting could modulate the spin filter in situ, pointing toward a voltage-controlled spin valve.
  • The analytic results assume a fixed Fermi energy and ballistic, coherent transport; at finite temperature or in the presence of inelastic scattering, the interference contribution will partially average out, so the room-temperature magnitude of the effect remains an open quantitative question.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper claims that Rashba quantum wires with multiple occupied channels generically exhibit spin-selective transport whenever the two right-moving states at the Fermi level have non-collinear spins (relative angle α ≠ π). The authors argue that this condition can be engineered by coupling the spin to a pseudospin degree of freedom (subband, orbital, or valley), and they demonstrate it analytically in a two-channel perfect-transmission model and numerically for two-subband InAs nanowires and oxide nanowires with orbital Rashba coupling. The central quantitative claim is a spin polarization of about 10% for realistic parameters, without invoking dephasing or broken time-reversal symmetry.

Significance. If correct, this would be an important mechanism for spin filtering in conventional time-reversal-symmetric one-dimensional systems, complementary to dephasing-based proposals and distinct from topological edge-state filtering. The paper gives a clean analytic derivation in the perfect-transmission limit (SM Eqs. S1–S9), showing that a uniform angular average of the outgoing spin is zero for α = π and nonzero otherwise. The parameters are taken from the literature or chosen illustratively; no parameter is fitted to the target polarization, which is a strength. However, the quantitative predictions in the scattering calculations rest on a nonstandard definition of the transmitted spin polarization that is not equivalent to the physical current spin polarization unless transmission probabilities are equal.

major comments (2)
  1. [Supplemental Material, Eqs. (S20) and (S27)] The average outgoing spin is computed as (S↑ + S↓)/2, i.e., equal weights for the two initial spin channels, without weighting by transmission probability. For an unpolarized current injected from a lead, equal currents enter the up and down channels, but the transmitted currents are proportional to T↑ and T↓, so the physical spin polarization of the transmitted electron stream is (T↑ S↑ + T↓ S↓)/(T↑ + T↓). Time-reversal symmetry does not guarantee T↑ = T↓ in this two-terminal geometry; it relates left-to-right transmission for one spin to right-to-left transmission for the opposite spin. Since the numerical matching conditions in Eq. (S18) include reflections, Tσ can be spin-dependent. The paper does not report Tσ or use the weighted expression. Consequently, the claimed 10–20% polarizations in Figs. 3 and 4 are not established as the polarization of an unpolarized transmitted current.
  2. [Supplemental Material, Eqs. (S19)–(S20) and Fig. 3(b)] The transmitted spin is defined as the normalized local expectation value S_i(x) of the scattering wavefunction in the drain. Because the drain has multiple subbands with different wavevectors, this quantity oscillates with position, as visible in Fig. 3(b). The value at a particular x is not the current spin polarization that would be measured in a two-terminal transport experiment. The relation between S_i(x) and a measurable observable (e.g., spin-resolved conductance, or a spatial average over the drain) is not specified. This ambiguity affects the quantitative predictions in Fig. 3(c) and Fig. 4(b); the authors should define the measured quantity and justify the choice of x (or the averaging procedure).
minor comments (3)
  1. [Main text, Fig. 3(c)] The subband weight ρ2/ρ1 is treated as a tunable parameter in Fig. 3(c), but in Eq. (S20) ρ1 and ρ2 are fixed by the lead wavevectors. The physical interpretation of varying ρ2/ρ1 (e.g., tuning the Fermi energy or a barrier) should be explained.
  2. [Main text, Abstract/Fig. 3 caption] The text says the spin polarization 'can exceed 20% of its maximum possible amplitude' and the abstract says 'up to 10%'. These statements are presumably consistent if the latter refers to a dimensionless polarization of 0.1, but the relation should be stated explicitly to avoid confusion.
  3. [Supplemental Material, Eq. (S21)] The notation δ^{A,II} for the Kronecker delta is easy to confuse with the crystal-field parameters δ_x, δ_y, δ_z introduced later in the oxide model. Using a different symbol (e.g., η^{A,II}) would improve clarity.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: spin selectivity is computed from explicit scattering solutions of independently stated model Hamiltonians; self-citations are contextual and not load-bearing.

full rationale

The paper's central claim is a derived transport result, not a restatement of its inputs. In the analytic perfect-transmission model (Supplemental Eqs. S1–S9), the incoming spin states are parameterized over the full Bloch sphere, the two right-moving channel states are given explicitly with relative angle α, and the transmitted spin is obtained by solving the boundary-value problem (Eqs. S5–S6). The vanishing of the angular-averaged outgoing spin for α=π and its generic non-zero value for α≠π follow from the explicit amplitudes in Eq. S6 and the solid-angle integration in Eq. S9; this is a calculation, not a definition. For the InAs and oxide nanowire models, the Hamiltonians (Eqs. 1, S15, S25) are constructed from independent microscopic considerations (confinement, tight-binding, orbital Rashba), and the spin non-collinearity is diagnosed from the band structure before the transport problem is solved by wavefunction and derivative matching (Eqs. S17–S18, S26). No parameter is fitted to reproduce the target spin polarization; model parameters are taken from literature or chosen for illustration. The self-citations (Refs. 26–28, 50) appear in the introduction/orbital-Rashba context and are not used to justify the central mechanism. The equal-weight spin averaging in Eqs. S20 and S27 is a modeling convention for the reported observable rather than a fitted input, so it does not make the prediction circular; it could be a physical correctness concern, but that is outside the circularity assessment. The coherence of the transport is an explicit assumption of the setup, not a hidden circular step.

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no new particles or fundamental constants. It relies on standard condensed matter models and material parameters from literature; the only hand-chosen numbers are model parameters for illustration, not fitted to reproduce the predicted spin polarization.

free parameters (5)
  • Oxide crystal field splittings delta_x, delta_y, delta_z = -0.2 epsilon0, -0.2 epsilon0, 0.3 epsilon0
    Chosen to realize a specific orbital ordering in the oxide nanowire; the spin polarization magnitude depends on these values.
  • InAs Rashba coupling alpha_R = 10 meV*nm
    Taken from literature (Ref [40]) as a typical InAs value; not fitted to the target spin polarization.
  • InAs effective mass parameter nu = 0.04
    Material parameter from literature; used in the two-subband model.
  • InAs subband gap Delta E = 1.6 meV (d_y=130 nm)
    Determined by the chosen transverse confinement width; affects the intersubband mixing.
  • Wire length d_x = 10 um (InAs), 1 um (oxide)
    Set for the scattering simulations; the spin polarization is strongly length-dependent.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption The two-subband projection of a 2D Rashba gas with hard-wall confinement accurately captures the low-energy physics of the InAs nanowire.
    Used in the SM to derive Eq. (S15); neglects higher subbands and non-parabolicity.
  • domain assumption The oxide nanowire is described by an L=1 orbital model with orbital Rashba coupling, atomic spin-orbit coupling, and crystal fields.
    Based on literature (Refs 43,47-49); the specific parameter values are chosen for illustration.
  • domain assumption Leads are spin-orbit free and parabolic.
    The spin polarization is defined relative to the lead spin basis; realistic leads with SOC would alter the result.
  • domain assumption Transport is coherent and ballistic throughout the wire.
    The mechanism relies on a definite phase between channel states; dephasing would suppress the interference contribution.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Spin selectivity induced by non-collinear spins in Rashba wires." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/IN7BZJWZ

@misc{pith2026260800599,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Spin selectivity induced by non-collinear spins in Rashba wires},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/IN7BZJWZ}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.00599}
}
read the original abstract

We report a previously overlooked general mechanism to obtain highly efficient spin selectivity in conventional time-reversal symmetric one-dimensional systems without invoking phase decoherence. We reveal that Rashba quantum wires featuring non-collinear spin states at the Fermi level inherently possess spin-selective transport properties. We show that this spin noncollinearity can be systematically designed and engineered by introducing an additional pseudospin degree of freedom - such as valley, sublattice, or orbital angular momentum - into spin-orbit coupled systems. By applying this framework to multi-subband semiconducting quantum wires and oxide nanowires, we establish a generalized route toward quantum-coherent spin selectivity up to 10 %. Our findings offer practical design principles for spin-selective transport devices.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2608.00599 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Spin polarization acquired by unpolarized electrons perfectly transmitted through a Rashba wire with non-collinear [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Spin selectivity in an electron–hole wire with Rashba spin-orbit coupling. (a) Energy band dispersion assuming model [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. Spin selectivity in a two-subband InAs nanowire. (a) Energy dispersion for the model Hamiltonian Eq.(1). (b) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Non-collinear spins and spin selectivity in an oxide nanowire with orbital Rashba and spin-orbit coupling. The nanowire [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

58 extracted references · 41 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Matsukura, Y

    F. Matsukura, Y. Tokura, and H. Ohno, Control of mag- netism by electric fields, Nature Nanotechnology10, 209 (2015)

    2015

  2. [2]

    The bottom of the band has been set at 0.51 meV below the Kramers’ doublet of the lowest-energy InAs subband. FIG. 4. Non-collinear spins and spin selectivity in an oxide nanowire with orbital Rashba and spin-orbit coupling. The nanowire is modelled by the HamiltonianH=Ak 2 x +α ORkx ˆLy +λ ˆL· ˆS+δ x ˆL2 x +δ y ˆL2 y +δ z ˆL2 z with ˆLx,y,z theL= 1 angul...

    work page 2022

  3. [3]

    M. I. D’Yakonov and V. I. Perel’, Possibility of orienting electron spins with current, Soviet Journal of Experimen- tal and Theoretical Physics Letters13, 467 (1971)

    work page 1971

  4. [4]

    Manchon, J

    A. Manchon, J. Zelezny, I. M. Miron, T. Jungwirth, J. Sinova, A. Thiaville, K. Garello, and P. Gambardella, Current-induced spin-orbit torques in ferromagnetic and antiferromagnetic systems, Reviews of Modern Physics 91, 035004 (2019)

    work page 2019

  5. [5]

    S. O. Valenzuela and M. Tinkham, Direct electronic mea- surement of the spin Hall effect, Nature442, 176 (2006)

    2006

  6. [6]

    J. E. Hirsch, Spin Hall effect, Phys. Rev. Lett.83, 1834 (1999)

    1999

  7. [7]

    Y. K. Kato, R. C. Myers, A. C. Gossard, and D. D. Awschalom, Current-induced spin polarization in strained semiconductors, Physical Review Letters93, 176601 (2004)

    work page 2004

  8. [8]

    V. M. Edelstein, Spin polarization of conduction elec- trons induced by electric current in two-dimensional asymmetric electron systems, Solid State Communica- tions73, 233 (1990)

    1990

Show all 58 references
  1. [9]

    Varotto, A

    S. Varotto, A. Johansson, B. G¨ obel, L. M. Vicente-Arche, S. Mallik, J. Br´ ehin, R. Salazar, F. Bertran, P. L. F´ evre, N. Bergeal, J. Rault, I. Mertig, and M. Bibes, Direct vi- sualization of Rashba-split bands and spin/orbital-charge interconversion at KTaO 3 interfaces, N...

    2022

  2. [10]

    J. C. R. S´ anchez, L. Vila, G. Desfonds, S. Gambarelli, J. P. Attan´ e, J. M. De Teresa, C. Mag´ en, and A. Fert, Spin-to-charge conversion using Rashba coupling at the interface between non-magnetic materials, Nature Com- munications4, 2944 (2013)

    2013

  3. [11]

    Tanaka, H

    T. Tanaka, H. Kontani, M. Naito, T. Naito, D. S. Hi- rashima, K. Yamada, and J. Inoue, Intrinsic spin Hall effect and orbital Hall effect in 4dand 5dtransition met- als, Phys. Rev. B77, 165117 (2008)

    2008

  4. [12]

    Soumyanarayanan, N

    A. Soumyanarayanan, N. Reyren, A. Fert, and C. Panagopoulos, Emergent phenomena induced by spin– orbit coupling at surfaces and interfaces, Nature539, 509 (2016)

    2016

  5. [13]

    D. Go, D. Jo, C. Kim, and H.-W. Lee, Intrinsic spin and orbital Hall effects from orbital texture, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 086602 (2018)

    2018

  6. [14]

    Kontani, T

    H. Kontani, T. Tanaka, D. S. Hirashima, K. Yamada, and J. Inoue, Giant orbital Hall effect in transition metals: Origin of large spin and anomalous Hall effects, Phys. Rev. Lett.102, 016601 (2009)

    2009

  7. [15]

    G. Sala, H. Wang, W. Legrand, and P. Gambardella, Or- bital hanle magnetoresistance in a 3dtransition metal, Phys. Rev. Lett.131, 156703 (2023)

    2023

  8. [16]

    T. P. Cysne, S. Bhowal, G. Vignale, and T. G. Rap- poport, Orbital Hall effect in bilayer transition metal dichalcogenides: From the intra-atomic approximation to the bloch states orbital magnetic moment approach, Phys. Rev. B105, 195421 (2022)

    2022

  9. [17]

    Y.-G. Choi, D. Jo, K.-H. Ko, D. Go, K.-H. Kim, H. G. Park, C. Kim, B.-C. Min, G.-M. Choi, and H.-W. Lee, Observation of the orbital Hall effect in a light metal Ti, Nature619, 52 (2023)

    2023

  10. [18]

    Lyalin, S

    I. Lyalin, S. Alikhah, M. Berritta, P. M. Oppeneer, and R. K. Kawakami, Magneto-optical detection of the orbital Hall effect in chromium, Phys. Rev. Lett.131, 156702 (2023)

    2023

  11. [19]

    Johansson, B

    A. Johansson, B. G¨ obel, J. Henk, M. Bibes, and I. Mer- tig, Spin and orbital edelstein effects in a two-dimensional electron gas: Theory and application to SrTiO 3 inter- faces, Phys. Rev. Res.3, 013275 (2021)

    2021

  12. [20]

    T. Yoda, T. Yokoyama, and S. Murakami, Orbital edel- 7 stein effect as a condensed-matter analog of solenoids, Nano Letters18, 916–920 (2018)

    2018

  13. [21]

    Salemi, M

    L. Salemi, M. Berritta, A. K. Nandy, and P. M. Op- peneer, Orbitally dominated Rashba-Edelstein effect in noncentrosymmetric antiferromagnets, Nature Commu- nications10, 5381 (2019)

    2019

  14. [22]

    Go, J.-P

    D. Go, J.-P. Hanke, P. M. Buhl, F. Freimuth, G. Bihlmayer, H.-W. Lee, Y. Mokrousov, and S. Bl¨ ugel, Toward surface orbitronics: giant orbital magnetism from the orbital Rashba effect at the surface of sp-metals, Sci- entific Reports7, 46742 (2017)

    2017

  15. [23]

    Gaiardoni, M

    I. Gaiardoni, M. Trama, A. Maiellaro, C. Guarcello, F. Romeo, and R. Citro, Boltzmann theory of the in- verse edelstein effect in a two-dimensional rashba gas, Phys. Rev. B113, 195419 (2026)

    2026

  16. [24]

    Chirolli, M

    L. Chirolli, M. T. Mercaldo, C. Guarcello, F. Giazotto, and M. Cuoco, Colossal orbital Edelstein effect in non- centrosymmetric superconductors, Phys. Rev. Lett.128, 217703 (2022)

    2022

  17. [25]

    Adamantopoulos, M

    T. Adamantopoulos, M. Merte, D. Go, F. Freimuth, S. Bl¨ ugel, and Y. Mokrousov, Orbital Rashba effect as a platform for robust orbital photocurrents, Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 076901 (2024)

    2024

  18. [26]

    El Hamdi, J.-Y

    A. El Hamdi, J.-Y. Chauleau, M. Boselli, C. Thibault, C. Gorini, A. Smogunov, C. Barreteau, S. Gariglio, J.- M. Triscone, and M. Viret, Observation of the orbital inverse Rashba-Edelstein effect, Nature Physics19, 1855 (2023)

    2023

  19. [27]

    Lesne, Y

    E. Lesne, Y. G. Saˇ glam, R. Battilomo, M. T. Mercaldo, T. C. van Thiel, U. Filippozzi, C. Noce, M. Cuoco, G. A. Steele, C. Ortix, and A. D. Caviglia, Designing spin and orbital sources of Berry curvature at oxide interfaces, Na- ture Materials22, 576 (2023)

    2023

  20. [28]

    L. J. D’Onofrio, M. T. Mercaldo, W. Brzezicki, A. K losi´ nski, F. Mazzola, C. Ortix, and M. Cuoco, Filter- ing spin and orbital moment in centrosymmetric systems, Phys. Rev. B112, 085428 (2025)

    2025

  21. [29]

    K. Ray, S. P. Ananthavel, D. H. Waldeck, and R. Naa- man, Asymmetric scattering of polarized electrons by or- ganized organic films of chiral molecules, Science283, 814 (1999)

    1999

  22. [30]

    M. T. Mercaldo, C. Noce, A. D. Caviglia, M. Cuoco, and C. Ortix, Orbital design of Berry curvature: pinch points and giant dipoles induced by crystal fields, npj Quantum Materials8, 12 (2023)

    2023

  23. [31]

    G¨ ohler, V

    B. G¨ ohler, V. Hamelbeck, T. Z. Markus, M. Kettner, G. F. Hanne, Z. Vager, R. Naaman, and H. Zacharias, Spin selectivity in electron transmission through self- assembled monolayers of double-stranded dna, Science 331, 894 (2011)

    2011

  24. [32]

    Naaman, Y

    R. Naaman, Y. Paltiel, and D. H. Waldeck, Chiral molecules and the electron spin, Nature Reviews Chem- istry3, 250 (2019)

    2019

  25. [33]

    Streda and P

    P. Streda and P. Seba, Antisymmetric spin filtering in one-dimensional electron systems with uniform spin-orbit coupling, Phys. Rev. Lett.90, 256601 (2003)

    2003

  26. [34]

    Naaman, Y

    R. Naaman, Y. Paltiel, and D. H. Waldeck, Chiral molecules and the spin selectivity effect, The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters11, 3660 (2020)

    2020

  27. [35]

    Debald and B

    S. Debald and B. Kramer, Rashba effect and magnetic field in semiconductor quantum wires, Physical Review B71, 115322 (2005)

    2005

  28. [36]

    Y. V. Pershin, J. A. Nesteroff, and V. Privman, Effect of spin-orbit interaction and in-plane magnetic field on the conductance of a quasi-one-dimensional system, Physical Review B69, 121306(R) (2004)

    2004

  29. [37]

    Guo and Q.-F

    A.-M. Guo and Q.-F. Sun, Spin-dependent electron transport in protein-like single-helical molecules, Pro- ceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America111, 11658 (2014)

    2014

  30. [38]

    Guo and Q

    A.-M. Guo and Q. feng Sun, Spin-selective transport of electrons in dna double helix, Physical Review Letters 108, 218102 (2012)

    2012

  31. [39]

    J. Liu, T. H. Hsieh, P. Wei, W. Duan, J. S. Moodera, and L. Fu, Spin-filtered edge states with an electrically tunable gap in a two-dimensional topological crystalline insulator, Nature Materials13, 178 (2014)

    2014

  32. [40]

    We find [see Fig

    and a transversal size of the quasi-one-dimensional channeld y = 130 nm. We find [see Fig. 3(a)] that the parabolic behavior of the subbands is substantially al- tered at finite momenta with the presence of avoided level crossings where the electronic states have a mixed sub- ...

  33. [41]

    B¨ uttiker, Role of quantum coherence in series resis- tors, Phys

    M. B¨ uttiker, Role of quantum coherence in series resis- tors, Phys. Rev. B33, 3020 (1986)

    1986

  34. [42]

    T. D. Stanescu, R. M. Lutchyn, and S. Das Sarma, Ma- jorana fermions in semiconductor nanowires, Phys. Rev. B84, 144522 (2011)

    2011

  35. [43]

    Z. S. Popovi´ c, S. Satpathy, and R. M. Martin, Origin of the two-dimensional electron gas carrier density at the laalo3 on srtio 3 interface, Physical Review Letters101, 256801 (2008)

    2008

  36. [44]

    Salluzzo, J

    M. Salluzzo, J. C. Cezar, N. B. Brookes, V. Bisogni, G. M. De Luca, C. Richter, S. Thiel, J. Mannhart, M. Huijben, A. Brinkman, and G. Ghiringhelli, Orbital reconstruction and the two-dimensional electron gas at the laalo3/srtio3 interface, Physical Review Letters102, 166804 (2009)

    2009

  37. [45]

    Khalsa, B

    G. Khalsa, B. Lee, and A. H. MacDonald, Theory oft 2g electron-gas rashba interactions, Phys. Rev. B88, 041302 (2013)

    2013

  38. [46]

    C. Cen, S. Thiel, G. Hammerl, C. W. Schneider, K. E. Andersen, C. S. Hellberg, J. Mannhart, and J. Levy, Nanoscale control of an interfacial metal–insulator tran- sition at room temperature, Nature Materials7, 298 (2008)

    2008

  39. [47]

    C. Cen, S. Thiel, J. Mannhart, and J. Levy, Oxide nano- electronics on demand, Science323, 1026 (2009)

    2009

  40. [48]

    Barthelemy, N

    A. Barthelemy, N. Bergeal, M. Bibes, A. D. Caviglia, R. Citro, M. Cuoco, A. Kalaboukhov, B. Kalisky, C. A. Perroni, J. Santamaria, D. Stornaiuolo, and M. Salluzzo, Quasi-two-dimensional electron gas at the oxide inter- faces for topological quantum physics, EPL (Europhysics Le...

    2021

  41. [49]

    S. R. Park, C. H. Kim, J. Yu, J. H. Han, and C. Kim, Orbital-angular-momentum based origin of Rashba -type surface band splitting, Phys. Rev. Lett.107, 156803 (2011)

    2011

  42. [50]

    J.-H. Park, C. H. Kim, J.-W. Rhim, and J. H. Han, Or- bital Rashba effect and its detection by circular dichroism angle-resolved photoemission spectroscopy, Phys. Rev. B 85, 195401 (2012)

    2012

  43. [51]

    P. Kim, K. T. Kang, G. Go, and J. H. Han, Nature of orbital and spin rashba coupling in the surface bands of SrTiO3 and KTaO3, Phys. Rev. B90, 205423 (2014)

    2014

  44. [52]

    M. T. Mercaldo, P. Solinas, F. Giazotto, and M. Cuoco, Electrically tunable superconductivity through surface orbital polarization, Phys. Rev. Applied14, 034041 (2020)

    2020

  45. [53]

    D. Go, D. Jo, C. Kim, and H.-W. Lee, Intrinsic spin 8 and orbital hall effects from orbital-dependent band ge- ometric properties, Physical Review Letters121, 086602 (2018)

    2018

  46. [54]

    D. Go, D. Jo, T. Gao, K. Ando, S. Bl¨ ugel, A. Manchon, and H.-W. Lee, Orbital rashba effect in a surface-oxidized cu thin film, Nature Communications12, 4964 (2021)

    2021

  47. [55]

    A. D. Caviglia, M. Gabay, S. Gariglio, N. Reyren, C. Can- cellieri, and J.-M. Triscone, Tunable rashba spin-orbit interaction at oxide interfaces, Physical Review Letters 104, 126803 (2010)

    2010

  48. [56]

    T. Ren, M. Li, X. Sun, L. Ju, Y. Liu, S. Hong, Y. Sun, Q. Tao, Y. Zhou, Z.-A. Xu, and Y. Xie, Two-dimensional superconductivity at the surfaces of ktao 3 gated with ionic liquid, Science Advances8, eabn4273 (2022). 9 Supplemental Material: Spin selectivity induced by non-colli...

    2022

  49. [57]

    andρ 2 =k I 2/(kI 1 +k I 2), respectively. As a consequence,    S↑ i (x) =ρ 1Si(x, φ1 in) +ρ 2Si(x, φ2 in) S↓ i (x) =ρ 1Si(x, φ3 in) +ρ 2Si(x, φ4 in) ¯Si(x) = S↑ i (x) +S ↓ i (x) 2 .(S20) In particular, ¯Sout i = ¯Si(x≥d x/2). For numerical implementation, we cast all t...

  50. [58]

    (withk 0d0 = 1). Thus, HA(kx) ϵ0 = ¯aA¯k2 x + 2δA,II( ¯αR¯kx ˆSy −¯γR ˆSx ˆτy) + ¯EA 1,y − ¯EA 2,y 2 ! ˆτz + ¯EA 1,y + ¯EA 2,y 2 ,(S21) whereδ A,II is the Kronecker delta, and the dimensionless quantities are defined as ¯kx = kx k0 ,¯a A = aAk2 0 ϵ0 ,¯α R = αRk0 ϵ0 ,¯γ R = αRβ...

Pith tools

Reviewed August 5, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.