pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.19124 · v1 · pith:IPTD3W3Tnew · submitted 2026-05-18 · ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci · cond-mat.dis-nn· cs.LG· physics.chem-ph

Atomistic Modeling of Chemical Disorder in Materials: Bridging Classical Methods and AI-Assisted Approaches

Jiayu Peng , Peichen Zhong This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-20 08:30 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci cond-mat.dis-nncs.LGphysics.chem-ph
keywords chemical disorderatomistic modelingAI-assisted materials discoverycluster expansionMonte Carlogenerative modelsconfigurational ensemblesdisorder-native AI
0
0 comments X

The pith

Chemical disorder can be turned from a representational obstacle into a controllable variable in AI-driven materials discovery by bridging classical methods with AI techniques.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This review tackles the mismatch between how experiments report chemical disorder through partial occupancies and averaged properties and how atomistic simulations plus AI models require explicit atomic arrangements. It surveys classical tools such as mean-field theories, cluster expansions, quasi-random structures, and Monte Carlo sampling that generate representative configurational ensembles from averaged data while weighing computational cost against bias and accuracy. The paper then shows how AI elements like universal interatomic potentials and generative models can speed up these classical steps and introduce new capabilities such as ordering-sensitive representations and kinetics-aware disorder modeling. A sympathetic reader would care because ignoring disorder in AI workflows can lead to incorrect stability rankings, overlooked novel compositions, and misguided experimental targets. The overall argument is that these combined approaches create a practical path to disorder-native AI that treats mixed atomic occupations as a tunable design feature rather than an approximation error.

Core claim

The paper establishes that classical statistical methods including mean-field theories, cluster expansion, quasi-random approximations, and Monte Carlo sampling can be integrated with AI accelerations such as universal interatomic potentials and generative models to convert experimental partial-occupancy descriptions of chemical disorder into representative atomic ensembles, while AI further enables workflow triage, alchemical representations, generative sampling of disordered structures, and kinetics-aware predictions, thereby outlining a roadmap that makes disorder a controllable input for realistic AI-accelerated materials discovery.

What carries the argument

The conversion of averaged disorder descriptions (partial occupancies and ensemble averages) into representative configurational ensembles, achieved by balancing cost, bias, and fidelity across classical and AI-driven schemes.

If this is right

  • AI materials screening will rank compound stability more accurately once disorder ensembles replace single average structures.
  • Generative models will produce libraries of disordered configurations suitable for training data in compositionally complex systems.
  • Workflows will incorporate ordering-sensitive and alchemical representations that capture how local atomic arrangements affect global properties.
  • Kinetics-aware models will predict how disorder evolves under processing conditions rather than assuming static averages.
  • Disorder becomes a design variable that can be optimized alongside composition and structure in automated discovery loops.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same ensemble-generation logic could be applied to defect or vacancy disorder to improve modeling of non-stoichiometric compounds.
  • Direct experimental validation could come from comparing neutron or X-ray diffuse scattering patterns against simulated ensembles generated by the reviewed methods.
  • High-entropy alloys and ceramics would be a natural test bed where the cost savings from AI-accelerated sampling become especially visible.
  • Neighboring challenges such as modeling surface segregation or grain-boundary disorder might adopt analogous disorder-native representations.

Load-bearing premise

Classical methods combined with emerging AI schemes can sufficiently balance cost, bias, and fidelity when converting averaged disorder into representative ensembles for AI workflows.

What would settle it

A side-by-side test in which AI discovery pipelines using disorder ensembles produce stability rankings or property predictions that match experimental measurements more closely than pipelines using idealized average structures would support the framework; systematic failure to improve agreement would undermine it.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.19124 by Jiayu Peng, Peichen Zhong.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Conceptual distinction and coupling between chemical and structural disorder. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Comparing thermodynamic, experimental, and computational perspectives on chemical disorder. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Selected milestones in the development of computational methods for modeling chemically disordered [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Conceptual differences among classical atomistic simulation methods for modeling chemical disorder. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Representative applications of classical atomistic simulation methods for modeling chemical disorder. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p028_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: ML as an accelerator for established atomistic and thermodynamic formalisms for disorder modeling. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p039_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: ML as an enabler of disorder-native capabilities beyond conventional atomistic simulation workflows. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p048_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Grand challenges and future directions for AI-powered modeling of chemically disordered materials. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p057_8.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Chemical disorder, originating from the mixed occupation of crystallographic sites by multiple elements, is widespread in alloys, ceramics, and compositionally complex materials, where short- and long-range orderings can strongly influence properties. A central obstacle is the representation gap between experiments and simulations: experiments often report disorder as partial occupancies and ensemble-averaged behaviors, whereas atomistic simulations and AI workflows usually require fully specified configurations. Tackling this gap requires computational methods that convert averaged disorder descriptions into representative configurational ensembles while balancing cost, bias, and fidelity. This challenge has become more urgent in AI-driven computational discovery, where ignoring disorder may cause AI workflows to misrank stability, misjudge novelty, and misdirect experiments with too-idealized representations. This Review highlights how classical and AI-driven methods can bridge this representation gap. We assess the strengths and limitations of approaches spanning mean-field theories, cluster expansion, quasi-random approximations, Monte Carlo, and emerging schemes powered by universal interatomic potentials and generative models. We further highlight how AI can accelerate classical computational schemes by lowering the cost of microstate evaluation, configurational exploration, and atomistic-to-thermodynamic closure. We also emphasize how AI can enable disorder-native capabilities, including workflow triage, ordering-sensitive and alchemical representations, generative models of disordered structures and distributions, and kinetics-aware disorder prediction. Together, this framework outlines a practical roadmap toward disorder-native AI, which can transform chemical disorder from a representational obstacle into a controllable variable for realistic AI-accelerated materials discovery.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 1 minor

Summary. This review synthesizes classical and AI-assisted methods for representing chemical disorder in materials such as alloys and ceramics. It identifies the representation gap between experimental partial occupancies (ensemble-averaged) and the explicit atomic configurations required by atomistic simulations and AI workflows. The manuscript assesses mean-field theories, cluster expansion, quasi-random approximations, Monte Carlo sampling, universal interatomic potentials, and generative models, while outlining how AI can accelerate microstate evaluation, configurational exploration, and enable disorder-native features including ordering-sensitive representations and kinetics-aware predictions. The central claim is a practical roadmap toward disorder-native AI that treats chemical disorder as a controllable variable rather than an obstacle in materials discovery.

Significance. If the roadmap holds, the work could meaningfully advance realistic AI-accelerated materials discovery by reducing misranking of stability and novelty that arises from overly idealized, disorder-free representations. Strengths include the balanced assessment of cost-bias-fidelity trade-offs across classical and emerging methods, explicit discussion of AI acceleration of classical schemes, and the forward-looking emphasis on generative models and alchemical representations. The synthesis provides a coherent framework that connects established techniques with new AI capabilities without introducing unsupported derivations.

minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract and introduction could benefit from a brief table or enumerated list summarizing the classical methods and their AI counterparts to improve scannability for readers.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their positive and constructive review. We are pleased that the assessment recognizes the manuscript's balanced treatment of classical and AI-assisted methods, the explicit discussion of cost-bias-fidelity trade-offs, and the forward-looking emphasis on generative models and disorder-native AI capabilities. The recommendation to accept is appreciated, and we believe the synthesis provides a coherent framework connecting established techniques with emerging AI approaches.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; review synthesizes external methods without self-referential derivations

full rationale

This is a review paper outlining existing classical and AI-assisted approaches to chemical disorder without presenting original derivations, equations, or predictions. The abstract and structure emphasize synthesis of prior literature (mean-field theories, cluster expansion, Monte Carlo, generative models) to bridge representation gaps, with the roadmap claim resting on external methods rather than any fitted parameter renamed as prediction or self-citation chain. No load-bearing step reduces by construction to the paper's own inputs, satisfying the criteria for a self-contained review with independent content from cited sources.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Review paper based on abstract only; no new free parameters, axioms, or invented entities are introduced by the authors.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5818 in / 910 out tokens · 42309 ms · 2026-05-20T08:30:47.973207+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

  • IndisputableMonolith/Cost/FunctionalEquation.lean washburn_uniqueness_aczel unclear
    ?
    unclear

    Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

    This Review highlights how classical and AI-driven methods can bridge this representation gap... spanning mean-field theories, cluster expansion, quasi-random approximations, Monte Carlo, and emerging schemes powered by universal interatomic potentials and generative models.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

300 extracted references · 300 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    Simonov and A

    A. Simonov and A. L. Goodwin,Nat. Rev. Chem., 2020,4, 657–673

    work page 2020

  2. [2]

    F. C. Nix and W. Shockley,Rev. Mod. Phys., 1938,10, 1–71

    work page 1938

  3. [3]

    J. Peng, J. Damewood and R. G ´omez-Bombarelli,Cell Rep. Phys. Sci., 2024,5, 101942

    work page 2024

  4. [4]

    S. D. Young, J. Chen, W. Sun, B. R. Goldsmith and G. Pilania,Chem. Mater ., 2023,35, 5975–5987

    work page 2023

  5. [5]

    Zhang, J

    X. Zhang, J. Kang and S.-H. Wei,Nat. Comput. Sci., 2023,3, 210–220

    work page 2023

  6. [6]

    L. Han, S. Zhu, Z. Rao, C. Scheu, D. Ponge, A. Ludwig, H. Zhang, O. Gutfleisch, H. Hahn, Z. Li and D. Raabe,Nat. Rev. Mater ., 2024,9, 846–865

    work page 2024

  7. [7]

    Hsu, C.-W

    W.-L. Hsu, C.-W. Tsai, A.-C. Yeh and J.-W. Yeh,Nat. Rev. Chem., 2024,8, 471–485

    work page 2024

  8. [8]

    Ding,Nat

    J. Ding,Nat. Rev. Mater ., 2026,11, 82–83

    work page 2026

  9. [9]

    S. Kang, S. Lee, H. Lee and Y .-M. Kang,Nat. Rev. Chem., 2024,8, 587–604

    work page 2024

  10. [10]

    Hirai,Chem

    D. Hirai,Chem. Mater ., 2026,38, 559–571

    work page 2026

  11. [11]

    K. Jun, Y . Chen, G. Wei, X. Yang and G. Ceder,Nat. Rev. Mater ., 2024,9, 887–905

    work page 2024

  12. [12]

    V . A. Mints, J. K. Pedersen, J. C. Olsen, M. K. Plenge, M. Arenz and J. Rossmeisl,J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2026,148, 4815–4825

    work page 2026

  13. [13]

    S. Chen, Z. H. Aitken, S. Pattamatta, Z. Wu, Z. G. Yu, D. J. Srolovitz, P. K. Liaw and Y .-W. Zhang,Nat. Commun., 2021,12, 4953

    work page 2021

  14. [14]

    Zhang, Y

    Y . Zhang, Y . N. Osetsky and W. J. Weber,Chem. Rev., 2022,122, 789–829

    work page 2022

  15. [15]

    Z. Lun, B. Ouyang, D.-H. Kwon, Y . Ha, E. E. Foley, T.-Y . Huang, Z. Cai, H. Kim, M. Balasubramanian, Y . Sun, J. Huang, Y . Tian, H. Kim, B. D. McCloskey, W. Yang, R. J. Cl´ement, H. Ji and G. Ceder,Nat. Mater ., 2021,20, 214–221

    work page 2021

  16. [16]

    Y . Zeng, B. Ouyang, J. Liu, Y .-W. Byeon, Z. Cai, L. J. Miara, Y . Wang and G. Ceder, Science, 2022,378, 1320–1324

    work page 2022

  17. [17]

    J. Peng, J. K. Damewood, J. Karaguesian, R. G´omez-Bombarelli and Y . Shao-Horn,Joule, 2021,5, 3069–3071

    work page 2021

  18. [18]

    J. Peng,J. Chem. Phys., 2025,163, 040902. 65

    work page 2025

  19. [19]

    K. C. Hass, R. J. Lempert and H. Ehrenreich,Phys. Rev. Lett., 1984,52, 77–80

    work page 1984

  20. [20]

    V . V . Sokolovskiy, V . D. Buchelnikov, M. A. Zagrebin, P. Entel, S. Sahoo and M. Ogura, Phys. Rev. B, 2012,86, 134418

    work page 2012

  21. [21]

    Moniri, Y

    S. Moniri, Y . Yang, J. Ding, Y . Yuan, J. Zhou, L. Yang, F. Zhu, Y . Liao, Y . Yao, L. Hu, P. Ercius and J. Miao,Nature, 2023,624, 564–569

    work page 2023

  22. [22]

    Hume-Rothery, R

    W. Hume-Rothery, R. Smallman and C. Haworth,The Structure of Metals and Alloys, Metals and Metallurgy Trust, London, 1969

    work page 1969

  23. [23]

    Zacharias and J

    M. Zacharias and J. Even,ACS Energy Lett., 2025,10, 5635–5643

    work page 2025

  24. [24]

    M. A. Pe ˜na and J. L. G. Fierro,Chem. Rev., 2001,101, 1981–2018

    work page 2001

  25. [25]

    Cheng and W

    Y .-T. Cheng and W. L. Johnson,Science, 1987,235, 997–1002

    work page 1987

  26. [26]

    H. Song, F. Tian, Q.-M. Hu, L. Vitos, Y . Wang, J. Shen and N. Chen,Phys. Rev. Mater ., 2017,1, 023404

    work page 2017

  27. [27]

    J. P. Barber, W. J. Deary, A. N. Titus, G. R. Bejger, S. S. I. Almishal and C. M. Rost, Mater . Horiz., 2025,12, 10453–10477

    work page 2025

  28. [28]

    D. A. Drabold,Eur . Phys. J. B, 2009,68, 1–21

    work page 2009

  29. [29]

    Biswas, D

    P. Biswas, D. N. Tafen, F. Inam, B. Cai and D. A. Drabold,J. Phys. Condens. Matter, 2009,21, 084207

    work page 2009

  30. [30]

    Berthier and G

    L. Berthier and G. Biroli,Rev. Mod. Phys., 2011,83, 587–645

    work page 2011

  31. [31]

    E. B. Jones and V . Stevanovi´c,npj Comput. Mater ., 2020,6, 56

    work page 2020

  32. [32]

    Berthier and D

    L. Berthier and D. R. Reichman,Nat. Rev. Phys., 2023,5, 102–116

    work page 2023

  33. [33]

    Y . Liu, A. Madanchi, A. S. Anker, L. Simine and V . L. Deringer,Nat. Rev. Mater ., 2025, 10, 228–241

    work page 2025

  34. [34]

    L. Wolf, A. Novick and V . Stevanovi´c,J. Appl. Phys., 2025,137, 095101

    work page 2025

  35. [35]

    Madanchi, E

    A. Madanchi, E. Azek, K. Zongo, L. K. B ´eland, N. Mousseau and L. Simine,ACS Phys. Chem. Au, 2025,5, 3–16

    work page 2025

  36. [36]

    Schlegel, S

    N. Schlegel, S. Punke, C. M. Clausen, U. Friis-Jensen, A. F. Sapnik, D. Stoian, O. Aalling- Frederiksen, D. Gautam, J. Rossmeisl, R. K. Pittkowski, M. Arenz and K. M. Ø. Jensen, Chem. Mater ., 2025,37, 939–953. 66

    work page 2025

  37. [37]

    B. C. Wyatt, Y . Yang, P. P. Michałowski, T. Parker, Y . Morency, F. Urban, G. Kadagishvili, M. Tanwar, S. P. Muhoza, S. K. Nemani, A. Bedford, H. Fang, Z. D. Hood, J. Jang, K. Kamath, B. G. Wright, R. Disko, A. Thakur, S. Han, N. Ghosh, X. Xu, Z. Fakhraai, Y . Gogotsi, A. V ojvodic, D.-e. Jiang and B. Anasori,Science, 2025,389, 1054–1058

    work page 2025

  38. [38]

    Huang, T

    Z. Huang, T. Li, B. Li, Q. Dong, J. Smith, S. Li, L. Xu, G. Wang, M. Chi and L. Hu,J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2024,146, 2167–2173

    work page 2024

  39. [39]

    L. M. V ogl, S. Chen, P. Schweizer, X. Jin, S.-Q. Yu, J. Liu, T. Li and A. M. Minor,Science, 2025,389, 1342–1346

    work page 2025

  40. [40]

    Y . P. Wang, B. S. Li and H. Z. Fu,Adv. Eng. Mater ., 2009,11, 641–644

    work page 2009

  41. [41]

    M. Cui, C. Yang, S. Hwang, M. Yang, S. Overa, Q. Dong, Y . Yao, A. H. Brozena, D. A. Cullen, M. Chi, T. F. Blum, D. Morris, Z. Finfrock, X. Wang, P. Zhang, V . G. Goncharov, X. Guo, J. Luo, Y . Mo, F. Jiao and L. Hu,Sci. Adv., 2022,8, eabm4322

    work page 2022

  42. [42]

    Wang, Q.-F

    H. Wang, Q.-F. He and Y . Yang,Rare Met., 2022,41, 1989–2001

    work page 2022

  43. [43]

    Liu and L

    Z. Liu and L. Zhang,J. Alloys Compd., 2024,981, 173716

    work page 2024

  44. [44]

    X. Chen, Q. Wang, Z. Cheng, M. Zhu, H. Zhou, P. Jiang, L. Zhou, Q. Xue, F. Yuan, J. Zhu, X. Wu and E. Ma,Nature, 2021,592, 712–716

    work page 2021

  45. [45]

    W. Chen, L. Li, Q. Zhu and H. Zhuang,MRS Bull., 2023,48, 762–768

    work page 2023

  46. [46]

    Z. Pei, Y . Gong, P. Singh, Y . Li, F. K¨ormann, Q. Xie, K. Wang, X. Wu, S. Mu, M. C. Gao, P. K. Liaw, Y . Tong, F. Zhang, Y . Wang and R. Li,Curr . Opin. Solid State Mater . Sci., 2026,41, 101254

    work page 2026

  47. [47]

    Ferrari, F

    A. Ferrari, F. K ¨ormann, M. Asta and J. Neugebauer,Nat. Comput. Sci., 2023,3, 221–229

    work page 2023

  48. [48]

    Ekborg-Tanner, P

    P. Ekborg-Tanner, P. Rosander, E. Fransson and P. Erhart,PRX Energy, 2024,3, 042001

    work page 2024

  49. [49]

    L. J. Santodonato, P. K. Liaw, R. R. Unocic, H. Bei and J. R. Morris,Nat. Commun., 2018, 9, 4520

    work page 2018

  50. [50]

    Brahlek, M

    M. Brahlek, M. Gazda, V . Keppens, A. R. Mazza, S. J. McCormack, A. Mielewczyk-Gry´n, B. Musico, K. Page, C. M. Rost, S. B. Sinnott, C. Toher, T. Z. Ward and A. Yamamoto, APL Mater ., 2022,10, 110902

    work page 2022

  51. [51]

    S. S. Aamlid, M. Oudah, J. Rottler and A. M. Hallas,J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2023,145, 5991–6006. 67

    work page 2023

  52. [52]

    W. L. Bragg and E. J. Williams,Proc. R. Soc. London. A. Math. Phys. Sci., 1934,145, 699–730

    work page 1934

  53. [53]

    W. L. Bragg and E. J. Williams,Proc. R. Soc. London. A. Math. Phys. Sci., 1935,151, 540–566

    work page 1935

  54. [54]

    E. J. Williams,Proc. R. Soc. London. A. Math. Phys. Sci., 1935,152, 231–252

    work page 1935

  55. [55]

    Toher, C

    C. Toher, C. Oses, D. Hicks and S. Curtarolo,npj Comput. Mater ., 2019,5, 69

    work page 2019

  56. [56]

    D. Dey, L. Liang and L. Yu,J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2024,146, 5142–5151

    work page 2024

  57. [57]

    S. S. I. Almishal, M. Furst, Y . Tan, J. T. Sivak, G. Bejger, J. Petruska, S. V . G. Ayyagari, D. Srikanth, N. Alem, C. M. Rost, S. B. Sinnott, L.-Q. Chen and J.-P. Maria,Nat. Commun., 2025,16, 8211

    work page 2025

  58. [58]

    J. T. Sivak, S. S. I. Almishal, M. K. Caucci, Y . Tan, D. Srikanth, J. Petruska, M. Furst, L.-Q. Chen, C. M. Rost, J.-P. Maria and S. B. Sinnott,Phys. Rev. Lett., 2025,134, 216101

    work page 2025

  59. [59]

    O. A. Dicks, S. S. Aamlid, A. M. Hallas and J. Rottler,Comput. Mater . Sci., 2026,267, 114581

    work page 2026

  60. [60]

    B. Xing, T. J. Rupert, X. Pan and P. Cao,Nat. Commun., 2024,15, 3879

    work page 2024

  61. [61]

    Y . Han, H. Chen, Y . Sun, J. Liu, S. Wei, B. Xie, Z. Zhang, Y . Zhu, M. Li, J. Yang, W. Chen, P. Cao and Y . Yang,Nat. Commun., 2024,15, 6486

    work page 2024

  62. [62]

    V . P. Bacurau, P. A. F. P. Moreira, G. Bertoli, A. F. Andreoli, E. Mazzer, F. F. de Assis, P. Gargarella, G. Koga, G. C. Stumpf, S. J. A. Figueroa, M. Widom, M. Kaufman, A. Fantin, Y . Cao, R. Freitas, D. Miracle and F. G. Coury,Nat. Commun., 2024,15, 7815

    work page 2024

  63. [63]

    Islam, K

    M. Islam, K. Sheriff, Y . Cao and R. Freitas,Nat. Commun., 2025,16, 8926

    work page 2025

  64. [64]

    Zhong, B

    P. Zhong, B. Deng, S. Anand, T. Mishra and G. Ceder,Phys. Rev. Mater ., 2025,9, 105404

    work page 2025

  65. [65]

    H. Chun, H. Tang, B. Xing, R. Gomez-Bombarelli and J. Li,Preprint at arXiv, 2025, 10.48550/arXiv.2411.17839

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2411.17839 2025

  66. [66]

    N. J. Szymanski, Z. Lun, J. Liu, E. C. Self, C. J. Bartel, J. Nanda, B. Ouyang and G. Ceder, Chem. Mater ., 2023,35, 4922–4934

    work page 2023

  67. [67]

    Deng, J.-Y

    H. Deng, J.-Y . Qi, Q.-H. Xia, J. Li and X. Zhang,Preprint at arXiv, 2025, 10.48550/arXiv.2506.05684. 68

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2506.05684 2025

  68. [68]

    Joress, B

    H. Joress, B. Ravel, E. Anber, J. Hollenbach, D. Sur, J. Hattrick-Simpers, M. L. Taheri and B. DeCost,Matter, 2023,6, 3763–3781

    work page 2023

  69. [69]

    Morris, Y

    D. Morris, Y . Yao and P. Zhang,ACS Nano, 2026,20, 8959–8970

    work page 2026

  70. [70]

    M. He, W. J. Davids, A. J. Breen and S. P. Ringer,Nat. Mater ., 2024,23, 1200–1207

    work page 2024

  71. [71]

    J. M. Cowley,Phys. Rev., 1950,77, 669–675

    work page 1950

  72. [72]

    Norman and B

    N. Norman and B. E. Warren,J. Appl. Phys., 1951,22, 483–486

    work page 1951

  73. [73]

    Raabe, J

    D. Raabe, J. R. Mianroodi and J. Neugebauer,Nat. Comput. Sci., 2023,3, 198–209

    work page 2023

  74. [74]

    F. G. Coury, C. Miller, R. Field and M. Kaufman,Nature, 2023,622, 742–747

    work page 2023

  75. [75]

    Walsh, M

    F. Walsh, M. Zhang, R. O. Ritchie, A. M. Minor and M. Asta,Nat. Mater ., 2023,22, 926–929

    work page 2023

  76. [76]

    Walsh, M

    F. Walsh, M. Zhang, R. O. Ritchie, M. Asta and A. M. Minor,Sci. Adv., 2024,10, eadn9673

    work page 2024

  77. [77]

    E. C.-Y . Yuan, Y . Liu, J. Chen, P. Zhong, S. Raja, T. Kreiman, S. Vargas, W. Xu, M. Head- Gordon, C. Yang, S. M. Blau, B. Cheng, A. Krishnapriyan and T. Head-Gordon,Nat. Rev. Chem., 2026,10, 212–230

    work page 2026

  78. [78]

    Metni, L

    H. Metni, L. Ruple, L. N. Walters, L. Torresi, J. Teufel, H. Schopmans, J. ¨Ostreicher, Y . Zhang, M. Neubert, Y . Koide, K. Steiner, P. Link, L. B¨ar, M. Petrova, G. Ceder and P. Friederich,Adv. Mater ., 2026,38, e23620

    work page 2026

  79. [79]

    J. Peng, D. Schwalbe-Koda, K. Akkiraju, T. Xie, L. Giordano, Y . Yu, C. J. Eom, J. R. Lunger, D. J. Zheng, R. R. Rao, S. Muy, J. C. Grossman, K. Reuter, R. G´omez-Bombarelli and Y . Shao-Horn,Nat. Rev. Mater ., 2022,7, 991–1009

    work page 2022

  80. [80]

    A. K. Cheetham and R. Seshadri,Chem. Mater ., 2024,36, 3490–3495

    work page 2024

Showing first 80 references.