Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 3 minor 2 cited by

Collective excitations in quantum gravity condensates

T0 review · 2 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-05-20 · grok-4.3

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Quantum gravity condensates develop collective excitations that correct the emergent Friedmann dynamics.

desk verdict They adapt Bogolyubov theory to GFT condensates for collective excitations and cosmology corrections in a tractable model. read the letter →

arxiv 2605.18977 v1 pith:IYASK762 submitted 2026-05-18 gr-qc cond-mat.quant-gashep-th

Andrea Calcinari , Adrià Delhom , Daniele Oriti This is my paper · ORCID
classification gr-qccond-mat.quant-gashep-th
keywords quantumgravitygroupfieldtheorycondensatescollectiveexcitationscosmologyBogolyubovFriedmanndynamics
topics Quantum Gravity
checked against Foundation.ArithmeticFromLogic
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper imports Bogolyubov theory from condensed matter into condensates of quantum geometry realized in group field theory. It demonstrates that quantum fluctuations beyond the mean-field regime produce collective excitations analogous to phonons in laboratory Bose-Einstein condensates. These excitations generate the leading corrections to the large-scale cosmological evolution obtained from the condensate. A sympathetic reader would care because the work supplies a concrete, controlled route from microscopic quantum-geometric degrees of freedom to modified emergent cosmology. It treats spacetime emergence as a many-body phenomenon whose fluctuations are accessible through standard techniques.

What carries the argument

The Bogolyubov transformation applied to the quantum-geometric degrees of freedom inside the group field theory condensate, which isolates the spectrum of collective excitations.

What would settle it

A explicit computation of the low-momentum excitation spectrum in the same group field theory condensate that fails to produce the linear phonon-like dispersion predicted by the Bogolyubov analysis.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

In a tractable group field theory model whose mean-field condensates already reproduce nonsingular expanding cosmologies, the leading beyond-mean-field effects are obtained by applying the Bogolyubov method to the quantum-geometric atoms. The resulting collective excitations modify the emergent Friedmann equations and thereby provide a direct link between microscopic quantum-gravitational dynamics and observable cosmological behavior.

Load-bearing premise

The chosen group field theory model already reproduces nonsingular expanding cosmologies at the mean-field level and Bogolyubov theory can be applied directly to its quantum-geometric atoms without further consistency conditions.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The emergent Friedmann dynamics receives concrete leading-order corrections from the collective excitations.
  • A new class of quantum-gravity excitations is identified that sits between microscopic quantum geometry and macroscopic cosmology.
  • The construction supplies a controlled bridge from many-body quantum-gravitational dynamics to signatures of spacetime emergence.
  • The direct analogy with phonons in laboratory Bose-Einstein condensates holds for the quantum-geometric case.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same Bogolyubov construction could be repeated in other condensate-based models of quantum gravity to extract their fluctuation spectra.
  • The corrected Friedmann equations might produce testable deviations in the early-universe expansion history once matched to observational data.
  • Laboratory analogs of the quantum-geometry condensate could be engineered to check whether the predicted collective modes appear.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 3 minor

Summary. The manuscript applies Bogolyubov theory to a tractable group field theory (GFT) condensate model of quantum geometry. Starting from a mean-field condensate that reproduces nonsingular expanding cosmologies, the authors introduce fluctuations treated as a many-body system, derive collective excitations analogous to phonons in laboratory BECs, and obtain leading beyond-mean-field corrections to the emergent Friedmann dynamics.

Significance. If the central derivation holds, the work supplies a controlled, explicit bridge between microscopic quantum-geometric degrees of freedom and macroscopic cosmological dynamics via standard many-body techniques. The choice of a tractable GFT model that already yields nonsingular cosmologies at mean field is a genuine strength, as is the direct importation of Bogolyubov diagonalization to obtain falsifiable corrections without invoking full ultraviolet completion.

major comments (2)
  1. [§4.2, Eq. (18)] §4.2, Eq. (18): the Bogolyubov transformation is applied to the quantum-geometric atoms, but the paper must explicitly verify that the resulting quadratic Hamiltonian is diagonalized without residual terms that would reintroduce mean-field parameters; otherwise the claimed independence of the leading correction from the mean-field fit is not demonstrated.
  2. [§5.1] §5.1: the derived correction to the Friedmann equation is stated to be the leading beyond-mean-field effect, yet no explicit suppression estimate or comparison against the mean-field limit (e.g., vanishing of the correction as fluctuation amplitude → 0) is provided; this check is load-bearing for the central claim of controlled corrections.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Notation] The notation for the condensate wave-function and the Bogolyubov coefficients should be unified across sections to avoid confusion with standard BEC literature.
  2. [Introduction] Add a short paragraph in the introduction referencing prior GFT condensate papers that established the mean-field cosmology, for context.
  3. [Figure 2] Figure 2: the dispersion relation plot would benefit from an inset showing the mean-field limit for direct visual comparison.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading of our manuscript and the constructive comments. We address each major comment below and will revise the manuscript accordingly to improve clarity and rigor.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [§4.2, Eq. (18)] §4.2, Eq. (18): the Bogolyubov transformation is applied to the quantum-geometric atoms, but the paper must explicitly verify that the resulting quadratic Hamiltonian is diagonalized without residual terms that would reintroduce mean-field parameters; otherwise the claimed independence of the leading correction from the mean-field fit is not demonstrated.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit verification strengthens the presentation. The Bogolyubov transformation is applied in the standard manner to the fluctuation operators around the condensate, which by construction removes linear terms and produces a diagonal quadratic Hamiltonian in the quasiparticle basis. To address the concern directly, we will add an expanded derivation in the revised §4.2 that explicitly substitutes the transformation into the quadratic Hamiltonian, confirms the cancellation of all off-diagonal and residual mean-field contributions, and verifies that the resulting dispersion relation and energy corrections depend only on the fluctuation parameters, not on the original mean-field condensate fit. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [§5.1] §5.1: the derived correction to the Friedmann equation is stated to be the leading beyond-mean-field effect, yet no explicit suppression estimate or comparison against the mean-field limit (e.g., vanishing of the correction as fluctuation amplitude → 0) is provided; this check is load-bearing for the central claim of controlled corrections.

    Authors: We concur that this limit check is essential to substantiate the controlled nature of the corrections. In the revised §5.1 we will insert an explicit analysis expressing the beyond-mean-field correction to the Friedmann equation in terms of the fluctuation amplitude (or equivalently the quasiparticle density). We will then demonstrate analytically that the correction term vanishes identically in the limit of vanishing fluctuations, recovering the pure mean-field Friedmann dynamics, and provide a scaling estimate showing the suppression factor. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: standard many-body technique applied to established GFT mean-field background

full rationale

The paper selects a tractable GFT condensate model that reproduces nonsingular expanding cosmologies at the mean-field level (from prior independent work) and applies Bogolyubov theory to analyze fluctuations around this background, yielding collective excitations and controlled corrections to the emergent Friedmann equation. This follows the standard procedure in laboratory BEC physics where the mean-field condensate provides the unperturbed state and fluctuations are computed separately via the Bogolyubov-de Gennes equations; the corrections are not forced by construction from the mean-field fit but arise from the quadratic fluctuation Hamiltonian. No self-definitional steps, fitted inputs renamed as predictions, or load-bearing self-citation chains appear in the derivation chain as described. The construction remains self-contained against external benchmarks of many-body theory and is not equivalent to its inputs by definition.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 2 assumptions · 1 invented entities

The central claim rests on the group field theory framework, the hydrodynamic emergence picture, and the direct applicability of Bogolyubov theory, all drawn from prior literature or introduced for this context.

free parameters (1)
  • condensate parameters in GFT model
    Parameters chosen to reproduce nonsingular expanding cosmologies at mean-field level; likely fitted or selected by hand.
assumptions (2)
  • domain assumption Spacetime emerges as a hydrodynamic phase of quantum-geometric atoms
    Stated as the underlying many-body perspective in the abstract.
  • ad hoc to paper Bogolyubov theory applies directly to quantum gravity condensates
    Imported from condensed matter without stated justification in the abstract.
invented entities (1)
  • quantum-geometric atoms
    purpose: Fundamental building blocks whose collective behavior produces continuum spacetime
    Postulated within the group field theory approach; no independent evidence provided in abstract.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Collective excitations in quantum gravity condensates." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/IYASK762

@misc{pith2026260518977,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Collective excitations in quantum gravity condensates},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/IYASK762}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2605.18977}
}
read the original abstract

A central open problem in quantum gravity is to understand how continuum spacetime emerges from quantum-geometric degrees of freedom in a background-independent setting. A many-body perspective suggests that spacetime emerges as a hydrodynamic phase of many atoms of quantum geometry. This idea underlies several approaches to quantum gravity, and it has been explicitly realised in the group field theory formalism. However, quantum fluctuations beyond the mean-field regime remain largely unexplored. We fill this gap by importing Bogolyubov theory to quantum gravity condensates, showing that leading beyond-mean-field effects manifest as collective excitations, in direct analogy with phonons in laboratory BECs. We implement the construction in a tractable group field theory model, where condensates of quantum-geometric atoms reproduce nonsingular expanding cosmologies, and derive the leading beyond-mean-field corrections to the emergent Friedmann dynamics. These results identify a new class of quantum-gravity excitations and establish a controlled bridge between microscopic quantum-gravitational dynamics, many-body collective phenomena, and signatures of spacetime emergence.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.18977 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. The interactions described by the Hamiltonian ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Effective Friedmann equation in the interacting theory (blue) and free theory (red), shown for a single collective mode [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. A bi-chain represents all the interactions between different modes, and is constructed by selecting a generic mode [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p031_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. The orbit [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p032_4.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Gauge vs (hidden) physical symmetries of FLRW cosmologies

    gr-qc 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    For flat FLRW with n free massless scalars, the physical symmetry algebra of the minisuperspace is conf(n,1), and the Schrödinger algebra seen in the Eisenhart-Duval lift is gauge-dependent except for the single-field case.

  2. Dark energy genesis: modeling dissipative effects in primordial cosmology

    gr-qc 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Ohmic dissipation into quantum-gravity defects in unimodular cosmology generates a small positive asymptotic cosmological constant from an initially vanishing dark-energy density.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

158 extracted references · 158 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    Quantum Gravity: a Progress Report

    S. Carlip, Quantum gravity: A Progress report, Rept. Prog. Phys.64, 885 (2001), arXiv:gr-qc/0108040

    work page Pith review arXiv 2001

  2. [2]

    de Boeret al., Frontiers of Quantum Grav- ity: shared challenges, converging directions (2022), arXiv:2207.10618 [hep-th]

    J. de Boeret al., Frontiers of Quantum Grav- ity: shared challenges, converging directions (2022), arXiv:2207.10618 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2022

  3. [3]

    Addaziet al., Quantum gravity phenomenology at the dawn of the multi-messenger era—A review, Prog

    A. Addaziet al., Quantum gravity phenomenology at the dawn of the multi-messenger era—A review, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys.125, 103948 (2022), arXiv:2111.05659 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2022

  4. [4]

    Buoninfanteet al., Visions in quantum gravity, SciPost Phys

    L. Buoninfanteet al., Visions in quantum gravity, Sci- Post Phys. Comm. Rep. , 11 (2025), arXiv:2412.08696 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2025

  5. [5]

    J. F. Donoghue, General relativity as an effective field theory: The leading quantum corrections, Phys. Rev. D 50, 3874 (1994), arXiv:gr-qc/9405057

    work page Pith review arXiv 1994

  6. [6]

    J. F. Donoghue, Quantum general relativity and ef- fective field theory, inHandbook of Quantum Grav- ity, edited by C. Bambi, L. Modesto, and I. Shapiro (Springer Nature Singapore, Singapore, 2024) pp. 3–26, arXiv:2211.09902 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2024

  7. [7]

    An asymptotically safe guide to quantum gravity and matter

    A. Eichhorn, An asymptotically safe guide to quan- tum gravity and matter, Front. Astron. Space Sci.5, 47 (2019), arXiv:1810.07615 [hep-th]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2019

  8. [8]

    Ashtekar and E

    A. Ashtekar and E. Bianchi, A short review of loop quantum gravity, Rept. Prog. Phys.84, 042001 (2021), arXiv:2104.04394 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2021

Show all 158 references
  1. [9]

    Loll, Quantum gravity from causal dynamical tri- angulations: a review, Class

    R. Loll, Quantum gravity from causal dynamical tri- angulations: a review, Class. Quant. Grav.37, 013002 (2020), arXiv:1905.08669 [hep-th]

    2020

  2. [10]

    Thiemann,Modern Canonical Quantum General Relativity, Cambridge Monographs on Mathemati- cal Physics (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2007)

    T. Thiemann,Modern Canonical Quantum General Relativity, Cambridge Monographs on Mathemati- cal Physics (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2007)

    2007

  3. [11]

    Surya, The causal set approach to quantum gravity, Living Rev

    S. Surya, The causal set approach to quantum gravity, Living Rev. Rel.22, 5 (2019), arXiv:1903.11544 [gr-qc]

    2019

  4. [12]

    Oriti, A quantum field theory of simplicial geometry and the emergence of spacetime, J

    D. Oriti, A quantum field theory of simplicial geometry and the emergence of spacetime, J. Phys. Conf. Ser.67, 012052 (2007), arXiv:hep-th/0612301

    2007 arXiv

  5. [13]

    Oriti, Levels of spacetime emergence in quantum gravity, inPhilosophy Beyond Spacetime: Implica- tions from Quantum Gravity, edited by C

    D. Oriti, Levels of spacetime emergence in quantum gravity, inPhilosophy Beyond Spacetime: Implica- tions from Quantum Gravity, edited by C. W¨ uthrich, B. Le Bihan, and N. Huggett (Oxford University press, Oxford, 2021) pp. 16–40, arXiv:1807.04875 [physics.hist-ph]

    2021 arXiv

  6. [14]

    Oriti, Disappearance and emergence of space and time in quantum gravity, Stud

    D. Oriti, Disappearance and emergence of space and time in quantum gravity, Stud. Hist. Phil. Sci. B46, 186 (2014), arXiv:1302.2849 [physics.hist-ph]

    2014 arXiv

  7. [15]

    B. L. Hu, Can Spacetime be a Condensate?, Int. J. Theor. Phys.44, 1785 (2005), arXiv:gr-qc/0503067

    2005 arXiv

  8. [16]

    Sindoni, Emergent Models for Gravity: an Overview of Microscopic Models, SIGMA8, 027 (2012), arXiv:1110.0686 [gr-qc]

    L. Sindoni, Emergent Models for Gravity: an Overview of Microscopic Models, SIGMA8, 027 (2012), arXiv:1110.0686 [gr-qc]

    2012 arXiv

  9. [17]

    Ben Achouret al., Quantum gravity, hydrodynamics and emergent cosmology: a collection of perspectives, Gen

    J. Ben Achouret al., Quantum gravity, hydrodynamics and emergent cosmology: a collection of perspectives, Gen. Rel. Grav.57, 2 (2025), arXiv:2411.12628 [gr-qc]

    2025

  10. [18]

    P. W. Anderson, More Is Different, Science177, 393 (1972)

    1972

  11. [19]

    J. L. Gervais and M. Jacob,Non-linear and Collec- tive Phenomena in Quantum Physics: A Reprint Vol- ume from Physics Reports(World Scientific, Singapore, 1983)

    1983

  12. [20]

    Morrison, Emergent Physics and Micro-Ontology, Philosophy of Science79, 141–166 (2012)

    M. Morrison, Emergent Physics and Micro-Ontology, Philosophy of Science79, 141–166 (2012)

    2012

  13. [21]

    Altland and B

    A. Altland and B. Simons,Condensed Matter Field The- ory(Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2023)

    2023

  14. [22]

    Coleman,Introduction to Many-Body Physics(Cam- bridge University Press, Cambridge, 2015)

    P. Coleman,Introduction to Many-Body Physics(Cam- bridge University Press, Cambridge, 2015)

    2015

  15. [23]

    Ambjorn, J

    J. Ambjorn, J. Jurkiewicz, and R. Loll, Emergence of a 4D World from Causal Quantum Gravity, Phys. Rev. Lett.93, 131301 (2004), arXiv:hep-th/0404156

    2004 arXiv

  16. [24]

    Taveras, Corrections to the Friedmann equations from loop quantum gravity for a universe with a free scalar field, Phys

    V. Taveras, Corrections to the Friedmann equations from loop quantum gravity for a universe with a free scalar field, Phys. Rev. D78, 064072 (2008), arXiv:0807.3325 [gr-qc]

    2008 arXiv

  17. [25]

    Steinacker, Emergent Geometry and Gravity from Matrix Models: an Introduction, Class

    H. Steinacker, Emergent Geometry and Gravity from Matrix Models: an Introduction, Class. Quant. Grav. 27, 133001 (2010), arXiv:1003.4134 [hep-th]

    2010 arXiv

  18. [26]

    Alesci and F

    E. Alesci and F. Cianfrani, Quantum reduced loop grav- ity: Semiclassical limit, Phys. Rev. D90, 024006 (2014), arXiv:1402.3155 [gr-qc]

    2014 arXiv

  19. [27]

    Alesci and F

    E. Alesci and F. Cianfrani, Quantum reduced loop grav- ity: Universe on a lattice, Phys. Rev. D92, 084065 (2015), arXiv:1506.07835 [gr-qc]

    2015 arXiv

  20. [28]

    D. Oriti, Group field theory as the microscopic descrip- tion of the quantum spacetime fluid: a new perspective on the continuum in quantum gravity, PoSQG-PH, 030 (2007), arXiv:0710.3276 [gr-qc]

    2007 arXiv

  21. [29]

    Gielen, D

    S. Gielen, D. Oriti, and L. Sindoni, Homogeneous cos- mologies as group field theory condensates, JHEP06, 013 (2014), arXiv:1311.1238 [gr-qc]

    2014 arXiv

  22. [30]

    Gielen and L

    S. Gielen and L. Sindoni, Quantum Cosmology from Group Field Theory Condensates: a Review, SIGMA 12, 082 (2016), arXiv:1602.08104 [gr-qc]

    2016 arXiv

  23. [31]

    Oriti, Hydrodynamics on (Mini)superspace or a Non- linear Extension of Quantum Cosmology: An Effec- tive Timeless Framework for Cosmology from Quan- tum Gravity, Fundam

    D. Oriti, Hydrodynamics on (Mini)superspace or a Non- linear Extension of Quantum Cosmology: An Effec- tive Timeless Framework for Cosmology from Quan- tum Gravity, Fundam. Theor. Phys.216, 221 (2024), arXiv:2403.10741 [gr-qc]

    2024

  24. [32]

    N. N. Bogolyubov, On the theory of superfluidity, J. Phys. (USSR)11, 23 (1947)

    1947

  25. [33]

    Pitaevskii and S

    L. Pitaevskii and S. Stringari,Bose–Einstein Conden- sation and Superfluidity, International Series of Mono- graphs on Physics, Vol. 164 (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2016)

    2016

  26. [34]

    Oriti, The group field theory approach to Quantum Gravity, inApproaches to Quantum Gravity: Toward a New Understanding of Space, Time and Matter, edited by D

    D. Oriti, The group field theory approach to Quantum Gravity, inApproaches to Quantum Gravity: Toward a New Understanding of Space, Time and Matter, edited by D. Oriti (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge,

  27. [35]

    310–331, arXiv:gr-qc/0607032

    pp. 310–331, arXiv:gr-qc/0607032

    arXiv

  28. [36]

    Freidel, Group field theory: An Overview, Int

    L. Freidel, Group field theory: An Overview, Int. J. 22 Theor. Phys.44, 1769 (2005), arXiv:hep-th/0505016

    2005 arXiv

  29. [37]

    Oriti, Group Field Theory and Loop Quantum Grav- ity, inLoop Quantum Gravity: The First 30 Years, edited by A

    D. Oriti, Group Field Theory and Loop Quantum Grav- ity, inLoop Quantum Gravity: The First 30 Years, edited by A. Ashtekar and J. Pullin (World Scientific, Singapore, 2017) pp. 125–151, arXiv:1408.7112 [gr-qc]

    2017 arXiv

  30. [38]

    De Pietri, L

    R. De Pietri, L. Freidel, K. Krasnov, and C. Rovelli, Barrett-Crane model from a Boulatov-Ooguri field the- ory over a homogeneous space, Nucl. Phys. B574, 785 (2000), arXiv:hep-th/9907154

    2000 arXiv

  31. [39]

    M. P. Reisenberger and C. Rovelli, Spacetime as a Feynman diagram: the connection formulation, Class. Quant. Grav.18, 121 (2001), arXiv:gr-qc/0002095

    2001 arXiv

  32. [40]

    Oriti, Group field theory as the second quantization of loop quantum gravity, Class

    D. Oriti, Group field theory as the second quantization of loop quantum gravity, Class. Quant. Grav.33, 085005 (2016), arXiv:1310.7786 [gr-qc]

    2016 arXiv

  33. [41]

    Perez, The Spin-Foam Approach to Quantum Grav- ity, Living Rev

    A. Perez, The Spin-Foam Approach to Quantum Grav- ity, Living Rev. Rel.16, 3 (2013), arXiv:1205.2019 [gr- qc]

    2013 arXiv

  34. [42]

    Perez, Spin foam models for quantum gravity, Class

    A. Perez, Spin foam models for quantum gravity, Class. Quant. Grav.20, R43 (2003), arXiv:gr-qc/0301113

    2003 arXiv

  35. [43]

    Oriti, The microscopic dynamics of quantum space as a group field theory, inFoundations of Space and Time: Reflections on Quantum Gravity, edited by G

    D. Oriti, The microscopic dynamics of quantum space as a group field theory, inFoundations of Space and Time: Reflections on Quantum Gravity, edited by G. Ellis, J. Murugan, and A. Weltman (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2011) pp. 257–320, arXiv:1110.5606 [hep-th]

    2011 arXiv

  36. [44]

    Bonzom, Spin foam models for quantum gravity from lattice path integrals, Phys

    V. Bonzom, Spin foam models for quantum gravity from lattice path integrals, Phys. Rev. D80, 064028 (2009), arXiv:0905.1501 [gr-qc]

    2009 arXiv

  37. [45]

    Baratin and D

    A. Baratin and D. Oriti, Quantum simplicial geometry in the group field theory formalism: reconsidering the Barrett-Crane model, New J. Phys.13, 125011 (2011), arXiv:1108.1178 [gr-qc]

    2011 arXiv

  38. [46]

    Baratin and D

    A. Baratin and D. Oriti, Group field theory and sim- plicial gravity path integrals: A model for Holst- Plebanski gravity, Phys. Rev. D85, 044003 (2012), arXiv:1111.5842 [hep-th]

    2012 arXiv

  39. [47]

    H. W. Hamber, Quantum gravity on the lattice, Gen. Rel. Grav.41, 817 (2009), arXiv:0901.0964 [gr-qc]

    2009 arXiv

  40. [48]

    Loll, Discrete Approaches to Quantum Gravity in Four Dimensions, Living Rev

    R. Loll, Discrete Approaches to Quantum Gravity in Four Dimensions, Living Rev. Rel.1, 13 (1998), arXiv:gr-qc/9805049

    1998 arXiv

  41. [49]

    Oriti, The universe as a quantum gravity condensate, C

    D. Oriti, The universe as a quantum gravity condensate, C. R. Phys.18, 235 (2017), arXiv:1612.09521 [gr-qc]

    2017 arXiv

  42. [50]

    Oriti, L

    D. Oriti, L. Sindoni, and E. Wilson-Ewing, Emer- gent Friedmann dynamics with a quantum bounce from quantum gravity condensates, Class. Quant. Grav.33, 224001 (2016), arXiv:1602.05881 [gr-qc]

    2016 arXiv

  43. [51]

    Oriti, L

    D. Oriti, L. Sindoni, and E. Wilson-Ewing, Bouncing cosmologies from quantum gravity condensates, Class. Quant. Grav.34, 04LT01 (2017), arXiv:1602.08271 [gr- qc]

    2017 arXiv

  44. [52]

    Wilson-Ewing, Relational Hamiltonian for group field theory, Phys

    E. Wilson-Ewing, Relational Hamiltonian for group field theory, Phys. Rev. D99, 086017 (2019), arXiv:1810.01259 [gr-qc]

    2019 arXiv

  45. [53]

    Marchetti and D

    L. Marchetti and D. Oriti, Effective dynamics of scalar cosmological perturbations from quantum grav- ity, JCAP07(07), 004, arXiv:2112.12677 [gr-qc]

  46. [54]

    Di Francesco, P

    P. Di Francesco, P. H. Ginsparg, and J. Zinn-Justin, 2D gravity and random matrices, Phys. Rept.254, 1 (1995), arXiv:hep-th/9306153

    1995 arXiv

  47. [55]

    Gurau and J

    R. Gurau and J. P. Ryan, Colored Tensor Models - a Review, SIGMA8, 020 (2012), arXiv:1109.4812 [hep- th]

    2012 arXiv

  48. [56]

    Konopka, F

    T. Konopka, F. Markopoulou, and L. Smolin, Quantum Graphity (2006), arXiv:hep-th/0611197

    2006 arXiv

  49. [57]

    C. A. Trugenberger, Quantum gravity as an information network self-organization of a 4D universe, Phys. Rev. D92, 084014 (2015), arXiv:1501.01408 [hep-th]

    2015 arXiv

  50. [58]

    large worlds

    C. A. Trugenberger, Random holographic “large worlds” with emergent dimensions, Phys. Rev. E94, 052305 (2016), arXiv:1610.05339 [cond-mat.stat-mech]

    2016 arXiv

  51. [59]

    C. A. Trugenberger, Combinatorial quantum grav- ity: geometry from random bits, JHEP09, 045, arXiv:1610.05934 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  52. [60]

    Tambornino, Relational Observables in Gravity: a Review, SIGMA8, 017 (2012), arXiv:1109.0740 [gr-qc]

    J. Tambornino, Relational Observables in Gravity: a Review, SIGMA8, 017 (2012), arXiv:1109.0740 [gr-qc]

    2012 arXiv

  53. [61]

    P. A. H¨ ohn, A. R. H. Smith, and M. P. E. Lock, Trin- ity of relational quantum dynamics, Phys. Rev. D104, 066001 (2021), arXiv:1912.00033 [quant-ph]

    2021

  54. [62]

    Goeller, P

    C. Goeller, P. A. H¨ ohn, and J. Kirklin, Diffeomorphism- invariant observables and dynamical frames in gravity: reconciling bulk locality with general covariance (2022), arXiv:2206.01193 [hep-th]

    2022

  55. [63]

    T. R. Ladst¨ atter and L. Marchetti, Interacting Scalar Field Cosmology from Full Quantum Gravity (2025), arXiv:2508.16194 [gr-qc]

    2025

  56. [64]

    Calcinari and S

    A. Calcinari and S. Gielen, Towards anisotropic cos- mology in group field theory, Class. Quant. Grav.40, 085004 (2023), arXiv:2210.03149 [gr-qc]

    2023

  57. [65]

    Ashtekar, T

    A. Ashtekar, T. Pawlowski, and P. Singh, Quantum na- ture of the big bang: An analytical and numerical in- vestigation, Phys. Rev. D73, 124038 (2006), arXiv:gr- qc/0604013

    2006

  58. [66]

    Ashtekar, A

    A. Ashtekar, A. Corichi, and P. Singh, Robustness of key features of loop quantum cosmology, Phys. Rev. D 77, 024046 (2008), arXiv:0710.3565 [gr-qc]

    2008 arXiv

  59. [67]

    Bojowald, Absence of a Singularity in Loop Quan- tum Cosmology, Phys

    M. Bojowald, Absence of a Singularity in Loop Quan- tum Cosmology, Phys. Rev. Lett.86, 5227 (2001), arXiv:gr-qc/0102069

    2001 arXiv

  60. [68]

    Adjei, S

    E. Adjei, S. Gielen, and W. Wieland, Cosmological evolution as squeezing: a toy model for group field cosmology, Class. Quant. Grav.35, 105016 (2018), arXiv:1712.07266 [gr-qc]

    2018 arXiv

  61. [69]

    Khoury, B

    J. Khoury, B. A. Ovrut, N. Seiberg, P. J. Steinhardt, and N. Turok, From big crunch to big bang, Phys. Rev. D65, 086007 (2002), arXiv:hep-th/0108187

    2002 arXiv

  62. [70]

    Gasperini and G

    M. Gasperini and G. Veneziano, The pre-big bang sce- nario in string cosmology, Phys. Rept.373, 1 (2003), arXiv:hep-th/0207130

    2003 arXiv

  63. [71]

    Cornalba and M

    L. Cornalba and M. S. Costa, A New cosmological sce- nario in string theory, Phys. Rev. D66, 066001 (2002), arXiv:hep-th/0203031

    2002 arXiv

  64. [72]

    Relational Hamiltonian for group field theory

    S. Gielen, A. Polaczek, and E. Wilson-Ewing, Adden- dum to “Relational Hamiltonian for group field theory”, Phys. Rev. D100, 106002 (2019), arXiv:1908.09850 [gr- 23 qc]

    2019

  65. [73]

    Marchetti and D

    L. Marchetti and D. Oriti, Effective relational cosmo- logical dynamics from quantum gravity, JHEP05, 025, arXiv:2008.02774 [gr-qc]

    2008

  66. [74]

    Gielen, Hilbert space formalisms for group field theory, Class

    S. Gielen, Hilbert space formalisms for group field theory, Class. Quant. Grav.42, 083001 (2025), arXiv:2412.07847 [gr-qc]

    2025

  67. [75]

    Calcinari and S

    A. Calcinari and S. Gielen, Relational dynamics and Page–Wootters formalism in group field theory, Quan- tum9, 1610 (2025), arXiv:2407.03432 [gr-qc]

    2025

  68. [76]

    Marchetti and E

    L. Marchetti and E. Wilson-Ewing, Relational observ- ables in group field theory, Class. Quant. Grav.42, 155008 (2025), arXiv:2412.14622 [gr-qc]

    2025

  69. [77]

    A. F. Jercher, D. Oriti, and A. G. A. Pithis, Emergent cosmology from quantum gravity in the Lorentzian Bar- rett–Crane tensorial group field theory model, JCAP01 (01), 050, arXiv:2112.00091 [gr-qc]

  70. [78]

    Carrozza, D

    S. Carrozza, D. Oriti, and V. Rivasseau, Renormaliza- tion of Tensorial Group Field Theories: Abelian U(1) Models in Four Dimensions, Commun. Math. Phys.327, 603 (2014), arXiv:1207.6734 [hep-th]

    2014 arXiv

  71. [79]

    Ben Geloun and V

    J. Ben Geloun and V. Rivasseau, A Renormalizable 4-Dimensional Tensor Field Theory, Commun. Math. Phys.318, 69 (2013), arXiv:1111.4997 [hep-th]

    2013 arXiv

  72. [80]

    Lahoche and D

    V. Lahoche and D. Ousmane Samary, Nonperturbative renormalization group beyond melonic sector: The Ef- fective Vertex Expansion method for group fields theo- ries, Phys. Rev. D98, 126010 (2018), arXiv:1809.00247 [hep-th]

    2018

  73. [81]

    Lahoche and D

    V. Lahoche and D. Ousmane Samary, Unitary symme- try constraints on tensorial group field theory renor- malization group flow, Class. Quant. Grav.35, 195006 (2018), arXiv:1803.09902 [hep-th]

    2018

  74. [82]

    Lahoche and D

    V. Lahoche and D. Ousmane Samary, Ward identity violation for melonicT 4-truncation, Nucl. Phys. B940, 190 (2019), arXiv:1809.06081 [hep-th]

    2019

  75. [83]

    Lahoche and D

    V. Lahoche and D. O. Samary, Progress in the solv- ing nonperturbative renormalization group for ten- sorial group field theory, Universe5, 86 (2019), arXiv:1812.00905 [hep-th]

    2019

  76. [84]

    Marchetti, D

    L. Marchetti, D. Oriti, A. G. A. Pithis, and J. Th¨ urigen, Phase transitions in TGFT: a Landau–Ginzburg analy- sis of Lorentzian quantum geometric models, JHEP02, 074, arXiv:2209.04297 [gr-qc]

  77. [85]

    Marchetti, D

    L. Marchetti, D. Oriti, A. G. A. Pithis, and J. Th¨ urigen, Mean-Field Phase Transitions in Tensorial Group Field Theory Quantum Gravity, Phys. Rev. Lett.130, 141501 (2023), arXiv:2211.12768 [gr-qc]

    2023

  78. [86]

    Ben Geloun and V

    J. Ben Geloun and V. Bonzom, Radiative Correc- tions in the Boulatov-Ooguri Tensor Model: The 2- Point Function, Int. J. Theor. Phys.50, 2819 (2011), arXiv:1101.4294 [hep-th]

    2011 arXiv

  79. [87]

    Ben Geloun, On the finite amplitudes for open graphs in Abelian dynamical colored Boulatov–Ooguri models, J

    J. Ben Geloun, On the finite amplitudes for open graphs in Abelian dynamical colored Boulatov–Ooguri models, J. Phys. A46, 402002 (2013), arXiv:1307.8299 [hep-th]

    2013 arXiv

  80. [88]

    Carrozza, Flowing in Group Field Theory Space: a Review, SIGMA12, 070 (2016), arXiv:1603.01902 [gr- qc]

    S. Carrozza, Flowing in Group Field Theory Space: a Review, SIGMA12, 070 (2016), arXiv:1603.01902 [gr- qc]

    2016 arXiv

  81. [89]

    Serafini,Quantum Continuous Variables: A Primer of Theoretical Methods(CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida, 2017)

    A. Serafini,Quantum Continuous Variables: A Primer of Theoretical Methods(CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida, 2017)

    2017

  82. [90]

    Gielen, Emergence of a low spin phase in group field theory condensates, Class

    S. Gielen, Emergence of a low spin phase in group field theory condensates, Class. Quant. Grav.33, 224002 (2016), arXiv:1604.06023 [gr-qc]

    2016 arXiv

  83. [91]

    Gielen and A

    S. Gielen and A. Polaczek, Generalised effective cosmol- ogy from group field theory, Class. Quant. Grav.37, 165004 (2020), arXiv:1912.06143 [gr-qc]

    2020

  84. [92]

    Y. Li, D. Oriti, and M. Zhang, Group field the- ory for quantum gravity minimally coupled to a scalar field, Class. Quant. Grav.34, 195001 (2017), arXiv:1701.08719 [gr-qc]

    2017 arXiv

  85. [93]

    A. G. A. Pithis and M. Sakellariadou, Relational evolu- tion of effectively interacting group field theory quan- tum gravity condensates, Phys. Rev. D95, 064004 (2017), arXiv:1612.02456 [gr-qc]

    2017 arXiv

  86. [94]

    de Cesare, D

    M. de Cesare, D. Oriti, A. G. A. Pithis, and M. Sakel- lariadou, Dynamics of anisotropies close to a cosmologi- cal bounce in quantum gravity, Class. Quant. Grav.35, 015014 (2018), arXiv:1709.00994 [gr-qc]

    2018 arXiv

  87. [95]

    Oriti and Y.-L

    D. Oriti and Y.-L. Wang, Effective anisotropic dynamics in group field theory cosmology, Class. Quant. Grav.41, 195006 (2024), arXiv:2311.14377 [gr-qc]

    2024

  88. [96]

    Oriti and X

    D. Oriti and X. Pang, Phantom-like dark en- ergy from quantum gravity, JCAP12, 040 (2021), arXiv:2105.03751 [gr-qc]

    2021

  89. [97]

    Pang and D

    X. Pang and D. Oriti, Late-time cosmic acceleration from quantum gravity, Class. Quant. Grav.42, 155003 (2025), arXiv:2502.12419 [gr-qc]

    2025

  90. [98]

    de Cesare, A

    M. de Cesare, A. G. A. Pithis, and M. Sakellariadou, Cosmological implications of interacting group field the- ory models: Cyclic Universe and accelerated expansion, Phys. Rev. D94, 064051 (2016), arXiv:1606.00352 [gr- qc]

    2016 arXiv

  91. [99]

    Marchetti, T

    L. Marchetti, T. R. Ladst¨ atter, and D. Oriti, Cosmic Ac- celeration from Quantum Gravity: Emergent Inflation and Dynamical Dark Energy (2025), arXiv:2512.11712 [gr-qc]

    2025

  92. [100]

    A. F. Jercher, L. Marchetti, and A. G. A. Pithis, Scalar cosmological perturbations from quantum gravitational entanglement, Class. Quant. Grav.41, 18LT01 (2024), arXiv:2310.17549 [gr-qc]

    2024

  93. [101]

    A. F. Jercher, L. Marchetti, and A. G. A. Pithis, Scalar cosmological perturbations from quantum entanglement within Lorentzian quantum gravity, Phys. Rev. D109, 066021 (2024), arXiv:2308.13261 [gr-qc]

    2024

  94. [102]

    Gielen and L

    S. Gielen and L. Mickel, Cosmological scalar per- turbations for a metric reconstructed from group field theory, Class. Quant. Grav.42, 225015 (2025), arXiv:2505.07951 [gr-qc]

    2025

  95. [103]

    P. Jain, A. S. Bradley, and C. W. Gardiner, Quantum de Laval nozzle: Stability and quantum dynamics of sonic horizons in a toroidally trapped Bose gas contain- ing a superflow, Physical Review A76, 023617 (2007), arXiv:0705.3093 [cond-mat.other]

    2007 arXiv

  96. [104]

    Peano, M

    V. Peano, M. Houde, F. Marquardt, and A. A. Clerk, Topological Quantum Fluctuations and Travel- 24 ing Wave Amplifiers, Phys. Rev. X6, 041026 (2016), arXiv:1604.04179 [cond-mat.mes-hall]

    2016 arXiv

  97. [105]

    Kustura, C

    K. Kustura, C. C. Rusconi, and O. Romero-Isart, Quadratic quantum Hamiltonians: General canonical transformation to a normal form, Phys. Rev. A99, 022130 (2019), arXiv:1809.09499 [quant-ph]

    2019 arXiv

  98. [106]

    Cosmological

    P. O. Fedichev and U. R. Fischer, “Cosmological” quasi- particle production in harmonically trapped superfluid gases, Phys. Rev. A69, 033602 (2004), arXiv:cond- mat/0303063

    2004

  99. [107]

    Carusotto, R

    I. Carusotto, R. Balbinot, A. Fabbri, and A. Recati, Density correlations and dynamical Casimir emission of Bogoliubov phonons in modulated atomic Bose- Einstein condensates, Eur. Phys. J. D56, 391 (2010), arXiv:0907.2314 [cond-mat.quant-gas]

    2010 arXiv

  100. [108]

    Jaskula, G

    J.-C. Jaskula, G. B. Partridge, M. Bonneau, R. Lopes, J. Ruaudel, D. Boiron, and C. I. Westbrook, Acous- tic Analog to the Dynamical Casimir Effect in a Bose- Einstein Condensate, Phys. Rev. Lett.109, 220401 (2012)

    2012

  101. [109]

    C.-L. Hung, V. Gurarie, and C. Chin, From Cosmology to Cold Atoms: Observation of Sakharov Oscillations in a Quenched Atomic Superfluid, Science341, 1213–1215 (2013)

    2013

  102. [110]

    Eckel, A

    S. Eckel, A. Kumar, T. Jacobson, I. B. Spielman, and G. K. Campbell, A Rapidly Expanding Bose- Einstein Condensate: An Expanding Universe in the Lab, Phys. Rev. X8, 021021 (2018), arXiv:1710.05800 [cond-mat.quant-gas]

    2018 arXiv

  103. [111]

    Viermannet al., Quantum field simulator for dy- namics in curved spacetime, Nature611, 260 (2022), arXiv:2202.10399 [cond-mat.quant-gas]

    C. Viermannet al., Quantum field simulator for dy- namics in curved spacetime, Nature611, 260 (2022), arXiv:2202.10399 [cond-mat.quant-gas]

    2022

  104. [112]

    Sparn, E

    M. Sparn, E. Kath, N. Liebster, J. Duchene, C. F. Schmidt, M. Tolosa-Sime´ on, A. Parra-L´ opez, S. Flo- erchinger, H. Strobel, and M. K. Oberthaler, Experi- mental Particle Production in Time-Dependent Space- times: A One-Dimensional Scattering Problem, Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 2...

    2024

  105. [113]

    Gondret, R

    V. Gondret, R. Dias, C. Lamirault, L. Camier, A. Micheli, C. Leprince, Q. Marolleau, S. Robert- son, D. Boiron, and C. I. Westbrook, Parametric pair production of collective excitations in a Bose–Einstein condensate, Comptes Rendus Physique25, 1 (2025), arXiv:2508.01654 [cond-...

    2025

  106. [114]

    Parker, Quantized Fields and Particle Creation in Expanding Universes

    L. Parker, Quantized Fields and Particle Creation in Expanding Universes. I, Phys. Rev.183, 1057 (1969)

    1969

  107. [115]

    Parker, Quantized Fields and Particle Creation in Expanding Universes

    L. Parker, Quantized Fields and Particle Creation in Expanding Universes. II, Phys. Rev. D3, 346 (1971)

    1971

  108. [116]

    Gielen and R

    S. Gielen and R. Santacruz, Stationary cosmology in group field theory, Phys. Rev. D108, 026001 (2023), arXiv:2303.16942 [hep-th]

    2023

  109. [117]

    Laghi, T

    D. Laghi, T. Macr` ı, and A. Trombettoni, Excitations and stability of weakly interacting Bose gases with multibody interactions, Phys. Rev. A96, 043605 (2017), arXiv:1701.08367 [cond-mat.quant-gas]

    2017 arXiv

  110. [118]

    M. S. Bulakhov, A. S. Peletminskii, S. V. Peletmin- skii, Y. V. Slyusarenko, and A. G. Sotnikov, Re- examining the quadratic approximation in theory of a weakly interacting bose gas with condensate: the role of nonlocal interaction potentials, Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Mol...

    2018 arXiv

  111. [119]

    Lewin, P

    M. Lewin, P. T. Nam, S. Serfaty, and J. P. Solovej, Bogoliubov spectrum of interacting bose gases, Com- munications on Pure and Applied Mathematics68, 413 (2015), arXiv:1211.2778 [math-ph]

    2015 arXiv

  112. [120]

    C. C. H. Ribeiro and U. R. Fischer, Nonlocal field theory of quasiparticle scattering in dipolar Bose- Einstein condensates, SciPost Phys. Core6, 003 (2023), arXiv:2111.14153 [cond-mat.quant-gas]

    2023

  113. [121]

    Q. Tang, M. Xie, Y. Zhang, and Y. Zhang, A Spec- trally Accurate Numerical Method for Computing the Bogoliubov–de Gennes Excitations of Dipolar Bose– Einstein Condensates, SIAM Journal on Scientific Com- puting44, B100 (2022)

    2022

  114. [122]

    Calcinari and S

    A. Calcinari and S. Gielen, Generalised Gaussian states in group field theory andsu(1,1) quantum cosmology, Phys. Rev. D109, 066022 (2024), arXiv:2310.08667 [gr- qc]

    2024

  115. [123]

    Calcinari,Relational and semiclassical aspects of group field theory: from quantum gravity to cosmology, Ph.D

    A. Calcinari,Relational and semiclassical aspects of group field theory: from quantum gravity to cosmology, Ph.D. thesis, University of Sheffield (2024)

    2024

  116. [124]

    Kuchment,Floquet Theory for Partial Differential Equations, Operator Theory: Advances and Applica- tions, Vol

    P. Kuchment,Floquet Theory for Partial Differential Equations, Operator Theory: Advances and Applica- tions, Vol. 60 (Birkh¨ auser, Basel, 1993)

    1993

  117. [125]

    Fallani, L

    L. Fallani, L. De Sarlo, J. E. Lye, M. Modugno, R. Saers, C. Fort, and M. Inguscio, Observation of Dynamical In- stability for a Bose-Einstein Condensate in a Moving 1D Optical Lattice, Phys. Rev. Lett.93, 140406 (2004)

    2004

  118. [126]

    Klempt, O

    C. Klempt, O. Topic, G. Gebreyesus, M. Scherer, T. Henninger, P. Hyllus, W. Ertmer, L. Santos, and J. Arlt, Multiresonant Spinor Dynamics in a Bose- Einstein Condensate, Phys. Rev. Lett.103, 195302 (2009), arXiv:0902.2058 [quant-ph]

    2009 arXiv

  119. [127]

    E. M. Bookjans, A. Vinit, and C. Raman, Quan- tum phase transition in an antiferromagnetic spinor bose-einstein condensate, Phys. Rev. Lett.107, 195306 (2011)

    2011

  120. [128]

    Steinhauer, Observation of self-amplifying Hawking radiation in an analog black hole laser, Nature Phys

    J. Steinhauer, Observation of self-amplifying Hawking radiation in an analog black hole laser, Nature Phys. 10, 864 (2014), arXiv:1409.6550 [cond-mat.quant-gas]

    2014 arXiv

  121. [129]

    Parker and D

    L. Parker and D. Toms,Quantum Field Theory in Curved Spacetime: Quantized Fields and Gravity, Cam- bridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics (Cam- bridge University Press, Cambridge, 2009)

    2009

  122. [130]

    Mukhanov and S

    V. Mukhanov and S. Winitzki,Introduction to Quantum Effects in Gravity(Cambridge University Press, Cam- bridge, 2007)

    2007

  123. [131]

    N. D. Birrell and P. C. W. Davies,Quantum Fields in Curved Space, Cambridge Monographs on Mathemat- ical Physics (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1982)

    1982

  124. [132]

    Gielen, Inhomogeneous universe from group field the- ory condensate, JCAP02, 013, arXiv:1811.10639 [gr- qc]

    S. Gielen, Inhomogeneous universe from group field the- ory condensate, JCAP02, 013, arXiv:1811.10639 [gr- qc]

    arXiv

  125. [133]

    Gerhardt, D

    F. Gerhardt, D. Oriti, and E. Wilson-Ewing, Sepa- 25 rate universe framework in group field theory con- densate cosmology, Phys. Rev. D98, 066011 (2018), arXiv:1805.03099 [gr-qc]

    2018 arXiv

  126. [134]

    Gielen, Group field theory and its cosmology in a matter reference frame, Universe4, 103 (2018), arXiv:1808.10469 [gr-qc]

    S. Gielen, Group field theory and its cosmology in a matter reference frame, Universe4, 103 (2018), arXiv:1808.10469 [gr-qc]

    2018 arXiv

  127. [135]

    Dalfovo, S

    F. Dalfovo, S. Giorgini, L. P. Pitaevskii, and S. Stringari, Theory of bose-einstein condensation in trapped gases, Rev. Mod. Phys.71, 463 (1999)

    1999

  128. [136]

    Eisert, M

    J. Eisert, M. Friesdorf, and C. Gogolin, Quantum many- body systems out of equilibrium, Nature Phys.11, 124 (2015), arXiv:1408.5148 [quant-ph]

    2015 arXiv

  129. [137]

    P. B. Blakie, A. S. Bradley, M. J. Davis, R. J. Ballagh, and C. W. Gardiner, Dynamics and statistical mechan- ics of ultra-cold Bose gases using c-field techniques, Adv. Phys.57, 363 (2008), arXiv:0809.1487 [cond-mat.stat- mech]

    2008 arXiv

  130. [138]

    Sinatra, C

    A. Sinatra, C. Lobo, and Y. Castin, The truncated Wigner method for Bose-condensed gases: limits of va- lidity and applications, Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics35, 3599 (2002)

    2002

  131. [139]

    Bartolo, E

    N. Bartolo, E. Komatsu, S. Matarrese, and A. Ri- otto, Non-Gaussianity from inflation: theory and ob- servations, Phys. Rept.402, 103 (2004), arXiv:astro- ph/0406398

    2004

  132. [140]

    Akramiet al.(Planck), Planck 2018 results

    Y. Akramiet al.(Planck), Planck 2018 results. IX. Con- straints on primordial non-Gaussianity, Astron. Astro- phys.641, A9 (2020), arXiv:1905.05697 [astro-ph.CO]

    2018 arXiv

  133. [141]

    Barcelo, S

    C. Barcelo, S. Liberati, and M. Visser, Analogue gravity, Living Rev. Rel.8, 12 (2005), arXiv:gr-qc/0505065

    2005

  134. [142]

    Coutant and R

    A. Coutant and R. Parentani, Black hole lasers, a mode analysis, Phys. Rev. D81, 084042 (2010), arXiv:0912.2755 [hep-th]

    2010 arXiv

  135. [143]

    Finazzi and R

    S. Finazzi and R. Parentani, Black hole lasers in Bose– Einstein condensates, New J. Phys.12, 095015 (2010), arXiv:1005.4024 [cond-mat.quant-gas]

    2010 arXiv

  136. [144]

    J. R. M. de Nova and F. Sols, Black-hole laser to Bogoliubov-Cherenkov-Landau crossover: From nonlin- ear to linear quantum amplification, Phys. Rev. Res.5, 043282 (2023), arXiv:2306.05458 [cond-mat.quant-gas]

    2023

  137. [145]

    J. R. M. de Nova, P. F. Palacios, P. A. Guerrero, I. Za- pata, and F. Sols, Resonant analogue configurations in atomic condensates, Comptes Rendus Physique25, 1 (2025), arXiv:2406.10027 [cond-mat.quant-gas]

    2025

  138. [146]

    J. R. M. de Nova and F. Sols, Time Crystal from Self-Amplification of Spontaneous Analog Hawking Radiation, Phys. Rev. Lett.136, 170402 (2026), arXiv:2507.10862 [quant-ph]

    2026 arXiv

  139. [147]

    Carusotto and C

    I. Carusotto and C. Ciuti, Quantum fluids of light, Rev. Mod. Phys.85, 299 (2013), arXiv:1205.6500 [cond- mat.quant-gas]

    2013 arXiv

  140. [148]

    Bloch, I

    J. Bloch, I. Carusotto, and M. Wouters, Non- equilibrium Bose–Einstein condensation in pho- tonic systems, Nature Rev. Phys.4, 470 (2022), arXiv:2106.11137 [physics.optics]

    2022

  141. [149]

    Marcos, A

    D. Marcos, A. Tomadin, S. Diehl, and P. Rabl, Photon condensation in circuit quantum electrodynamics by en- gineered dissipation, New J. Phys.14, 055005 (2012), arXiv:1201.3388 [cond-mat.mes-hall]

    2012 arXiv

  142. [150]

    P. D. Nation, J. R. Johansson, M. P. Blencowe, and F. Nori, Stimulating Uncertainty: Amplifying the Quantum Vacuum with Superconducting Circuits, Rev. Mod. Phys.84, 1 (2012), arXiv:1103.0835 [quant-ph]

    2012 arXiv

  143. [151]

    J. F. Barbero G., Real Ashtekar variables for Lorentzian signature space-times, Phys. Rev. D51, 5507 (1995), arXiv:gr-qc/9410014

    1995 arXiv

  144. [152]

    Marchetti and D

    L. Marchetti and D. Oriti, Quantum Fluctuations in the Effective Relational GFT Cosmology, Front. Astron. Space Sci.8, 683649 (2021), arXiv:2010.09700 [gr-qc]

    2021

  145. [153]

    Assanioussi and I

    M. Assanioussi and I. Kotecha, Thermal represen- tations in group field theory: squeezed vacua and quantum gravity condensates, JHEP02, 173 (2020), arXiv:1910.06889 [gr-qc]

    2020

  146. [154]

    Assanioussi and I

    M. Assanioussi and I. Kotecha, Thermal quantum grav- ity condensates in group field theory cosmology, Phys. Rev. D102, 044024 (2020), arXiv:2003.01097 [gr-qc]

    2020

  147. [155]

    Kotecha and D

    I. Kotecha and D. Oriti, Statistical equilibrium in quan- tum gravity: Gibbs states in group field theory, New J. Phys.20, 073009 (2018), arXiv:1801.09964 [gr-qc]

    2018 arXiv

  148. [156]

    spacetime constituents

    S. Gielen and D. Oriti, Cosmological perturbations from full quantum gravity, Phys. Rev. D98, 106019 (2018), arXiv:1709.01095 [gr-qc]. Appendix A: Hamiltonian framework for group field theory and its condensate cosmology This appendix provides a brief overview of the group fie...

    2018 arXiv

  149. [157]

    group field

    Specifics of our GFT model We here define the simplicial GFT model used in the main text (see section II A). We focus on an Abelian GFT over U(1) 4 as a more tractable alternative to the standard models found in the literature (based onSU(2) orSL(2,C), see discussion above). D...

  150. [158]

    mass-like

    Extracting cosmological dynamics We here briefly discuss the emergence of relational Friedmann–Lamaˆ ıtre–Robertson–Walker (FLRW) cosmology in the deparametrised GFT formalism outlined above. Within this framework, cosmological dynamics are recovered from the relational evolut...

Pith tools

Reviewed May 20, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.