Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Untargeted Poisoning Attack Detection in Federated Learning via Behavior Attestation

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2101.10904 v3 pith:IYK4PXPO submitted 2021-01-24 cs.CR cs.AIcs.LG

classification cs.CRcs.AIcs.LG
keywords trainingattacksbehaviordefenselearningmodelnodesworker
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Federated Learning (FL) is a paradigm in Machine Learning (ML) that addresses data privacy, security, access rights and access to heterogeneous information issues by training a global model using distributed nodes. Despite its advantages, there is an increased potential for cyberattacks on FL-based ML techniques that can undermine the benefits. Model-poisoning attacks on FL target the availability of the model. The adversarial objective is to disrupt the training. We propose attestedFL, a defense mechanism that monitors the training of individual nodes through state persistence in order to detect a malicious worker. A fine-grained assessment of the history of the worker permits the evaluation of its behavior in time and results in innovative detection strategies. We present three lines of defense that aim at assessing if the worker is reliable by observing if the node is really training, advancing towards a goal. Our defense exposes an attacker's malicious behavior and removes unreliable nodes from the aggregation process so that the FL process converge faster. Through extensive evaluations and against various adversarial settings, attestedFL increased the accuracy of the model between 12% to 58% under different scenarios such as attacks performed at different stages of convergence, attackers colluding and continuous attacks.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Decoding FL Defenses: Systemization, Pitfalls, and Remedies

    cs.CR 2025-02 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Many FL defenses are evaluated on overly easy datasets and attacks, and this paper demonstrates with case studies that those easy settings can make weak defenses look strong.

Pith tools