REVIEW 5 cited by
Vibe-Eval: A hard evaluation suite for measuring progress of multimodal language models
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
We introduce Vibe-Eval: a new open benchmark and framework for evaluating multimodal chat models. Vibe-Eval consists of 269 visual understanding prompts, including 100 of hard difficulty, complete with gold-standard responses authored by experts. Vibe-Eval is open-ended and challenging with dual objectives: (i) vibe checking multimodal chat models for day-to-day tasks and (ii) rigorously testing and probing the capabilities of present frontier models. Notably, our hard set contains >50% questions that all frontier models answer incorrectly. We explore the nuances of designing, evaluating, and ranking models on ultra challenging prompts. We also discuss trade-offs between human and automatic evaluation, and show that automatic model evaluation using Reka Core roughly correlates to human judgment. We offer free API access for the purpose of lightweight evaluation and plan to conduct formal human evaluations for public models that perform well on the Vibe-Eval's automatic scores. We release the evaluation code and data, see https://github.com/reka-ai/reka-vibe-eval
Forward citations
Cited by 5 Pith papers
-
VL-RewardBench: A Challenging Benchmark for Vision-Language Generative Reward Models
VL-RewardBench curates 1,250 hard preference pairs for vision-language reward models; GPT-4o reaches only 62 to 65 percent accuracy, and benchmark scores correlate strongly with Best-of-N gains on MMMU-Pro.
-
Seeing is Believing, but How Much? A Comprehensive Analysis of Verbalized Calibration in Vision-Language Models
Current vision-language models are largely miscalibrated when they verbalize confidence, visual reasoning models such as o3 and o4-mini are better calibrated, and Visual Confidence-Aware Prompting reduces ECE on IsoBench.
-
ZeroBench: An Impossible Visual Benchmark for Contemporary Large Multimodal Models
ZeroBench is a hand-built 100-question visual reasoning benchmark, adversarially filtered so every evaluated frontier LMM scored 0% at release.
-
MiMo-VL Technical Report
MiMo-VL-7B-RL, a 7B open-source vision-language model, reports state-of-the-art results on 35 of 40 benchmarks and a 59.4 OlympiadBench score, with the report crediting long-CoT pretraining data and mixed on-policy RL.
-
MME-Survey: A Comprehensive Survey on Evaluation of Multimodal LLMs
A broad survey that organizes MLLM evaluation benchmarks into capability categories, explains benchmark construction and scoring methods, and identifies gaps in current evaluation practice.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.