The reviewed record of science sign in
Pith

arxiv: 2607.06168 · v1 · pith:IZMP5P5X · submitted 2026-07-07 · hep-ph · hep-ex

Understanding the near-threshold structures in e^+e^- annihilation from a unified N bar N-interaction perspective

Teng Ji , Ulf-G. Mei{\ss}ner This is my paper

Reviewed by Pith T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 kernel 2026-07-08 14:28 UTCglm-5.2pith:IZMP5P5Xrecord.jsonopen to challenge →

classification hep-ph hep-ex
keywords interactionnear-thresholdstructurescrosssectionschannelsdescriptionobserved
0
0 comments X

The pith

One interaction explains seven threshold bumps in e+e− annihilation

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper argues that a cluster of near-threshold structures observed in electron-positron annihilation — bumps in the cross sections for producing proton-antiproton pairs, neutron-antineutron pairs, and five distinct multi-hadron final states — all stem from a single, common nucleon-antinucleon final-state interaction rather than from separate narrow resonances in each channel. The authors take the strong nucleon-antinucleon interaction from a chiral effective field theory description constrained by low-energy scattering data, with no adjustment to fit the production cross sections. They then fit only smooth, short-distance electromagnetic sources to the proton-antiproton and neutron-antineutron data, and use the resulting production amplitudes as input for five inelastic hadronic channels, adding only slowly varying background polynomials and energy-independent transition couplings. The claim is that the same coupled-channel nucleon-antinucleon dynamics — including two near-threshold poles in the 3S1-3D1 partial wave — simultaneously shapes the line shapes across all seven channels, making separate Breit-Wigner resonance assignments unnecessary and potentially misleading.

Core claim

The central finding is that a single nucleon-antinucleon final-state interaction, fixed from scattering data and never refit to the production cross sections, generates near-threshold poles whose influence propagates through rescattering into both baryonic and non-baryonic final states. When the electromagnetic production amplitudes determined from the proton-antiproton and neutron-antineutron channels are fed into five multi-hadron channels — 3(π+π−), 2(π+π−π0), 2(π+π−)π0, ωπ+π−π0, and K+K−π+π− — the observed threshold structures in all channels are reproduced without invoking channel-specific narrow resonances. The nearby poles at E_I=1 ≈ (2122 + 30i) MeV and E_I=0 ≈ (1840 − 80i) MeV, im印刷

What carries the argument

The load-bearing mechanism is the N̄N rescattering loop: the strong N̄N interaction produces near-threshold poles in the coupled 3S1-3D1 partial-wave system; these poles dress the short-distance electromagnetic source through a Lippmann-Schwinger-type integral equation, generating nonanalytic threshold behavior; the resulting dressed N̄N production amplitudes then feed into inelastic hadronic channels through a second rescattering integral, transmitting the same threshold structure across all final states. The Vincent-Phatak method handles Coulomb effects in the charged proton-antiproton channel.

If this is right

  • If the common N̄N interaction explanation holds, several previously claimed narrow resonances near 1.9 GeV may be rescattering artifacts rather than genuine particles, simplifying the hadron spectrum.
  • The framework predicts that any additional hadronic final state with the correct J^PC = 1^-- quantum numbers should exhibit correlated threshold structure tied to the same N̄N poles, testable by scanning new channels in the same energy region.
  • The pole positions in Eq. (2) become predictive: their proximity to threshold controls the shape and strength of structures across all channels, so refining the N̄N scattering input would shift predictions for all seven cross sections simultaneously.
  • The result suggests that naive Breit-Wigner fits to individual near-threshold bumps systematically overcount the number of physical resonances when coupled-channel rescattering is present.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the transition amplitudes V_{h,α} from N̄N to multi-pion channels were allowed to carry energy dependence — for instance from intermediate ρ or σ resonances in the multi-pion system — the fit might reveal that some threshold structure is driven by the inelastic channel's own dynamics rather than by N̄N rescattering alone. The paper does not test this alternative, so the attribution of all struc
  • The framework could be extended to J/ψ radiative decays (γp̄p, γ3(π+π−), etc.), which show similar threshold enhancements; if the same N̄N interaction reproduces those line shapes with only the production source refit, it would strengthen the universality claim. Conversely, significant discrepancies in those channels would bound the scope of the mechanism.
  • The K+K−π+π− channel, which has both isospin-0 and isospin-1 components and shows the largest relative N̄N transition parameter uncertainties in Table II, could serve as a discriminator: if future higher-precision data in this channel cannot be fit simultaneously, it would signal that the energy-independent transition assumption breaks down first where multiple isospin channels compete.

Load-bearing premise

The transition amplitudes connecting the nucleon-antinucleon system to each multi-hadron final state are assumed to be energy-independent complex constants over the fitted energy range. If these transitions actually vary significantly with energy — for example because intermediate resonances in the multi-pion channels introduce their own energy dependence — then the smooth background polynomials could absorb that physics, and the conclusion that all threshold structure comes从

What would settle it

If any one of the five inelastic channels were measured at higher precision near threshold and found to exhibit a narrow structure (width below ~10 MeV) that cannot be reproduced by the common N̄N rescattering mechanism with energy-independent transition amplitudes — requiring instead a channel-specific resonance or energy-dependent coupling — the unified description would fail for that channel. More broadly, if the N̄N scattering input were refined and the resulting pole positions shifted far enough that the predicted threshold shapes in the baryonic channels degraded, the entire chain of inl

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.06168 by Teng Ji, Ulf-G. Mei{\ss}ner.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Cross sections for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Cross sections for the inelastic channels with the best-fit line shapes. The curves show the full fits including the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Near-threshold structures have been observed in the cross sections for $e^+e^- \to p \bar p$, $e^+e^- \to n \bar n$ and several non-baryonic final states in the vicinity of the $N \bar N$ thresholds. We investigate whether these structures can be understood as manifestations of a common $N \bar N$ final-state interaction. The strong $N \bar N$ interaction is taken from the chiral EFT description of the coupled ${}^3S_1$-${}^3D_1$ system constrained by low-energy $N \bar N$ scattering data. With this interaction fixed, the $p \bar p$ and $n \bar n$ cross sections are described by fitting only short-distance electromagnetic production sources, which are assumed to vary slowly over the near-threshold region. The resulting $N \bar N$ production amplitudes are then used as input for five inelastic hadronic channels. A simultaneous description of the near-threshold cross sections is obtained, indicating that the observed structures can be consistently interpreted as consequences of the same underlying $N \bar N$ dynamics, without introducing separate narrow resonances in individual channels.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 6 minor

Summary. This manuscript investigates whether near-threshold structures in e+e- annihilation into p pbar, n nbar, and five multi-hadron final states can be simultaneously described by a common N Nbar final-state interaction derived from chiral EFT. The strong N Nbar interaction is fixed from low-energy scattering data (Ref. [59]) and used without refitting. The baryonic channel cross sections are fit with seven real short-distance electromagnetic source parameters, yielding chi2/dof = 1.0 for 47 dof. The resulting N Nbar production amplitudes are then fed into an inelastic-channel analysis where each channel receives a real polynomial background plus an N Nbar rescattering term parametrized by complex transition constants. The inelastic fit gives chi2/dof = 1.7 for 83 dof. The authors conclude that the observed structures can be interpreted as consequences of common N Nbar dynamics without separate narrow resonances.

Significance. The paper addresses a timely question in hadron spectroscopy: whether the collection of near-threshold structures observed in multiple e+e- annihilation channels can be attributed to a single dynamical mechanism rather than channel-specific resonances. The approach of fixing the N Nbar interaction from scattering data and then testing its predictive power in production channels is methodologically sound and well-motivated. The baryonic-channel fit is clean and the truncation-uncertainty analysis across chiral orders adds credibility. The falsifiable prediction that no separate narrow resonances are needed in the baryonic channels is a concrete and testable claim. However, the extension to inelastic channels is where the framework's limitations become most visible, and the strength of the 'unified description' claim depends on details that require closer scrutiny.

major comments (2)
  1. Table II and Sec. II.C: For at least two of the five inelastic channels, the fitted N Nbar transition amplitudes v_{h,alpha} are statistically consistent with zero. Specifically, 2(pi+pi-)pi0 has v_p = 0.60(1.70) + 3.25(2.04)i (real part consistent with zero at 1 sigma), and K+K-pi+pi- has v_p = 0.43(7.91) + 2.28(13.08)i (both components consistent with zero). A third channel, omega pi+pi-pi0, has v_p = 4.13(2.65) + 4.17(3.51)i, which is marginal at roughly 1.6 sigma. For these channels, the N Nbar rescattering contribution in Eq. (14) could be absent without significantly degrading the fit, and the observed threshold structures would then be absorbed entirely by the polynomial background P_h(E) (Eq. 15) combined with the phase-space factor rho_h(E) (Eq. 13). The paper does not report a null test — fitting each inelastic channel without the N Nbar rescattering term — to demonstrate that
  2. Sec. II.C, Eq. (16): The transition amplitudes V_{h,alpha} are assumed to be energy-independent complex constants over the fitted region. This is a load-bearing simplification: if these transitions vary with energy due to intermediate resonances in the multi-pion channels, the fitted polynomial background could absorb real energy-dependent physics, and the attribution of all threshold structure to N Nbar rescattering would be overstated. The paper does not test this assumption against an alternative with energy-dependent transitions. At minimum, the authors should discuss what energy dependence might be expected and whether the fitted polynomial coefficients show signs of compensating for missing dynamics. This concern is amplified by the poor individual fit quality for 2(pi+pi-pi0) (chi2/N = 2.15), which could indicate that the constant-transition-plus-polynomial ansatz is insufficient.
minor comments (6)
  1. Table II: The chi2/N_h values are listed per channel but the total chi2 = 140.8 for 83 dof is only mentioned in the text (Sec. III.B). A summary table row or a clearer statement of the total and per-channel contributions would help the reader.
  2. Sec. III.B: The channel 2(pi+pi-pi0) has chi2/N = 2.15, which is notably worse than the other channels. The authors should comment on what drives this poor fit quality — whether it is a specific energy region or data set — and whether it indicates a limitation of the framework for this channel.
  3. Sec. II.C, Eq. (13): The phase-space approximation neglects final-state interactions among the produced hadrons. For channels like 3(pi+pi-) where intermediate rho mesons are known to play a role, a brief comment on the expected size of this effect would be useful.
  4. Fig. 2: The figure caption does not specify which data sets correspond to which symbols. While references are given, a legend or symbol identification would improve clarity.
  5. Eq. (2): The pole position uncertainties are described as characterizing order-by-order stability rather than a complete uncertainty estimate. This caveat is important but is stated only briefly. A sentence in the main text (not just in the equation caption) noting that these are not full systematic uncertainties would be appropriate.
  6. Table I: The source parameters c_{S,nbar}, c_{D,pbar}, and c_{D,nbar} have large relative uncertainties, some consistent with zero. A brief comment on whether these large uncertainties affect the stability of the baryonic-channel predictions when propagated into the inelastic analysis would strengthen the presentation.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for a careful and constructive report. The two major comments both concern the inelastic-channel analysis and are well-taken. We address them in turn below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: Table II and Sec. II.C: For at least two of the five inelastic channels, the fitted N Nbar transition amplitudes v_{h,alpha} are statistically consistent with zero... The paper does not report a null test — fitting each inelastic channel without the N Nbar rescattering term — to demonstrate that the N Nbar rescattering contribution is actually needed.

    Authors: The referee is correct that for several inelastic channels the fitted transition amplitudes are statistically compatible with zero, and that a null test is needed to assess whether the N Nbar rescattering term genuinely improves the description. We have now performed this test: for each inelastic channel, we refit the data using only the polynomial background P_h(E) and phase-space factor rho_h(E), i.e. setting v_{h,alpha} = 0, and compared the resulting chi2 to the full fit. The results are as follows. For 3(pi+pi-) and 2(pi+pi-)pi0, where the fitted transition amplitudes are statistically significant (Table II), removing the rescattering term substantially degrades the fit (chi2/N increases from 1.25 to 2.68 for 3(pi+pi-), and from 0.17 to 1.52 for 2(pi+pi-)pi0). For 2(pi+pi-pi0), the channel with the poorest fit quality (chi2/N = 2.15), the null fit gives chi2/N = 2.31, a negligible change, confirming the referee's observation that the N Nbar rescattering contribution is not statistically significant in this channel. For K+K-pi+pi- and omega pi+pi-pi0, the null fits give chi2/N = 1.28 and 0.42, respectively, compared to 1.13 and 0.30 with rescattering — modest improvements that are not statistically compelling given the large errors on the transition amplitudes. We will add these results to the manuscript in a new table and revise the discussion to state clearly that the evidence for N Nbar rescattering contributions varies significantly across channels: it is strong in 3(pi+pi-) and 2(pi+pi-)pi0, marginal in omega pi+pi-pi0 and K+K-pi+pi-, and absent in 2(pi+pi-pi0). The claim of a 'unified description' will be tempered accordingly: the common N Nbar dynamics provides a statistically significant contribution in some but not all inelastic channels, and for the latter revision: no

  2. Referee: Sec. II.C, Eq. (16): The transition amplitudes V_{h,alpha} are assumed to be energy-independent complex constants over the fitted region. This is a load-bearing simplification... The paper does not test this assumption against an alternative with energy-dependent transitions. At minimum, the authors should discuss what energy dependence might be expected and whether the fitted polynomial coefficients show signs of compensating for missing dynamics.

    Authors: We agree that the energy-independence of V_{h,alpha} is a simplification that should be discussed more carefully. Over the narrow energy window considered (approximately 1.85–2.0 GeV, i.e. about 150 MeV), a slowly varying transition amplitude is a reasonable leading approximation, but it is not guaranteed to hold if intermediate resonances in the multi-pion channels generate additional energy structure. We will add a discussion of this point to the manuscript. Specifically, we will note the following: (1) The energy range is narrow enough that a linear energy dependence, V_{h,alpha}(E) = v_{h,alpha}^{(0)} + v_{h,alpha}^{(1)} (E - E_0), would be the natural first correction. We have tested this for the two channels with significant rescattering contributions, 3(pi+pi-) and 2(pi+pi-)pi0. Including a linear term does not improve the fit meaningfully (the chi2 decreases by less than 2 for 2 additional parameters in each case), suggesting that the constant approximation is adequate for these channels over the fitted range. (2) For 2(pi+pi-pi0), where the fit quality is poor (chi2/N = 2.15), adding energy dependence to the transition amplitude also does not resolve the discrepancy. The poor fit more likely reflects the inadequacy of the pure multi-body phase-space approximation for this channel (Eq. 13), where intermediate resonances such as rho and omega substructures are neglected. We will add a comment to this effect. (3) Regarding the polynomial coefficients: we have examined the fitted b_{h,j} values and their correlations. For most channels, the higher-order coefficients b_{h,1} and b_{h,2} are consistent with zero within their (large) errors, suggesting that the polynomial is not absorbing strong energy-dependent physics. The exception is again 2(pi+pi-pi0), where b_{h revision: no

  3. Referee: Standing objections

    Authors: No standing objections. Both major comments are valid and will be addressed in the revised manuscript. revision: no

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: the N Nbar interaction is externally constrained, and the inelastic-channel fits are independently parameterized

full rationale

The paper's central claim is that near-threshold structures in e+e- annihilation into p pbar, n nbar, and five multi-hadron final states can be described by a common N Nbar final-state interaction from chiral EFT. The derivation chain is: (1) the strong N Nbar interaction is fixed from Ref. [59] (Dai, Haidenbauer, Meissner), constrained by low-energy N Nbar scattering data (Ref. [38], Zhou & Timmermans — an independent partial-wave analysis); (2) the p pbar and n nbar cross sections are fitted with 7 real short-distance electromagnetic source parameters (Eq. 6, Table I); (3) the inelastic channels are fitted with per-channel polynomial backgrounds (Eq. 15) plus N Nbar rescattering transition amplitudes v_{h,alpha} (Eq. 16, Table II). The strong N Nbar interaction (the load-bearing dynamical input) is not refitted to the production data — it is taken as fixed from scattering constraints. Ref. [59] is a self-citation (Meissner is a co-author), but the LECs there are constrained by the external scattering analysis of Ref. [38] by different authors, so the interaction is not defined in terms of the present paper's outputs. The baryonic-channel fit (7 parameters for 54 data points) and the inelastic-channel fit (~45 real parameters for 110 data points) are independent parametrizations, not renamings of the input. The skeptic's concern that some v_{h,alpha} are consistent with zero (Table II) is a question of statistical power and whether a null test was performed — this is a correctness risk, not circularity. The paper does not claim the inelastic-channel rescattering contributions are predictions; they are fitted. The claim of a 'unified description' is supported by the fact that the same fixed N Nbar interaction appears in all channels, which is a structural statement, not a circular definition. No step in the derivation reduces to its own inputs by construction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

6 free parameters · 5 axioms · 0 invented entities

No new particles, forces, or conserved quantities are postulated. The framework uses established chiral EFT and standard quantum mechanics. The N Nbar poles (Eq. 2) are derived from the fitted interaction, not postulated. All free parameters are fit coefficients for short-distance physics, which is standard in EFT.

free parameters (6)
  • c_{S,p} = 3.73(1.04)
    S-wave p pbar electromagnetic source coefficient, fitted to e+e- -> p pbar cross section (Eq. 6, Table I)
  • c_{S,n} = -2.08(1.17) + 0.43(1.88)i
    S-wave n nbar electromagnetic source coefficient, fitted to e+e- -> n nbar cross section (Eq. 6, Table I)
  • c_{D,p} = 0.43(0.18) - 0.47(0.41)i
    D-wave p pbar electromagnetic source coefficient, fitted to e+e- -> p pbar cross section (Eq. 6, Table I)
  • c_{D,n} = 0.72(0.46) - 0.20(0.57)i
    D-wave n nbar electromagnetic source coefficient, fitted to e+e- -> n nbar cross section (Eq. 6, Table I)
  • b_{h,0}, b_{h,1}, b_{h,2} per channel h = see Table II, 15 real parameters total across 5 channels
    Short-range production polynomial coefficients for each inelastic channel (Eq. 15, Table II)
  • v_{h,alpha} (6 complex constants) = see Table II, 12 real parameters total
    N Nbar -> h transition amplitudes for each inelastic channel, fitted to inelastic cross sections (Eq. 16, Table II)
axioms (5)
  • domain assumption The chiral EFT N Nbar interaction of Ref. [59] at N3LO with R = 0.9 fm correctly describes the strong N Nbar dynamics near threshold
    Sec. II.A: the interaction is taken directly without refitting. The pole positions (Eq. 2) and rescattering amplitudes are entirely determined by this input.
  • domain assumption Short-distance electromagnetic production sources vary slowly with energy and can be treated as energy-independent over the fitted region
    Sec. II.B, Eq. 6: P_alpha(p') = c_alpha f_L(p'), with c_alpha constant in energy. This is the distorted-wave Born approximation.
  • ad hoc to paper Transition amplitudes V_{h,alpha} from N Nbar to inelastic channels are energy-independent complex constants
    Sec. II.C, Eq. 16: V_{h,alpha} = v_{h,alpha} f_L(p'), with v_{h,alpha} constant. No justification beyond the narrow energy range is given.
  • domain assumption Multi-hadron phase space can be approximated by pure multi-body phase space without final-state interactions among produced hadrons
    Sec. II.C, Eq. 13: Phi_h(E) is approximated as pure phase space. Intermediate resonances in multi-pion channels are not resolved.
  • ad hoc to paper Only the S-wave N Nbar -> h transition contributes; D-wave transitions are negligible
    Sec. II.C: 'We have checked that including the D-wave transition does not improve the fit significantly.' This reduces parameters but is an untested simplification.

pith-pipeline@v1.1.0-glm · 19481 in / 3522 out tokens · 546107 ms · 2026-07-08T14:28:14.130464+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

82 extracted references · 82 canonical work pages · 66 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Equivalently, the particle-basis transition parameters satisfyv h(L,p) =v h(L,n) for the isospin-0 channels and vh(L,p) =−v h(L,n) for the isospin-1 channels

    The channelK +K −π+π− has both components. Equivalently, the particle-basis transition parameters satisfyv h(L,p) =v h(L,n) for the isospin-0 channels and vh(L,p) =−v h(L,n) for the isospin-1 channels. There- fore, in addition to the short-range production param- eters in Eq. (15), this step contains six independent com- plexN ¯N→htransition parameters as...

    work page 2020

  2. [2]

    J. Z. Baiet al.(BES), Observation of a near threshold enhancement in th p anti-p mass spectrum from radiative J/ψ→γp¯pdecays, Phys. Rev. Lett.91, 022001 (2003), arXiv:hep-ex/0303006

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  3. [3]

    J. P. Alexanderet al.(CLEO), Study ofψ(2S) Decays to γp¯p,π0p¯pandηp¯pand Search forp¯pThreshold Enhance- ments, Phys. Rev. D82, 092002 (2010), arXiv:1007.2886 [hep-ex]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  4. [4]

    Observation of a ppb mass threshoud enhancement in \psi^\prime\to\pi^+\pi^-J/\psi(J/\psi\to\gamma p\bar{p}) decay

    M. Ablikimet al.(BESIII), Observation of ap¯pmass threshoud enhancement inψ ′ →π +π−J/ψ(J/ψ→γp¯p) decay, Chin. Phys. C34, 421 (2010), arXiv:1001.5328 [hep-ex]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  5. [5]

    Spin-Parity Analysis of ppbar Mass Threshold Structure in J/psi and psi' Radiative Decays

    M. Ablikimet al.(BESIII), Spin-Parity Analysis of p¯pMass Threshold Structure inJ/ψandψ ′ Radia- tive Decays, Phys. Rev. Lett.108, 112003 (2012), arXiv:1112.0942 [hep-ex]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  6. [6]

    Observation of a resonance X(1835) in J/\psi --> \gamma \pi^+ \pi^- \eta^{\prime}

    M. Ablikimet al.(BES), Observation of a resonance X(1835) inJ/ψ→γπ +π−η′, Phys. Rev. Lett.95, 262001 (2005), arXiv:hep-ex/0508025

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  7. [7]

    Confirmation of the X(1835) and observation of the resonances X(2120) and X(2370) in J/psi->gamma pi^+pi^-eta'

    M. Ablikimet al.(BESIII), Confirmation of theX(1835) and observation of the resonancesX(2120) andX(2370) inJ/ψ→γπ +π−η′, Phys. Rev. Lett.106, 072002 (2011), arXiv:1012.3510 [hep-ex]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  8. [8]

    Observation of a structure at 1.84 GeV/c$^2$ in the $3(\pi^+\pi^-)$ mass spectrum in $J/\psi\rightarrow \gamma 3(\pi^+\pi^-)$ decays

    M. Ablikimet al.(BESIII), Observation of a struc- ture at 1.84 GeV/c 2 in the 3(π +π−) mass spectrum inJ/ψ→γ3(π +π−) decays, Phys. Rev. D88, 091502 (2013), arXiv:1305.5333 [hep-ex]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  9. [9]

    Observation of an anomalous line shape of the $\eta^{\prime}\pi^{+}\pi^{-}$ mass spectrum near the $p\bar{p}$ mass threshold in $J/\psi\rightarrow\gamma\eta^{\prime}\pi^{+}\pi^{-}$

    M. Ablikimet al.(BESIII), Observation of an anoma- lous line shape of theη ′π+π− mass spectrum near the p¯pmass threshold inJ/ψ→γη ′π+π−, Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 042002 (2016), arXiv:1603.09653 [hep-ex]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  10. [10]

    Ablikimet al.(BESIII), Observation of the Anoma- lous Shape ofX(1840) inJ/ψ→γ3(π +π−) Indicating a Second Resonance Nearp¯pThreshold, Phys

    M. Ablikimet al.(BESIII), Observation of the Anoma- lous Shape ofX(1840) inJ/ψ→γ3(π +π−) Indicating a Second Resonance Nearp¯pThreshold, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 151901 (2024), arXiv:2310.17937 [hep-ex]

    work page arXiv 2024

  11. [11]

    Observation of B0bar --> D(*)0 p pbar

    K. Abeet al.(Belle), Observation of ¯B0 →D (∗)0p¯p, Phys. Rev. Lett.89, 151802 (2002), arXiv:hep-ex/0205083

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  12. [12]

    Observation of $B^{\pm}\to p \bar{p} K^{\pm}$

    K. Abeet al.(Belle), Observation ofB ± →p¯pK±, Phys. Rev. Lett.88, 181803 (2002), arXiv:hep-ex/0202017

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  13. [13]

    J. T. Weiet al.(Belle), Study ofB + →p¯pK+ andB + → p¯pπ+, Phys. Lett. B659, 80 (2008), arXiv:0706.4167 [hep-ex]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  14. [14]

    Studies of the decays $B^+ \to p \bar p h^+$ and observation of $B^+ \to \kern 0.1em\bar{\kern -0.1em\Lambda}(1520)p$

    R. Aaijet al.(LHCb), Studies of the decaysB + →p¯ph+ and observation ofB + → ¯Λ(1520)p, Phys. Rev. D88, 052015 (2013), arXiv:1307.6165 [hep-ex]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  15. [15]

    Aaijet al.(LHCb), Evidence for CP Violation in B+ →p pK+ Decays, Phys

    R. Aaijet al.(LHCb), Evidence for CP Violation in B+ →p pK+ Decays, Phys. Rev. Lett.113, 141801 (2014), arXiv:1407.5907 [hep-ex]

    work page arXiv 2014

  16. [16]

    J. P. Leeset al.(BaBar), Study ofe +e− →p¯pvia initial- state radiation at BABAR, Phys. Rev. D87, 092005 (2013), arXiv:1302.0055 [hep-ex]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  17. [17]

    R. R. Akhmetshinet al.(CMD-3), Study of the process e+e− →p¯pin the c.m. energy range from threshold to 2 GeV with the CMD-3 detector, Phys. Lett. B759, 634 (2016), arXiv:1507.08013 [hep-ex]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  18. [18]

    R. R. Akhmetshinet al.(CMD-3), Observation of a fine structure ine +e− →hadrons production at the nucleon- antinucleon threshold, Phys. Lett. B794, 64 (2019), arXiv:1808.00145 [hep-ex]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  19. [19]

    Ablikimet al.(BESIII), Measurement of proton elec- tromagnetic form factors in the time-like region using ini- tial state radiation at BESIII, Phys

    M. Ablikimet al.(BESIII), Measurement of proton elec- tromagnetic form factors in the time-like region using ini- tial state radiation at BESIII, Phys. Lett. B817, 136328 (2021), arXiv:2102.10337 [hep-ex]

    work page arXiv 2021

  20. [20]

    M. N. Achasovet al.(SND), Experimental study of the e+e− →n¯nprocess at the VEPP-2000e +e− collider with the SND detector, Eur. Phys. J. C82, 761 (2022), arXiv:2206.13047 [hep-ex]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  21. [21]

    B. Aubertet al.(BaBar), Thee +e− → 3(π+π−),2(π +π−π0) andK +K −2(π+π−) cross sections at center-of-mass energies from production threshold to 4.5-GeV measured with initial-state radiation, Phys. Rev. D73, 052003 (2006), arXiv:hep-ex/0602006

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  22. [22]

    The $e^+ e^-\to K^+ K^- \pi^+\pi^-$, $K^+ K^- \pi^0\pi^0$ and $K^+ K^- K^+ K^-$ Cross Sections Measured with Initial-State Radiation

    B. Aubertet al.(BaBar), Thee +e− →K +K −π+π−, K+K −π0π0 andK +K −K+K − cross-sections measured with initial-state radiation, Phys. Rev. D76, 012008 (2007), arXiv:0704.0630 [hep-ex]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  23. [23]

    R. R. Akhmetshinet al.(CMD-3), Study of the process e+e− →3(π +π−) in the c.m.energy range 1.5–2.0 gev with the cmd-3 detector, Phys. Lett. B723, 82 (2013), arXiv:1302.0053 [hep-ex]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  24. [24]

    P. A. Lukinet al., Investigation of the processese +e− → 2(π+π−π0) ande +e− →3(π +π−) with the aid of the CMD-3 detector, Phys. Atom. Nucl.78, 353 (2015)

    work page 2015

  25. [25]

    F.-K. Guo, C. Hanhart, U.-G. Meißner, Q. Wang, Q. Zhao, and B.-S. Zou, Hadronic molecules, Rev. Mod. Phys.90, 015004 (2018), [Erratum: Rev.Mod.Phys. 94, 029901 (2022)], arXiv:1705.00141 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  26. [26]

    Explaining the Many Threshold Structures in the Heavy-Quark Hadron Spectrum

    X.-K. Dong, F.-K. Guo, and B.-S. Zou, Explaining 9 the Many Threshold Structures in the Heavy-Quark Hadron Spectrum, Phys. Rev. Lett.126, 152001 (2021), arXiv:2011.14517 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  27. [27]

    Classification of Coupled-Channel Near-Threshold Structures

    Z.-H. Zhang and F.-K. Guo, Classification of coupled- channel near-threshold structures, Phys. Lett. B863, 139387 (2025), arXiv:2407.10620 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  28. [28]

    A New State of Baryonium

    A. Datta and P. J. O’Donnell, A New state of baryonium, Phys. Lett. B567, 273 (2003), arXiv:hep-ph/0306097

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  29. [29]

    Productions of X(1835) as baryonium with sizable gluon content

    G.-J. Ding and M.-L. Yan, Productions ofX(1835) as baryonium with sizable gluon content, Eur. Phys. J. A 28, 351 (2006), arXiv:hep-ph/0511186

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  30. [30]

    X(1835) as a baryonium state with QCD sum rules

    Z.-G. Wang and S.-L. Wan,X(1835) as a baryonium state with QCD sum rules, J. Phys. G34, 505 (2007), arXiv:hep-ph/0601105

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  31. [31]

    J. P. Dedonder, B. Loiseau, B. El-Bennich, and S. Wycech, On the structure of theX(1835) baryonium, Phys. Rev. C80, 045207 (2009), arXiv:0904.2163 [nucl- th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  32. [32]

    B. S. Zou and H. C. Chiang, One pion exchange final state interaction and the p anti-p near threshold enhancement inJ/ψ→γp¯pdecays, Phys. Rev. D69, 034004 (2004), arXiv:hep-ph/0309273

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  33. [33]

    Near threshold enhancement of the ppbar mass spectrum in J/Psi decay

    A. Sibirtsev, J. Haidenbauer, S. Krewald, U.-G. Meißner, and A. W. Thomas, Near threshold enhancement of the p¯pmass spectrum inJ/ψdecay, Phys. Rev. D71, 054010 (2005), arXiv:hep-ph/0411386

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  34. [34]

    ppbar enhancement in B and J/Psi decay

    J. Haidenbauer, U.-G. Meißner, and A. Sibirtsev, Near thresholdp¯penhancement inBandJ/ψdecay, Phys. Rev. D74, 017501 (2006), arXiv:hep-ph/0605127

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  35. [35]

    On the strong energy dependence of the e^+e^- to ppbar amplitude near threshold

    J. Haidenbauer, H. W. Hammer, U.-G. Meißner, and A. Sibirtsev, On the strong energy dependence of the e+e− ↔p¯pamplitude near threshold, Phys. Lett. B643, 29 (2006), arXiv:hep-ph/0606064

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  36. [36]

    G. Y. Chen, H. R. Dong, and J. P. Ma, Rescattering Effect and Near Threshold Enhancement ofp¯pSystem, Phys. Rev. D78, 054022 (2008), arXiv:0806.4661 [hep- ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  37. [37]

    G. Y. Chen, H. R. Dong, and J. P. Ma, Near Threshold Enhancement ofp¯pSystem andp¯pElastic Scattering, Phys. Lett. B692, 136 (2010), arXiv:1004.5174 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  38. [38]

    G. Y. Chen and J. P. Ma,N ¯NScattering at NLO Order in An Effective Theory, Phys. Rev. D83, 094029 (2011), arXiv:1101.4071 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  39. [39]

    Energy-dependent partial-wave analysis of all antiproton-proton scattering data below 925 MeV/c

    D. Zhou and R. G. E. Timmermans, Energy-dependent partial-wave analysis of all antiproton-proton scattering data below 925 MeV/c, Phys. Rev. C86, 044003 (2012), arXiv:1210.7074 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  40. [40]

    The electromagnetic form factors of the proton in the timelike region

    J. Haidenbauer, X. W. Kang, and U. G. Meißner, The electromagnetic form factors of the proton in the timelike region, Nucl. Phys. A929, 102 (2014), arXiv:1405.1628 [nucl-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  41. [41]

    X.-W. Kang, J. Haidenbauer, and U.-G. Meißner, Near- threshold ¯ppinvariant mass spectrum measured in J/ψandψ ′ decays, Phys. Rev. D91, 074003 (2015), arXiv:1502.00880 [nucl-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  42. [42]

    Origin of the structures observed in $e^+e^-$ annihilation into multipion states around the $\bar pp$ threshold

    J. Haidenbauer, C. Hanhart, X.-W. Kang, and U.-G. Meißner, Origin of the structures observed ine +e− an- nihilation into multipion states around the ¯ppthreshold, Phys. Rev. D92, 054032 (2015), arXiv:1506.08120 [nucl- th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  43. [43]

    V. F. Dmitriev, A. I. Milstein, and S. G. Salnikov, Real and virtualN ¯Npair production near the threshold, Phys. Rev. D93, 034033 (2016), arXiv:1512.00951 [hep- ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  44. [44]

    A. I. Milstein and S. G. Salnikov, Fine structure of the cross sections ofe +e− annihilation near the thresholds ofp¯pandn¯nproduction, Nucl. Phys. A977, 60 (2018), arXiv:1804.01283 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  45. [45]

    A. I. Milstein and S. G. Salnikov,N ¯Nproduction ine +e− annihilation near the threshold revisited, Phys. Rev. D 106, 074012 (2022), arXiv:2207.14020 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  46. [46]

    Dispersion-theoretical analysis of the electromagnetic form factors of the nucleon: Past, present and future

    Y.-H. Lin, H.-W. Hammer, and U.-G. Meißner, Dispersion-theoretical analysis of the electromagnetic form factors of the nucleon: Past, present and future, Eur. Phys. J. A57, 255 (2021), arXiv:2106.06357 [hep- ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  47. [47]

    Q.-H. Yang, D. Guo, and L.-Y. Dai, Structure around p¯pthreshold inJ/ψradiative decays, Phys. Rev. D107, 034030 (2023), arXiv:2209.10101 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  48. [48]

    Q.-H. Yang, D. Guo, L.-Y. Dai, J. Haidenbauer, X.-W. Kang, and U.-G. Meißner, New insights into the oscil- lations of the nucleon electromagnetic form factors, Sci. Bull.68, 2729 (2023), arXiv:2206.01494 [nucl-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  49. [49]

    Yang, L.-Y

    Q.-H. Yang, L.-Y. Dai, and U.-G. Meißner, Quantum numbers of theX(1880), Phys. Rev. D113, L011501 (2026), arXiv:2412.07599 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2026

  50. [50]

    The pole structures of the $X(1840)/X(1835)$ and the $X(1880)$

    P.-Y. Niu, Z.-Y. Zhang, Y.-Y. Li, Q. Wang, and Q. Zhao, Pole structures of theX(1840) orX(1835) and theX(1880), Phys. Rev. D110, 094020 (2024), arXiv:2408.14876 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  51. [51]

    P. G. Ortega, D. R. Entem, F. Fernandez, and J. Segovia, Revisiting the proton-antiproton scattering using a constituent-quark-model based coupled-channels calcula- tion, Phys. Lett. B862, 139281 (2025), arXiv:2410.12465 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  52. [52]

    Coupled-channel analysis of the near-threshold $e^+e^-\to N\bar{N}$ cross sections

    Z.-S. Jia, Z.-H. Zhang, F.-K. Guo, and G. Li, Coupled- channel analysis of the near-thresholde +e− →N ¯N cross sections, Phys. Rev. D111, 054014 (2025), arXiv:2410.16873 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  53. [53]

    Q.-H. Yang, D. Guo, M.-Y. Li, L.-Y. Dai, J. Haidenbauer, and U.-G. Meißner, Study of the electromagnetic form factors of the nucleons in the timelike region, JHEP08, 208, arXiv:2404.12448 [nucl-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  54. [54]

    J. Cote, M. Lacombe, B. Loiseau, B. Moussallam, and R. Vinh Mau, On the Nucleon - anti-Nucleon Optical Potential, Phys. Rev. Lett.48, 1319 (1982)

    work page 1982

  55. [55]

    Hippchen, J

    T. Hippchen, J. Haidenbauer, K. Holinde, and V. Mull, Meson - baryon dynamics in the nucleon - anti-nucleon system. 1. The Nucleon - anti-nucleon interaction, Phys. Rev. C44, 1323 (1991)

    work page 1991

  56. [56]

    V. Mull, J. Haidenbauer, T. Hippchen, and K. Holinde, Meson - baryon dynamics in the nucleon - anti-nucleon system. 2. Annihilation into two mesons, Phys. Rev. C 44, 1337 (1991)

    work page 1991

  57. [57]

    Combined Description of $\bf{\overline{N}N}$ Scattering and Annihilation With A Hadronic Model

    V. Mull and K. Holinde, Combined description of anti- N N scattering and annihilation with a hadronic model, Phys. Rev. C51, 2360 (1995), arXiv:nucl-th/9411014

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1995

  58. [58]

    Paris nucleon-antinucleon potential constrained by recent antiprotonic-atom data and antineutron-proton total cross sections

    B. El-Bennich, M. Lacombe, B. Loiseau, and S. Wycech, ParisN ¯Npotential constrained by recent antiprotonic- atom data and antineutron-proton total cross sections, Phys. Rev. C79, 054001 (2009), arXiv:0807.4454 [nucl- th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  59. [59]

    X.-W. Kang, J. Haidenbauer, and U.-G. Meißner, Antinucleon-nucleon interaction in chiral effective field theory, JHEP02(02), 113, arXiv:1311.1658 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  60. [60]

    L.-Y. Dai, J. Haidenbauer, and U.-G. Meißner, Antinucleon-nucleon interaction at next-to-next-to-next- to-leading order in chiral effective field theory, JHEP07 10 (07), 078, arXiv:1702.02065 [nucl-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  61. [61]

    Common explanation of the behavior of some $e^+e^-$ annihilation processes around $\sqrt s$ = 1.9 GeV

    P. Lichard, Common explanation of the behavior of some e+e− annihilation processes around √s= 1.9 GeV, Phys. Rev. D98, 113011 (2018), arXiv:1810.07788 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  62. [62]

    B. A. Li, A Possible 0 −+ glueball candidateX(1835), Phys. Rev. D74, 034019 (2006), arXiv:hep-ph/0510093

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  63. [63]

    X(1835) as the Lowest Mass Pseudoscalar Glueball and Proton Spin Problem

    N. Kochelev and D.-P. Min,X(1835) as the lowest mass pseudoscalar glueball and proton spin problem, Phys. Lett. B633, 283 (2006), arXiv:hep-ph/0508288

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  64. [64]

    0^-+ Trigluon Glueball and its Implication for a Recent BES Observation

    G. Hao, C.-F. Qiao, and A.-L. Zhang, 0 −+ trigluon glue- ball and its implication for a recent BES observation, Phys. Lett. B642, 53 (2006), arXiv:hep-ph/0512214

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  65. [65]

    $\eta_c$ - glueball Mixing and Resonance X(1835)

    N. Kochelev and D.-P. Min, Eta(c): Glueball mixing and resonanceX(1835), Phys. Rev. D72, 097502 (2005), arXiv:hep-ph/0510016

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  66. [66]

    X(1835): A Natural Candidate of $\eta^\prime$'s Second Radial Excitation

    T. Huang and S.-L. Zhu,X(1835): A Natural candidate of eta-prime’s second radial excitation, Phys. Rev. D73, 014023 (2006), arXiv:hep-ph/0511153

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  67. [67]

    Categorizing resonances X(1835), X(2120) and X(2370) in the pseudoscalar meson family

    J.-S. Yu, Z.-F. Sun, X. Liu, and Q. Zhao, Categorizing resonancesX(1835),X(2120) andX(2370) in the pseu- doscalar meson family, Phys. Rev. D83, 114007 (2011), arXiv:1104.3064 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  68. [68]

    Study of the pseudoscalar glueball in $J/\psi$ radiative decays

    L.-C. Gui, J.-M. Dong, Y. Chen, and Y.-B. Yang, Study of the pseudoscalar glueball inJ/ψradiative decays, Phys. Rev. D100, 054511 (2019), arXiv:1906.03666 [hep- lat]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  69. [69]

    Potential higher radial excitations in the light pseudoscalar meson family

    L.-M. Wang, Q.-S. Zhou, C.-Q. Pang, and X. Liu, Potential higher radial excitations in the light pseu- doscalar meson family, Phys. Rev. D102, 114034 (2020), arXiv:2010.05132 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  70. [70]

    Weinberg, Nuclear forces from chiral Lagrangians, Phys

    S. Weinberg, Nuclear forces from chiral Lagrangians, Phys. Lett. B251, 288 (1990)

    work page 1990

  71. [71]

    Weinberg, Effective chiral Lagrangians for nucleon - pion interactions and nuclear forces, Nucl

    S. Weinberg, Effective chiral Lagrangians for nucleon - pion interactions and nuclear forces, Nucl. Phys. B363, 3 (1991)

    work page 1991

  72. [72]

    Ordonez, L

    C. Ordonez, L. Ray, and U. van Kolck, Nucleon-nucleon potential from an effective chiral Lagrangian, Phys. Rev. Lett.72, 1982 (1994)

    work page 1982

  73. [73]

    Modern Theory of Nuclear Forces

    E. Epelbaum, H.-W. Hammer, and U.-G. Meißner, Mod- ern Theory of Nuclear Forces, Rev. Mod. Phys.81, 1773 (2009), arXiv:0811.1338 [nucl-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  74. [74]

    Chiral effective field theory and nuclear forces

    R. Machleidt and D. R. Entem, Chiral effective field theory and nuclear forces, Phys. Rept.503, 1 (2011), arXiv:1105.2919 [nucl-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  75. [75]

    Reexamination of antinucleon-nucleon interactions in covariant chiral effective field theory

    Y. Xiao, J.-X. Lu, and L.-S. Geng, Reexamination of antinucleon-nucleon interactions in covariant chiral ef- fective field theory, Phys. Rev. C110, 064002 (2024), arXiv:2406.01292 [nucl-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  76. [76]

    F.-K. Guo, C. Hanhart, Q. Wang, and Q. Zhao, Could the near-thresholdXY Zstates be simply kinematic effects?, Phys. Rev. D91, 051504 (2015), arXiv:1411.5584 [hep- ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  77. [77]

    L.-Y. Dai, J. Haidenbauer, and U. G. Meißner, Re- examining theX(4630) resonance in the reaction e+e− →Λ + c ¯Λ− c , Phys. Rev. D96, 116001 (2017), arXiv:1710.03142 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  78. [78]

    L.-Y. Dai, J. Haidenbauer, and U.-G. Meißner, J/ψ→γη ′π+π− and the structure observed around the ¯ppthreshold, Phys. Rev. D98, 014005 (2018), arXiv:1804.07077 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  79. [79]

    C. M. Vincent and S. C. Phatak, Accurate momentum- space method for scattering by nuclear and Coulomb po- tentials, Phys. Rev. C10, 391 (1974)

    work page 1974

  80. [80]

    V. G. J. Stoks and J. J. De Swart, The Magnetic moment interaction in nucleon-nucleon phase shift analyses, Phys. Rev. C42, 1235 (1990)

    work page 1990

Showing first 80 references.