pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 1705.00141 · v3 · submitted 2017-04-29 · ✦ hep-ph · hep-ex· hep-lat· nucl-th

Recognition: 2 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

Hadronic molecules

Feng-Kun Guo , Christoph Hanhart , Ulf-G. Mei{\ss}ner , Qian Wang , Qiang Zhao , Bing-Song Zou
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-17 04:48 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ph hep-exhep-latnucl-th
keywords hadronic moleculesexotic hadronsheavy quarkoniumeffective field theorylattice QCDhadron spectroscopy
0
0 comments X

The pith

Hadronic molecules allow predictions of exotic hadron properties with controlled uncertainty

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This review examines hadronic molecules as explanations for exotic states in the heavy quarkonium sector that do not fit the traditional quark model. These bound states of two hadrons, analogous to light nuclei, stand out because their properties can be calculated using effective field theories with well-understood errors. The authors survey experimental candidates, identification methods, nonrelativistic effective field theories applied in both continuum and finite volumes, pertinent lattice QCD results, and production and decay mechanisms.

Core claim

Hadronic molecules play a unique role among explanations for exotic hadron states because predictions for their properties can be made with controlled uncertainty. The review presents experimental evidences of various candidates, methods of identifying such structures, and discusses nonrelativistic effective field theories in the continuum and finite volumes along with lattice QCD results, production mechanisms, and decays.

What carries the argument

Nonrelativistic effective field theories that provide a framework for studying hadronic molecules with controlled uncertainty in both the continuum and finite volumes.

If this is right

  • Masses and decay widths of molecular candidates can be predicted with quantifiable errors.
  • Lattice QCD results in finite volumes can be compared directly to effective theory calculations for confirmation.
  • Production cross sections and decay rates can be computed reliably within the same framework.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The controlled-uncertainty approach could guide targeted searches for additional molecular states in upcoming experiments.
  • Comparing effective theory predictions to data may help resolve whether ambiguous states are molecular or have other internal structures.
  • The framework might be extended to lighter systems where relativistic effects become more important.

Load-bearing premise

That a sufficient number of the observed states are genuinely molecular rather than compact multiquark configurations or kinematic effects.

What would settle it

A precise measurement or lattice calculation showing that the mass, width, or other property of a candidate state deviates from the predictions of the nonrelativistic effective field theory beyond the estimated theoretical uncertainty.

read the original abstract

A large number of experimental discoveries especially in the heavy quarkonium sector that did not at all fit to the expectations of the until then very successful quark model led to a renaissance of hadron spectroscopy. Among various explanations of the internal structure of these excitations, hadronic molecules, being analogues of light nuclei, play a unique role since for those predictions can be made with controlled uncertainty. We review experimental evidences of various candidates of hadronic molecules, and methods of identifying such structures. Nonrelativistic effective field theories are the suitable framework for studying hadronic molecules, and are discussed in both the continuum and finite volumes. Also pertinent lattice QCD results are presented. Further, we discuss the production mechanisms and decays of hadronic molecules, and comment on the reliability of certain assertions often made in the literature.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. This review article examines hadronic molecules as analogues of light nuclei that explain exotic states in the heavy quarkonium sector. It argues that such states play a unique role because nonrelativistic effective field theories permit predictions with controlled uncertainty. The manuscript surveys experimental candidate states, identification methods, EFT formulations in both continuum and finite-volume settings, pertinent lattice QCD results, production and decay mechanisms, and the reliability of common assertions in the literature.

Significance. If the central claim holds, the review is significant for synthesizing the current status of molecular interpretations, emphasizing the predictive power of NR EFTs when the molecular picture is adopted, and connecting experimental data with lattice results. It explicitly credits the controlled-uncertainty aspect of EFT treatments and the role of finite-volume methods as strengths that distinguish this approach from purely phenomenological models.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract and §1] Abstract and §1: The claim that hadronic molecules 'play a unique role since for those predictions can be made with controlled uncertainty' is load-bearing for the review's central thesis. However, this uniqueness rests on the fraction of observed states (X(3872), Zc(3900), etc.) that remain genuinely molecular rather than compact multiquark or kinematic cusp interpretations. The manuscript should add an explicit sensitivity discussion or table quantifying how many candidates survive under alternative assignments drawn from the cited literature.
  2. [EFT sections] Section on nonrelativistic EFTs (continuum and finite volume): While the framework is correctly identified as suitable, the discussion of power counting and cutoff dependence would benefit from a concrete worked example for one state (e.g., binding energy and width uncertainty for X(3872)) that demonstrates how the error remains controlled once the molecular assignment is fixed. Without this, the 'controlled uncertainty' advantage remains stated rather than illustrated.
minor comments (2)
  1. A few figure captions could be expanded to indicate which lattice ensembles or experimental datasets are shown, improving readability for readers outside the immediate subfield.
  2. Some references to recent lattice results on finite-volume spectra could be cross-checked against post-2017 updates, though the core citations remain appropriate for a review of this scope.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading of the manuscript and the constructive comments. We address the major comments point by point below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract and §1] Abstract and §1: The claim that hadronic molecules 'play a unique role since for those predictions can be made with controlled uncertainty' is load-bearing for the review's central thesis. However, this uniqueness rests on the fraction of observed states (X(3872), Zc(3900), etc.) that remain genuinely molecular rather than compact multiquark or kinematic cusp interpretations. The manuscript should add an explicit sensitivity discussion or table quantifying how many candidates survive under alternative assignments drawn from the cited literature.

    Authors: We agree that the strength of the central claim depends on the robustness of the molecular assignments. The review is devoted to the molecular interpretation and the predictive power of NR EFTs under that assumption; alternative interpretations (compact multiquark states or cusps) are already referenced for individual candidates in the text. To address the referee's concern we will insert a short paragraph in Section 1 that summarizes the current status of alternative assignments for the principal states, citing the relevant literature. A full quantitative table would exceed the scope of this review, but the added discussion will make the sensitivity explicit. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [EFT sections] Section on nonrelativistic EFTs (continuum and finite volume): While the framework is correctly identified as suitable, the discussion of power counting and cutoff dependence would benefit from a concrete worked example for one state (e.g., binding energy and width uncertainty for X(3872)) that demonstrates how the error remains controlled once the molecular assignment is fixed. Without this, the 'controlled uncertainty' advantage remains stated rather than illustrated.

    Authors: We thank the referee for this suggestion. A concrete illustration will make the advantage of the EFT approach clearer. We will add a short worked example in the nonrelativistic EFT section (both continuum and finite-volume parts) using the X(3872). The example will show the leading-order binding energy and width together with the estimated theoretical uncertainty arising from power counting and cutoff variation, assuming the molecular picture. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

Review draws on external experimental, lattice, and EFT results with no internal circular derivations

full rationale

This is a review paper that summarizes experimental evidences for hadronic molecule candidates, methods of identification, nonrelativistic EFT frameworks in continuum and finite volume, and pertinent lattice QCD results from the literature. The central claim that hadronic molecules allow predictions with controlled uncertainty is presented as a review of existing approaches rather than a new derivation from parameters fitted within the paper. No load-bearing steps reduce by the paper's own equations or self-citations to inputs by construction. The content remains self-contained against external benchmarks and cited works.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

This is a review article rather than a derivation paper, so the ledger contains no free parameters, axioms, or invented entities introduced by the authors themselves. The review relies on standard assumptions of effective field theory and lattice QCD already established in the cited works.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5444 in / 1097 out tokens · 22925 ms · 2026-05-17T04:48:28.450369+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Forward citations

Cited by 19 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Analysis of the $D_0^*(2300)$ resonance from lattice QCD under chiral symmetry

    hep-ph 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Chiral symmetry corrections in lattice QCD fits shift the D0*(2300) resonance pole closer to the Dπ threshold and reduce its width, while coupled channels produce a two-pole structure.

  2. Compositeness of near-threshold eigenstates with Coulomb plus short-range interactions

    hep-ph 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    The compositeness of near-threshold eigenstates with Coulomb plus short-range forces is determined solely by the Coulomb scattering length, effective range, and Bohr radius, with the Coulomb interaction qualitatively ...

  3. Open-flavor threshold effects on quarkonium spectrum in the BOEFT

    hep-ph 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    BOEFT quantifies threshold-induced shifts in quarkonium masses below threshold by solving coupled Schrödinger equations using lattice potentials and one parameter fixed to the χ_c1(3872) mass.

  4. The Quantum Complexity of String Breaking in the Schwinger Model

    hep-ph 2026-01 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Quantum complexity measures applied to the Schwinger model reveal nonlocal correlations along the string and show that entanglement and magic give complementary views of string formation and breaking.

  5. Probing the hadronic molecular nature of the $\Omega(2012)$, $\Omega(2380)$, and $\Omega_c(3120)$ via femtoscopy correlation functions

    hep-ph 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Correlation function calculations with coupled-channel potentials produce low-momentum enhancements that the authors interpret as signatures of the molecular structure of Ω(2012), Ω(2380), and Ωc(3120).

  6. Probing the hadronic molecular nature of the $\Omega(2012)$, $\Omega(2380)$, and $\Omega_c(3120)$ via femtoscopy correlation functions

    hep-ph 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Numerical correlation functions computed from effective potentials exhibit enhancements that indicate the hadronic molecular nature of the Ω(2012), Ω(2380), and Ωc(3120) resonances.

  7. Determination of the $Z_c(3900)$ and the $Z_{cs}(3985)$ states from joint analysis of experimental and lattice data

    hep-ph 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Joint analysis of experimental and lattice data confirms Z_c(3900) and Z_cs(3985) as SU(3) flavor partners with pole masses (3879.6 ± 4.8) MeV and (3976.9 ± 5.1) MeV, half-widths (32.2 ± 4.7) MeV and (28.8 ± 5.9) MeV,...

  8. Coupled-channel study of the three-body $DDK$ and $D^{*}D^{*}K$

    hep-ph 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    The DDK system supports a deeply bound compact state across wide parameters and possibly a shallow three-body halo state near the D-DK threshold, with negligible D*D*K coupling and no resonances.

  9. Proposed mixing between $2P$ and $1F$ wave charmonia

    hep-ph 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Unquenched calculation finds sizable 2P-1F mixing in charmonium with angles 7.5° and 15.4°, yielding predictions for two-photon and two-gluon decay widths.

  10. All-charm tetraquarks at hadron colliders: A high-precision fragmentation perspective

    hep-ph 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    The authors construct and publicly release the TQ4Q2.0 fragmentation functions for all-heavy S-wave tetraquarks via NRQCD factorization, extending prior work with nonconstituent contributions and replica-based uncertainties.

  11. Correlation function and bound state from the $K D_{s0}^*(2317)$ interaction

    hep-ph 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    The K D_s0*(2317) system develops a narrow resonance 40 MeV below threshold under the fixed-center molecular assumption, producing a characteristic correlation function for strong attraction.

  12. Study of the molecular Properties of the $P_c$ and $P_{cs}$ States

    hep-ph 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Coupled-channel calculations show Pc and Pcs states as molecular bound states with RMS radii 0.5-2 fm when heavy-quark spin symmetry is respected across all channels.

  13. Short-range production of three bottom mesons

    hep-ph 2025-11 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Leading-order predictions for three-body point production rates of B and B* meson systems are derived in short-range NREFT from two-body input alone.

  14. Observation and investigation of the $T_{c\bar{c}1}(4430)^{+}$ structure in $B^{+} \to \psi(2S) K_{\text{S}}^{0} \pi^{+}$ decays

    hep-ex 2025-11 accept novelty 5.0

    First 4D amplitude analysis of B+ → ψ(2S) K_S0 π+ confirms the exotic T_{c c-bar 1}(4430)+ structure with properties consistent with prior observations in the isospin-related channel.

  15. Does $\psi(4660)$ exist?

    hep-ph 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    Fits using coupled channels and bare states show the psi(4660) as a conventional charmonium state above the Lambda_c pair threshold in both Belle and BESIII datasets.

  16. Hunting for $B\bar B$ molecular state $X_{b0}$ via radiative transition of $\Upsilon(10753)$

    hep-ph 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    The decay Υ(10753) → γ X_b0 is predicted to have partial width 0.2-1.5 keV and branching fraction 10^{-6} to 10^{-5} for binding energies 0-10 MeV, dominated by B1(') meson loops.

  17. $D\bar{D}^\ast$-$\pi J/\psi$ scatterings of coupled channels for $Z_c(3900)$ channel

    hep-ph 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    Quark-exchange interactions at short distances dominate the coupled-channel scattering amplitudes for Zc(3900) over meson exchanges in an effective hadron-quark model.

  18. QCD sum rule analysis of local meson-meson currents for the $K(1690)$ state

    hep-ph 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    QCD sum rules with local meson-meson currents for the K(1690) consistently predict masses around 2 GeV or above, disfavoring a molecular interpretation in favor of a compact multiquark state.

  19. Multimodal Fragmentation of All-Heavy Pentaquarks: Uncertainty-Aware Predictions for Hadron Colliders

    hep-ph 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 3.0

    Develops uncertainty-aware fragmentation functions PQ5Q1.1 for all-charm pentaquarks using multimodal perturbative and nonperturbative modeling for collider predictions.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

50 extracted references · 50 canonical work pages · cited by 18 Pith papers · 36 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Observation of X(3872) production in pp collisions at sqrt(s)= 7 TeV

    Aaij, R., et al. (LHCb) (2012), Eur. Phys. J. C72, 1972, arXiv:1112.5310 [hep-ex]. Aaij, R., et al. (LHCb) (2013), Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 222001, arXiv:1302.6269 [hep-ex]. Aaij, R., et al. (LHCb) (2014a), Nucl. Phys. B886, 665, arXiv:1404.0275 [hep-ex]. Aaij, R., et al. (LHCb) (2014b), Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 162001, arXiv:1407.7574 [hep-ex]. 56 Aaij, R., et...

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  2. [2]

    Observation of the Narrow State $X(3872)\to J/\psi\pi^{+}\pi^{-}$ in $\bar{p}p$ Collisions at $\sqrt{s}=1.96 \TeV$

    Acosta, D., et al. (CDF) (2004), Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 072001, arXiv:hep-ex/0312021 [hep-ex]. Adam, J., et al. (ALICE) (2016), Phys. Rev. C93 (2), 024917, arXiv:1506.08951 [nucl-ex]. Adolph, C., et al. (COMPASS) (2015), Phys. Rev. Lett. 115 (8), 082001, arXiv:1501.05732 [hep-ex]. Agadjanov, A., V . Bernard, U.-G. Meißner, and A. Rusetsky (2014), Nucl. Phys...

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  3. [3]

    Altenbuchinger, M., L. S. Geng, and W. Weise (2014), Phys. Rev. D89 (1), 014026, arXiv:1309.4743 [hep-ph]. del Amo Sanchez, P.,et al. (BaBar) (2010), Phys. Rev.D82, 011101, arXiv:1005.5190 [hep-ex]. Anisovich, A. V ., and V . V . Anisovich (1995), Phys. Lett.B345,

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  4. [4]

    Anisovich, V . V ., D. V . Bugg, A. V . Sarantsev, and B. S. Zou (1995), Phys. Rev. D51, R4619. Aoki, S., et al. (PACS-CS) (2009), Phys. Rev. D79, 034503, arXiv:0807.1661 [hep-lat]. Aoki, S., et al. (CS) (2011), Phys. Rev. D84, 094505, arXiv:1106.5365 [hep-lat]. Artoisenet, P., and E. Braaten (2010), Phys. Rev. D81, 114018, arXiv:0911.2016 [hep-ph]. Artoi...

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1995

  5. [5]

    Observation of a Narrow Meson Decaying to Ds+pi0 at a Mass of 2.32 GeV/c^2

    Aubert, B., et al. (BaBar) (2003), Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 242001, arXiv:hep-ex/0304021 [hep-ex]. Aubert, B., et al. (BaBar) (2005a), Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 142001, arXiv:hep-ex/0506081 [hep-ex]. Aubert, B., et al. (BaBar) (2005b), Phys. Rev. D71, 031501, arXiv:hep-ex/0412051 [hep-ex]. Aubert, B., et al. (BaBar) (2005c), Phys. Rev. D71, 071103, arXiv:hep-ex/04...

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  6. [6]

    Interpreting the $X(5568)$

    Burns, T. J., and E. S. Swanson (2016), Phys. Lett. B760, 627, arXiv:1603.04366 [hep-ph]. Butenschoen, M., Z.-G. He, and B. A. Kniehl (2013), Phys. Rev. D88, 011501, arXiv:1303.6524 [hep-ph]. Canham, D. L., H.-W. Hammer, and R. P. Springer (2009), Phys. Rev. D80, 014009, arXiv:0906.1263 [hep-ph]. Cao, Z., M. Cleven, Q. Wang, and Q. Zhao (2016), Eur. Phys....

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  7. [7]

    On the pole content of coupled channels chiral approaches used for the $\bar{K}N$ system

    Ciepl´y, A., M. Mai, U.-G. Meißner, and J. Smejkal (2016), Nucl. Phys. A954, 17, arXiv:1603.02531 [hep-ph]. Cincioglu, E., J. Nieves, A. Ozpineci, and A. U. Yilmazer (2016), Eur. Phys. J. C76 (10), 576, arXiv:1606.03239 [hep-ph]. Cleven, M., H. W. Grießhammer, F.-K. Guo, C. Hanhart, and U.-G. Meißner (2014a), Eur. Phys. J. A50, 149, arXiv:1405.2242 [hep- ...

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  8. [8]

    Copley, L. A., N. Isgur, and G. Karl (1979), Phys. Rev. D20, 768, [Erratum: Phys. Rev.D23,817(1981)]. Cotugno, G., R. Faccini, A. D. Polosa, and C. Sabelli (2010), Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 132005, arXiv:0911.2178 [hep-ph]. Cui, C.-Y ., Y .-L. Liu, W.-B. Chen, and M.-Q. Huang (2014), J. Phys. G41, 075003, arXiv:1304.1850 [hep-ph]. Dalitz, R. H., and S. F. Tua...

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1979

  9. [9]

    H., and S

    Dalitz, R. H., and S. F. Tuan (1960), Annals Phys. 10,

    work page 1960

  10. [10]

    Danilkin, I. V ., V . D. Orlovsky, and Yu. A. Simonov (2012), Phys. Rev. D85, 034012, arXiv:1106.1552 [hep-ph]. Danilkin, I. V ., and Y . A. Simonov (2010a), Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 102002, arXiv:1006.0211 [hep-ph]. Danilkin, I. V ., and Yu. A. Simonov (2010b), Phys. Rev. D81, 074027, arXiv:0907.1088 [hep-ph]. Davoudi, Z., and M. J. Savage (2011), Phys. Rev...

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  11. [11]

    Debastiani, V . R., F. Aceti, W.-H. Liang, and E. Oset (2017a), Phys. Rev. D95 (3), 034015, arXiv:1611.05383 [hep-ph]. Debastiani, V . R., S. Sakai, and E. Oset (2017b), Phys. Rev.C96 (2), 025201, arXiv:1703.01254 [hep-ph]. DeGrand, T. A. (1991), Phys. Rev.D43,

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1991

  12. [12]

    Excited Heavy-Light Systems and Hadronic Transitions

    Di Pierro, M., and E. Eichten (2001), Phys. Rev. D64, 114004, arXiv:hep-ph/0104208 [hep-ph]. Dias, J. M., F. Aceti, and E. Oset (2015), Phys. Rev. D91 (7), 076001, arXiv:1410.1785 [hep-ph]. Ding, G.-J. (2009), Phys. Rev. D79, 014001, arXiv:0809.4818 [hep- ph]. Ding, G.-J., J.-F. Liu, and M.-L. Yan (2009), Phys. Rev. D79, 054005, arXiv:0901.0426 [hep-ph]. ...

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  13. [13]

    Dynamical coupled-channel approaches on a momentum lattice

    D¨oring, M., J. Haidenbauer, U.-G. Meißner, and A. Rusetsky (2011a), Eur. Phys. J. A47, 163, arXiv:1108.0676 [hep-lat]. D¨oring, M., C. Hanhart, F. Huang, S. Krewald, and U.-G. Meißner (2009), Nucl. Phys. A829, 170, arXiv:0903.4337 [nucl-th]. D¨oring, M., B. Hu, and M. Mai (2016), arXiv:1610.10070 [hep-lat]. D¨oring, M., M. Mai, and U.-G. Meißner (2013), ...

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  14. [14]

    Eichten, E. J., K. Lane, and C. Quigg (2006), Phys. Rev. D73, 014014, [Erratum: Phys. Rev.D73,079903(2006)], arXiv:hep- ph/0511179 [hep-ph]. Epelbaum, E., H.-W. Hammer, and U.-G. Meißner (2009), Rev. Mod. Phys. 81, 1773, arXiv:0811.1338 [nucl-th]. Esposito, A., A. L. Guerrieri, L. Maiani, F. Piccinini, A. Pilloni, A. D. Polosa, and V . Riquer (2015a), Phy...

    work page arXiv 2006

  15. [15]

    Feijoo, A., V . K. Magas, A. Ramos, and E. Oset (2015), Phys. Rev. D92 (7), 076015, [Erratum: Phys. Rev.D95,no.3,039905(2017)], arXiv:1507.04640 [hep-ph]. Feijoo, A., V . K. Magas, A. Ramos, and E. Oset (2016), Eur. Phys. J. C76 (8), 446, arXiv:1512.08152 [hep-ph]. Feng, X., S. Aoki, S. Hashimoto, and T. Kaneko (2015), Phys. Rev. D91 (5), 054504, arXiv:14...

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  16. [16]

    Pion Interactions in the X(3872)

    Fleming, S., M. Kusunoki, T. Mehen, and U. van Kolck (2007), Phys. Rev. D76, 034006, arXiv:hep-ph/0703168 [hep-ph]. Fleming, S., and T. Mehen (2008), Phys. Rev. D78, 094019, arXiv:0807.2674 [hep-ph]. Fleming, S., and T. Mehen (2012), Phys. Rev. D85, 014016, arXiv:1110.0265 [hep-ph]. Flynn, J. M., P. Fritzsch, T. Kawanai, C. Lehner, B. Samways, C. T. Sachr...

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  17. [17]

    Gell-Mann, M., R. J. Oakes, and B. Renner (1968), Phys. Rev. 175,

    work page 1968

  18. [18]

    Scale Invariance in Heavy Hadron Molecules

    Geng, L., J. Lu, and M. P. Valderrama (2017), arXiv:1704.06123 [hep-ph]. Geng, L. S., and E. Oset (2009), Phys. Rev. D79, 074009, arXiv:0812.1199 [hep-ph]. G¨ockeler, M., R. Horsley, M. Lage, U.-G. Meißner, P. E. L. Rakow, A. Rusetsky, G. Schierholz, and J. M. Zanotti (2012), Phys. Rev. D86, 094513, arXiv:1206.4141 [hep-lat]. Godfrey, S. (2003), Phys. Let...

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  19. [19]

    Bottomonium Mesons and Strategies for Their Observation

    Godfrey, S., and K. Moats (2015), Phys. Rev. D92 (5), 054034, arXiv:1507.00024 [hep-ph]. Goebel, C. J., S. F. Tuan, and W. A. Simmons (1983), Phys. Rev. D27,

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  20. [20]

    (Belle) (2006), Phys

    Gokhroo, G., et al. (Belle) (2006), Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 162002, arXiv:hep-ex/0606055 [hep-ex]. Gomez Nicola, A., and J. R. Pel´aez (2002), Phys. Rev.D65, 054009, arXiv:hep-ph/0109056 [hep-ph]. Gong, Q.-R., Z.-H. Guo, C. Meng, G.-Y . Tang, Y .-F. Wang, and H.-Q. Zheng (2016a), Phys. Rev. D94 (11), 114019, 61 arXiv:1604.08836 [hep-ph]. Gong, Q.-R., J.-L. P...

    work page arXiv 2006

  21. [21]

    X(3872) and its Partners in the Heavy Quark Limit of QCD

    Hidalgo-Duque, C., J. Nieves, A. Ozpineci, and V . Zamiralov (2013a), Phys. Lett. B727, 432, arXiv:1305.4487 [hep-ph]. Hidalgo-Duque, C., J. Nieves, and M. P. Valderrama (2013b), Phys. Rev. D87 (7), 076006, arXiv:1210.5431 [hep-ph]. Hiller Blin, A. N., C. Fern ´andez-Ram´ırez, A. Jackura, V . Mathieu, V . I. Mokeev, A. Pilloni, and A. P. Szczepaniak (2016...

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  22. [22]

    The nature of $Z_b$ states from a combined analysis of $\Upsilon(5S)\rightarrow h_b(mP) \pi^+ \pi^-$ and $\Upsilon(5S)\rightarrow B^{(\ast)}\bar B^{(\ast)}\pi$

    Huo, W.-S., and G.-Y . Chen (2016), Eur. Phys. J. C76 (3), 172, arXiv:1501.02189 [hep-ph]. Hyodo, T. (2013a), Int. J. Mod. Phys. A28, 1330045, arXiv:1310.1176 [hep-ph]. Hyodo, T. (2013b), Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 132002, arXiv:1305.1999 [hep-ph]. Hyodo, T., and D. Jido (2012), Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 67, 55, arXiv:1104.4474 [nucl-th]. Hyodo, T., D. Jido, and...

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  23. [23]

    Isgur, N., and M. B. Wise (1989), Phys. Lett. B232,

    work page 1989

  24. [24]

    Jaffe, R. L. (2007), Proceedings, 4th International Workshop on QCD - Theory and Experiment (QCD@Work 2007): Martina Franca, Italy, June 16-20, 2007 , AIP Conf. Proc. 964, 1, [Prog. Theor. Phys. Suppl.168,127(2007)], arXiv:hep-ph/0701038 [hep- ph]. Jansen, M., H.-W. Hammer, and Y . Jia (2014), Phys. Rev. D89 (1), 014033, arXiv:1310.6937 [hep-ph]. Jansen, ...

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  25. [25]

    Heavy pentaquark states $P_c(4380)$ and $P_c(4450)$ in the $J/\psi$ production induced by pion beams off the nucleon

    Kim, S.-H., H.-C. Kim, and A. Hosaka (2016), Phys. Lett. B763, 358, arXiv:1605.02919 [hep-ph]. Klarsfeld, S., J. Martorell, and D. W. L. Sprung (1984), J. Phys. G10,

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  26. [26]

    Baryon spectroscopy

    Klempt, E., and J.-M. Richard (2010), Rev. Mod. Phys. 82, 1095, arXiv:0901.2055 [hep-ph]. Klempt, E., and A. Zaitsev (2007), Phys. Rept. 454, 1, arXiv:0708.4016 [hep-ph]. Kolomeitsev, E. E., and M. F. M. Lutz (2004), Phys. Lett. B582, 39, arXiv:hep-ph/0307133 [hep-ph]. 63 K¨onig, S., D. Lee, and H.-W. Hammer (2011), Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 112001, arXiv:110...

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  27. [27]

    Lang, C. B., L. Leskovec, D. Mohler, S. Prelovsek, and R. M. Woloshyn (2014), Phys. Rev. D90 (3), 034510, arXiv:1403.8103 [hep-lat]. Lang, C. B., D. Mohler, S. Prelovsek, and M. Vid- mar (2011), Phys. Rev. D84 (5), 054503, [Erratum: Phys. Rev.D89,no.5,059903(2014)], arXiv:1105.5636 [hep-lat]. Lang, C. B., D. Mohler, S. Prelovsek, and R. M. Woloshyn (2015)...

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  28. [28]

    Coupled-Channel and Screening Effects in Charmonium Spectrum

    Li, B.-Q., C. Meng, and K.-T. Chao (2009), Phys. Rev.D80, 014012, arXiv:0904.4068 [hep-ph]. Li, G. (2013), Eur. Phys. J. C73 (11), 2621, arXiv:1304.4458 [hep- ph]. Li, G., and X.-H. Liu (2013a), Phys. Rev. D88 (9), 094008, arXiv:1307.2622 [hep-ph]. Li, G., X.-h. Liu, Q. Wang, and Q. Zhao (2013a), Phys. Rev.D88 (1), 014010, arXiv:1302.1745 [hep-ph]. Li, G....

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  29. [29]

    Mass and $K\Lambda$ coupling of $N^*(1535)$

    Liu, B. C., and B. S. Zou (2006), Phys. Rev. Lett. 96 (4), 042002, arXiv:nucl-th/0503069 [nucl-th]. Liu, C. (2017), Proceedings, 34th International Symposium on Lat- tice Field Theory (Lattice 2016): Southampton, UK, July 24-30, 2016, PoS LA TTICE2016, 006, arXiv:1612.00103 [hep-lat]. Liu, C., X. Feng, and S. He (2006), QCD and hadronic physics. Pro- ceed...

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  30. [30]

    New structures in the proton-antiproton system

    Lorenz, I. T., H.-W. Hammer, and U.-G. Meißner (2015), Phys. Rev. D92 (3), 034018, arXiv:1506.02282 [hep-ph]. Lu, J.-X., H.-X. Chen, Z.-H. Guo, J. Nieves, J.-J. Xie, and L.-S. Geng (2016a), Phys. Rev. D93 (11), 114028, arXiv:1603.05388 [hep-ph]. Lu, J.-X., E. Wang, J.-J. Xie, L.-S. Geng, and E. Oset (2016b), Phys. Rev. D93, 094009, arXiv:1601.00075 [hep-p...

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  31. [31]

    (1991), Nucl

    L¨uscher, M. (1991), Nucl. Phys. B354,

    work page 1991

  32. [32]

    On charm baryon resonances and chiral symmetry

    Lutz, M. F. M., and E. E. Kolomeitsev (2004a), Nucl. Phys. A730, 110, arXiv:hep-ph/0307233 [hep-ph]. Lutz, M. F. M., and E. E. Kolomeitsev (2004b), Nucl. Phys. A730, 392, arXiv:nucl-th/0307039 [nucl-th]. Lutz, M. F. M., and M. Soyeur (2008), Nucl. Phys. A813, 14, arXiv:0710.1545 [hep-ph]. Luu, T., and M. J. Savage (2011), Phys. Rev. D83, 114508, arXiv:110...

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  33. [33]

    Meißner, U.-G., and J. A. Oller (2015), Phys. Lett. B751, 59, arXiv:1507.07478 [hep-ph]. Meißner, U.-G., G. R ´ıos, and A. Rusetsky (2015), Phys. Rev. Lett. 114 (9), 091602, [Erratum: Phys. Rev. Lett.117,no.6,069902(2016)], arXiv:1412.4969 [hep-lat]. Meng, C., and K.-T. Chao (2007), Phys. Rev. D75, 114002, arXiv:hep-ph/0703205 [hep-ph]. Meng, C., and K.-T...

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  34. [34]

    Morgan, D., and M. R. Pennington (1993), Phys. Rev. D48,

    work page 1993

  35. [35]

    Measurement of the Sigma pi photoproduction line shapes near the Lambda(1405)

    Moriya, K., et al. (CLAS) (2013), Phys. Rev. C87 (3), 035206, arXiv:1301.5000 [nucl-ex]. Moriya, K., et al. (CLAS) (2014), Phys. Rev. Lett. 112 (8), 082004, arXiv:1402.2296 [hep-ex]. Moxhay, P. (1989), Phys. Rev.D39,

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  36. [36]

    Enhanced non-quark-antiquark and non-glueball Nc behavior of light scalar mesons

    65 Nakamura, K., et al. (Particle Data Group) (2010), J. Phys. G37, 075021. Nebreda, J., J. R. Pel ´aez, and G. R ´ıos (2011), Phys. Rev. D84, 074003, arXiv:1107.4200 [hep-ph]. Neubert, M. (1994), Phys. Rept. 245, 259, arXiv:hep-ph/9306320 [hep-ph]. Nieves, J., and M. P. Valderrama (2011), Phys. Rev. D84, 056015, arXiv:1106.0600 [hep-ph]. Nieves, J., and ...

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  37. [37]

    Decays and productions via bottomonium for Z_b resonances and other B anti-B molecules

    Ohkoda, S., Y . Yamaguchi, S. Yasui, and A. Hosaka (2012a), Phys. Rev. D86, 117502, arXiv:1210.3170 [hep-ph]. Ohkoda, S., Y . Yamaguchi, S. Yasui, K. Sudoh, and A. Hosaka (2012b), Phys. Rev. D86, 014004, arXiv:1111.2921 [hep-ph]. Ohnishi, S., Y . Ikeda, T. Hyodo, and W. Weise (2016), Phys. Rev. C93 (2), 025207, arXiv:1512.00123 [nucl-th]. Oller, J. A., an...

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  38. [38]

    Ono, S., and N. A. T ¨ornqvist (1984), Z. Phys. C23,

    work page 1984

  39. [39]

    Ortega, P. G., D. R. Entem, and F. Fernandez (2013), Phys. Lett. B718, 1381, arXiv:1210.2633 [hep-ph]. Ortega, P. G., D. R. Entem, and F. Fern ´andez (2017), Phys. Lett. B764, 207, arXiv:1606.06148 [hep-ph]. Ortega, P. G., J. Segovia, D. R. Entem, and F. Fernandez (2010), Phys. Rev. D81, 054023, arXiv:1001.3948 [hep-ph]. Oset, E., and A. Ramos (1998), Nuc...

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  40. [40]

    Decay channels and charmonium mass-shifts

    Pennington, M. R., and D. J. Wilson (2007), Phys. Rev. D76, 077502, arXiv:0704.3384 [hep-ph]. Phillips, D. R., S. R. Beane, and M. C. Birse (1999), J. Phys. A32, 3397, arXiv:hep-th/9810049 [hep-th]. Pilloni, A., C. Fernandez-Ramirez, A. Jackura, V . Mathieu, M. Mikhasenko, J. Nys, and A. P. Szczepaniak (JPAC) (2016), arXiv:1612.06490 [hep-ph]. Pirjol, D.,...

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  41. [41]

    Two-body wave functions and compositeness from scattering amplitudes. I. General properties with schematic models

    Sekihara, T. (2017), Phys. Rev. C95 (2), 025206, arXiv:1609.09496 [quant-ph]. Sekihara, T., T. Hyodo, and D. Jido (2015), PTEP 2015, 063D04, arXiv:1411.2308 [hep-ph]. 66 Shen, C. P., et al. (Belle) (2014), Phys. Rev. D89 (7), 072015, arXiv:1402.6578 [hep-ex]. Shen, C.-W., F.-K. Guo, J.-J. Xie, and B.-S. Zou (2016), Nucl. Phys. A954, 393, arXiv:1603.04672 ...

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  42. [42]

    Swanson, E. S. (2004a), Phys. Lett. B598, 197, arXiv:hep- ph/0406080 [hep-ph]. Swanson, E. S. (2004b), Phys. Lett. B588, 189, arXiv:hep- ph/0311229 [hep-ph]. Swanson, E. S. (2006), Phys. Rept. 429, 243, arXiv:hep-ph/0601110 [hep-ph]. Swanson, E. S. (2015), Phys. Rev.D91 (3), 034009, arXiv:1409.3291 [hep-ph]. Swanson, E. S. (2016), Int. J. Mod. Phys. E25 (...

    work page arXiv 2006

  43. [43]

    Compositeness of hadron resonances in finite volume

    Tsuchida, Y ., and T. Hyodo (2017), arXiv:1703.02675 [nucl-th]. Uglov, T. V ., and P. N. Pakhlov (2016), Phys. Atom. Nucl. 79 (2), 285, [Yad. Fiz.79,no.2,174(2016)]. Valderrama, M. P. (2012), Phys. Rev.D85, 114037, arXiv:1204.2400 [hep-ph]. Van Der Leun, C., and C. Alderliesten (1982), Nucl. Phys. A380,

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  44. [44]

    V oloshin, M. B. (1983), JETP Lett. 37, 69, [Pisma Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz.37,58(1983)]. V oloshin, M. B. (2004a), Phys. Lett. B604, 69, arXiv:hep- ph/0408321 [hep-ph]. V oloshin, M. B. (2004b), Phys. Lett. B579, 316, arXiv:hep- ph/0309307 [hep-ph]. V oloshin, M. B. (2006), Int. J. Mod. Phys. A21, 1239, arXiv:hep- ph/0509192 [hep-ph]. V oloshin, M. B. (2011),...

    work page arXiv 1983

  45. [45]

    (1965), Phys

    Weinberg, S. (1965), Phys. Rev.137, B672. Weinberg, S. (1979), Physica A96,

    work page 1965

  46. [46]

    D., and N

    Weinstein, J. D., and N. Isgur (1982), Phys. Rev. Lett. 48,

    work page 1982

  47. [47]

    D., and N

    Weinstein, J. D., and N. Isgur (1990), Phys. Rev. D41,

    work page 1990

  48. [48]

    67 Wiese, U. J. (1989), The 1988 Symposium on Lattice Field Theory: Lattice 88 Batavia, Illinois, September 22-25, 1988 , Nucl. Phys. Proc. Suppl. 9,

    work page 1989

  49. [49]

    Electromagnetic Structure of the Z_c(3900)

    Wilbring, E., H.-W. Hammer, and U.-G. Meißner (2013), Phys. Lett. B726, 326, arXiv:1304.2882 [hep-ph]. Wise, M. B. (1992), Phys. Rev. D45 (7), R2188. Wong, C.-Y . (2004), Phys. Rev.C69, 055202, arXiv:hep-ph/0311088 [hep-ph]. Wu, J.-J., T.-S. H. Lee, A. W. Thomas, and R. D. Young (2014a), Phys. Rev. C90 (5), 055206, arXiv:1402.4868 [hep-lat]. Wu, J.-J., X....

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  50. [50]

    Comprehending heavy charmonia and their decays by hadron loop effects

    Zhou, Z.-Y ., and Z. Xiao (2014), Eur. Phys. J. A50 (10), 165, arXiv:1309.1949 [hep-ph]. Zhou, Z.-Y ., and Z. Xiao (2015), Phys. Rev. D92 (9), 094024, arXiv:1505.05761 [hep-ph]. Zhou, Z.-Y ., and Z. Xiao (2017), arXiv:1704.04438 [hep-ph]. Zhu, S.-L. (2000), Phys. Rev. D61, 114019, arXiv:hep-ph/0002023 [hep-ph]. Zou, B. S. (2008), Eur. Phys. J.A35, 325, ar...

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014