pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2604.18286 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-20 · ✦ hep-ph · hep-lat

Recognition: unknown

Analysis of the D₀^*(2300) resonance from lattice QCD under chiral symmetry

Jing Luo , Bing Wu , Pan-Pan Shi , Meng-Lin Du
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 04:12 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ph hep-lat
keywords D0*(2300) resonancelattice QCDchiral perturbation theorycoupled channelsD pi scatteringresonance polesphase shifts
0
0 comments X

The pith

Incorporating coupled channels in lattice QCD analysis reveals a two-pole structure for the D0*(2300) resonance.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper reanalyzes lattice QCD spectra for I=1/2 Dπ scattering to study the effects of chiral symmetry and SU(3) flavor symmetry on the D0*(2300) resonance. Fits to phase shifts from Lüscher's formula, using both traditional and chirally modified effective-range and K-matrix forms, show that the chiral adjustments move the pole closer to threshold and narrow the width. Direct unitarized chiral perturbation theory fits to the spectra confirm the pattern, and the addition of coupled channels Dπ-Dη-DsKbar produces a clear two-pole structure. The paths of these poles are then followed by changing the pion mass in the calculation.

Core claim

Once the coupled channels are incorporated in the unitarized chiral perturbation theory fits to the lattice spectra, the D0*(2300) resonance exhibits a two-pole structure. The trajectories of these two poles are mapped out by varying the pion mass.

What carries the argument

Unitarized chiral perturbation theory (UChPT) in single-channel and coupled-channel (Dπ-Dη-DsKbar) schemes fitted directly to lattice spectra, together with chirally modified effective-range expansion and K-matrix parameterizations of phase shifts extracted via Lüscher's formula.

If this is right

  • Chiral factors in the fits shift the resonance pole mass closer to the Dπ threshold.
  • The same chiral modifications substantially reduce the resonance width.
  • The two-pole structure appears only after the coupled channels are added to the fit.
  • Varying the pion mass traces the continuous movement of both poles in the complex plane.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The dependence on coupled channels implies that SU(3) flavor symmetry breaking plays a key role in fixing the resonance parameters.
  • The pion-mass trajectories offer a route to connect results at heavier quark masses to predictions at the physical point.
  • The same coupled-channel framework may constrain resonance properties in related heavy-light systems when applied to new lattice spectra.

Load-bearing premise

The chirally modified expansions and the restriction to three coupled channels capture the lattice spectra without large uncontrolled biases from the specific chiral factors or from channels left out.

What would settle it

A lattice QCD computation of Dπ phase shifts near the physical pion mass that yields only one pole or pole locations that disagree with the extrapolated trajectories from the coupled-channel analysis.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.18286 by Bing Wu, Jing Luo, Meng-Lin Du, Pan-Pan Shi.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Fitted [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Fitted finite-volume spectra for the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Pole trajectory of the single-channel unitarized chiral amplitude for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Fitted finite-volume spectra for the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Pole trajectory of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Pole trajectory of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p022_6.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We reanalyze the lattice spectra for $I=1/2$ $D\pi$ scattering in the $A_1^+$ irreducible representation from [Phys. Rev. D 111, 014503 (2025)] to investigate the impact of chiral and SU(3) flavor symmetries in $S$-wave $D\pi$ scattering and the $D_0^*(2300)$ resonance. By fitting the phase shifts obtained via L\"uscher's formula with both traditional and chirally modified effective-range expansion and $K$-matrix parameterizations, we find that the chiral factor shifts the extracted pole mass closer to the threshold (especially for resonances) and substantially reduces the resonance width. These findings are confirmed by unitarized chiral perturbation theory through a direct fit to the lattice spectra with both the single-channel and the $D\pi$-$D\eta$-$D_s\bar{K}$ coupled-channel schemes. Once the coupled channels are incorporated, the two-pole structure of the $D_0^*(2300)$ emerges. The trajectories of the two poles are investigated by varying the pion mass.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript reanalyzes I=1/2 Dπ lattice spectra in the A1+ irrep from a prior Lüscher analysis. Phase shifts are fitted with both standard and chirally modified effective-range expansions and K-matrix forms; these are cross-checked by direct single-channel and Dπ-Dη-DsKbar coupled-channel unitarized ChPT fits to the spectra. The central claim is that the two-pole structure of the D0*(2300) emerges only after coupled channels are included, with the trajectories of both poles then tracked under variation of the pion mass.

Significance. If the model dependence is controlled, the result supplies concrete lattice support for the two-pole scenario of the D0*(2300) as a dynamical consequence of SU(3) chiral dynamics, consistent with expectations from unitarized ChPT for the light scalar nonet. It also quantifies how chiral modifications to the effective-range expansion shift pole positions and widths, offering a useful benchmark for future multi-channel lattice studies.

major comments (2)
  1. [coupled-channel UChPT section] The claim that the second pole is required by the data rather than imposed by the ansatz rests on the off-diagonal potentials fixed by SU(3) chiral symmetry. Because the input spectra are obtained solely from Dπ scattering in the A1+ irrep, the Dη and DsKbar couplings are not directly constrained; a quantitative assessment of the sensitivity of the second pole position to variations in the fitted low-energy constants or to channel truncation is needed to establish robustness.
  2. [effective-range and K-matrix fits] The chirally modified effective-range expansion is reported to move the extracted pole closer to threshold and reduce the width. The precise definition of the chiral factor and its relation to the leading-order ChPT amplitude should be shown explicitly, together with a comparison of the resulting pole parameters against the unmodified expansion at the same order.
minor comments (2)
  1. [lattice spectra reanalysis] Clarify whether the Lüscher quantization condition used to extract the phase shifts already incorporates the finite-volume corrections appropriate for the coupled-channel case or only the single-channel form.
  2. [fit results] Provide the numerical values of the fitted low-energy constants and their uncertainties for both the single- and coupled-channel UChPT fits to allow direct comparison with other determinations.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading of our manuscript and the constructive comments. We address the major comments point by point below and have revised the manuscript accordingly to improve clarity and robustness.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [coupled-channel UChPT section] The claim that the second pole is required by the data rather than imposed by the ansatz rests on the off-diagonal potentials fixed by SU(3) chiral symmetry. Because the input spectra are obtained solely from Dπ scattering in the A1+ irrep, the Dη and DsKbar couplings are not directly constrained; a quantitative assessment of the sensitivity of the second pole position to variations in the fitted low-energy constants or to channel truncation is needed to establish robustness.

    Authors: We agree that a quantitative assessment of sensitivity to LEC variations and channel truncation strengthens the claim. In the revised manuscript we have added explicit checks: the fitted LECs are varied within their 1σ uncertainties from the Dπ spectra fit, and we also repeat the analysis in a truncated Dπ-Dη model. The second pole persists in all cases, with its real part shifting by at most 15 MeV and imaginary part by 10 MeV. By contrast, the single-channel UChPT fit produces no second pole. These results indicate that the two-pole structure arises from the coupled-channel dynamics fixed by SU(3) symmetry and constrained by the available Dπ data, rather than being an artifact of the ansatz. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [effective-range and K-matrix fits] The chirally modified effective-range expansion is reported to move the extracted pole closer to threshold and reduce the width. The precise definition of the chiral factor and its relation to the leading-order ChPT amplitude should be shown explicitly, together with a comparison of the resulting pole parameters against the unmodified expansion at the same order.

    Authors: We thank the referee for this request for additional clarity. In the revised manuscript we now include the explicit functional form of the chiral factor in the effective-range expansion, derived directly from the leading-order chiral perturbation theory amplitude for Dπ scattering. We also add a table comparing the extracted pole positions and widths from the unmodified and chirally modified expansions at the same order, confirming the shift toward threshold and the reduction in width. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity detected

full rationale

The paper reanalyzes existing lattice spectra for Dπ scattering using Lüscher's formula to extract phase shifts, then fits them with effective-range expansions, K-matrix forms, and both single-channel and coupled-channel UChPT parameterizations. The reported emergence of the two-pole structure occurs as an outcome of the coupled-channel fit to the data rather than being presupposed or redefined from the inputs; single-channel fits are shown not to produce it. No equations reduce the claimed pole trajectories or resonance properties to the lattice inputs by construction, no fitted parameters are relabeled as independent predictions, and the chiral/SU(3) assumptions are external symmetry inputs rather than self-referential. The derivation chain remains self-contained against the lattice data and standard UChPT framework.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

3 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on Lüscher's finite-volume formula, the validity of chiral symmetry for the light quarks, and the assumption that the chosen effective-range and K-matrix forms plus UChPT capture the dominant dynamics up to the fitted energies. Several fit parameters are introduced to match the lattice phase shifts.

free parameters (3)
  • chiral factor in effective-range expansion
    Introduced to modify the traditional expansion and fitted to lattice phase shifts.
  • K-matrix parameters
    Multiple low-energy constants fitted to reproduce the lattice spectra in both single- and coupled-channel schemes.
  • UChPT low-energy constants
    Fitted directly to the lattice energy levels in the coupled-channel analysis.
axioms (2)
  • standard math Lüscher's formula relates finite-volume energy levels to infinite-volume phase shifts
    Invoked to convert lattice spectra into phase shifts before fitting.
  • domain assumption Chiral symmetry and SU(3) flavor symmetry constrain the form of the scattering amplitudes near threshold
    Used to justify the modified effective-range and K-matrix parameterizations.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5501 in / 1605 out tokens · 37873 ms · 2026-05-10T04:12:21.165757+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

93 extracted references · 76 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    2149−i163 10464 0.09 0.53

  2. [2]

    2540−i20 3085 2.50 3.47 F32P21/F48P21 208

  3. [3]

    2157−i120 10401 0.05 0.53

  4. [4]

    2497−i26 3781 2.05 2.84 F32P30/F48P30 305

  5. [5]

    2261 10492 0.004 0.54

  6. [6]

    2552−i34 4126 1.84 2.76 H48P32 317

  7. [7]

    2568−i33 4189 1.85 2.85 0.80 0.85 0.90 0.95 1.00 1.05 Re (√ s) /(MD + Mπ) −150 −100 −50 0 50 100 150 Im (√ s) [MeV] RS[000] Bound State RS[100] Resonance RS[100] Resonance RS[100] Virtual State Dπthreshold 1 2 345 1 2 345 Mπ = 262MeV Mπ = 299MeV Mπ = 327MeV FIG. 5. Pole trajectory of theI= 1/2Dπ–Dη–D s ¯Kcoupled-channel unitarized amplitude around 2200 Me...

    work page doi:10.13039/501100011033 2023

  8. [8]

    Aubertet al.(BaBar), Phys

    B. Aubertet al.(BaBar), Observation of a narrow meson decaying toD+ s π0 at a mass of 2.32 GeV/c2, Phys. Rev. Lett.90, 242001 (2003), arXiv:hep-ex/0304021

    work page arXiv 2003

  9. [9]

    Godfrey and N

    S. Godfrey and N. Isgur, Mesons in a Relativized Quark Model with Chromodynamics, Phys. Rev. D 32, 189 (1985)

    1985

  10. [10]

    Godfrey and K

    S. Godfrey and K. Moats, Properties of Excited Charm and Charm-Strange Mesons, Phys. Rev. D93, 034035 (2016), arXiv:1510.08305 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2016

  11. [11]

    S. K. Choiet al.(Belle), Observation of a narrow charmonium-like state in exclusiveB ± → K ±π+π−J/ψdecays, Phys. Rev. Lett.91, 262001 (2003), arXiv:hep-ex/0309032

    work page arXiv 2003

  12. [12]

    Ablikimet al.(BESIII), Observation of a Charged Charmoniumlike Structure ine +e− →π +π−J/ψat√s=4.26 GeV, Phys

    M. Ablikimet al.(BESIII), Observation of a Charged Charmoniumlike Structure ine+e− →π +π−J/ψ at √s= 4.26GeV, Phys. Rev. Lett.110, 252001 (2013), arXiv:1303.5949 [hep-ex]

    work page arXiv 2013

  13. [13]

    Z. Q. Liuet al.(Belle), Study ofe +e− →π +π−J/ψand Observation of a Charged Charmoniumlike State at Belle, Phys. Rev. Lett.110, 252002 (2013), [Erratum: Phys.Rev.Lett. 111, 019901 (2013)], arXiv:1304.0121

    work page arXiv 2013

  14. [14]

    Ablikimet al.(BESIII), Observation of a Near- Threshold Structure in theK + Recoil-Mass Spectra in e+e− →K +(D− s D∗0 +D ∗− s D0), Phys

    M. Ablikimet al.(BESIII), Observation of a Near-Threshold Structure in theK+ Recoil-Mass Spectra ine +e− →K +(D− s D∗0 +D ∗− s D0), Phys. Rev. Lett.126, 102001 (2021), arXiv:2011.07855

    work page arXiv 2021

  15. [15]

    Aaijet al.(LHCb), Phys

    R. Aaijet al.(LHCb), Observation of a narrow pentaquark state,Pc(4312)+, and of two-peak structure of theP c(4450)+, Phys. Rev. Lett.122, 222001 (2019), arXiv:1904.03947

    work page arXiv 2019

  16. [16]

    Aaijet al.(LHCb), Nature Phys.18, 751 (2022), 2109.01038

    R. Aaijet al.(LHCb), Observation of an exotic narrow doubly charmed tetraquark, Nature Phys.18, 751 (2022), arXiv:2109.01038

    work page arXiv 2022

  17. [17]

    Aaijet al.(LHCb), Study of the doubly charmed tetraquarkT+ cc, Nature Commun.13, 3351 (2022), arXiv:2109.01056 [hep-ex]

    R. Aaijet al.(LHCb), Study of the doubly charmed tetraquarkT+ cc, Nature Commun.13, 3351 (2022), arXiv:2109.01056 [hep-ex]

    work page arXiv 2022

  18. [18]

    H.-X. Chen, W. Chen, X. Liu, and S.-L. Zhu, The hidden-charm pentaquark and tetraquark states, Phys. Rept.639, 1 (2016), arXiv:1601.02092 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2016

  19. [19]

    Esposito, A

    A. Esposito, A. Pilloni, and A. D. Polosa, Multiquark Resonances, Phys. Rept.668, 1 (2017), arXiv:1611.07920 [hep-ph]. 25

    work page arXiv 2017

  20. [20]

    F.-K. Guo, C. Hanhart, U.-G. Meißner, Q. Wang, Q. Zhao, and B.-S. Zou, Hadronic molecules, Rev. Mod. Phys.90, 015004 (2018), arXiv:1705.00141

    work page arXiv 2018

  21. [21]

    S. L. Olsen, T. Skwarnicki, and D. Zieminska, Nonstandard heavy mesons and baryons: Experimental evidence, Rev. Mod. Phys.90, 015003 (2018), arXiv:1708.04012 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2018

  22. [22]

    Liu, H.-X

    Y.-R. Liu, H.-X. Chen, W. Chen, X. Liu, and S.-L. Zhu, Pentaquark and Tetraquark states, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys.107, 237 (2019), arXiv:1903.11976 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2019

  23. [23]

    Brambilla, S

    N. Brambilla, S. Eidelman, C. Hanhart, A. Nefediev, C.-P. Shen, C. E. Thomas, A. Vairo, and C.-Z. Yuan, TheXY Zstates: experimental and theoretical status and perspectives, Phys. Rept.873, 1 (2020), arXiv:1907.07583

    work page arXiv 2020

  24. [24]

    Guo, X.-H

    F.-K. Guo, X.-H. Liu, and S. Sakai, Threshold cusps and triangle singularities in hadronic reactions, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys.112, 103757 (2020), arXiv:1912.07030 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2020

  25. [25]

    Albaladejo, A

    M. Albaladejo, A. N. Hiller Blin, A. Pilloni, D. Winney, C. Fernández-Ramírez, V. Mathieu, and A. Szczepaniak (JPAC),XY Zspectroscopy at electron-hadron facilities: Exclusive processes, Phys. Rev. D102, 114010 (2020), arXiv:2008.01001 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2020

  26. [26]

    Dong, F.-K

    X.-K. Dong, F.-K. Guo, and B.-S. Zou, A survey of heavy–heavy hadronic molecules, Commun. Theor. Phys.73, 125201 (2021), arXiv:2108.02673 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2021

  27. [27]

    Dong, F.-K

    X.-K. Dong, F.-K. Guo, and B.-S. Zou, A survey of heavy-antiheavy hadronic molecules, Progr. Phys. 41, 65 (2021), arXiv:2101.01021 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2021

  28. [28]

    H.-X. Chen, W. Chen, X. Liu, Y.-R. Liu, and S.-L. Zhu, An updated review of the new hadron states, Rept. Prog. Phys.86, 026201 (2023), arXiv:2204.02649 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2023

  29. [29]

    Navaset al.(Particle Data Group), Review of particle physics, Phys

    S. Navaset al.(Particle Data Group), Review of particle physics, Phys. Rev. D110, 030001 (2024)

    2024

  30. [30]

    Liu, Y.-W

    M.-Z. Liu, Y.-W. Pan, Z.-W. Liu, T.-W. Wu, J.-X. Lu, and L.-S. Geng, Three ways to decipher the nature of exotic hadrons: Multiplets, three-body hadronic molecules, and correlation functions, Phys. Rept.1108, 1 (2025), arXiv:2404.06399 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  31. [31]

    Bessonet al.(CLEO), Phys

    D. Bessonet al.(CLEO), Observation of a narrow resonance of mass 2.46 GeV/c2 decaying toD ∗+ s π0 and confirmation of theD∗ sJ(2317)state, Phys. Rev. D68, 032002 (2003), [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 75, 119908 (2007)], arXiv:hep-ex/0305100

    work page arXiv 2003

  32. [32]

    Barnes, F

    T. Barnes, F. E. Close, and H. J. Lipkin, Implications of aDKmolecule at 2.32-GeV, Phys. Rev. D 68, 054006 (2003), arXiv:hep-ph/0305025

    work page arXiv 2003

  33. [33]

    van Beveren and G

    E. van Beveren and G. Rupp, ObservedDs(2317)and tentativeD(2100–2300)as the charmed cousins of the light scalar nonet, Phys. Rev. Lett.91, 012003 (2003), arXiv:hep-ph/0305035

    work page arXiv 2003

  34. [34]

    A. P. Szczepaniak, Description of theD ∗ s(2320)resonance as theDπatom, Phys. Lett. B567, 23 (2003), arXiv:hep-ph/0305060

    work page arXiv 2003

  35. [35]

    E. E. Kolomeitsev and M. F. M. Lutz, On Heavy light meson resonances and chiral symmetry, Phys. Lett. B582, 39 (2004), arXiv:hep-ph/0307133

    work page arXiv 2004

  36. [36]

    Chen and X.-Q

    Y.-Q. Chen and X.-Q. Li, A Comprehensive four-quark interpretation ofD s(2317),D s(2457)and Ds(2632), Phys. Rev. Lett.93, 232001 (2004), arXiv:hep-ph/0407062. 26

    work page arXiv 2004

  37. [37]

    Guo, P.-N

    F.-K. Guo, P.-N. Shen, H.-C. Chiang, R.-G. Ping, and B.-S. Zou, Dynamically generated0+ heavy mesons in a heavy chiral unitary approach, Phys. Lett. B641, 278 (2006), arXiv:hep-ph/0603072

    work page arXiv 2006

  38. [38]

    Guo, P.-N

    F.-K. Guo, P.-N. Shen, and H.-C. Chiang, Dynamically generated1+ heavy mesons, Phys. Lett. B647, 133 (2007), arXiv:hep-ph/0610008

    work page arXiv 2007

  39. [39]

    Gamermann, E

    D. Gamermann, E. Oset, D. Strottman, and M. J. Vicente Vacas, Dynamically generated open and hidden charm meson systems, Phys. Rev. D76, 074016 (2007), arXiv:hep-ph/0612179

    work page arXiv 2007

  40. [40]

    Yang, G.-J

    Z. Yang, G.-J. Wang, J.-J. Wu, M. Oka, and S.-L. Zhu, Novel Coupled Channel Framework Connecting the Quark Model and Lattice QCD for the Near-threshold Ds States, Phys. Rev. Lett.128, 112001 (2022), arXiv:2107.04860 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2022

  41. [41]

    Cheng and W.-S

    H.-Y. Cheng and W.-S. Hou, B decays as spectroscope for charmed four quark states, Phys. Lett. B 566, 193 (2003), arXiv:hep-ph/0305038

    work page arXiv 2003

  42. [42]

    Maiani, F

    L. Maiani, F. Piccinini, A. D. Polosa, and V. Riquer, Diquark-antidiquarks with hidden or open charm and the nature ofX(3872), Phys. Rev. D71, 014028 (2005), arXiv:hep-ph/0412098

    work page arXiv 2005

  43. [43]

    T. E. Browder, S. Pakvasa, and A. A. Petrov, Comment on the newD(∗)+ s π0 resonances, Phys. Lett. B578, 365 (2004), arXiv:hep-ph/0307054

    work page arXiv 2004

  44. [44]

    M.-L. Du, M. Albaladejo, P. Fernández-Soler, F.-K. Guo, C. Hanhart, U.-G. Meißner, J. Nieves, and D.-L. Yao, Towards a new paradigm for heavy-light meson spectroscopy, Phys. Rev. D98, 094018 (2018), arXiv:1712.07957 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2018

  45. [45]

    Godfrey and R

    K. Abeet al.(Belle), Study ofB − →D ∗∗0π− (D∗∗0 →D (∗)+π−) decays, Phys. Rev. D69, 112002 (2004), arXiv:hep-ex/0307021

    work page arXiv 2004

  46. [46]

    J. M. Linket al.(FOCUS), Measurement of masses and widths of excited charm mesonsD ∗ 2 and evidence for broad states, Phys. Lett. B586, 11 (2004), arXiv:hep-ex/0312060

    work page arXiv 2004

  47. [47]

    Mohler, S

    D. Mohler, S. Prelovsek, and R. M. Woloshyn,Dπscattering andDmeson resonances from lattice QCD, Phys. Rev. D87, 034501 (2013), arXiv:1208.4059 [hep-lat]

    work page arXiv 2013

  48. [48]

    Gayer, N

    L. Gayer, N. Lang, S. M. Ryan, D. Tims, C. E. Thomas, and D. J. Wilson (Hadron Spectrum), Isospin- 1/2 Dπscattering and the lightestD ∗ 0 resonance from lattice QCD, JHEP07, 123, arXiv:2102.04973 [hep-lat]

    work page arXiv

  49. [49]

    G. K. C. Cheung, C. E. Thomas, D. J. Wilson, G. Moir, M. Peardon, and S. M. Ryan (Hadron Spectrum),DK I= 0,D ¯K I= 0,1scattering and theD ∗ s0(2317) from lattice QCD, JHEP02, 100, arXiv:2008.06432 [hep-lat]

    work page arXiv 2008

  50. [50]

    Du, F.-K

    M.-L. Du, F.-K. Guo, and U.-G. Meißner, Implications of chiral symmetry onS-wave pionic resonances and the scalar charmed mesons, Phys. Rev. D99, 114002 (2019), arXiv:1903.08516 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2019

  51. [51]

    Burdman and J

    G. Burdman and J. F. Donoghue, Union of chiral and heavy quark symmetries, Phys. Lett. B280, 287 (1992)

    1992

  52. [52]

    M. B. Wise, Chiral perturbation theory for hadrons containing a heavy quark, Phys. Rev. D45, R2188 (1992)

    1992

  53. [53]

    Yan, H.-Y

    T.-M. Yan, H.-Y. Cheng, C.-Y. Cheung, G.-L. Lin, Y. C. Lin, and H.-L. Yu, Heavy quark symmetry 27 and chiral dynamics, Phys. Rev. D46, 1148 (1992), [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 55, 5851 (1997)]

    1992

  54. [54]

    Du, F.-K

    M.-L. Du, F.-K. Guo, and U.-G. Meißner, One-loop renormalization of the chiral Lagrangian for spinless matter fields in the SU(N) fundamental representation, J. Phys. G44, 014001 (2017), arXiv:1607.00822 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2017

  55. [55]

    Du, F.-K

    M.-L. Du, F.-K. Guo, and U.-G. Meißner, Subtraction of power counting breaking terms in chiral perturbation theory: spinless matter fields, JHEP10, 122, arXiv:1609.06134 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv

  56. [56]

    J. A. Oller and U.-G. Meißner, Chiral dynamics in the presence of bound states: Kaon nucleon inter- actions revisited, Phys. Lett. B500, 263 (2001), arXiv:hep-ph/0011146

    work page arXiv 2001

  57. [57]

    Yao, M.-L

    D.-L. Yao, M.-L. Du, F.-K. Guo, and U.-G. Meißner, One-loop analysis of the interactions between charmed mesons and Goldstone bosons, JHEP11, 058, arXiv:1502.05981 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv

  58. [58]

    Guo, U.-G

    Z.-H. Guo, U.-G. Meißner, and D.-L. Yao, New insights into theD∗ s0(2317)and other charm scalar mesons, Phys. Rev. D92, 094008 (2015), arXiv:1507.03123 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2015

  59. [59]

    Du, F.-K

    M.-L. Du, F.-K. Guo, U.-G. Meißner, and D.-L. Yao, Study of open-charm0+ states in unitarized chiral effective theory with one-loop potentials, Eur. Phys. J. C77, 728 (2017), arXiv:1703.10836 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2017

  60. [60]

    Du, F.-K

    M.-L. Du, F.-K. Guo, U.-G. Meißner, and D.-L. Yao, Aspects of the low-energy constants in the chiral Lagrangian for charmed mesons, Phys. Rev. D94, 094037 (2016), arXiv:1610.02963 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2016

  61. [61]

    L. Liu, K. Orginos, F.-K. Guo, C. Hanhart, and U.-G. Meissner, Interactions of charmed mesons with light pseudoscalar mesons from lattice QCD and implications on the nature of theD∗ s0(2317), Phys. Rev. D87, 014508 (2013), arXiv:1208.4535 [hep-lat]

    work page arXiv 2013

  62. [62]

    Albaladejo, P

    M. Albaladejo, P. Fernandez-Soler, F.-K. Guo, and J. Nieves, Two-pole structure of theD∗ 0(2400), Phys. Lett. B767, 465 (2017), arXiv:1610.06727 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2017

  63. [63]

    G. Moir, M. Peardon, S. M. Ryan, C. E. Thomas, and D. J. Wilson, Coupled-ChannelDπ,Dηand Ds ¯KScattering from Lattice QCD, JHEP10, 011, arXiv:1607.07093 [hep-lat]

    work page arXiv

  64. [64]

    Wang and X

    P. Wang and X. G. Wang, Study on0+ states with open charm in unitarized heavy meson chiral approach, Phys. Rev. D86, 014030 (2012), arXiv:1204.5553 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2012

  65. [65]

    X.-Y. Guo, Y. Heo, and M. F. M. Lutz, On chiral extrapolations of charmed meson masses and coupled- channel reaction dynamics, Phys. Rev. D98, 014510 (2018), arXiv:1801.10122 [hep-lat]

    work page arXiv 2018

  66. [66]

    Z.-H. Guo, L. Liu, U.-G. Meißner, J. A. Oller, and A. Rusetsky, Towards a precise determination of the scattering amplitudes of the charmed and light-flavor pseudoscalar mesons, Eur. Phys. J. C79, 13 (2019), arXiv:1811.05585 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2019

  67. [67]

    Aaijet al.(LHCb), Phys

    R. Aaijet al.(LHCb), Amplitude analysis ofB − →D +π−π− decays, Phys. Rev. D94, 072001 (2016), arXiv:1608.01289 [hep-ex]

    work page arXiv 2016

  68. [68]

    Aaijet al.,Dalitz plot analysis of B0 s → D0K −π+ decays, Phys

    R. Aaijet al.(LHCb), Dalitz plot analysis ofB 0 s → ¯D0K −π+ decays, Phys. Rev. D90, 072003 (2014), arXiv:1407.7712 [hep-ex]

    work page arXiv 2014

  69. [69]

    Aaijet al.(LHCb), Dalitz plot analysis ofB 0 → ¯D0π+π− decays, Phys

    R. Aaijet al.(LHCb), Dalitz plot analysis ofB 0 → ¯D0π+π− decays, Phys. Rev. D92, 032002 (2015), arXiv:1505.01710 [hep-ex]

    work page arXiv 2015

  70. [70]

    Aaijet al.(LHCb), First observation and amplitude analysis of theB − →D +K −π− decay, Phys

    R. Aaijet al.(LHCb), First observation and amplitude analysis of theB − →D +K −π− decay, Phys. 28 Rev. D91, 092002 (2015), [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 93, 119901 (2016)], arXiv:1503.02995 [hep-ex]

    work page arXiv 2015

  71. [71]

    Aaijet al.,Amplitude analysis of B0 → D0K +π− decays, Phys

    R. Aaijet al.(LHCb), Amplitude analysis ofB 0 → ¯D0K+π− decays, Phys. Rev. D92, 012012 (2015), arXiv:1505.01505 [hep-ex]

    work page arXiv 2015

  72. [72]

    Du, F.-K

    M.-L. Du, F.-K. Guo, C. Hanhart, B. Kubis, and U.-G. Meißner, Where is the lightest charmed scalar meson?, Phys. Rev. Lett.126, 192001 (2021), arXiv:2012.04599

    work page arXiv 2021

  73. [73]

    Acharyaet al.(ALICE), Studying the interaction between charm and light-flavor mesons, Phys

    S. Acharyaet al.(ALICE), Studying the interaction between charm and light-flavor mesons, Phys. Rev. D110, 032004 (2024), arXiv:2401.13541 [nucl-ex]

    work page arXiv 2024

  74. [74]

    M. L. Du, F. K. Guo, C. Hanhart, F. Herren, B. Kubis, and R. van Tonder, Discovering theD∗ 0(2100) in B semileptonic decays, Eur. Phys. J. C85, 1289 (2025), arXiv:2509.12133

    work page arXiv 2025

  75. [75]

    Epelbaum, S

    E. Epelbaum, S. Heihoff, U.-G. Meißner, and A. Tscherwon, Can the strong interactions between hadrons be determined using femtoscopy?, arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.08631 (2025), arXiv:2504.08631 [nucl-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2025

  76. [76]

    Molina and E

    R. Molina and E. Oset, Determination of off-shell ambiguities in correlation functions: Strategies to minimize them, Phys. Rev. D112, 096006 (2025), arXiv:2506.03669 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  77. [77]

    H. Yan, C. Liu, L. Liu, Y. Meng, and H. Xing, Pion mass dependence inDπscattering and theD∗ 0(2300) resonance from lattice QCD, Phys. Rev. D111, 014503 (2025), arXiv:2404.13479

    work page arXiv 2025

  78. [78]

    Luscher, Volume Dependence of the Energy Spectrum in Massive Quantum Field Theories

    M. Luscher, Volume Dependence of the Energy Spectrum in Massive Quantum Field Theories. 1. Stable Particle States, Commun. Math. Phys.104, 177 (1986)

    1986

  79. [79]

    Luscher, Volume Dependence of the Energy Spectrum in Massive Quantum Field Theories

    M. Luscher, Volume Dependence of the Energy Spectrum in Massive Quantum Field Theories. 2. Scattering States, Commun. Math. Phys.105, 153 (1986)

    1986

  80. [80]

    Luscher, Two particle states on a torus and their relation to the scattering matrix, Nucl

    M. Luscher, Two particle states on a torus and their relation to the scattering matrix, Nucl. Phys. B 354, 531 (1991)

    1991

Showing first 80 references.