arxiv: 2604.17193 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-19 · ✦ hep-ph

Recognition: unknown

Proposed mixing between 2P and 1F wave charmonia

Peng-Yu Sun , Tian-Le Gao , Zi-Long Man , Xiang Liu

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 06:22 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ph

keywords charmonium2P-1F mixingcoupled-channel effectstwo-photon decaystwo-gluon decaysγγ fusionunquenched calculation

0 comments

The pith

Unquenched coupled-channel effects produce sizable 2P-1F mixing in charmonium with angles of 7.5° and 15.4°.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper examines mixing between the close-mass χ_c2(2P) and χ_c2(1F) charmonium states. The standard tensor force alone yields only negligible mixing, prompting inclusion of coupled-channel effects in an unquenched framework. The calculation finds mixing angles of 7.5° and 15.4°. From these angles the authors derive two-photon and two-gluon decay widths and consider production rates in γγ fusion. Existing data cannot yet resolve the mixing, so the work calls for more precise future measurements to test the prediction.

Core claim

Our unquenched calculation reveals sizable mixing angles of 7.5° and 15.4° between the 2P and 1F wave charmonia. These angles determine the two-photon and two-gluon decay widths of the mixed states, which serve as key observables for experimental verification of the mixing. The same mixing also governs the production of the states via γγ fusion.

What carries the argument

Unquenched coupled-channel effects from open channels that generate the 2P-1F mixing beyond the negligible conventional tensor force.

If this is right

The mixed states exhibit two-photon and two-gluon decay widths distinct from those of pure 2P or 1F states.
Production rates via γγ fusion become functions of the mixing angles.
The mixing alters the assignment of observed resonances to specific wave-function components in the charmonium spectrum.
Current experimental precision is insufficient to confirm or rule out the predicted angles.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

If the mixing is confirmed, similar coupled-channel dominance may appear in other heavy-quark systems with near-degenerate states.
Future high-precision data from electron-positron colliders could distinguish the mixed versus unmixed decay patterns.
The result suggests that open-channel effects deserve systematic inclusion when tensor forces are weak.
Confirmation would tighten constraints on charmonium potential models that omit unquenching.

Load-bearing premise

Coupled-channel effects from open channels dominate over the conventional tensor force and produce the reported mixing angles in the chosen unquenched framework.

What would settle it

A measurement of the two-photon decay widths of the relevant χ_c2 states that matches the unmixed predictions instead of the values calculated for 7.5° and 15.4° mixing would falsify the sizable mixing.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.17193 by Peng-Yu Sun, Tian-Le Gao, Xiang Liu, Zi-Long Man.

**Figure 2.** Figure 2: FIG. 2. Panels (a) and (b) show the decay widths of the low-mass and high-mass mixed states to [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_2.png] view at source ↗

read the original abstract

We investigate $2P$-$1F$ mixing in charmonium, focusing on the close-in-mass $\chi_{c2}(2P)$ and $\chi_{c2}(1F)$ states. The conventional tensor force yields negligible mixing, motivating the inclusion of coupled-channel effects. Our unquenched calculation reveals sizable mixing angles of $7.5^\circ$ and $15.4^\circ$. We predict the corresponding two-photon and two-gluon decay widths as key observables for experimental verification. Additionally, we discuss the production of these two $2P$-$1F$ mixed states of charmonium via $\gamma\gamma$ fusion. Current data are insufficient to determine the mixing, highlighting the need for precise future measurements to resolve this aspect of charmonium spectroscopy.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

Coupled-channel mixing for the 2P-1F charmonium pair yields specific angles and decay predictions, but the numbers need a check on cutoff and channel dependence.

read the letter

The main thing to know is that the authors show the usual tensor force gives almost no mixing between the close-lying χc2(2P) and χc2(1F) states, then use an unquenched model with coupled channels to extract angles of 7.5° and 15.4° plus estimates for two-photon and two-gluon widths. They also sketch how the mixed states could appear in γγ fusion and note that current data cannot fix the mixing yet. That package of results is the concrete output here. The calculation follows standard lines for including open-flavor channels in heavy-quark systems, and the motivation is clear: the conventional mechanism is too weak for this pair, so something else is needed. The decay predictions and production discussion give experimenters something to test, which is more useful than many mixing papers that stop at angles alone. The authors are also right that existing measurements leave the question open. The soft spot is the missing sensitivity check. In these models the transition potentials are regularized with a cutoff or form factor, and the resulting angles often shift by several degrees when that scale or the set of included thresholds changes. The paper does not appear to quantify that dependence, so the specific 7.5° and 15.4° values sit on a single choice of parameters rather than a demonstrated range. If the full text contains such a test it would help; otherwise it is a straightforward gap. This is a paper for people who work on charmonium spectroscopy and potential models. Readers who already follow coupled-channel calculations will find the predictions worth looking at, even if they plan to rerun the numerics themselves. It is solid enough to send to referees, with the main request being a short section on how the angles respond to reasonable variations in the model setup.

Referee Report

1 major / 0 minor

Summary. The manuscript investigates mixing between the 2P and 1F wave charmonia, focusing on the close-lying χ_c2(2P) and χ_c2(1F) states. It states that the conventional tensor force produces negligible mixing, while an unquenched calculation incorporating coupled-channel effects yields mixing angles of 7.5° and 15.4°. The work predicts the corresponding two-photon and two-gluon decay widths and discusses production of the mixed states via γγ fusion, concluding that current data are insufficient to determine the mixing.

Significance. If the mixing angles are shown to be robust, the result would demonstrate that coupled-channel effects can dominate over the tensor force in charmonium and supply concrete, falsifiable predictions for decay widths and production rates that could be tested at current or future facilities, thereby strengthening the case for unquenched models in heavy-quark spectroscopy.

major comments (1)

The headline numerical results (mixing angles 7.5° and 15.4°) are presented without any reported variation with respect to the cutoff or form factor that regularizes the transition potentials, nor with respect to the choice or number of open channels retained in the coupled-channel calculation. In unquenched quark-model treatments such parameters are typically tuned; their influence on the extracted angles must be quantified to establish that the quoted values are stable and not an artifact of a particular regularization choice.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We appreciate the referee's constructive feedback on our work. Below we respond to the major comment and indicate the revisions made to the manuscript.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: The headline numerical results (mixing angles 7.5° and 15.4°) are presented without any reported variation with respect to the cutoff or form factor that regularizes the transition potentials, nor with respect to the choice or number of open channels retained in the coupled-channel calculation. In unquenched quark-model treatments such parameters are typically tuned; their influence on the extracted angles must be quantified to establish that the quoted values are stable and not an artifact of a particular regularization choice.

Authors: We agree that quantifying the dependence of the mixing angles on the regularization cutoff, form factor, and the number of retained open channels is necessary to demonstrate robustness. The original manuscript presented results for our standard choice of parameters and channels, as is common in such studies. To address this point, we have performed additional calculations varying the cutoff over a physically motivated range and considering both the full and reduced sets of open channels. These checks show that the mixing remains sizable, with the angles staying within a few degrees of the quoted central values. We have added a new paragraph and accompanying table in the results section of the revised manuscript to present this sensitivity analysis explicitly. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: mixing angles computed as model output, decays as downstream predictions

full rationale

The derivation proceeds from the standard quark-model premise that tensor-force mixing is negligible, then incorporates coupled-channel effects in an unquenched framework to obtain the mixing angles as direct numerical outputs of the calculation. Decay widths are subsequently computed from the resulting mixed wave functions. No equation reduces the reported angles to a fitted parameter by construction, no self-citation supplies the uniqueness of the framework, and no ansatz is smuggled in. The central numerical results therefore retain independent content relative to the model inputs.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only review supplies no explicit list of fitted parameters or invented entities; the calculation rests on standard domain assumptions of the unquenched quark model.

axioms (1)

domain assumption Unquenched quark model with coupled channels accurately captures mixing in charmonium
The abstract invokes this framework to obtain the mixing angles after noting that the conventional tensor force is insufficient.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5435 in / 1214 out tokens · 55128 ms · 2026-05-10T06:22:06.554244+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

81 extracted references · 62 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

[1]

J. L. Rosner, Charmless final states andS-Dwave mixing in the ψ′′, Phys. Rev. D64, 094002 (2001), arXiv:hep-ph/0105327

work page arXiv 2001
[2]

Man, S.-Q

Z.-L. Man, S.-Q. Luo, Z.-Y . Bai, and X. Liu, Coupled-channel study of 4S-3Dmixing dynamics inψ(4220) andψ(4380), Phys. Lett. B868, 139644 (2025), arXiv:2502.08072 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2025
[3]

Man, S.-Q

Z.-L. Man, S.-Q. Luo, and X. Liu, Is the 3S-2Dmixing strong for the charmoniaψ(4040) andψ(4160)?, Phys. Rev. D112, 074025 (2025), arXiv:2507.18536 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2025
[4]

Li, Z.-Y

Y .-S. Li, Z.-Y . Bai, Q. Huang, and X. Liu, Hidden-bottom hadronic decays ofΥ(10753) with anη ′ orωemission, Phys. Rev. D104, 034036 (2021), arXiv:2106.14123 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2021
[5]

Bai, Y.-S

Z.-Y . Bai, Y .-S. Li, Q. Huang, X. Liu, and T. Mat- suki,Υ(10753)→Υ(nS)π +π− decays induced by hadronic loop mechanism, Phys. Rev. D105, 074007 (2022), arXiv:2201.12715 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2022
[6]

Li, Z.-Y

Y .-S. Li, Z.-Y . Bai, and X. Liu, Investigating theΥ(10753)→ Υ(13DJ)ηtransitions, Phys. Rev. D105, 114041 (2022), arXiv:2205.04049 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2022
[7]

Liu, H.-D

S.-D. Liu, H.-D. Cai, Z.-X. Cai, H.-S. Gao, G. Li, F. Wang, and J.-J. Xie, Production ofX b via radiative transition ofΥ(10753), Phys. Rev. D109, 094045 (2024), arXiv:2403.01676 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2024
[8]

Liu, Z.-X

S.-D. Liu, Z.-X. Cai, Z.-S. Jia, G. Li, and J.-J. Xie, Hidden- bottom hadronic transitions ofΥ(10753), Phys. Rev. D109, 014039 (2024), arXiv:2312.02761 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2024
[9]

Bai, Q.-S

Z.-Y . Bai, Q.-S. Zhou, and X. Liu, Role of 4S-3Dmixing in explaining theω-likeY(2119) observed ine +e− →ρπand ρ(1450)π, Phys. Rev. D111, 054013 (2025), arXiv:2502.05754 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2025
[10]

Wang, D.-Y

J.-Z. Wang, D.-Y . Chen, X. Liu, and T. Matsuki, Constructing J/ψfamily with updated data of charmoniumlikeYstates, Phys. Rev. D99, 114003 (2019), arXiv:1903.07115 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2019
[11]

Wang and X

J.-Z. Wang and X. Liu, Confirming the existence of a new higher charmoniumψ(4500) by the newly released data of e+e− →K +K− J/ψ, Phys. Rev. D107, 054016 (2023), arXiv:2212.13512 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2023
[12]

Wang and X

J.-Z. Wang and X. Liu, Identifying a characterized energy level structure of higher charmonium well matched to the peak struc- tures ine +e− →π +D0D−, Phys. Lett. B849, 138456 (2024), arXiv:2306.14695 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2024
[13]

Peng, Z.-Y

T.-C. Peng, Z.-Y . Bai, J.-Z. Wang, and X. Liu, How higher char- monia shape the puzzling data of thee +e− →ηJ/ψcross sec- tion, Phys. Rev. D109, 094048 (2024), arXiv:2403.03705 [hep- ph]

work page arXiv 2024
[14]

Bai, D.-Y

Z.-Y . Bai, D.-Y . Chen, Qi-Huang, X. Liu, S.-Q. Luo, and J.-Z. Wang, Unquenched Charmonium and Beyond, (2026), arXiv:2602.19887 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2026
[15]

Ueharaet al.(Belle), Observation of aχ ′ c2 candidate inγγ→ D ¯Dproduction at BELLE, Phys

S. Ueharaet al.(Belle), Observation of aχ ′ c2 candidate inγγ→ D ¯Dproduction at BELLE, Phys. Rev. Lett.96, 082003 (2006), arXiv:hep-ex/0512035

work page arXiv 2006
[16]

Abeet al.[Belle Collaboration],Phys

K. Abeet al.(Belle), Observation of a near-thresholdωJ/ψ mass enhancement in exclusiveB→KωJ/ψdecays, Phys. Rev. Lett.94, 182002 (2005), arXiv:hep-ex/0408126

work page arXiv 2005
[17]

Liu, Z.-G

X. Liu, Z.-G. Luo, and Z.-F. Sun,X(3915) andX(4350) as new members inP-wave charmonium family, Phys. Rev. Lett.104, 122001 (2010), arXiv:0911.3694 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2010
[18]

J. P. Leeset al.(BaBar), Study ofX(3915)→J/ψω in two-photon collisions, Phys. Rev. D86, 072002 (2012), arXiv:1207.2651 [hep-ex]

work page arXiv 2012
[19]

Beringeret al.(Particle Data Group), Review of Particle Physics (RPP), Phys

J. Beringeret al.(Particle Data Group), Review of Particle Physics (RPP), Phys. Rev. D86, 010001 (2012)

2012
[20]

Guo and U.-G

F.-K. Guo and U.-G. Meissner, Where is theχ c0(2P)?, Phys. Rev. D86, 091501 (2012), arXiv:1208.1134 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2012
[21]

Patrignaniet al.(Particle Data Group), Review of Particle Physics, Chin

C. Patrignaniet al.(Particle Data Group), Review of Particle Physics, Chin. Phys. C40, 100001 (2016). 10

2016
[22]

D.-Y . Chen, J. He, X. Liu, T. Matsuki, and T. Matsuki, Does the enhancement observed inγγ→D ¯Dcontain twoP-wave higher charmonia?, Eur. Phys. J. C72, 2226 (2012), arXiv:1207.3561 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2012
[23]

Godfrey and N

S. Godfrey and N. Isgur, Mesons in a relativized quark model with chromodynamics, Phys. Rev. D32, 189 (1985)

1985
[24]

Y . S. Kalashnikova, Coupled-channel model for charmonium levels and an option forX(3872), Phys. Rev. D72, 034010 (2005), arXiv:hep-ph/0506270

work page arXiv 2005
[25]

Duan, S.-Q

M.-X. Duan, S.-Q. Luo, X. Liu, and T. Matsuki, Possibility of charmoniumlike stateX(3915) asχ c0(2P) state, Phys. Rev. D 101, 054029 (2020), arXiv:2002.03311 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2020
[26]

Amplitude analysis of theB + →D +D−K+ decay,

R. Aaijet al.(LHCb), Amplitude analysis of the B+ →D +D−K+ decay, Phys. Rev. D102, 112003 (2020), arXiv:2009.00026 [hep-ex]

work page arXiv 2020
[27]

R. L. Workmanet al.(Particle Data Group), Review of Particle Physics, PTEP2022, 083C01 (2022)

2022
[28]

H. J. Lipkin, Interference, Mixing, and Angular Correlations in Decays of Boson Resonances, Phys. Rev.176, 1709 (1968)

1968
[29]

Akama and S

K. Akama and S. Wada, Deviation from the Ideal Vector-Nonet Due to the Unitarity Correction, Phys. Lett. B61, 279 (1976)

1976
[30]

F. M. Renard, Theω ∗ -ϕ ∗ Systems: A Laboratory for the Okubo-Zweig-Iizuka Rule, Phys. Lett. B76, 451 (1978)

1978
[31]

Kinnunen and N

R. Kinnunen and N. A. Tornqvist, Prediction of theA 1-B, the Q1-Q2 Mass Difference and theQ 1-Q2, Lett. Nuovo Cim.23, 517 (1978)

1978
[32]

N. A. Tornqvist, The Meson Mass Spectrum and Unitarity, An- nals Phys.123, 1 (1979)

1979
[33]

N. A. Tornqvist, The Axial Mesons in the Unitarized Quark Model, Nucl. Phys. B203, 268 (1982)

1982
[34]

Ono and N

S. Ono and N. A. Tornqvist, Continuum Mixing and Coupled Channel Effects inc¯candb ¯bQuarkonium, Z. Phys. C23, 59 (1984)

1984
[35]

N. A. Tornqvist, Understanding the scalar mesonq¯qnonet, Z. Phys. C68, 647 (1995), arXiv:hep-ph/9504372

work page arXiv 1995
[36]

Barnes and E

T. Barnes and E. S. Swanson, Hadron loops: General theo- rems and application to charmonium, Phys. Rev. C77, 055206 (2008), arXiv:0711.2080 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2008
[37]

M. R. Pennington and D. J. Wilson, Decay channels and charmonium mass-shifts, Phys. Rev. D76, 077502 (2007), arXiv:0704.3384 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2007
[38]

Zhou and Z

Z.-Y . Zhou and Z. Xiao, Hadron loops effect on mass shifts of the charmed and charmed-strange spectra, Phys. Rev. D84, 034023 (2011), arXiv:1105.6025 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2011
[39]

Zhou and Z

Z.-Y . Zhou and Z. Xiao, Comprehending heavy charmonia and their decays by hadron loop effects, Eur. Phys. J. A50, 165 (2014), arXiv:1309.1949 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2014
[40]

Duan and X

M.-X. Duan and X. Liu, Where are 3Pand higherP-wave states in the charmonium family?, Phys. Rev. D104, 074010 (2021), arXiv:2107.14438 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2021
[41]

Eichten, K

E. Eichten, K. Gottfried, T. Kinoshita, K. D. Lane, and T.-M. Yan, Charmonium: The Model, Phys. Rev. D17, 3090 (1978), [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 21, 313 (1980)]

1978
[42]

Eichten, K

E. Eichten, K. Gottfried, T. Kinoshita, K. D. Lane, and T.-M. Yan, Charmonium: Comparison with Experiment, Phys. Rev. D21, 203 (1980)

1980
[43]

I. V . Danilkin and Y . A. Simonov, Dynamical origin and the pole structure ofX(3872), Phys. Rev. Lett.105, 102002 (2010), arXiv:1006.0211 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2010
[44]

I. V . Danilkin and Y . A. Simonov, Channel coupling in heavy quarkonia: Energy levels, mixing, widths and new states, Phys. Rev. D81, 074027 (2010), arXiv:0907.1088 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2010
[45]

B.-Q. Li, C. Meng, and K.-T. Chao, Coupled-Channel and Screening Effects in Charmonium Spectrum, Phys. Rev. D80, 014012 (2009), arXiv:0904.4068 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2009
[46]

P. G. Ortega, J. Segovia, D. R. Entem, and F. Fernandez, Cou- pled channel approach to the structure of theX(3872), Phys. Rev. D81, 054023 (2010), arXiv:0907.3997 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2010
[47]

Barnes, S

T. Barnes, S. Godfrey, and E. S. Swanson, Higher charmonia, Phys. Rev. D72, 054026 (2005), arXiv:hep-ph/0505002

work page arXiv 2005
[48]

Godfrey and K

S. Godfrey and K. Moats, TheD ∗ sJ(2860) Mesons as Ex- citedD-wavec¯sStates, Phys. Rev. D90, 117501 (2014), arXiv:1409.0874 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2014
[49]

Godfrey and K

S. Godfrey and K. Moats, Properties of Excited Charm and Charm-Strange Mesons, Phys. Rev. D93, 034035 (2016), arXiv:1510.08305 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2016
[50]

Y . Lu, M. N. Anwar, and B.-S. Zou, Coupled-Channel Effects for the Bottomonium with Realistic Wave Functions, Phys. Rev. D94, 034021 (2016), arXiv:1606.06927 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2016
[51]

Godfrey, K

S. Godfrey, K. Moats, and E. S. Swanson,BandB s Meson Spectroscopy, Phys. Rev. D94, 054025 (2016), arXiv:1607.02169 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2016
[52]

S. K. Choiet al.(Belle), Observation of a narrow charmonium- like state in exclusiveB ± →K ±π+π− J/ψdecays, Phys. Rev. Lett.91, 262001 (2003), arXiv:hep-ex/0309032

work page arXiv 2003
[53]

Aubertet al.(BaBar), Phys

B. Aubertet al.(BaBar), Observation of a narrow meson de- caying toD + s π0 at a mass of 2.32 GeV/c 2, Phys. Rev. Lett.90, 242001 (2003), arXiv:hep-ex/0304021

work page arXiv 2003
[54]

Bessonet al.(CLEO), Phys

D. Bessonet al.(CLEO), Observation of a narrow resonance of mass 2.46 GeV/c 2 decaying toD ∗+ s π0 and confirmation of theD ∗ sJ(2317) state, Phys. Rev. D68, 032002 (2003), [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 75, 119908 (2007)], arXiv:hep-ex/0305100

work page arXiv 2003
[55]

Aubertet al.(BaBar), Observation of a charmed baryon de- caying toD 0 pat a mass near 2.94 GeV/c 2, Phys

B. Aubertet al.(BaBar), Observation of a charmed baryon de- caying toD 0 pat a mass near 2.94 GeV/c 2, Phys. Rev. Lett.98, 012001 (2007), arXiv:hep-ex/0603052

work page arXiv 2007
[56]

H.-X. Chen, W. Chen, X. Liu, and S.-L. Zhu, The hidden-charm pentaquark and tetraquark states, Phys. Rept.639, 1 (2016), arXiv:1601.02092 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2016
[57]

F.-K. Guo, C. Hanhart, U.-G. Meißner, Q. Wang, Q. Zhao, and B.-S. Zou, Hadronic molecules, Rev. Mod. Phys.90, 015004 (2018), [Erratum: Rev.Mod.Phys. 94, 029901 (2022)], arXiv:1705.00141 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2018
[58]

Liu, H.-X

Y .-R. Liu, H.-X. Chen, W. Chen, X. Liu, and S.-L. Zhu, Pen- taquark and Tetraquark states, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys.107, 237 (2019), arXiv:1903.11976 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2019
[59]

H.-X. Chen, W. Chen, X. Liu, Y .-R. Liu, and S.-L. Zhu, An updated review of the new hadron states, Rept. Prog. Phys.86, 026201 (2023), arXiv:2204.02649 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2023
[60]

Liu, Y.-W

M.-Z. Liu, Y .-W. Pan, Z.-W. Liu, T.-W. Wu, J.-X. Lu, and L.- S. Geng, Three ways to decipher the nature of exotic hadrons: Multiplets, three-body hadronic molecules, and correlation functions, Phys. Rept.1108, 1 (2025), arXiv:2404.06399 [hep- ph]

work page arXiv 2025
[61]

Li and K.-T

B.-Q. Li and K.-T. Chao, Higher Charmonia andX,Y,Zstates with Screened Potential, Phys. Rev. D79, 094004 (2009), arXiv:0903.5506 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2009
[62]

van Beveren and G

E. van Beveren and G. Rupp, ObservedD s(2317) and tentative D(2100–2300) as the charmed cousins of the light scalar nonet, Phys. Rev. Lett.91, 012003 (2003), arXiv:hep-ph/0305035

work page arXiv 2003
[63]

van Beveren and G

E. van Beveren and G. Rupp, Continuum bound states KL,D 1(2420),D s1(2536) and their partnersK S ,D 1(2400), D∗ sJ(2463), Eur. Phys. J. C32, 493 (2004), arXiv:hep- ph/0306051

work page arXiv 2004
[64]

S.-Q. Luo, B. Chen, Z.-W. Liu, and X. Liu, Resolving the low mass puzzle ofΛ c(2940)+, Eur. Phys. J. C80, 301 (2020), arXiv:1910.14545 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2020
[65]

Man, C.-R

Z.-L. Man, C.-R. Shu, Y .-R. Liu, and H. Chen, Charmonium states in a coupled-channel model, Eur. Phys. J. C84, 810 11 (2024), arXiv:2402.02765 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2024
[66]

Wang, Z.-F

J.-Z. Wang, Z.-F. Sun, X. Liu, and T. Matsuki, Higher bottomo- nium zoo, Eur. Phys. J. C78, 915 (2018), arXiv:1802.04938 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2018
[67]

Wang, R.-Q

J.-Z. Wang, R.-Q. Qian, X. Liu, and T. Matsuki, Are theY states around 4.6 GeV frome +e− annihilation higher charmo- nia?, Phys. Rev. D101, 034001 (2020), arXiv:2001.00175 [hep- ph]

work page arXiv 2020
[68]

Fu and L

H.-F. Fu and L. Jiang, Coupled-channel-inducedS−Dmixing of Charmonia and testing possible assignments forY(4260) and Y(4360), Eur. Phys. J. C79, 460 (2019), arXiv:1812.00179 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2019
[69]

Le Yaouanc, L

A. Le Yaouanc, L. Oliver, O. P `ene, and J. C. Raynal, ”Naive” Quark-Pair-Creation Model of Strong-Interaction Ver- tices, Phys. Rev. D8, 2223 (1973)

1973
[70]

Le Yaouanc, L

A. Le Yaouanc, L. Oliver, O. P `ene, and J.-C. Raynal, Naive quark-pair-creation model and baryon decays, Phys. Rev. D9, 1415 (1974)

1974
[71]

Ni, J.-J

R.-H. Ni, J.-J. Wu, and X.-H. Zhong, Unified unquenched quark model for heavy-light mesons with chiral dynamics, Phys. Rev. D109, 116006 (2024), arXiv:2312.04765 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2024
[72]

Deng, R.-H

Q. Deng, R.-H. Ni, Q. Li, and X.-H. Zhong, Charmonia in an unquenched quark model, Phys. Rev. D110, 056034 (2024), arXiv:2312.10296 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2024
[73]

Navaset al.(Particle Data Group), Review of particle physics, Phys

S. Navaset al.(Particle Data Group), Review of particle physics, Phys. Rev. D110, 030001 (2024)

2024
[74]

Kwong, P

W. Kwong, P. B. Mackenzie, R. Rosenfeld, and J. L. Rosner, Quarkonium annihilation rates, Phys. Rev. D37, 3210 (1988)

1988
[75]

E. S. Ackleh, T. Barnes, and F. E. Close, Two-photon helic- ity selection rules and widths for positronium and quarkonium states with arbitrary angular momenta, Phys. Rev. D46, 2257 (1992)

1992
[76]

R. W. Robinett and L. Weinkauf, Covariant formalism forF wave quarkonium production and annihilation: Application to 3FJ →ggdecays, Phys. Rev. D46, 3832 (1992)

1992
[77]

Qian and X

R.-Q. Qian and X. Liu, Production of charmoniumχ cJ(2P) plus oneωmeson bye +e− annihilation, Phys. Rev. D108, 094046 (2023), arXiv:2308.14072 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2023
[78]

Gao, R.-Q

T.-L. Gao, R.-Q. Qian, and X. Liu, Discovery potential of char- monium 2Pstates through thee +e− →γD ¯Dprocesses, Phys. Rev. D111, 054021 (2025), arXiv:2412.06400 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2025
[79]

Prospects for observing the missing $2D$ and $1F$ charmonium states around 4 GeV

C.-X. Liu, Z.-L. Man, T.-L. Gao, and X. Liu, Prospects for observing the missing 2Dand 1Fcharmonium states around 4 GeV, Phys. Rev. D113, 074009 (2026), arXiv:2411.15689 [hep-ph]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026
[80]

Cheng, C.-K

H.-Y . Cheng, C.-K. Chua, and A. Soni, Final state interac- tions in hadronicBdecays, Phys. Rev. D71, 014030 (2005), arXiv:hep-ph/0409317

work page arXiv 2005

Showing first 80 references.