REVIEW 10 cited by
OpenChat: Advancing Open-source Language Models with Mixed-Quality Data
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
OpenChat: Advancing Open-source Language Models with Mixed-Quality Data
read the original abstract
Nowadays, open-source large language models like LLaMA have emerged. Recent developments have incorporated supervised fine-tuning (SFT) and reinforcement learning fine-tuning (RLFT) to align these models with human goals. However, SFT methods treat all training data with mixed quality equally, while RLFT methods require high-quality pairwise or ranking-based preference data. In this study, we present a novel framework, named OpenChat, to advance open-source language models with mixed-quality data. Specifically, we consider the general SFT training data, consisting of a small amount of expert data mixed with a large proportion of sub-optimal data, without any preference labels. We propose the C(onditioned)-RLFT, which regards different data sources as coarse-grained reward labels and learns a class-conditioned policy to leverage complementary data quality information. Interestingly, the optimal policy in C-RLFT can be easily solved through single-stage, RL-free supervised learning, which is lightweight and avoids costly human preference labeling. Through extensive experiments on three standard benchmarks, our openchat-13b fine-tuned with C-RLFT achieves the highest average performance among all 13b open-source language models. Moreover, we use AGIEval to validate the model generalization performance, in which only openchat-13b surpasses the base model. Finally, we conduct a series of analyses to shed light on the effectiveness and robustness of OpenChat. Our code, data, and models are publicly available at https://github.com/imoneoi/openchat and https://huggingface.co/openchat.
Forward citations
Cited by 10 Pith papers
-
Analytical Provisioning for Attention-FFN Disaggregated LLM Serving under Stochastic Workloads
A renewal-reward analysis yields a closed-form mean-field rule for the optimal Attention/FFN provisioning ratio in disaggregated LLM serving that accounts for stochastic KV-cache growth and matches simulation optima w...
-
LLM Agents can Autonomously Exploit One-day Vulnerabilities
GPT-4 LLM agents autonomously exploit 87% of tested one-day vulnerabilities when given CVE descriptions, far outperforming other models and tools.
-
Skin-Deep: A Geometric Diagnostic for Alignment Fragility in Large Language Model Representations
Skin-Deep extracts a Geometric Fragility Score from LLM activations that identifies which initially safe models retain the most refusal after small LoRA fine-tuning.
-
Common-agency Games for Multi-Objective Test-Time Alignment
CAGE uses common-agency games and an EPEC algorithm to compute equilibrium policies that balance multiple conflicting objectives for test-time LLM alignment.
-
Rethinking LLM Ensembling from the Perspective of Mixture Models
ME reinterprets LLM ensembling as a mixture model by sampling a single model stochastically at each token step, matching the ensemble distribution while invoking only one model per step for substantial speed gains.
-
Rethinking LLM Ensembling from the Perspective of Mixture Models
ME reinterprets LLM ensembling as token-level sampling from a mixture model, enabling single-model invocation per token with claimed mathematical equivalence to full ensembling and measured speedups of 1.78x-2.68x.
-
MMLU-Pro: A More Robust and Challenging Multi-Task Language Understanding Benchmark
MMLU-Pro is a revised benchmark that makes language model evaluation harder and more stable by using ten options per question and emphasizing reasoning over simple knowledge recall.
-
ALLaVA: Harnessing GPT4V-Synthesized Data for Lite Vision-Language Models
ALLaVA creates 1.3M GPT4V-synthesized samples enabling 4B VLMs to achieve competitive results on 17 benchmarks and match 7B/13B models on some tasks.
-
TrustLLM: Trustworthiness in Large Language Models
TrustLLM defines eight trustworthiness principles, creates a six-dimension benchmark, and evaluates 16 LLMs showing proprietary models generally lead but some open-source ones are close while over-calibration can hurt...
-
Model Merging in LLMs, MLLMs, and Beyond: Methods, Theories, Applications and Opportunities
The paper introduces a new taxonomy for model merging methods and reviews their applications in LLMs, MLLMs, continual learning, multi-task learning, and other subfields while outlining open challenges.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.