REVIEW 3 cited by
How to Construct Random Unitaries
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
abstract
The existence of pseudorandom unitaries (PRUs) -- efficient quantum circuits that are computationally indistinguishable from Haar-random unitaries -- has been a central open question, with significant implications for cryptography, complexity theory, and fundamental physics. In this work, we close this question by proving that PRUs exist, assuming that any quantum-secure one-way function exists. We establish this result for both (1) the standard notion of PRUs, which are secure against any efficient adversary that makes queries to the unitary $U$, and (2) a stronger notion of PRUs, which are secure even against adversaries that can query both the unitary $U$ and its inverse $U^\dagger$. In the process, we prove that any algorithm that makes queries to a Haar-random unitary can be efficiently simulated on a quantum computer, up to inverse-exponential trace distance.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
Quantum Simulation of Random Unitaries from Clebsch-Gordan Transforms
Clebsch-Gordan transforms give exact compressed oracles for Haar-random unitary group actions, with efficient circuits for U(d).
-
Pseudorandom Dynamics in the SYK Model and Cryptographic Censorship in JT Gravity
SYK disorder is shown to be an approximate unitary k-design for poly(N) k; under the planted-SYK hardness conjecture this yields gravitationally pseudorandom unitaries, implying cryptographic censorship in JT gravity ...
-
Non-Clifford Cost of Random Unitaries
Rigorous bounds establish that t = Theta(k^2) non-Clifford gates are necessary and sufficient for frame-potential approximation to unitary k-designs while t = Theta(nk) suffices for relative-error k-designs.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.