REVIEW 2 cited by
A Survey of AI Reliance
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Although artificial intelligence (AI) systems are becoming increasingly indispensable, research into how humans rely on these systems (AI reliance) is lagging behind. To advance this research, this survey presents a novel, comprehensive sociotechnical perspective on AI reliance, essential to fully understand the phenomenon. To address these challenges, the survey introduces a categorization framework resulting in a morphological box, which guides rigorous AI reliance research. Further, the survey identifies the core influences on AI reliance within the components of a sociotechnical system and discusses current limitations alongside emerging future research avenues to form a research agenda.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Plan-Then-Execute: An Empirical Study of User Trust and Team Performance When Using LLM Agents As A Daily Assistant
User involvement in plan-then-execute LLM agents fails to calibrate trust and only inconsistently improves performance, while plausible but wrong plans can mislead users into over-trust.
-
Do Students Rely on AI? Analysis of Student-ChatGPT Conversations from a Field Study
In 315 real quiz conversations, college students showed moderate, often ineffective reliance on ChatGPT, and simple behaviors, such as how closely a prompt matched the quiz text and how long the interaction lasted, pr...
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.