Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

From Melting Pots to Misrepresentations: Exploring Harms in Generative AI

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2403.10776 v1 pith:JBBJQUYK submitted 2024-03-16 cs.HC cs.AIcs.CYcs.LG

classification cs.HCcs.AIcs.CYcs.LG
keywords modelsresearchacrossaiaascontextdespitegenerativeharms
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

With the widespread adoption of advanced generative models such as Gemini and GPT, there has been a notable increase in the incorporation of such models into sociotechnical systems, categorized under AI-as-a-Service (AIaaS). Despite their versatility across diverse sectors, concerns persist regarding discriminatory tendencies within these models, particularly favoring selected `majority' demographics across various sociodemographic dimensions. Despite widespread calls for diversification of media representations, marginalized racial and ethnic groups continue to face persistent distortion, stereotyping, and neglect within the AIaaS context. In this work, we provide a critical summary of the state of research in the context of social harms to lead the conversation to focus on their implications. We also present open-ended research questions, guided by our discussion, to help define future research pathways.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Investigating Social Bias in Narrative Image Generation

    cs.CV 2026-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Across six text-to-image models, stereotyped outputs rise from 25.9% of single photos to about 36% of storyboards and 44% of four-panel comics, with bias expressed through plot, character placement, and dialogue.

  2. Social Scientists on the Role of AI in Research

    cs.CY 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Randomized survey wording makes social scientists report more familiarity but less trust in "AI" than in "machine learning", with ethical concerns concentrated on generative AI.

  3. Breaking Down Bias: On The Limits of Generalizable Pruning Strategies

    cs.CL 2025-02 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Pruning-based bias removal in Llama-3-8B reduces racial bias mainly in the context used to choose what to prune, and transfers poorly across contexts.

Pith tools