Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1704.08792 v1 pith:JBDRHSZO submitted 2017-04-28 stat.ML cs.LG

DeepArchitect: Automatically Designing and Training Deep Architectures

classification stat.ML cs.LG
keywords searchspacesdeeparchitecturesautomaticallybeenexperimentsexpert
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

In deep learning, performance is strongly affected by the choice of architecture and hyperparameters. While there has been extensive work on automatic hyperparameter optimization for simple spaces, complex spaces such as the space of deep architectures remain largely unexplored. As a result, the choice of architecture is done manually by the human expert through a slow trial and error process guided mainly by intuition. In this paper we describe a framework for automatically designing and training deep models. We propose an extensible and modular language that allows the human expert to compactly represent complex search spaces over architectures and their hyperparameters. The resulting search spaces are tree-structured and therefore easy to traverse. Models can be automatically compiled to computational graphs once values for all hyperparameters have been chosen. We can leverage the structure of the search space to introduce different model search algorithms, such as random search, Monte Carlo tree search (MCTS), and sequential model-based optimization (SMBO). We present experiments comparing the different algorithms on CIFAR-10 and show that MCTS and SMBO outperform random search. In addition, these experiments show that our framework can be used effectively for model discovery, as it is possible to describe expressive search spaces and discover competitive models without much effort from the human expert. Code for our framework and experiments has been made publicly available.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. EPNAS: Efficient Progressive Neural Architecture Search

    cs.LG 2019-07 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    EPNAS uses a progressive search policy with REINFORCE performance prediction to search neural architectures in parallel, supporting multiple resource constraints and outperforming ENAS and PNAS on CIFAR-10 and ImageNe...

  2. Bilevel Optimization for Neural Architecture Search

    cs.LG 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 3.0

    Reviews NAS methods through bilevel optimization lens, categorizing them into sampling-based and theory-based, and proposes an auxiliary math programming framework for more principled architecture and weight updates.