REVIEW 4 cited by
Planting Undetectable Backdoors in Machine Learning Models
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
Given the computational cost and technical expertise required to train machine learning models, users may delegate the task of learning to a service provider. We show how a malicious learner can plant an undetectable backdoor into a classifier. On the surface, such a backdoored classifier behaves normally, but in reality, the learner maintains a mechanism for changing the classification of any input, with only a slight perturbation. Importantly, without the appropriate "backdoor key", the mechanism is hidden and cannot be detected by any computationally-bounded observer. We demonstrate two frameworks for planting undetectable backdoors, with incomparable guarantees. First, we show how to plant a backdoor in any model, using digital signature schemes. The construction guarantees that given black-box access to the original model and the backdoored version, it is computationally infeasible to find even a single input where they differ. This property implies that the backdoored model has generalization error comparable with the original model. Second, we demonstrate how to insert undetectable backdoors in models trained using the Random Fourier Features (RFF) learning paradigm or in Random ReLU networks. In this construction, undetectability holds against powerful white-box distinguishers: given a complete description of the network and the training data, no efficient distinguisher can guess whether the model is "clean" or contains a backdoor. Our construction of undetectable backdoors also sheds light on the related issue of robustness to adversarial examples. In particular, our construction can produce a classifier that is indistinguishable from an "adversarially robust" classifier, but where every input has an adversarial example! In summary, the existence of undetectable backdoors represent a significant theoretical roadblock to certifying adversarial robustness.
Forward citations
Cited by 4 Pith papers
-
Fox in the Henhouse: Supply-Chain Backdoor Attacks Against Reinforcement Learning
A malicious pre-trained opponent can, through legitimate in-game actions, embed a trigger-activated backdoor into a victim reinforcement learning agent.
-
Mirror Mirror on the Wall, Have I Forgotten it All? A New Framework for Evaluating Machine Unlearning
A formal indistinguishability definition of machine unlearning is introduced, current methods are shown to fail it empirically, and impossibility and utility-collapse results are claimed.
-
Obfuscated Activations Bypass LLM Latent-Space Defenses
Obfuscation attacks that jointly optimize for target behavior and for low monitor scores bypass sparse autoencoders, probes, and OOD detectors on LLMs, while performance degrades mainly on hard tasks like writing correct SQL.
-
Data Free Backdoor Attacks
DFBA injects a backdoor into a pre-trained image classifier by editing one neuron per layer and a few output weights, requiring no data or retraining.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.