Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Designing Heterogeneous LLM Agents for Financial Sentiment Analysis

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2401.05799 v1 pith:JFM47PFK submitted 2024-01-11 cs.CL cs.AIcs.MAq-fin.GN

classification cs.CLcs.AIcs.MAq-fin.GN
keywords agentsdesignframeworkmodelsanalysisdiscussionsfinancialheterogeneous
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Large language models (LLMs) have drastically changed the possible ways to design intelligent systems, shifting the focuses from massive data acquisition and new modeling training to human alignment and strategical elicitation of the full potential of existing pre-trained models. This paradigm shift, however, is not fully realized in financial sentiment analysis (FSA), due to the discriminative nature of this task and a lack of prescriptive knowledge of how to leverage generative models in such a context. This study investigates the effectiveness of the new paradigm, i.e., using LLMs without fine-tuning for FSA. Rooted in Minsky's theory of mind and emotions, a design framework with heterogeneous LLM agents is proposed. The framework instantiates specialized agents using prior domain knowledge of the types of FSA errors and reasons on the aggregated agent discussions. Comprehensive evaluation on FSA datasets show that the framework yields better accuracies, especially when the discussions are substantial. This study contributes to the design foundations and paves new avenues for LLMs-based FSA. Implications on business and management are also discussed.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. ContestTrade: A Multi-Agent Trading System Based on Internal Contest Mechanism

    q-fin.TR 2025-08 reject novelty 6.0 of 10

    An LLM trading system that selects agents through an internal contest scored by a zero-intelligence trader and LightGBM predictions reports 52.8% returns and Sharpe 3.12 on A-shares over six months.

  2. Improving monotonic optimization in heterogeneous multi-agent reinforcement learning with optimal marginal deterministic policy gradient

    cs.AI 2025-07 reject novelty 5.0 of 10

    OMDPG combines optimal marginal Q-values with pessimistic Q-critics to reconcile monotonic improvement with partial parameter sharing in heterogeneous multi-agent RL.

Pith tools