Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Six Lectures on Linearized Neural Networks

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2308.13431 v1 pith:JI4A3QCI submitted 2023-08-25 stat.ML cs.LGmath.STstat.TH

classification stat.MLcs.LGmath.STstat.TH
keywords neurallinearnetworksmodelslectureslinearizedmodelregression
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

In these six lectures, we examine what can be learnt about the behavior of multi-layer neural networks from the analysis of linear models. We first recall the correspondence between neural networks and linear models via the so-called lazy regime. We then review four models for linearized neural networks: linear regression with concentrated features, kernel ridge regression, random feature model and neural tangent model. Finally, we highlight the limitations of the linear theory and discuss how other approaches can overcome them.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. ExpTest: Automating Learning Rate Searching and Tuning with Insights from Linearized Neural Networks

    cs.LG 2024-11 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    ExpTest auto-selects and tunes the learning rate by testing whether the training loss decays exponentially, without needing an initial learning rate choice.

  2. Tracing sources of epistemic uncertainty in deep learning predictions: homo- and hetero-scedastic linearized estimators

    cs.LG 2026-08 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A deep-learning adaptation of homoscedastic and heteroscedastic linear-regression variance estimators, scaled with EKFAC, to attribute prediction uncertainty to label noise versus scarce data.

Pith tools