Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Graph Representations for Higher-Order Logic and Theorem Proving

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1905.10006 v2 pith:JLZVSZTA submitted 2019-05-24 cs.LG cs.AIcs.LOstat.ML

classification cs.LGcs.AIcs.LOstat.ML
keywords higher-orderlogicrepresentationstheoremgnnsgraphprovingallow
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

This paper presents the first use of graph neural networks (GNNs) for higher-order proof search and demonstrates that GNNs can improve upon state-of-the-art results in this domain. Interactive, higher-order theorem provers allow for the formalization of most mathematical theories and have been shown to pose a significant challenge for deep learning. Higher-order logic is highly expressive and, even though it is well-structured with a clearly defined grammar and semantics, there still remains no well-established method to convert formulas into graph-based representations. In this paper, we consider several graphical representations of higher-order logic and evaluate them against the HOList benchmark for higher-order theorem proving.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. From Solvers to Research: Large Language Model-Driven Formal Mathematics at the Research Frontier

    cs.CL 2026-07 accept novelty 6.0 of 10

    LLM formal provers must shift from competition solvers to research agents that handle open-ended, under-specified frontier mathematics under machine-checked rigor.

  2. Partial Label Learning for Automated Theorem Proving

    cs.LO 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Using partial label learning losses, especially Libra and meritocratic losses, improves the plCoP theorem prover's solved-problem count by roughly 14 to 28 percent over the MCTS-imitation baseline.

Pith tools