Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Learning vs Retrieval: The Role of In-Context Examples in Regression with Large Language Models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2409.04318 v2 pith:JMRI3DVM submitted 2024-09-06 cs.CL cs.AI

classification cs.CLcs.AI
keywords in-contextexampleslearningknowledgellmsmodelsregressiondepending
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Generative Large Language Models (LLMs) are capable of being in-context learners. However, the underlying mechanism of in-context learning (ICL) is still a major research question, and experimental research results about how models exploit ICL are not always consistent. In this work, we propose a framework for evaluating in-context learning mechanisms, which we claim are a combination of retrieving internal knowledge and learning from in-context examples by focusing on regression tasks. First, we show that LLMs can solve real-world regression problems and then design experiments to measure the extent to which the LLM retrieves its internal knowledge versus learning from in-context examples. We argue that this process lies on a spectrum between these two extremes. We provide an in-depth analysis of the degrees to which these mechanisms are triggered depending on various factors, such as prior knowledge about the tasks and the type and richness of the information provided by the in-context examples. We employ three LLMs and utilize multiple datasets to corroborate the robustness of our findings. Our results shed light on how to engineer prompts to leverage meta-learning from in-context examples and foster knowledge retrieval depending on the problem being addressed.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Extracting Probabilistic Knowledge from Large Language Models for Bayesian Network Parameterization

    cs.CL 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    LLM-elicited conditional probabilities can serve as expert-style priors for Bayesian network parameterization, and blending them with data beats both uniform priors and data-only estimation in low-data regimes.

  2. ICL CIPHERS: Quantifying "Learning" in In-Context Learning via Substitution Ciphers

    cs.CL 2025-04 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    LLMs perform consistently better on tasks where input words are replaced with a consistent, reversible substitution cipher than when replacements are random, and the authors propose this gap as a measure of task learn...

  3. ClassComet: Exploring and Designing AI-generated Danmaku in Educational Videos to Enhance Online Learning

    cs.HC 2025-04 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    AI-written danmaku, combining content and emotion types, can match human comment quality and significantly boost learner engagement and quiz gains in short educational videos.

Pith tools