Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

Understanding the Capabilities of Large Language Models for Automated Planning

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2305.16151 v1 pith:JOAXL3D2 submitted 2023-05-25 cs.AI

Understanding the Capabilities of Large Language Models for Automated Planning

classification cs.AI
keywords llmsplanplanningautomatedeffectivegenerationquestionsanswer
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Automated planning is concerned with developing efficient algorithms to generate plans or sequences of actions to achieve a specific goal in a given environment. Emerging Large Language Models (LLMs) can answer questions, write high-quality programming code, and predict protein folding, showcasing their versatility in solving various tasks beyond language-based problems. In this paper, we aim to explore how LLMs can also be used for automated planning. To do so, we seek to answer four key questions. Firstly, we want to understand the extent to which LLMs can be used for plan generation. Secondly, we aim to identify which pre-training data is most effective in facilitating plan generation. Thirdly, we investigate whether fine-tuning or prompting is a more effective approach for plan generation. Finally, we explore whether LLMs are capable of plan generalization. By answering these questions, the study seeks to shed light on the capabilities of LLMs in solving complex planning problems and provide insights into the most effective approaches for using LLMs in this context.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. LLM+P: Empowering Large Language Models with Optimal Planning Proficiency

    cs.AI 2023-04 accept novelty 7.0

    LLM+P lets LLMs solve planning problems optimally by converting them to PDDL for classical planners and back to natural language.

  2. RoboHarness: Memory-Driven Orchestration of Heterogeneous Robot Policies for Long-Horizon Planning

    cs.RO 2026-07 reject novelty 6.0

    RoboHarness combines VLAs, RL policies, and TAMP planners via an LLM router and a memory-bridge handoff, reporting 95.2% average success on long-horizon LIBERO-LoHo versus 64.8% for the best baseline.

  3. Planning with Transformers: Chain of Computation and Structured Context Windows

    cs.LG 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0

    Small transformers, trained from scratch on curated instruction traces and run inside a pointer-memory loop, solve BlocksWorld/Pancake at >99.89% and Tower of Hanoi to 20 disks.

  4. Advances and Challenges in Foundation Agents: From Brain-Inspired Intelligence to Evolutionary, Collaborative, and Safe Systems

    cs.AI 2025-03 unverdicted novelty 2.0

    This survey frames foundation agents using brain-inspired modular architectures and reviews challenges in evolution, collaboration, and safety.