REVIEW 5 cited by
TAME: A Trustworthy Test-Time Evolution of Agent Memory with Systematic Benchmarking
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
TAME: A Trustworthy Test-Time Evolution of Agent Memory with Systematic Benchmarking
read the original abstract
Test-time evolution of agent memory represents a pivotal paradigm for advancing AGI, as it strengthens complex reasoning through experience accumulation without requiring parameter updates. However, even during benign task evolution, agent safety alignment remains vulnerable, a phenomenon known as Agent Memory Misevolution. To evaluate this phenomenon, we construct the Trust-Memevo benchmark and find that agents exhibit an overall decline in trustworthiness across multiple tasks during benign task evolution. To address this issue, we propose TAME, a trust-aware memory evolution framework in which a shared memory bank is jointly governed by an Executor and an Evaluator. The Executor retrieves and applies transferable experiences to support task solving, while the Evaluator assesses the contribution of each utilized experience to the outcome and produces trust-aware feedback to guide subsequent memory use. This executor-evaluator loop enables memory to be selectively reinforced, cautiously reused, and continuously expanded over time. Experiments show that TAME mitigates memory misevolution while achieving strong task performance. In particular, on the GPT-5.2 AIME benchmark, TAME improves accuracy by 14.6 percentage points over the strongest existing method and maintains competitive trustworthiness.
Forward citations
Cited by 5 Pith papers
-
Externalizing Research Synthesis and Validation in AI Scientists through a Research Harness
Xcientist externalizes research synthesis and validation in AI scientists via contract-governed artifacts to maintain traceable trajectories and avoid claim drift across three domains.
-
Externalizing Research Synthesis and Validation in AI Scientists through a Research Harness
Xcientist is a research harness that externalizes an AI scientist's literature grounding, idea evolution, experiments, and repairs into auditable artifacts, demonstrated on memory, traffic forecasting, and PDE-solving tasks.
-
From Procedural Skills to Strategy Genes: Towards Experience-Driven Test-Time Evolution
Compact control-oriented strategy genes outperform documentation-heavy skill packages for test-time guidance and iterative experience evolution on scientific coding tasks.
-
The Misattribution Gap: When Memory Poisoning Looks Like Model Failure in Agentic AI Systems
Memory poisoning via lost-provenance documents in agent memory stores creates agent misconduct that safety systems misattribute to model failure; the paper defines Semantic Norm Drift, releases a benchmark, and propos...
-
From Procedural Skills to Strategy Genes: Towards Experience-Driven Test-Time Evolution
Compact Gene representations of experience outperform documentation-oriented Skill packages for test-time control and iterative evolution in code-solving tasks, with measured gains on CritPt from 9.1% to 18.57% and 17...
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.