Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 58 references

Breakdown of hydrodynamics in a Galilean quantum Hall crystal

T0 review · 2 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper claims that in a Galilean-invariant quantum Hall crystal, the magnetophonon's linear-response quartic damping ($z=4$) is unstable and flows to a strongly coupled dynamical universality class with $z\approx3$, observable in…

desk verdict Solid EFT and a clean toy-model 'yes' for z≈3, but the GaAs experimental hook runs into the paper's own unscreened-Coulomb irrelevance condition. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.12535 v1 pith:JRVGOV23 submitted 2024-12-17 cond-mat.mes-hall cond-mat.stat-mechcond-mat.str-elhep-th

Xiaoyang Huang , Andrew Lucas This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mes-hallcond-mat.stat-mechcond-mat.str-elhep-th
keywords quantumHallcrystalmagnetophononnonlinearfluctuatinghydrodynamicsdynamicaluniversalityclassfractonSchwinger-KeldysheffectivefieldtheorylowestLandaulevelmicrowaveimpedancemicroscopy
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper argues that the standard linear-response picture of a Galilean-invariant quantum Hall crystal fails at long wavelengths. The magnetophonon mode, which linear response gives as $\omega \sim \pm k^2 - i k^4$ (dynamical exponent $z=4$), is unstable to nonlinear fluctuations and flows to a strongly coupled dynamical universality class with $z \approx 3$. The case is made with a nonlinear fluctuating hydrodynamic effective field theory that keeps charge and momentum conservation but drops energy conservation, and with classical many-body simulations of a lowest-Landau-level crystal model on a $200\times200$ lattice, where the extracted scaling is $z\approx3$ with a cubic anharmonicity and $z\approx4$ without it. If the claim is right, the decay rate of magnetophonons in a quantum Hall crystal is a measurable window into a fracton-inspired dynamical universality class, detectable through microwave impedance microscopy as peak broadening that scales as $k^z$ rather than $k^4$. The central caveat is that energy conservation is neglected; the numerics match that assumption only on accessible timescales.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the nonlinear fluctuating hydrodynamic effective field theory itself, constructed on the Schwinger-Keldysh contour with dynamical KMS symmetry via the coset construction for the modified Galilean algebra $[P_i, P_j] = i B Q \epsilon_{ij}$. This construction yields the invariant building blocks $E^a_{i,\mu}$ and $U^a_{ij} = \partial_i \partial_j \varphi'_a$, and the EFT's central identity is the magnetophonon dispersion $\omega = \pm c k^2 - i \Gamma k^4$ with the companion subdiffusive charge mode $\omega = -i D k^4$. The argument then identifies the cubic strain nonlinearities $\lambda' \partial_i(\partial_j \phi_j \delta n) + \lambda \partial_j(\partial_{i'} \phi_{i'} \partial_k \phi_l)$ as relevant below four dimensions, which drives the flow to $\omega \sim k^z$ with $z\approx3$.

What would settle it

Measure the wavevector dependence of the magnetophonon linewidth in a screened quantum Hall crystal with microwave impedance microscopy: a width scaling as $k^4$ rather than $k^3$ would falsify the predicted flow. Alternatively, longer-time simulations of the energy-conserving Hamiltonian model that show a crossover away from $z\approx3$ would demonstrate that the neglected energy mode cannot be ignored.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that linearized dissipative hydrodynamics breaks down for the quantum Hall crystal in two dimensions. In the constructed effective field theory, the linear-response normal modes are a magnetophonon $\omega = \pm c k^2 - i\Gamma k^4$ and a subdiffusive charge mode $\omega = -i D k^4$, so the naive dynamical exponent is $z=4$. Power counting shows that cubic nonlinearities in the lattice strain, which arise from the strain dependence of the elastic modulus and charge susceptibility, are relevant for $d<4$, and treating them as marginal gives a renormalized exponent $z^* \approx d/2+2 = 3$ in $d=2$. The paper reports numerical observation of exactly this flow: classical Hamiltonian dynamics of a Galilean-covariant lowest-Landau-level crystal gives $z\approx3$ when the cubic anharmonicity is present and $z\approx4$ when it is absent.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that energy conservation can be neglected for the hydrodynamic dynamics; if energy relaxes slowly or the energy mode couples strongly to the magnetophonon, the predicted $z\approx3$ scaling need not hold.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A clean Galilean-invariant quantum Hall crystal should show magnetophonon line broadening $\Delta\omega \sim k^3$, not the linear-response $k^4$, once nonlinear fluctuations dominate.
  • The quantum Hall crystal becomes a solid-state platform for a fracton-inspired dynamical universality class, the same class as the dipole-and-momentum-conserving fluid.
  • Galilean boost symmetry is the control parameter: without it, incoherent conductivity changes the mode to $\omega\sim\pm k^2 - i k^2$ with $z=2$ and no instability.
  • The equal-time phonon susceptibility diverges as $1/k^2$, but the paper argues this equilibrium divergence does not invalidate the non-equilibrium scaling; slightly long-range interactions remove the divergence while preserving the instability.
  • Microwave impedance microscopy should resolve a series of resonances at $\omega_{\rm MIM}=c k_n^2$ whose widths give a direct measurement of $z$, with estimated parameters placing the first peak near 1 GHz and $\Delta\omega/\omega\approx0.1$.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • An extension the paper leaves implicit is that Tkachenko modes in rotating vortex lattices, which share the magnetophonon's dispersion, should also flow to $z\approx3$ if the same EFT logic applies.
  • Because the energy-conserving simulations match the energy-free theory only on accessible timescales, the $z\approx3$ scaling is likely a transient window; experiments should target systems with fast energy relaxation into substrate phonons.
  • Screening is a tunable knob: for unscreened Coulomb interactions the paper's calculation gives a stable $\omega\sim k^{3/2}-i k^3$ mode, so the anomalous $z\approx3$ class should be searched for in samples where interactions are effectively short-ranged.
  • A testable extension is to add energy as a fourth conserved field to the EFT and determine numerically how long a time window is needed before the energy mode shifts the exponent away from $z\approx3$.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. This manuscript constructs a nonlinear fluctuating hydrodynamic effective field theory for a Galilean-invariant quantum Hall crystal, neglecting energy conservation. The linear-response theory yields a magnetophonon with dispersion ω ≈ ±k^2 − i k^4 (z = 4). A power-counting analysis shows that a cubic nonlinearity is relevant for d < 4, and the authors argue that the system flows to a new dynamical universality class with z ≈ 3, estimated as z* = d/2 + 2. They test this prediction in a classical lattice model of a lowest-Landau-level crystal and observe z ≈ 3 when a cubic anharmonicity is present and z ≈ 4 when it is absent. They propose microwave impedance microscopy as an experimental probe and estimate observable peak widths.

Significance. The claim is significant because it connects fracton-inspired hydrodynamics to a well-studied solid-state system and gives a concrete, falsifiable prediction (anomalous magnetophonon damping). The paper is careful in its EFT construction: dissipative terms are derived from a generalized KMS symmetry, the numerical model is transparent, and the exponent extraction includes a controlled comparison between cubic and quartic nonlinearities. However, the experimental relevance is questionable because the instability condition (α < 2/3) is not met for unscreened Coulomb interactions, which are the relevant ones in the proposed GaAs setting. The analytical derivation of the fixed-point exponent is also heuristic, leaving the numerical simulation as the main evidence for z ≈ 3.

major comments (2)
  1. [Experimental probes and Appendix A.4] The experimental proposal targets high-quality GaAs heterostructures such as those in Ref. [11]. However, Appendix A.4 shows that for an unscreened Coulomb interaction (α = 1) the nonlinearities are irrelevant in d = 2 and the magnetophonon obeys ω ∼ ±k^{3/2} − i k^3, i.e., the linear-response damping exponent is already z = 3 and there is no breakdown of hydrodynamics. The manuscript does not state a screening criterion (α < 2/3) or give an effective α for the proposed microwave impedance microscopy geometry. As written, the headline experimental claim of observing the z ≈ 3 universality class is unsupported; the proposed measurement on a GaAs Wigner crystal would see only the ordinary k^3 damping, and for the k^{3/2} dispersion of Ref. [11] the resonance condition differs from the ω = c k^2 assumed in Eq. (25). Please either identify a concrete screening mechanism that realizes α < 2/3 (and discuss the Mermin-Wagner caveat for α = 0) or revise the experimental claim.
  2. [Instabilities of hydrodynamics] The paper states that the nonlinear coupling is relevant for d < 4 and then estimates the fixed point as z* = d/2 + 2 by treating λ as marginal. This is dimensional analysis, not a controlled RG or ε-expansion, so the specific value z ≈ 3 is not derived from the EFT; the numerical simulation is the primary evidence for this exponent. To substantiate the claim of a universality class, please state explicitly that z* is a heuristic estimate, and provide additional numerical checks of universality, such as varying k3 and k4 over a range, testing different lattice sizes, and showing a collapse of the dynamical correlation function to a scaling form.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Effective field theory, Eq. (13)] The notation a_{i<k}δ_{l>j} is not defined; the traceless-symmetric projection A_{<ij>} is defined, but the mixed-index tensor structure requires explicit explanation.
  2. [Fig. 1(c)] The plots have no error bars or scatter of individual realizations; providing them would allow the reader to assess the significance of the difference between 1/z ≈ 0.33 and 1/4.
  3. [Instabilities of hydrodynamics] The phrase 'Nonlinearities cubic in ∂iφi in e.g. the pressure are marginal at tree-level' is cryptic; please specify which terms are meant and show their scaling explicitly.
  4. [Experimental probes, Eq. (26)] The experimental estimate uses a dimensionless coupling \tilde{λ} without connecting it to the model parameters k3 or k4; a brief derivation of this coupling would be helpful.
  5. [Abstract and Introduction] The abstract and introduction state the result for 'a Galilean quantum Hall crystal' without the caveat that the instability requires short-range or screened interactions (α < 2/3); the title and claims should be qualified or the text should clarify the regime from the outset.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No circular reduction found: the EFT is constructed from symmetries and independently power-counted; self-citations are not load-bearing. The GaAs extrapolation conflicts with App. A.4, but that is an internal consistency and correctness issue, not a circularity.

full rationale

The central derivation is self-contained: the linear-response magnetophonon ω ∼ ±k^2 − ik^4 follows from the coset/Schwinger-Keldysh construction and the normal-mode solution in Appendix A, not from the claimed z ≈ 3. The relevance criterion λ ∼ k^{(4−d)/2} is a standard power-counting argument, and the estimate z* ≈ d/2 + 2 is an explicit approximate fixed-point condition, not a restatement of the simulation output. The numerics are a controlled test: the k3 = 0 case recovers z ≈ 4 and the k3 ≠ 0 case produces z ≈ 3, so the exponent is not fit or inserted into the Hamiltonian. Self-citations [22, 23, 31, 39, 44] are present, but the load-bearing symmetry statements are rederived in Appendix A, and [44] is used only to motivate why thermodynamic fields should not renormalize, with the numerical result providing independent support. Two caveats flagged in the manuscript itself are correctness risks, not circularities: (i) energy conservation is explicitly neglected, with the authors relying on the same accessible-timescale argument as [22]; and (ii) Appendix A.4 states that for unscreened Coulomb α = 1 the linear response theory at d = 2 is stable (ω ∼ ±k^{3/2} − ik^3), while the Outlook asserts the phenomenon should occur in GaAs heterostructures as studied in [11] without specifying the α < 2/3 screening required by the theory. This is an experimental-validity gap, not a reduction of the derivation to its inputs.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No new particles, forces, or mediators are introduced. The effective field theory is built from known conservation laws and symmetries. The main inputs not supplied by the reader are the assumption of a stable finite-temperature crystal, the neglect of energy conservation, and the choice of nonlinear potentials in the numerical model; all numerical coefficients are either thermodynamic inputs or chosen test values.

free parameters (2)
  • k3 (cubic potential coefficient) = 2 (nonzero runs), 0 (control runs)
    Chosen by hand in the numerical Hamiltonian to realize the relevant nonlinearity predicted by the effective field theory. Not fitted to data.
  • k4 (quartic potential coefficient) = 4
    Chosen by hand in the numerical Hamiltonian as the marginal next-order nonlinearity. Not fitted to data.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption A finite-temperature quantum Hall crystal spontaneously breaks translation symmetry and retains order on experimental scales despite Mermin-Wagner fluctuations.
    The introduction and effective field theory section assume well-defined phonon displacements in the crystal; Appendix A discusses long-range interactions and finite-size order.
  • domain assumption Energy is not a conserved quantity for the hydrodynamic dynamics, or relaxes fast enough to be irrelevant.
    The effective field theory is constructed without energy conservation, and the numerical model's compatibility with this approximation is argued only for accessible timescales.
  • domain assumption The modified Galilean algebra [Pi, Pj] = i B Q epsilon_ij with the boost commutator in Appendix A describes the quantum Hall crystal.
    Appendix A derives this algebra from a charged-particle Hamiltonian, and the entire effective theory and Ward identities depend on it.
  • domain assumption The boost Goldstone mode eta_i relaxes quickly and can be integrated out, so momentum density equals mass current.
    Appendix A, around Eq. (A16) and (A17), assumes Kohn's theorem makes the boost non-hydrodynamic.
  • domain assumption The numerical lattice Hamiltonian in Eq. (22) captures the relevant low-energy nonlinearities of the Galilean quantum Hall crystal.
    The model is constructed as an effective low-energy Hamiltonian, not derived from a microscopic electron Hamiltonian; the cubic potential represents the EFT's relevant coupling.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Breakdown of hydrodynamics in a Galilean quantum Hall crystal." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/JRVGOV23

@misc{pith2026241212535,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Breakdown of hydrodynamics in a Galilean quantum Hall crystal},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/JRVGOV23}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.12535}
}
abstract

We construct a nonlinear fluctuating hydrodynamic effective field theory for Galilean-invariant quantum Hall systems with spontaneously broken translational symmetry. Neglecting the role of energy conservation in a low-temperature regime, the hydrodynamic mode is a magnetophonon with quartic attenuation: $\omega\sim \pm k^2-\mathrm{i} k^z$ with $z=4$. However, this linear response theory is unstable, and flows to a non-trivial dynamical universality class with $z\approx 3$. We observe this scaling in numerical simulations of many-body classical Hamiltonian dynamics, in a model of an electronic crystal in the lowest Landau level. Observing this magnetophonon decay rate in a quantum Hall crystal represents a promising setting to detect an analogue of a "fractonic dynamical universality class" in a solid-state system, e.g. using microwave impedance microscopy.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2412.12535 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1: Numerical simulation of the classical dynamics generated [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

58 extracted references · 32 canonical work pages

  1. [11]

    Observation of a magnetically induced wigner solid,

    E. Y. Andrei, G. Deville, D. C. Glattli, F. I. B. Williams, E. Paris, and B. Etienne, “Observation of a magnetically induced wigner solid,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 60, 2765–2768 (1988)

    work page 1988

  2. [1]

    Topological orders and edge excita- tions in fractional quantum hall states,

    Xiao-Gang Wen, “Topological orders and edge excita- tions in fractional quantum hall states,” Advances In Physics 44, 405–473 (1995)

    work page 1995

  3. [2]

    Quantum hall fluids,

    A Zee, “Quantum hall fluids,” Springer eBooks , 99–153 (2007)

    work page 2007

  4. [3]

    The quantum hall fluid and non- commutative chern simons theory,

    L. Susskind, “The quantum hall fluid and non- commutative chern simons theory,” (2001), arXiv:hep- th/0101029 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2001

  5. [4]

    Quantum Hall states as matrix Chern-Simons theory,

    Alexios P. Polychronakos, “Quantum Hall states as matrix Chern-Simons theory,” JHEP 04, 011 (2001), arXiv:hep-th/0103013

    arXiv 2001

  6. [5]

    Quan- tum Hall physics equals noncommutative field theory,

    Simeon Hellerman and Mark Van Raamsdonk, “Quan- tum Hall physics equals noncommutative field theory,” JHEP 10, 039 (2001), arXiv:hep-th/0103179

    arXiv 2001

  7. [6]

    Two- dimensional magnetotransport in the extreme quantum limit,

    D. C. Tsui, H. L. Stormer, and A. C. Gossard, “Two- dimensional magnetotransport in the extreme quantum limit,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 48, 1559–1562 (1982)

    work page 1982

  8. [7]

    Anomalous quantum hall effect: An incompressible quantum fluid with fractionally charged excitations,

    R. B. Laughlin, “Anomalous quantum hall effect: An incompressible quantum fluid with fractionally charged excitations,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 50, 1395–1398 (1983)

    work page 1983

Show all 58 references
  1. [8]

    “hall crystal

    Zlatko Teˇ sanovi´ c, Fran ¸ coise Axel, and B. I. Halperin, ““hall crystal” versus wigner crystal,” Phys. Rev. B 39, 8525–8551 (1989)

    1989

  2. [9]

    Nonabelions in the fractional quantum hall effect,

    Gregory Moore and Nicholas Read, “Nonabelions in the fractional quantum hall effect,” Nuclear Physics B 360, 362–396 (1991)

    1991

  3. [10]

    Jainendra K Jain, Composite fermions (Cambridge Uni- versity Press, 2007)

    2007

  4. [12]

    Dynamic scaling of growing interfaces,

    Mehran Kardar, Giorgio Parisi, and Yi-Cheng Zhang, “Dynamic scaling of growing interfaces,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 56, 889–892 (1986)

    1986

  5. [13]

    Nonlinear fluctuating hydrodynamics for anharmonic chains,

    Herbert Spohn, “Nonlinear fluctuating hydrodynamics for anharmonic chains,” Journal of Statistical Physics 154, 1191–1227 (2014)

    2014

  6. [14]

    Breakdown of Diffusion on Chiral Edges,

    Luca V. Delacretaz and Paolo Glorioso, “Breakdown of Diffusion on Chiral Edges,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 236802 (2020), arXiv:2002.08365 [cond-mat.str-el]

    2020 arXiv

  7. [15]

    Fracton hydrodynamics,

    Andrey Gromov, Andrew Lucas, and Rahul M. Nand- kishore, “Fracton hydrodynamics,” Phys. Rev. Res. 2, 033124 (2020)

    2020

  8. [16]

    Anomalous diffu- sion in dipole- and higher-moment-conserving systems,

    Johannes Feldmeier, Pablo Sala, Giuseppe De Tomasi, Frank Pollmann, and Michael Knap, “Anomalous diffu- sion in dipole- and higher-moment-conserving systems,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 245303 (2020)

    2020

  9. [17]

    Kinetically constrained freezing transition in a dipole- conserving system,

    Alan Morningstar, Vedika Khemani, and David A. Huse, “Kinetically constrained freezing transition in a dipole- conserving system,” Phys. Rev. B 101, 214205 (2020)

    2020

  10. [18]

    Subdiffusion in strongly tilted lattice systems,

    Pengfei Zhang, “Subdiffusion in strongly tilted lattice systems,” Phys. Rev. Res. 2, 033129 (2020)

    2020

  11. [19]

    Vortices as fractons,

    Darshil Doshi and Andrey Gromov, “Vortices as fractons,” Communications Physics 4 (2021), 10.1038/s42005-021-00540-4

    2021 doi

  12. [20]

    Towards classification of Fracton phases: the multipole algebra,

    Andrey Gromov, “Towards classification of Fracton phases: the multipole algebra,” Phys. Rev. X 9, 031035 (2019), arXiv:1812.05104 [cond-mat.str-el]

    2019 arXiv

  13. [21]

    A Chern-Simons theory for dipole symmetry,

    Xiaoyang Huang, “A Chern-Simons theory for dipole symmetry,” SciPost Phys. 15, 153 (2023), arXiv:2305.02492 [cond-mat.str-el]

    2023 arXiv

  14. [22]

    Breakdown of hydrody- namics below four dimensions in a fracton fluid,

    Paolo Glorioso, Jinkang Guo, Joaquin F. Rodriguez- Nieva, and Andrew Lucas, “Breakdown of hydrody- namics below four dimensions in a fracton fluid,” Na- ture Phys. 18, 912–917 (2022), arXiv:2105.13365 [cond- mat.str-el]

    2022 arXiv

  15. [23]

    Gold- stone bosons and fluctuating hydrodynamics with dipole and momentum conservation,

    Paolo Glorioso, Xiaoyang Huang, Jinkang Guo, Joaquin F. Rodriguez-Nieva, and Andrew Lucas, “Gold- stone bosons and fluctuating hydrodynamics with dipole and momentum conservation,” JHEP 05, 022 (2023), arXiv:2301.02680 [hep-th]

    2023 arXiv

  16. [24]

    Volume-preserving diffeomorphism as 6 nonabelian higher-rank gauge symmetry,

    Yi-Hsien Du, Umang Mehta, Dung Xuan Nguyen, and Dam Thanh Son, “Volume-preserving diffeomorphism as 6 nonabelian higher-rank gauge symmetry,” SciPost Phys. 12, 050 (2022), arXiv:2103.09826 [cond-mat.str-el]

    2022 arXiv

  17. [25]

    Theory of the Nernst effect near quantum phase transitions in condensed matter, and in dyonic black holes,

    Sean A. Hartnoll, Pavel K. Kovtun, Markus Muller, and Subir Sachdev, “Theory of the Nernst effect near quantum phase transitions in condensed matter, and in dyonic black holes,” Phys. Rev. B 76, 144502 (2007), arXiv:0706.3215 [cond-mat.str-el]

    2007 arXiv

  18. [26]

    Mag- netophonons & type-B Goldstones from Hydrodynamics to Holography,

    Matteo Baggioli, Sebastian Grieninger, and Li Li, “Mag- netophonons & type-B Goldstones from Hydrodynamics to Holography,” JHEP 09, 037 (2020), arXiv:2005.01725 [hep-th]

    2020 arXiv

  19. [27]

    Damping of Pseudo-Goldstone Fields,

    Luca V. Delacr´ etaz, Blaise Gout´ eraux, and Vaios Ziogas, “Damping of Pseudo-Goldstone Fields,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 141601 (2022), arXiv:2111.13459 [hep-th]

    2022 arXiv

  20. [28]

    Theory of collective magne- tophonon resonance and melting of a field-induced wigner solid,

    Luca V. Delacr´ etaz, Blaise Gout´ eraux, Sean A. Hart- noll, and Anna Karlsson, “Theory of collective magne- tophonon resonance and melting of a field-induced wigner solid,” Phys. Rev. B 100, 085140 (2019)

    2019

  21. [29]

    Dipole superfluid hydrodynamics,

    Akash Jain, Kristan Jensen, Ruochuan Liu, and Eric Mefford, “Dipole superfluid hydrodynamics,” JHEP 09, 184 (2023), arXiv:2304.09852 [hep-th]

    2023 arXiv

  22. [30]

    Ideal fracton superfluids,

    Jay Armas and Emil Have, “Ideal fracton superfluids,” SciPost Phys. 16, 039 (2024), arXiv:2304.09596 [hep-th]

    2024 arXiv

  23. [31]

    Electronic hy- drodynamics and the breakdown of the wiedemann-franz and mott laws in interacting metals,

    Andrew Lucas and Sankar Das Sarma, “Electronic hy- drodynamics and the breakdown of the wiedemann-franz and mott laws in interacting metals,” Phys. Rev. B 97, 245128 (2018)

    2018

  24. [32]

    Ef- fective field theory of dissipative fluids,

    Michael Crossley, Paolo Glorioso, and Hong Liu, “Ef- fective field theory of dissipative fluids,” JHEP 09, 095 (2017), arXiv:1511.03646 [hep-th]

    2017 arXiv

  25. [33]

    Effec- tive field theory of dissipative fluids (II): classical limit, dynamical KMS symmetry and entropy current,

    Paolo Glorioso, Michael Crossley, and Hong Liu, “Effec- tive field theory of dissipative fluids (II): classical limit, dynamical KMS symmetry and entropy current,” JHEP 09, 096 (2017), arXiv:1701.07817 [hep-th]

    2017 arXiv

  26. [34]

    Relativistic Fluids, Superfluids, Solids and Supersolids from a Coset Construction,

    Alberto Nicolis, Riccardo Penco, and Rachel A. Rosen, “Relativistic Fluids, Superfluids, Solids and Supersolids from a Coset Construction,” Phys. Rev. D 89, 045002 (2014), arXiv:1307.0517 [hep-th]

    2014 arXiv

  27. [35]

    Non-equilibrium effective field theory and second sound,

    Michael J. Landry, “Non-equilibrium effective field theory and second sound,” JHEP 04, 213 (2021), arXiv:2008.11725 [hep-th]

    2021 arXiv

  28. [36]

    Alex Kamenev, Field Theory of Non-Equilibrium Systems (Cambridge University Press, 2011)

    2011

  29. [37]

    Effective field theory for hydrody- namics: thermodynamics, and the derivative expansion,

    Sergei Dubovsky, Lam Hui, Alberto Nicolis, and Dam Thanh Son, “Effective field theory for hydrody- namics: thermodynamics, and the derivative expansion,” Phys. Rev. D 85, 085029 (2012), arXiv:1107.0731 [hep- th]

    2012 arXiv

  30. [38]

    The Schwinger-Keldysh coset construction,

    Can Onur Akyuz, Garrett Goon, and Riccardo Penco, “The Schwinger-Keldysh coset construction,” JHEP 06, 004 (2024), arXiv:2306.17232 [hep-th]

    2024 arXiv

  31. [39]

    Hydrodynamics as the effective field the- ory of strong-to-weak spontaneous symmetry breaking,

    Xiaoyang Huang, Marvin Qi, Jian-Hao Zhang, and An- drew Lucas, “Hydrodynamics as the effective field the- ory of strong-to-weak spontaneous symmetry breaking,” (2024), arXiv:2407.08760 [cond-mat.str-el]

    2024 arXiv

  32. [40]

    Redundan- cies in nambu-goldstone bosons,

    Haruki Watanabe and Hitoshi Murayama, “Redundan- cies in nambu-goldstone bosons,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 181601 (2013)

    2013

  33. [41]

    Zoology of condensed matter: Framids, ordinary stuff, extra-ordinary stuff,

    Alberto Nicolis, Riccardo Penco, Federico Piazza, and Riccardo Rattazzi, “Zoology of condensed matter: Framids, ordinary stuff, extra-ordinary stuff,” JHEP 06, 155 (2015), arXiv:1501.03845 [hep-th]

    2015 arXiv

  34. [42]

    The coset construction for non-equilibrium systems,

    Michael J. Landry, “The coset construction for non-equilibrium systems,” JHEP 07, 200 (2020), arXiv:1912.12301 [hep-th]

    2020 arXiv

  35. [43]

    The second law of ther- modynamics from symmetry and unitarity,

    Paolo Glorioso and Hong Liu, “The second law of ther- modynamics from symmetry and unitarity,” (2016), arXiv:1612.07705 [hep-th]

    2016 arXiv

  36. [44]

    Gen- eralized time-reversal symmetry and effective theories for nonequilibrium matter,

    Xiaoyang Huang, Jack H. Farrell, Aaron J. Friedman, Is- abella Zane, Paolo Glorioso, and Andrew Lucas, “Gen- eralized time-reversal symmetry and effective theories for nonequilibrium matter,” (2023), arXiv:2310.12233 [cond-mat.stat-mech]

    2023 arXiv

  37. [45]

    Crystalline order in two dimensions,

    N. D. Mermin, “Crystalline order in two dimensions,” Phys. Rev. 176, 250–254 (1968)

    1968

  38. [46]

    Mi- crowave impedance microscopy and its application to quantum materials,

    Mark E Barber, Eric Yue Ma, and Zhi-Xun Shen, “Mi- crowave impedance microscopy and its application to quantum materials,” Nature Reviews Physics 4, 61–74 (2021)

    2021

  39. [47]

    Probing the edge states of chern insulators using microwave impedance mi- croscopy,

    Taige Wang, Chen Wu, Masataka Mogi, Minoru Kawa- mura, Yoshinori Tokura, Zhi-Xun Shen, Yi-Zhuang You, and Monica T. Allen, “Probing the edge states of chern insulators using microwave impedance mi- croscopy,” Phys. Rev. B 108, 235432 (2023)

    2023

  40. [48]

    Dy- namic response of wigner crystals,

    Lili Zhao, Wenlu Lin, Yoon Jang Chung, Adbhut Gupta, Kirk W. Baldwin, Loren N. Pfeiffer, and Yang Liu, “Dy- namic response of wigner crystals,” Phys. Rev. Lett.130, 246401 (2023)

    2023

  41. [49]

    Melting of a 2d quantum electron solid in high magnetic field,

    Yong P Chen, G. Sambandamurthy, Z H Wang, R M Lewis, L W Engel, D C Tsui, P D Ye, L N Pfeiffer, and K W West, “Melting of a 2d quantum electron solid in high magnetic field,” Nature Physics 2, 452–455 (2006)

    2006

  42. [50]

    Tkachenko waves,

    E. B. Sonin, “Tkachenko waves,” JETP Letters 98, 758– 768 (2014)

    2014

  43. [51]

    Noncommutative field theory of the Tkachenko mode: Symmetries and decay rate,

    Yi-Hsien Du, Sergej Moroz, Dung Xuan Nguyen, and Dam Thanh Son, “Noncommutative field theory of the Tkachenko mode: Symmetries and decay rate,” Phys. Rev. Res. 6, L012040 (2024), arXiv:2212.08671 [cond- mat.str-el]

    2024 arXiv

  44. [52]

    Cyclotron resonance and de haas-van alphen oscillations of an interacting electron gas,

    Walter Kohn, “Cyclotron resonance and de haas-van alphen oscillations of an interacting electron gas,” Phys. Rev. 123, 1242–1244 (1961)

    1961

  45. [53]

    Pinning and conductivity of two-dimensional charge-density waves in magnetic fields,

    Hidetoshi Fukuyama and Patrick A. Lee, “Pinning and conductivity of two-dimensional charge-density waves in magnetic fields,” Phys. Rev. B 18, 6245–6252 (1978)

    1978

  46. [54]

    Some static and dy- namical properties of a two-dimensional wigner crystal,

    Lynn Bonsall and A. A. Maradudin, “Some static and dy- namical properties of a two-dimensional wigner crystal,” Phys. Rev. B 15, 1959–1973 (1977). 7 Appendix A: Hydrodynamic effective field theory In this appendix, we present a detailed construction of the hydrodynamic effecti...

    1977

  47. [55]

    boost density

    Coset construction In the presence of a magnetic field, we have a modified Galilean algebra [Pi, Pj] = iBQϵij, (A1a) [Ki, Pj] = imQδij, (A1b) [Ki, P0] = −i(Pi − (B/m)ϵijKj), (A1c) where Ki is the boost generator and m is the single particle mass. The algebra is closed, and com...

  48. [56]

    We have Lideal = pδj i + πiuj + κj k∂iσk Ei a,j + mnuiE′ a,0i + nCa,0, (A20) with πi + κ0 j ∂iσj = mnui, which comes from (A14)

    Ideal hydrodynamics The most general ideal Lagrangian corresponds to terms where T µ i and J µ contain as few derivatives as possible, as hydrodynamics is a gradient expansion in derivatives. We have Lideal = pδj i + πiuj + κj k∂iσk Ei a,j + mnuiE′ a,0i + nCa,0, (A20) with πi ...

  49. [57]

    Suppose we have the first order dissipative Lagrangian as L(1) ∼ −AiE′ a,0i − BCa,0

    Next-to-leading-order hydrodynamics The dissipative Lagrangian involving E′ a,0i and Ca,0 can be removed by field redefinitions [32]. Suppose we have the first order dissipative Lagrangian as L(1) ∼ −AiE′ a,0i − BCa,0. (A24) Consider a shift of the r-fields, µ → µ + δµ and ui ...

  50. [58]

    fixed charge

    Long-range Coulomb interactions We briefly discuss how long-range Coulomb interactions modify the EFT above. Density-dependent interactions with a potential 1 /r2−α effectively cause the bulk modulus and charge susceptibility to scale as a1 ∼ χ−1 ∼ k−α [53]. In the linear resp...

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.