Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 100 references

Time-resolved diamond magnetic microscopy of superparamagnetic iron-oxide nanoparticles

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Time-resolved NV microscopy records single-particle Néel relaxation

desk verdict Solid single-particle SPION characterization, but the 62-ms image acquisition time introduces an unquantified bias in the relaxation times that the authors should address. read the letter →

arxiv 2411.13087 v2 pith:JVETZCQI submitted 2024-11-20 cond-mat.mes-hall cond-mat.mtrl-sciphysics.ins-detphysics.med-phquant-ph

B. A. Richards , N. Ristoff , J. Smits , A. Jeronimo Perez , I. Fescenko , M. D. Aiello , F. Hubert , Y. Silani
show 14 more authors
N. Mosavian M. Saleh Ziabari A. Berzins J. T. Damron P. Kehayias D. Egbebunmi J. E. Shield D. L. Huber A. M. Mounce M. P. Lilly T. Karaulanov A. Jarmola A. Laraoui V. M. Acosta
This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mes-hallcond-mat.mtrl-sciphysics.ins-detphysics.med-phquant-ph
keywords diamondmagneticmicroscopynitrogen-vacancycenterssuperparamagneticironoxidenanoparticlesNéelrelaxationsingle-particlemagnetometryLangevinmagnetizationtime-resolvedimagingheterogeneity
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper establishes that a widefield magnetic microscope based on nitrogen-vacancy centers in diamond can follow the magnetization of hundreds of isolated ~30-nm superparamagnetic iron-oxide nanoparticles (SPIONs) individually, both as a function of applied field and in time. It shows that single-particle magnetization curves are much more varied than bulk measurements suggest: most particles saturate sharply at characteristic fields below 1 mT, producing a highly asymmetric distribution ($\sigma_c = 1.4$ mT vs median 0.6 mT), while a minority need several millitesla. It then directly records the Néel relaxation of individual particles after a 31 mT polarizing field is switched off, with roughly 60 ms resolution, and finds relaxation times from milliseconds to seconds that follow the expected exponential dependence on the holding field. The point of the work is that particle-to-particle heterogeneity, which is washed out in ensemble magnetometry, is measurable at ambient conditions and at single-particle level.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing mechanism is the dual-resonance optically detected magnetic resonance (ODMR) imaging protocol: two microwave tones are swept simultaneously across both NV spin resonances while camera exposures are synchronized to each frequency step, so that every camera pixel yields a Lorentzian resonance whose central offset is proportional to the local magnetic field component along the NV axis. Each ~62 ms sweep produces a magnetic image, and fitting each particle's image to a point-dipole field convolved with the microscope point-spread function extracts the three components of the SPION magnetic moment. For the time-resolved study, the polarizing field is switched with a high-current MOSFET and the ~60 ms coil ringdown sets the temporal resolution floor; repeated identical field-switching cycles are averaged to reach single-particle sensitivity.

What would settle it

Resolve the relaxation of one of the 11 SPIONs with fitted $\tau_N$ around 0.2–1 s using an independent single-particle readout with millisecond or better time resolution (for example, pulsed ODMR without the 62-ms sweep); if the independently measured $\tau_N$ deviates from the reported value beyond the reported uncertainty, the sweep-averaging assumption is violated. Alternatively, simulate the dual-resonance sweep with a moment that decays during the sweep and check whether the fitted Lorentzian central frequency still equals the instantaneous field at the sweep midpoint; if it does not, the extracted relaxation times carry a systematic bias.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the central discovery is that time-resolved diamond magnetic microscopy can watch individual SPIONs relax in real time and reveal heterogeneity that ensemble methods hide. For 101 isolated SPIONs, fits of the stray-field images to a point-dipole model yield the moment components versus applied field; the longitudinal component follows a Langevin curve with characteristic field $B_c$, and the $B_c$ distribution is strongly asymmetric (standard deviation 1.4 mT, median 0.6 mT). After switching off a 31 mT polarizing field, 11 of 97 particles relax inside the 0.06–20 s window, with exponential decays whose time constant depends on the holding field as $\tau_N = \tau_0 \exp(KV/k_B T - B_{\mathrm{hold}}/B_N)$, giving $B_N \approx 0.7 \pm 0.4$ mT. The paper presents this as the first direct, parallel imaging of Néel relaxation of many individual nanoparticles, with the observed broad distribution of relaxation times consistent with the expected log-normal spread.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that each 62-millisecond magnetic image captures a stationary moment: if a particle's moment changes significantly during the frequency sweep, the fitted Lorentzian no longer corresponds to a single field value, and the paper only guards against this with a resolution floor, without quantifying the distortion for particles whose relaxation times fall inside the 0.06- to several-second window.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Individual SPIONs with easy axes nearly aligned to the field show step-like magnetization curves, so bulk Langevin fits systematically overestimate the typical characteristic field of the population.
  • The holding field can be used to tune the Néel relaxation distribution into the measurement window, extending the accessible range of $\tau_N$ without changing temperature.
  • The same time-resolved imaging should work for other nanomagnetic objects whose stray fields and relaxation times fall within the NV microscope's sensitivity and bandwidth.
  • Improving the frame rate and shortening the coil ringdown could extend the measurable $\tau_N$ range by several orders of magnitude, from $10^{-5}$ s to tens of seconds.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A direct implication the authors leave implicit: the shape of the per-particle $B_c$ distribution (sharp peak plus $1/B_c^2$ tail) means ensemble magnetometry is dominated by a minority of harder particles, so bulk characterization may misreport the typical particle's response for applications like hyperthermia or magnetic particle imaging.
  • If the apparent ~370–400 K effective temperature is really caused by 532-nm laser heating, then varying the optical power or using pulsed illumination should shift the measured $\tau_N$; this is a testable way to separate heating from genuine sample differences.
  • Because the fitted dipole moment assumes a static moment during each 62 ms sweep, faster single-shot readouts (for example, pulsed ODMR) could resolve faster relaxation and check whether the reported $\tau_N$ values are biased for the borderline particles.
  • The method could be extended to correlate structural information (such as TEM-determined core volume) with the measured $\tau_N$ for the same particles, which would test the exponential volume dependence directly.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. This manuscript reports widefield diamond (NV) magnetic microscopy of ~30-nm iron-oxide nanoparticles, analyzing 101 isolated SPIONs. It measures field-dependent magnetic-moment components and fits Langevin curves to extract per-particle Bc and msat, finding a highly asymmetric Bc distribution. It then applies time-resolved magnetic imaging with ~62-ms image acquisition, after switching off a 31-mT polarizing field, and reports Néel relaxation times from ~0.06 s to >20 s for individual SPIONs, with a field dependence consistent with tau_N proportional to exp(-Bhold/BN). The paper includes extensive appendices on sample preparation, SEM co-localization, ODMR fitting, and MPMS comparisons.

Significance. If the results hold, the paper demonstrates a valuable capability: parallel single-nanoparticle magnetic characterization, including first time-resolved diamond magnetic microscopy of individual SPIONs. The per-particle Langevin analysis and the Bc distribution highlight heterogeneity masked by ensemble methods. The paper's strengths include detailed SEM/TEM characterization, explicit fitting routines and appendices with all per-particle curves (Appendices X and XI), and direct comparison to MPMS and literature. However, the quantitative claims rely on two calibration/modeling choices (NV depth model and rejection of three outliers) and on an unquantified finite-acquisition-time bias in the time-resolved channel; these need to be addressed before the claims are fully established.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section IV and Appendix IV.3] The 62-ms dual-resonance ODMR sweep is treated as an instantaneous readout of m(t). For the 11 particles with tau_N in the 0.06-20 s range, the resonance center shifts appreciably during one 12-step sweep (e.g., ~24% decay for tau_N=0.23 s, the value of P169 in Fig. 4). A Lorentzian fit to a moving resonance does not return the time-averaged field; the bias depends on sweep direction and is not removed by subtracting the up/down sweep images described in Appendix IV.3, because the two fitted centers are not equal and opposite. The extracted tau_N and the BN fit in Fig. 5(b) are therefore not demonstrated to be unbiased. Please add a quantitative estimate of this distortion (e.g., simulated ODMR spectra with a decaying center), correct the Delta m(t) model for the finite acquisition window, or restrict the relaxation claims to tau_N >> 62 ms.
  2. [Section III, Fig. 3(c), and Appendix X] Three SPIONs (P109, P117, P140) with Bc>7 mT and msat>1.2 A·nm2 are excluded from the Bc and msat statistics as 'poor fits.' Because the headline claim of an asymmetric Bc distribution (median 0.6 mT, sigma 1.4 mT) is a statement about the width and tail of the distribution, the decision to omit the three largest-Bc particles must be justified and the statistics should be reported both with and without them; otherwise the width is underestimated by construction.
  3. [Appendix VI and Section III] The absolute moment scale is set by an assumed NV depth model (SRIM profile plus 60 nm standoff and 20 nm dead layer). The mean msat=0.44 A·nm2 is 2-5 times lower than literature values and than the single-particle value of Mosavian et al., as the paper acknowledges in Appendix VIII. The manuscript should state a systematic uncertainty for msat and show how the Bc/msat statistics change under alternative standoff/dead-layer choices, since the claim of 'somewhat low' msat is otherwise conditional on the calibration model.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Appendix III.3] The text 'the SPIONS were polycrystalline' should read 'the SPIONs were polycrystalline.'
  2. [Section IV] The sentence 'Of this sample, 83 SPION exhibited relaxation on a timescale too short' has a subject-verb agreement error; it should be '83 SPIONs exhibited.'
  3. [Appendix IX] The phrase 'There were found to be 3 such outliers' is awkward; consider 'Three SPIONs were classified as outliers.'
  4. [Equation (2)] The sign convention for Bhold in the exponential term should be stated explicitly, since Bhold is described as opposite to Bpol and the fitted BN value has a large relative uncertainty.
  5. [Fig. 5(b)] The caption states that error bars for some points at |Bhold|=3.5 mT extend below the plot range; consider reporting those values numerically or using a different vertical scale so that all data are visible.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the central measurements are direct; Langevin and Néel-Arrhenius forms are used as data parametrization, and the few self-citations are methodological, not load-bearing.

full rationale

The paper's claims are experimental measurements: magnetic images are fitted to a dipole model, and time-resolved images are fitted to an exponential decay. Neither Eq. (1) nor Eq. (2) is derived from the data; both are standard physical models used to parametrize measured curves. The fitted constants B_c and B_N are reported as fit parameters, and the statement 'consistent with the predicted exponential dependence' is a fit-quality statement, not a prediction generated by a fitted parameter, so no fitted-input-called-prediction circularity arises. Self-citations (e.g., Refs. [30, 36] for rolling-shutter suppression and fiducial stabilization) support the imaging methodology but do not supply the physical conclusions about SPION heterogeneity or relaxation times. The temporal-resolution limitation is acknowledged by the paper through the ~60 ms ring-down floor and by dropping the first two images after field switching (Appendix IV 3); this is a measurement limitation, not a circular derivation. No self-definitional, uniqueness-imported, ansatz-smuggling, or renaming circularity is present.

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 7 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central experimental results rest on standard superparamagnetic models and on a hand-calibrated NV depth model. The main fitted constants are per-particle msat and Bc, plus the field-dependence constant BN. No invented physical entities are required.

free parameters (5)
  • msat (saturation magnetic moment per SPION) = ensemble mean 0.44 A·nm2, sigma_sat 0.12 A·nm2
    Fitted to each SPION's mx(B0) curve using Eq. (1). The distribution of msat is a main result and is compared with literature values.
  • Bc (characteristic polarizing field per SPION) = median 0.6 mT, sigma_c 1.4 mT; ensemble fit 0.7 ± 0.1 mT
    Langevin fit parameter from Eq. (1); the asymmetric Bc distribution is a central experimental claim.
  • BN (field-dependence constant for Néel relaxation time) = 0.7 ± 0.4 mT
    Fit to tau_N versus |Bhold| for seven SPIONs using Eq. (2).
  • Gaussian point-spread function width = not given numerically; set empirically from SPION clumps
    Used in the dipole fit model (Appendix VI) and held fixed for all particles in a given image.
  • NV layer depth and standoff model values = 60 nm standoff; z planes at -60, -90, -120, -150, -180 nm; 20 nm dead layer
    Hand-chosen in Appendix VI from SRIM plus assumptions about hydrocarbon, depleted, and dead layers; shifts absolute msat if wrong.
assumptions (7)
  • standard math The Langevin function, coth(x) - 1/x, describes the equilibrium magnetization of a superparamagnet (Eq. 1).
    Used in Sec. III to fit each SPION's mx(B0) curve and to define Bc.
  • domain assumption Néel relaxation follows tau_N = tau_0 exp(KV/kBT - Bhold/BN) (Eq. 2).
    Used in Sec. IV to interpret tau_N(Bhold) and to compare with ensemble AC susceptibility.
  • domain assumption Each SPION's stray field can be modeled as a point magnetic dipole at the particle center.
    Used in Eq. (AVI-2) for all magnetic moment fits; valid when standoff exceeds particle radius.
  • domain assumption The measured ODMR frequency shift is linearly proportional to the time-averaged x-component of the stray field along the NV axis.
    Underpins the conversion of fluorescence images to magnetic images in Appendix IV.
  • domain assumption The SPION moment is static during each 62 ms ODMR frequency sweep.
    Required for Lorentzian fits to represent a single well-defined field value; questionable for fast-relaxing SPIONs in Sec. IV.
  • ad hoc to paper The NV depth profile is given by SRIM plus a 60 nm standoff and a 20 nm dead layer.
    Chosen in Appendix VI; if wrong, absolute msat values shift and absolute quantitation is degraded.
  • ad hoc to paper Subtracting a Gaussian blur with 50-pixel standard deviation removes low-frequency image artifacts without altering single-SPION signals.
    Image processing assumption in Appendix V; kernel size was chosen empirically.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Time-resolved diamond magnetic microscopy of superparamagnetic iron-oxide nanoparticles." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/JVETZCQI

@misc{pith2026241113087,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Time-resolved diamond magnetic microscopy of superparamagnetic iron-oxide nanoparticles},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/JVETZCQI}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2411.13087}
}
read the original abstract

Superparamagnetic iron-oxide nanoparticles (SPIONs) are promising probes for biomedical imaging, but the heterogeneity of their magnetic properties is difficult to characterize with existing methods. Here, we perform widefield imaging of the stray magnetic fields produced by hundreds of isolated ~30-nm SPIONs using a magnetic microscope based on nitrogen-vacancy centers in diamond. By analyzing the SPION magnetic field patterns as a function of applied magnetic field, we observe substantial field-dependent transverse magnetization components that are typically obscured with ensemble characterization methods. We find negligible hysteresis in each of the three magnetization components for nearly all SPIONs in our sample. Most SPIONs exhibit a sharp Langevin saturation curve, enumerated by a characteristic polarizing applied field, B_c. The B_c distribution is highly asymmetric, with a standard deviation (1.4 mT) that is larger than the median (0.6 mT). Using time-resolved magnetic microscopy, we directly record SPION N\'eel relaxation, after switching off a 31 mT applied field, with a temporal resolution of ~60 ms that is limited by the ring-down time of the electromagnet coils. For small bias fields B_{hold}=1.5-3.5 mT, we observe a broad range of SPION N\'eel relaxation times--from milliseconds to seconds--that are consistent with an exponential dependence on B_{hold}. Our time-resolved diamond magnetic microscopy study reveals rich SPION sample heterogeneity and may be extended to other fundamental studies of nanomagnetism.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2411.13087 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. (c) are physically reasonable. A standard expression for the characteristic field is Bc = kBT /(|µ cos θ|) [50], where kB is the Boltzmann con￾stant, T is temperature, µ is the maximum instantaneous SPION magnetic moment, and θ is the angle between B⃗ 0 and a given SPION’s easy axis. Assuming a random easy axis (flat distribution of cos θ), and a narrow distribution for µ with mean µ, the Bc distribution is expected… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (2 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_5.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

100 extracted references · 74 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    They were initially suspended in chloro- form at a concentration of 25 mg/mL

    SPION sample preparation The SPIONs used here were purchased from Ocean Nan- otech (SOR30). They were initially suspended in chloro- form at a concentration of 25 mg/mL. Prior to depositing on a diamond, the suspension was diluted with hexane by a factor of approximately 4000 and then sonicated for 20 minutes to promote disaggregation. Then, ∼0.3 µL of th...

  2. [2]

    ComponentMeasurements

    SEM imaging After SPIONs are deposited on the diamond, a region near the center of the diamond surface is selected for SEM imaging. SPIONs are imaged with an FEI He- lios NanoLab 650 SEM to locate single, isolated SPIONs. To mitigate charging during SEM imaging, a copper clip mount was used, with the clip pressing on the diamond face itself. The current a...

  3. [3]

    This process involved extracting a small volume of the SPIONs dispersed in chloroform using a micropipette and depositing it onto a TEM copper grid

    TEM imaging The standard drop-casting method, as described in [81], was used to prepare the SPIONs for transmission elec- tron microscopy (TEM) analysis. This process involved extracting a small volume of the SPIONs dispersed in chloroform using a micropipette and depositing it onto a TEM copper grid. The sample was then allowed to air dry for 3 hours to ...

  4. [4]

    Concept Dual-resonance continuous-wave ODMR imaging is per- formed by simultaneously sweeping two microwave tones about the NV ground-state transition frequencies. One tone, f1(t), is swept about the ms = 0 ↔ −1 transition frequency (in the absence of a magnetic sample), denoted f−, while the other tone f2(t) is simultaneously swept about the ms = 0 ↔ +1 ...

  5. [5]

    This improvement is based on the observed change in the ODMR spectrum upon driving both resonances si- multaneously

    Sensitivity enhancement In the main text, we report a ∼1.4-fold improvement in sensitivity when using dual-resonance magnetometry, as compared to the typical single-resonance approach. This improvement is based on the observed change in the ODMR spectrum upon driving both resonances si- multaneously. Here, we discuss factors contributing to the observed i...

  6. [6]

    field on

    Sequences and timing Each microwave frequency sweep consists of 12 frequen- cies spaced over a 24 MHz full span. Twelve fluores- cence images are collected, one at each detuning (see Appendix IV 1). The time allocated for each frequency step is equal to the exposure time τexp = 5.2 ms for all measurements in this paper. Each image taken with f2(t) swept u...

  7. [7]

    dead layer

    Parallel ODMR fitting Each magnetic image is obtained by fitting the ODMR spectrum of each pixel in the FOV (699 × 700 pixels) for each of the two sweep directions, corresponding to a total of 978600 Lorentzian fits. The fitting procedure was performed using a graphics card (Asus Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060; 3584 CUDA cores; 12 GB GDDR6) in order to paralleli...

  8. [8]

    Samples were prepared by suspending SPIONs in hexane, sonicating for approximately 10 minutes to discourage particle aggrega- tion, and depositing the suspension on a cotton swab

    Bulk sample preparation and measurement A Quantum Design MPMS-3 SQUID magnetometer was used to characterize SPIONs of the same batch as those imaged by diamond magnetic microscopy. Samples were prepared by suspending SPIONs in hexane, sonicating for approximately 10 minutes to discourage particle aggrega- tion, and depositing the suspension on a cotton sw...

Show all 100 references
  1. [9]

    The applied field is swept up and down from ±37 mT several times, mimicking the procedure used by diamond magnetic microscopy

    Field-dependent magnetization curves The MPMS was used to measure the magnetic flux from a bulk sample of SPIONs along the direction of the ap- plied field. The applied field is swept up and down from ±37 mT several times, mimicking the procedure used by diamond magnetic micro...

  2. [10]

    AC susceptibility The MPMS SQUID magnetometer was used to measure the AC magnetic susceptibility of a sample of the same type of SPIONs (Ocean Nanotech, Fe 3O4, 30 nm diame- ter, oleic acid coated) as a function of the frequency of an applied magnetic field. For an idealized s...

  3. [11]

    L. H. Reddy, J. L. Arias, J. Nicolas, and P. Cou- vreur, Magnetic nanoparticles: design and characteriza- tion, toxicity and biocompatibility, pharmaceutical and biomedical applications, Chemical Reviews 112, 5818 (2012)

    2012

  4. [12]

    Dobson, Remote control of cellular behaviour with magnetic nanoparticles, Nature Nanotechnology 3, 139 (2008)

    J. Dobson, Remote control of cellular behaviour with magnetic nanoparticles, Nature Nanotechnology 3, 139 (2008)

    2008

  5. [13]

    A. C. Silva, T. R. Oliveira, J. B. Mamani, S. M. Malheiros, L. Malavolta, L. F. Pavon, T. T. Sibov, E. Amaro Jr., A. Tann´ us, E. L. Vidoto, M. J. Mar- tins, R. S. Santos, and L. F. Gamarra, Application of hyperthermia induced by superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles in g...

    2011

  6. [14]

    Suciu, C

    M. Suciu, C. M. Ionescu, A. Ciorita, S. C. Tripon, D. Nica, H. Al-Salami, and L. Barbu-Tudoran, Appli- cations of superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles in drug and therapeutic delivery, and biotechnological advancements, Beilstein Journal of Nanotechnology 11, 1092 (2020)

    2020

  7. [15]

    A. V. Samrot, C. S. Sahithya, J. Selvarani A, S. K. Pu- rayil, and P. Ponnaiah, A review on synthesis, charac- terization and potential biological applications of super- paramagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles, Current Research in Green and Sustainable Chemistry 4, 100042 (2021)

    2021

  8. [16]

    Vangijzegem, V

    T. Vangijzegem, V. Lecomte, I. Ternad, L. Van Leuven, R. N. Muller, D. Stanicki, and S. Laurent, Superparamag- netic iron oxide nanoparticles (spion): From fundamen- tals to state-of-the-art innovative applications for cancer therapy, Pharmaceutics 15, 236 (2023)

    2023

  9. [17]

    Estelrich, M

    J. Estelrich, M. J. S´ anchez-Mart ´ ın, and M. A. Busquets, Nanoparticles in magnetic resonance imaging: from sim- ple to dual contrast agents, International Journal of Nanomedicine , 1727–1741 (2015)

    2015

  10. [18]

    Panagiotopoulos, R

    N. Panagiotopoulos, R. L. Duschka, M. Ahlborg, G. Bringout, C. Debbeler, M. Graeser, C. Kaethner, K. L¨ udtke-Buzug, H. Medimagh, J. Stelzner, T. M. Buzug, J. Barkhausen, F. M. Vogt, and J. Haegele, Mag- netic particle imaging: current developments and future directions, Int J...

    2015

  11. [19]

    Johnson, N

    C. Johnson, N. L. Adolphi, K. L. Butler, D. M. Lovato, R. Larson, P. D. Schwindt, and E. R. Flynn, Magnetic relaxometry with an atomic magnetometer and squid sen- sors on targeted cancer cells, Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials 324, 2613 (2012)

    2012

  12. [20]

    S. M. Stavis, J. A. Fagan, M. Stopa, and J. A. Liddle, Nanoparticle manufacturing – heterogeneity through pro- cesses to products, ACS Applied Nano Materials 1, 4358 (2018)

    2018

  13. [21]

    N´ eel, Thermoremanent magnetization of fine powders, Rev

    L. N´ eel, Thermoremanent magnetization of fine powders, Rev. Mod. Phys. 25, 293 (1953)

    1953

  14. [22]

    W. F. Brown, Thermal fluctuations of a single-domain particle, Phys. Rev. 130, 1677 (1963)

    1963

  15. [23]

    Jaufenthaler, T

    A. Jaufenthaler, T. Kornack, V. Lebedev, M. E. Limes, R. K¨ orber, M. Liebl, and D. Baumgarten, Pulsed op- tically pumped magnetometers: Addressing dead time and bandwidth for the unshielded magnetorelaxometry of magnetic nanoparticles, Sensors 21, 1212 (2021)

    2021

  16. [24]

    Z. W. Tay, P. W. Goodwill, D. W. Hensley, L. A. Tay- lor, B. Zheng, and S. M. Conolly, A high-throughput, arbitrary-waveform, mpi spectrometer and relaxometer for comprehensive magnetic particle optimization and characterization, Scientific Reports 6, 34180 (2016)

    2016

  17. [25]

    Buchner, K

    M. Buchner, K. H¨ ofler, B. Henne, V. Ney, and A. Ney, Tutorial: Basic principles, limits of detection, and pitfalls of highly sensitive SQUID magnetometry for nanomag- netism and spintronics, Journal of Applied Physics 124, 161101 (2018)

    2018

  18. [26]

    Taukulis and A

    R. Taukulis and A. C¯ ebers, Coupled stochastic dynamics of magnetic moment and anisotropy axis of a magnetic nanoparticle, Phys. Rev. E 86, 061405 (2012)

    2012

  19. [27]

    Bogren, A

    S. Bogren, A. Fornara, F. Ludwig, M. Del Puerto Morales, U. Steinhoff, M. F. Hansen, O. Kaza- kova, and C. Johansson, Classification of magnetic nanoparticle systems—synthesis, standardization and analysis methods in the nanomag project, International Journal of Molecular Scie...

    2015

  20. [28]

    C. V. Topping and S. J. Blundell, A.c. susceptibility as a probe of low-frequency magnetic dynamics, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter 31, 013001 (2018)

    2018

  21. [29]

    M. M. Saari, M. H. Sulaiman, N. A. Che Lah, Z. Aziz, K. Sakai, T. Kiwa, and K. Tsukada, Properties of single- and multi-core magnetic nanoparticles assessed by mag- netic susceptibility measurements, Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials 528, 167812 (2021)

    2021

  22. [30]

    L. H. F. Andrade, A. Laraoui, M. Vomir, D. Muller, J.-P. Stoquert, C. Estourn` es, E. Beaurepaire, and J.-Y. Bigot, Damped precession of the magnetization vector of super- paramagnetic nanoparticles excited by femtosecond op- tical pulses, Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 127401 (2006)

    2006

  23. [31]

    Laraoui, V

    A. Laraoui, V. Halt´ e, M. Vomir, J. V´ enuat, M. Albrecht, E. Beaurepaire, and J.-Y. Bigot, Ultrafast spin dynamics of an individual copt3 ferromagnetic dot, The European Physical Journal D 43, 251 (2007)

    2007

  24. [32]

    Lederman, S

    M. Lederman, S. Schultz, and M. Ozaki, Measurement of the dynamics of the magnetization reversal in individual single-domain ferromagnetic particles, Phys. Rev. Lett. 73, 1986 (1994)

    1994

  25. [33]

    Thirion, W

    C. Thirion, W. Wernsdorfer, and D. Mailly, Switching of magnetization by nonlinear resonance studied in single nanoparticles, Nature Materials 2, 524 (2003)

    2003

  26. [34]

    Hefferman, J

    S. Hefferman, J. Chapman, and S. McVitie, In-situ mag- netising experiments on small regularly shaped permalloy particles, Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials 95, 76 (1991)

    1991

  27. [35]

    Adhikari, M

    S. Adhikari, M. V. Efremova, P. Spaeth, B. Koopmans, R. Lavrijsen, and M. Orrit, Single-particle photothermal circular dichroism and photothermal magnetic circular dichroism microscopy, Nano Letters 24, 5093 (2024)

    2024

  28. [36]

    P. Wang, S. Chen, M. Guo, S. Peng, M. Wang, M. Chen, W. Ma, R. Zhang, J. Su, X. Rong, F. Shi, T. Xu, and J. Du, Nanoscale magnetic imaging of ferritins in a single cell, Science Advances 5, eaau8038 (2019)

    2019

  29. [37]

    Sch¨ afer-Nolte, L

    E. Sch¨ afer-Nolte, L. Schlipf, M. Ternes, F. Reinhard, K. Kern, and J. Wrachtrup, Tracking temperature- dependent relaxation times of ferritin nanomagnets with a wideband quantum spectrometer, Phys. Rev. Lett.113, 217204 (2014)

    2014

  30. [38]

    J. M. McCoey, M. Matsuoka, R. W. de Gille, L. T. Hall, J. A. Shaw, J.-P. Tetienne, D. Kisailus, L. C. L. Hol- lenberg, and D. A. Simpson, Diamond-based magnetic 29 microscopy: Quantum magnetic imaging of iron biomin- eralization in teeth of the chiton acanthopleura hirtosa, Sm...

    2020

  31. [39]

    R. W. de Gille, J. M. McCoey, L. T. Hall, J.-P. Tetienne, E. P. Malkemper, D. A. Keays, L. C. L. Hollenberg, and D. A. Simpson, Quantum magnetic imaging of iron or- ganelles within the pigeon cochlea, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 118, e2112749118 (2021)

    2021

  32. [40]

    Fescenko, A

    I. Fescenko, A. Laraoui, J. Smits, N. Mosavian, P. Ke- hayias, J. Seto, L. Bougas, A. Jarmola, and V. M. Acosta, Diamond magnetic microscopy of malarial hemo- zoin nanocrystals, Phys. Rev. Applied 11, 034029 (2019)

    2019

  33. [41]

    Lamichhane, K

    S. Lamichhane, K. A. McElveen, A. Erickson, I. Fes- cenko, S. Sun, R. Timalsina, Y. Guo, S.-H. Liou, R. Y. Lai, and A. Laraoui, Nitrogen-vacancy magnetometry of individual fe-triazole spin crossover nanorods, ACS Nano 17, 8694 (2023)

    2023

  34. [42]

    D. R. Glenn, K. Lee, H. Park, R. Weissleder, A. Ya- coby, M. D. Lukin, H. Lee, R. L. Walsworth, and C. B. Connolly, Single-cell magnetic imaging using a quantum diamond microscope, Nature Methods 12, 736 (2015)

    2015

  35. [43]

    H. C. Davis, P. Ramesh, A. Bhatnagar, A. Lee-Gosselin, J. F. Barry, D. R. Glenn, R. L. Walsworth, and M. G. Shapiro, Mapping the microscale origins of magnetic res- onance image contrast with subcellular diamond magne- tometry, Nature Communications 9, 131 (2018)

    2018

  36. [44]

    S. Chen, W. Li, X. Zheng, P. Yu, P. Wang, Z. Sun, Y. Xu, D. Jiao, X. Ye, M. Cai, M. Shen, M. Wang, Q. Zhang, F. Kong, Y. Wang, J. He, H. Wei, F. Shi, and J. Du, Im- munomagnetic microscopy of tumor tissues using quan- tum sensors in diamond, Proceedings of the National Academy...

    2022

  37. [45]

    Gould, R

    M. Gould, R. J. Barbour, N. Thomas, H. Arami, K. M. Krishnan, and K.-M. C. Fu, Room-temperature detection of a single 19 nm super-paramagnetic nanoparticle with an imaging magnetometer, Applied Physics Letters 105, 072406 (2014)

    2014

  38. [46]

    Mosavian, F

    N. Mosavian, F. Hubert, J. Smits, P. Kehayias, Y. Silani, B. A. Richards, and V. M. Acosta, Super-resolution diamond magnetic microscopy of superparamagnetic nanoparticles, ACS Nano 18, 6523 (2024)

    2024

  39. [47]

    Camarneiro, J

    F. Camarneiro, J. Bocquel, J. Gallo, M. Ba˜ nobre-L´ opez, K. Berg-Sørensen, U. L. Andersen, A. Huck, and J. B. Nieder, Magnetic field mapping around individual mag- netic nanoparticle agglomerates using nitrogen-vacancy centers in diamond, Particle & Particle Systems Charac- ...

    2021

  40. [48]

    Sadzak, M

    N. Sadzak, M. H´ eritier, and O. Benson, Coupling a single nitrogen-vacancy center in nanodiamond to superparam- agnetic nanoparticles, Scientific Reports 8, 8430 (2018)

    2018

  41. [49]

    Barbiero, S

    M. Barbiero, S. Castelletto, Q. Zhang, Y. Chen, M. Charnley, S. Russell, and M. Gu, Nanoscale magnetic imaging enabled by nitrogen vacancy centres in nanodi- amonds labelled by iron–oxide nanoparticles, Nanoscale 12, 8847 (2020)

    2020

  42. [50]

    Kuwahata, T

    A. Kuwahata, T. Kitaizumi, K. Saichi, T. Sato, R. Igarashi, T. Ohshima, Y. Masuyama, T. Iwasaki, M. Hatano, F. Jelezko, M. Kusakabe, T. Yatsui, and M. Sekino, Magnetometer with nitrogen-vacancy center in a bulk diamond for detecting magnetic nanoparticles in biomedical applica...

    2020

  43. [51]

    Smits, A

    J. Smits, A. Berzins, F. H. Gahbauer, R. Ferber, K. Er- glis, A. Cebers, and J. Prikulis, Estimating the mag- netic moment of microscopic magnetic sources from their magnetic field distribution in a layer of nitrogen-vacancy (NV) centres in diamond, Eur. Phys. J. Appl. Phys. 7...

    2016

  44. [52]

    Mathes, M

    N. Mathes, M. Comas, R. Bleul, K. Everaert, T. Hermle, F. Wiekhorst, P. Knittel, R. A. Sperling, and X. Vi- dal, Nitrogen-vacancy center magnetic imaging of Fe3O4 nanoparticles inside the gastrointestinal tract of drosophila melanogaster, Nanoscale Adv. 6, 247 (2024)

    2024

  45. [53]

    Zhang, Y.-X

    X.-Y. Zhang, Y.-X. Wang, T. A. Tartaglia, T. Ding, M. J. Gray, K. S. Burch, F. Tafti, and B. B. Zhou, ac sus- ceptometry of 2d van der waals magnets enabled by the coherent control of quantum sensors, PRX Quantum 2, 030352 (2021)

    2021

  46. [54]

    Dasika, M

    S. Dasika, M. Parashar, and K. Saha, Mapping AC sus- ceptibility with quantum diamond microscope, Review of Scientific Instruments 94, 053702 (2023)

    2023

  47. [55]

    A. M. Wojciechowski, M. Karadas, C. Osterkamp, S. Jankuhn, J. Meijer, F. Jelezko, A. Huck, and U. L. Andersen, Precision temperature sensing in the presence of magnetic field noise and vice-versa using nitrogen- vacancy centers in diamond, Applied Physics Letters 113, 013502 (2018)

    2018

  48. [56]

    Fescenko, A

    I. Fescenko, A. Jarmola, I. Savukov, P. Kehayias, J. Smits, J. Damron, N. Ristoff, N. Mosavian, and V. M. Acosta, Diamond magnetometer enhanced by ferrite flux concentrators, Phys. Rev. Res. 2, 023394 (2020)

    2020

  49. [57]

    Z. Kazi, I. M. Shelby, H. Watanabe, K. M. Itoh, V. Shut- thanandan, P. A. Wiggins, and K.-M. C. Fu, Wide-field dynamic magnetic microscopy using double-double quan- tum driving of a diamond defect ensemble, Phys. Rev. Appl. 15, 054032 (2021)

    2021

  50. [58]

    J. H. Shim, S.-J. Lee, S. Ghimire, J. I. Hwang, K.-G. Lee, K. Kim, M. J. Turner, C. A. Hart, R. L. Walsworth, and S. Oh, Multiplexed sensing of magnetic field and temper- ature in real time using a nitrogen-vacancy ensemble in diamond, Phys. Rev. Appl. 17, 014009 (2022)

    2022

  51. [59]

    Z. Yu, Y. Xie, G. Jin, Y. Zhu, Q. Zhang, F. Shi, F.- y. Wan, H. Luo, A.-h. Tang, and X. Rong, Noninvasive magnetocardiography of a living rat based on a diamond quantum sensor, Phys. Rev. Appl. 21, 064028 (2024)

    2024

  52. [60]

    C. P. Bean and J. D. Livingston, Superparamagnetism, Journal of Applied Physics 30, S120 (1959)

    1959

  53. [61]

    W. T. Coffey, D. S. F. Crothers, J. L. Dormann, L. J. Geoghegan, Y. P. Kalmykov, J. T. Waldron, and A. W. Wickstead, Effect of an oblique magnetic field on the su- perparamagnetic relaxation time, Phys. Rev. B52, 15951 (1995)

    1995

  54. [62]

    Chantrell, S

    R. Chantrell, S. Hoon, and B. Tanner, Time-dependent magnetization in fine-particle ferromagnetic systems, Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials 38, 133 (1983)

    1983

  55. [63]

    Ahrentorp, A

    F. Ahrentorp, A. Astalan, J. Blomgren, C. Jonasson, E. Wetterskog, P. Svedlindh, A. Lak, F. Ludwig, L. J. van IJzendoorn, F. Westphal, C. Gr¨ uttner, N. Gehrke, S. Gustafsson, E. Olsson, and C. Johansson, Effective particle magnetic moment of multi-core particles, Journal of M...

    2015

  56. [64]

    K. Wu, J. Liu, R. Saha, C. Peng, D. Su, Y. A. Wang, and J.-P. Wang, Investigation of commercial iron oxide nanoparticles: Structural and magnetic property charac- terization, ACS Omega 6, 6274–6283 (2021)

    2021

  57. [65]

    F. Chen, N. Ilyas, X. Liu, Z. Li, S. Yan, and H. Fu, Size effect of Fe3O4 nanoparticles on magnetism and disper- 30 sion stability of magnetic nanofluid, Frontiers in Energy Research 9, 780008 (2021)

    2021

  58. [66]

    Nedelkoski, D

    Z. Nedelkoski, D. Kepaptsoglou, L. Lari, T. Wen, R. A. Booth, S. D. Oberdick, P. L. Galindo, Q. M. Ramasse, R. F. L. Evans, S. Majetich, and V. K. Lazarov, Ori- gin of reduced magnetization and domain formation in small magnetite nanoparticles, Scientific Reports 7, 45997 (2017)

    2017

  59. [67]

    V. N. Antonov, B. N. Harmon, and A. N. Yaresko, Elec- tronic structure and x-ray magnetic circular dichroism in Fe3O4 and Mn-, Co-, or Ni-substituted Fe3O4, Phys. Rev. B 67, 024417 (2003)

    2003

  60. [68]

    Colombo, S

    M. Colombo, S. Carregal-Romero, M. F. Casula, L. Guti´ errez, M. P. Morales, I. B. B¨ ohm, J. T. Hever- hagen, D. Prosperi, and W. J. Parak, Biological appli- cations of magnetic nanoparticles, Chem. Soc. Rev. 41, 4306 (2012)

    2012

  61. [69]

    A. R. Chalifour, J. C. Davidson, N. R. Anderson, T. M. Crawford, and K. L. Livesey, Magnetic relaxation time for an ensemble of nanoparticles with randomly aligned easy axes: A simple expression, Phys. Rev. B104, 094433 (2021)

    2021

  62. [70]

    Adhikari, Y

    S. Adhikari, Y. Wang, P. Spaeth, F. Scalerandi, W. Al- brecht, J. Liu, and M. Orrit, Magnetization switching of single magnetite nanoparticles monitored optically, Nano Letters 24, 9861 (2024)

    2024

  63. [71]

    V. M. Acosta, E. Bauch, M. P. Ledbetter, A. Waxman, L.-S. Bouchard, and D. Budker, Temperature dependence of the nitrogen-vacancy magnetic resonance in diamond, Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 070801 (2010)

    2010

  64. [72]

    Plan Sangnier, S

    A. Plan Sangnier, S. Preveral, A. Curcio, A. K. A. Silva, C. T. Lef` evre, D. Pignol, Y. Lalatonne, and C. Wil- helm, Targeted thermal therapy with genetically engi- neered magnetite magnetosomes@rgd: Photothermia is far more efficient than magnetic hyperthermia, Journal of Co...

    2018

  65. [73]

    A. M. Wojciechowski, M. Karadas, A. Huck, C. Os- terkamp, S. Jankuhn, J. Meijer, F. Jelezko, and U. L. Andersen, Contributed Review: Camera-limits for wide- field magnetic resonance imaging with a nitrogen- vacancy spin sensor, Review of Scientific Instruments 89, 031501 (2018)

    2018

  66. [74]

    Parashar, A

    M. Parashar, A. Bathla, D. Shishir, A. Gokhale, S. Bandyopadhyay, and K. Saha, Sub-second temporal magnetic field microscopy using quantum defects in dia- mond, Scientific Reports 12, 8743 (2022)

    2022

  67. [75]

    J. Tang, Z. Yin, C. A. Hart, J. W. Blanchard, J. T. Oon, S. Bhalerao, J. M. Schloss, M. J. Turner, and R. L. Walsworth, Quantum diamond microscope for dynamic imaging of magnetic fields, A VS Quantum Science 5, 044403 (2023)

    2023

  68. [76]

    Savukov and T

    I. Savukov and T. Karaulanov, Anatomical mri with an atomic magnetometer, Journal of Magnetic Resonance 231, 39 (2013)

    2013

  69. [77]

    L. P. D. Haro, T. Karaulanov, E. C. Vreeland, B. An- derson, H. J. Hathaway, D. L. Huber, A. N. Matlashov, C. P. Nettles, A. D. Price, T. C. Monson, and E. R. Flynn, Magnetic relaxometry as applied to sensitive can- cer detection and localization, Biomedical Engineering / Biom...

    2015

  70. [78]

    C. A. Hart, J. M. Schloss, M. J. Turner, P. J. Scheidegger, E. Bauch, and R. L. Walsworth, N- v–diamond magnetic microscopy using a double quantum 4-ramsey protocol, Phys. Rev. Appl. 15, 044020 (2021)

    2021

  71. [79]

    E. E. Kleinsasser, M. M. Stanfield, J. K. Q. Banks, Z. Zhu, W.-D. Li, V. M. Acosta, H. Watanabe, K. M. Itoh, and K.-M. C. Fu, High density nitrogen-vacancy sensing surface created via He+ ion implantation of 12C diamond, Applied Physics Letters 108, 202401 (2016)

    2016

  72. [80]

    A. J. Healey, A. Stacey, B. C. Johnson, D. A. Broadway, T. Teraji, D. A. Simpson, J.-P. Tetienne, and L. C. L. Hollenberg, Comparison of different methods of nitrogen- vacancy layer formation in diamond for wide-field quan- tum microscopy, Phys. Rev. Mater. 4, 104605 (2020)

    2020

  73. [81]

    Kehayias, J

    P. Kehayias, J. Henshaw, M. Saleh Ziabari, M. Titze, E. Bielejec, M. P. Lilly, and A. M. Mounce, A fitting algorithm for optimizing ion implantation energies and fluences, Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section B: Beam Interactions with Materials and Atoms...

    2021

  74. [82]

    Sievers, K.-F

    S. Sievers, K.-F. Braun, D. Eberbeck, S. Gustafsson, E. Olsson, H. W. Schumacher, and U. Siegner, Quanti- tative measurement of the magnetic moment of individ- ual magnetic nanoparticles by magnetic force microscopy, Small 8, 2675 (2012)

    2012

  75. [83]

    E. C. Vreeland, J. Watt, G. B. Schober, B. G. Hance, M. J. Austin, A. D. Price, B. D. Fellows, T. C. Monson, N. S. Hudak, L. Maldonado-Camargo, A. C. Bohorquez, C. Rinaldi, and D. L. Huber, Enhanced nanoparticle size control by extending lamer’s mechanism, Chemistry of Materia...

    2015

  76. [84]

    Wang, G.-Q

    N. Wang, G.-Q. Liu, W.-H. Leong, H. Zeng, X. Feng, S.-H. Li, F. Dolde, H. Fedder, J. Wrachtrup, X.-D. Cui, S. Yang, Q. Li, and R.-B. Liu, Magnetic criticality en- hanced hybrid nanodiamond thermometer under ambient conditions, Phys. Rev. X 8, 011042 (2018)

    2018

  77. [85]

    S. C. Scholten, A. J. Healey, I. O. Robertson, G. J. Abra- hams, D. A. Broadway, and J.-P. Tetienne, Widefield quantum microscopy with nitrogen-vacancy centers in di- amond: Strengths, limitations, and prospects, Journal of Applied Physics 130, 150902 (2021)

    2021

  78. [86]

    Oyarz´ un, A

    S. Oyarz´ un, A. Tamion, F. Tournus, V. Dupuis, and M. Hillenkamp, Size effects in the magnetic anisotropy of embedded cobalt nanoparticles: from shape to surface, Scientific Reports 5, 14749 (2015)

    2015

  79. [87]

    Kehayias, A

    P. Kehayias, A. Jarmola, N. Mosavian, I. Fescenko, F. M. Benito, A. Laraoui, J. Smits, L. Bougas, D. Budker, A. Neumann, S. R. J. Brueck, and V. M. Acosta, Solu- tion nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy on a nanos- tructured diamond chip, Nature Communications 8, 188 (2017)

    2017

  80. [88]

    Petracic, Superparamagnetic nanoparticle ensembles, Superlattices and Microstructures 47, 569 (2010)

    O. Petracic, Superparamagnetic nanoparticle ensembles, Superlattices and Microstructures 47, 569 (2010)

    2010

  81. [89]

    Kaliyaraj Selva Kumar, Y

    A. Kaliyaraj Selva Kumar, Y. Zhang, D. Li, and R. G. Compton, A mini-review: How reliable is the drop cast- ing technique?, Electrochemistry Communications 121, 106867 (2020)

    2020

  82. [90]

    Schindelin, I

    J. Schindelin, I. Arganda-Carreras, E. Frise, V. Kaynig, M. Longair, T. Pietzsch, S. Preibisch, C. Rueden, S. Saalfeld, B. Schmid, J.-Y. Tinevez, D. J. White, V. Hartenstein, K. Eliceiri, P. Tomancak, and A. Car- dona, Fiji: an open-source platform for biological-image analysi...

    2012

  83. [91]

    Zheng, Improving sample preparation methods to as- sess nanoparticle agglomeration using tem, Microscopy and Microanalysis 20, 1236 (2014)

    J. Zheng, Improving sample preparation methods to as- sess nanoparticle agglomeration using tem, Microscopy and Microanalysis 20, 1236 (2014)

    2014

  84. [92]

    V. M. Acosta, E. Bauch, A. Jarmola, L. J. Zipp, M. P. Ledbetter, and D. Budker, Broadband magnetometry by 31 infrared-absorption detection of nitrogen-vacancy ensem- bles in diamond, Applied Physics Letters 97, 174104 (2010)

    2010

  85. [93]

    K. Fang, V. M. Acosta, C. Santori, Z. Huang, K. M. Itoh, H. Watanabe, S. Shikata, and R. G. Beausoleil, High- sensitivity magnetometry based on quantum beats in di- amond nitrogen-vacancy centers, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 130802 (2013)

    2013

  86. [94]

    Dr´ eau, M

    A. Dr´ eau, M. Lesik, L. Rondin, P. Spinicelli, O. Arcizet, J.-F. Roch, and V. Jacques, Avoiding power broaden- ing in optically detected magnetic resonance of single nv defects for enhanced dc magnetic field sensitivity, Phys. Rev. B 84, 195204 (2011)

    2011

  87. [95]

    Jensen, V

    K. Jensen, V. M. Acosta, A. Jarmola, and D. Budker, Light narrowing of magnetic resonances in ensembles of nitrogen-vacancy centers in diamond, Phys. Rev. B 87, 014115 (2013)

    2013

  88. [96]

    Przybylski, B

    A. Przybylski, B. Thiel, J. Keller-Findeisen, B. Stock, and M. Bates, Gpufit: An open-source toolkit for gpu- accelerated curve fitting, Scientific Reports 7, 15722 (2017)

    2017

  89. [97]

    Dieckhoff, D

    J. Dieckhoff, D. Eberbeck, M. Schilling, and F. Lud- wig, Magnetic-field dependence of Brownian and N´ eel re- laxation times, Journal of Applied Physics 119, 043903 (2016)

    2016

  90. [98]

    K. Wu, J. Liu, Y. Wang, C. Ye, Y. Feng, and J.-P. Wang, Superparamagnetic nanoparticle-based viscosity test, Applied Physics Letters 107, 053701 (2015)

    2015

  91. [99]

    M. M. van de Loosdrecht, S. Draack, S. Waanders, J. G. L. Schlief, H. J. G. Krooshoop, T. Viereck, F. Lud- wig, and B. ten Haken, A novel characterization tech- nique for superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles: The superparamagnetic quantifier, compared with mag- netic par...

    2019

  92. [100]

    S. C. Scholten, I. O. Robertson, G. J. Abrahams, P. Singh, A. J. Healey, and J.-P. Tetienne, Aberration control in quantitative widefield quantum microscopy, A VS Quantum Science4, 034404 (2022)

    2022

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.