pith. sign in

arxiv: 2607.01589 · v1 · pith:JWRBTCXKnew · submitted 2026-07-02 · ✦ hep-ex

Study of ZZ and ZH production in the bbττ final state and search for high-mass spin-0 and spin-1 resonances in proton-proton collisions at sqrt{s} = 13 TeV

CMS Collaboration This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-07-03 03:29 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ex
keywords ZZ productionZH productionresonance searchbb tau tauCMSLHCupper limitsbeyond standard model
0
0 comments X

The pith

CMS sets upper limits on high-mass spin-0 and spin-1 resonances decaying to ZZ and ZH in the bbττ channel.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper examines ZZ and ZH production in proton-proton collisions at 13 TeV using the final state with two b quarks and two tau leptons. It performs the first measurements of these standard model processes in this channel while also searching for new heavy resonances. Data corresponding to 138 fb^{-1} are analyzed to set 95% confidence level limits on the production rate times branching fraction for spin-0 particles X decaying to ZZ and spin-1 particles Z' decaying to ZH. No deviation from standard model expectations is found across the mass ranges studied.

Core claim

The analysis establishes the first probe of ZZ and ZH production in the bbττ final state and sets upper limits at 95% confidence level on σ(X)B(X → ZZ) ranging from 300 pb to 24 fb for masses 0.2-5 TeV and on σ(Z')B(Z' → ZH) ranging from 0.4 pb to 12 fb for masses 0.5-6 TeV, with no observed excess over standard model predictions.

What carries the argument

The resonant search strategy in the bbττ final state that separates potential signals from backgrounds using kinematic selections and discriminants.

If this is right

  • The limits constrain the parameter space of models predicting heavy spin-0 and spin-1 particles.
  • The bbττ reconstruction methods support related searches such as nonresonant Higgs pair production.
  • Increased integrated luminosity will extend the sensitivity to smaller production cross sections.
  • The results provide reference points for interpreting data in complementary final states.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The channel may gain importance for lower-mass resonance searches as luminosity grows.
  • Reinterpretation in specific models such as extended Higgs sectors could yield tighter bounds on couplings.
  • Combining with other decay modes like four leptons would strengthen overall constraints on new physics.

Load-bearing premise

Standard model backgrounds and detector response including b-tagging and tau identification are accurately modeled by simulation and control samples.

What would settle it

A statistically significant excess in the reconstructed resonance mass distributions above the predicted background that persists after accounting for systematic uncertainties would indicate new resonances.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.01589 by CMS Collaboration.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Illustrative diagrams describing the production of a high-mass resonance: a spin-0 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Distributions in the (mbb, mFASTMTT τ τ ) plane for the SM ZZ (left) and ZH (right) sig￾nals, and for the sum of all simulated backgrounds (blue). The corresponding one-dimensional projections are also shown. The distributions are normalized to unity after the ττ and bb can￾didate selections have been applied. The colored curves indicate the elliptical mass selection, and the black line in the right panel … view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Distribution of the invariant mass of the ZZ system, in the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Distribution of the nonresonant DNN used for ZZ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Distributions of the output of the DNN used for SM ZZ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Distributions of the output of the DNN used for SM ZH [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Example distributions of the output of the resonant DNN used for signal extraction. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Results for the SM ZZ → bbττ and ZH → bbττ processes. Left: best fit signal strengths and approximate 68% CL intervals, obtained from a profile likelihood fit, as described in Ref. [104]. Right: upper limits at 95% CL on the ratio of production cross section and the SM expectation for the ZZ and ZH processes, as well as those from the HH → bbττ analysis on the same data set for comparison [40]. ZZ, and 2.4… view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Projected significance [111] for SM ZZ → bbττ and ZH → bbττ processes as a func￾tion of integrated luminosity at the HL-LHC with the CMS Phase 2 detector upgrade [66]. Two scenarios for systematic uncertainties are shown: the S2 scenario assumes reduced systematic uncertainties, as described in Ref. [7], and the second scenario neglects systematic uncertain￾ties. Projections for HH → bbττ from Ref. [7] are… view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Upper limits on the production cross section for the X [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_10.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

A study of the production of pairs of Z bosons (ZZ) and of the associated production of a Z boson and a Higgs boson (ZH) in final states containing two b quarks and two tau leptons (bb$\tau\tau$) is presented. The analysis is based on proton-proton collisions collected at $\sqrt{s}$ = 13 TeV by the CMS experiment at the LHC, corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 138 fb$^{-1}$. The nonresonant analysis targets the standard model ZZ and ZH processes in the bb$\tau\tau$ final state, motivated by the prominent role of this channel in searches for nonresonant Higgs boson pair production. The resonant searches target physics beyond the standard model, probing heavy spin-0 resonances X that decay into ZZ and spin-1 resonances Z' that decay into ZH, with masses in the 0.2$-$5 and 0.5$-$6 TeV ranges, respectively. Upper limits at 95% confidence level are set on the product of production rate and branching fraction $\sigma$(X)$\mathcal{B}$(X $\to$ ZZ), ranging from 300 pb to 24 fb, and $\sigma$(Z')$\mathcal{B}$(Z' $\to$ ZH), ranging from 0.4 pb to 12 fb. These are the first measurements to probe the ZZ/ZH $\to$ bb$\tau\tau$ processes. No deviation from standard model expectations is observed.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 3 minor

Summary. The manuscript presents an analysis of ZZ and ZH production in the bbττ final state using 138 fb⁻¹ of 13 TeV pp collision data collected by CMS. It performs a non-resonant measurement of the standard model ZZ and ZH processes and searches for high-mass spin-0 resonances X decaying to ZZ (masses 0.2–5 TeV) and spin-1 resonances Z' decaying to ZH (masses 0.5–6 TeV). Upper limits at 95% CL are reported on σ(X)B(X→ZZ) ranging from 300 pb to 24 fb and on σ(Z')B(Z'→ZH) ranging from 0.4 pb to 12 fb, with no deviations from SM expectations observed. These are stated to be the first measurements in the ZZ/ZH → bbττ channels.

Significance. If the results hold, the work provides the first experimental constraints on ZZ and ZH production in the bbττ final state at the LHC, extending resonance searches into a channel motivated by Higgs-pair production studies. The reported limits on high-mass resonances constitute a useful addition to the BSM search program, particularly given the use of 138 fb⁻¹ of data and the combination of resonant and non-resonant interpretations.

minor comments (3)
  1. [Abstract / §1] The abstract states that these are the 'first measurements to probe the ZZ/ZH → bbττ processes,' but the introduction or §1 should explicitly compare to any prior related searches in other final states (e.g., 4ℓ or bbℓℓ) to clarify the novelty of the channel choice.
  2. [Results section (limit plots)] Figure captions for the limit plots (presumably in §6 or §7) should include the exact mass ranges and the functional form of the interpolation used between mass points to allow readers to assess the smoothness of the reported limits.
  3. [§4 or §5 (background estimation)] The description of background estimation in control regions should clarify whether the same control-region definitions are used for both the non-resonant and resonant analyses or if they differ, as this affects the interpretation of the systematic uncertainties.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful review of our manuscript and for the positive assessment of its significance. The recommendation for minor revision is noted. No specific major comments were provided in the report.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity

full rationale

This is a standard experimental hep-ex search paper reporting limits on resonant and non-resonant ZZ/ZH production from 138 fb⁻¹ of 13 TeV collision data. The central claims (upper limits on σB, no deviation from SM) are extracted directly from observed events after background estimation in control regions and systematic uncertainties on efficiencies and scales. No derivation chain, equations, or predictions reduce by construction to fitted inputs, self-definitions, or self-citation load-bearing premises. The result is benchmarked against external data and is self-contained.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on accurate modeling of SM backgrounds and detector efficiencies in the bbττ final state; without the full text, specific free parameters or additional axioms cannot be enumerated.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Standard model backgrounds and detector response are correctly modeled by simulation and control samples
    Invoked to interpret the absence of excess as upper limits on new resonances

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5820 in / 1215 out tokens · 27907 ms · 2026-07-03T03:29:35.269644+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

111 extracted references · 105 canonical work pages · 53 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Observation of a new particle in the search for the Standard Model Higgs boson with the ATLAS detector at the LHC

    ATLAS Collaboration, “Observation of a new particle in the search for the standard model Higgs boson with the ATLAS detector at the LHC”,Phys. Lett. B716(2012) 1, doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2012.08.020,arXiv:1207.7214

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2012.08.020 2012

  2. [2]

    Observation of a new boson at a mass of 125 GeV with the CMS experiment at the LHC

    CMS Collaboration, “Observation of a new boson at a mass of 125 GeV with the CMS experiment at the LHC”,Phys. Lett. B716(2012) 30, doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2012.08.021,arXiv:1207.7235. References 19

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2012.08.021 2012

  3. [3]

    Observation of a new boson with mass near 125 GeV in pp collisions at sqrt(s) = 7 and 8 TeV

    CMS Collaboration, “Observation of a new boson with mass near 125 GeV in pp collisions at √s=7 and 8 TeV”,JHEP06(2013) 081, doi:10.1007/JHEP06(2013)081,arXiv:1303.4571

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep06(2013)081 2013

  4. [4]

    A portrait of the Higgs boson by the CMS experiment ten years after the discovery

    CMS Collaboration, “A portrait of the Higgs boson by the CMS experiment ten years after the discovery”,Nature607(2022) 60,doi:10.1038/s41586-022-04892-x, arXiv:2207.00043. [Erratum:doi:10.1038/s41586-023-06164-8]

    work page doi:10.1038/s41586-022-04892-x 2022

  5. [5]

    Higgs Physics at the HL-LHC and HE-LHC

    M. Cepeda et al., “Report from working group 2: Higgs physics at the HL-LHC and HE-LHC”, CERN Yellow Rep. Monogr., 2019.doi:10.23731/CYRM-2019-007.221, arXiv:1902.00134

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.23731/cyrm-2019-007.221 2019

  6. [6]

    Combination of searches for nonresonant Higgs boson pair production in proton-proton collisions at √s=13 TeV

    CMS Collaboration, “Combination of searches for nonresonant Higgs boson pair production in proton-proton collisions at √s=13 TeV”, 2025.arXiv:2510.07527. Submitted toJ. Phys. G

    work page arXiv 2025

  7. [7]

    Highlights of the HL-LHC physics projections by ATLAS and CMS

    ATLAS and CMS Collaborations, “Highlights of the HL-LHC physics projections by ATLAS and CMS”, 2025.arXiv:2504.00672.doi:10.48550/arXiv.2504.00672

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2504.00672 2025

  8. [8]

    Measurements of pp→ZZ production cross sections and constraints on anomalous triple gauge couplings at √s=13 TeV

    CMS Collaboration, “Measurements of pp→ZZ production cross sections and constraints on anomalous triple gauge couplings at √s=13 TeV”,Eur. Phys. J. C81 (2021) 200,doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-020-08817-8,arXiv:2009.01186

    work page doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-020-08817-8 2021

  9. [9]

    Measurements of differential cross-sections in four-lepton events in 13 TeV proton-proton collisions with the ATLAS detector

    ATLAS Collaboration, “Measurements of differential cross-sections in four-lepton events in 13 TeV proton-proton collisions with the ATLAS detector”,JHEP07(2021) 005,doi:10.1007/JHEP07(2021)005,arXiv:2103.01918

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep07(2021)005 2021

  10. [10]

    Measurement of ZZ production cross-sections in the four-lepton final state in pp collisions at √s=13.6 TeV with the ATLAS experiment

    ATLAS Collaboration, “Measurement of ZZ production cross-sections in the four-lepton final state in pp collisions at √s=13.6 TeV with the ATLAS experiment”,Phys. Lett. B 855(2024) 138764,doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2024.138764,arXiv:2311.09715

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2024.138764 2024

  11. [11]

    Measurement of simplified template cross sections of the Higgs boson produced in association with W or Z bosons in the H→b b decay channel in proton-proton collisions at √s=13 TeV

    CMS Collaboration, “Measurement of simplified template cross sections of the Higgs boson produced in association with W or Z bosons in the H→b b decay channel in proton-proton collisions at √s=13 TeV”,Phys. Rev. D109(2024) 092011, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.109.092011,arXiv:2312.07562

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.109.092011 2024

  12. [12]

    Search for ZZ and ZH production in the b bb b final state using proton-proton collisions at √s=13 TeV

    CMS Collaboration, “Search for ZZ and ZH production in the b bb b final state using proton-proton collisions at √s=13 TeV”,Eur. Phys. J. C84(2024) 712, doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-024-13021-z,arXiv:2403.20241

    work page doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-024-13021-z 2024

  13. [13]

    Influence of strongly coupled, hidden scalars on Higgs signals

    T. Binoth and J. J. van der Bij, “Influence of strongly coupled, hidden scalars on Higgs signals”,Z. Phys. C75(1997) 17,doi:10.1007/s002880050442, arXiv:hep-ph/9608245

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/s002880050442 1997

  14. [14]

    A Minimal Spontaneously Broken Hidden Sector and its Impact on Higgs Boson Physics at the Large Hadron Collider

    R. M. Schabinger and J. D. Wells, “A minimal spontaneously broken hidden sector and its impact on Higgs boson physics at the large hadron collider”,Phys. Rev. D72(2005) 093007,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.72.093007,arXiv:hep-ph/0509209

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.72.093007 2005

  15. [15]

    Higgs-field Portal into Hidden Sectors

    B. Patt and F. Wilczek, “Higgs-field portal into hidden sectors”, 2006. arXiv:hep-ph/0605188.doi:10.48550/arXiv.hep-ph/0605188

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.hep-ph/0605188 2006

  16. [16]

    Theory and phenomenology of two-Higgs-doublet models

    G. C. Branco et al., “Theory and phenomenology of two-Higgs-doublet models”,Phys. Rept.516(2012) 1,doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2012.02.002,arXiv:1106.0034. 20

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2012.02.002 2012

  17. [17]

    Heavy Vector Triplets: Bridging Theory and Data

    D. Pappadopulo, A. Thamm, R. Torre, and A. Wulzer, “Heavy vector triplets: Bridging theory and data”,JHEP09(2014) 060,doi:10.1007/JHEP09(2014)060, arXiv:1402.4431

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep09(2014)060 2014

  18. [18]

    Supergauge invariant extension of the Higgs mechanism and a model for the electron and its neutrino

    P . Fayet, “Supergauge invariant extension of the Higgs mechanism and a model for the electron and its neutrino”,Nucl. Phys. B90(1975) 104, doi:10.1016/0550-3213(75)90636-7

    work page doi:10.1016/0550-3213(75)90636-7 1975

  19. [19]

    Spontaneously broken supersymmetric theories of weak, electromagnetic and strong interactions

    P . Fayet, “Spontaneously broken supersymmetric theories of weak, electromagnetic and strong interactions”,Phys. Lett. B69(1977) 489, doi:10.1016/0370-2693(77)90852-8

    work page doi:10.1016/0370-2693(77)90852-8 1977

  20. [20]

    Warped Gravitons at the LHC and Beyond

    K. Agashe, H. Davoudiasl, G. Perez, and A. Soni, “Warped gravitons at the LHC and beyond”,Phys. Rev. D76(2007) 036006,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.76.036006, arXiv:hep-ph/0701186

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.76.036006 2007

  21. [21]

    Searching for the Kaluza-Klein Graviton in Bulk RS Models

    A. L. Fitzpatrick, J. Kaplan, L. Randall, and L.-T. Wang, “Searching for the Kaluza-Klein graviton in Bulk RS models”,JHEP09(2007) 013, doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2007/09/013,arXiv:hep-ph/0701150

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2007/09/013 2007

  22. [22]

    ATLAS Collaboration, “Search for heavy resonances decaying into a pair of Z bosons in theℓ +ℓ−ℓ′+ℓ′− andℓ +ℓ−ννfinal states using 139 fb −1 of proton-proton collisions at√s=13 TeV with the ATLAS detector”,Eur. Phys. J. C81(2021) 332, doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-021-09013-y,arXiv:2009.14791

    work page doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-021-09013-y 2021

  23. [23]

    Search for a new scalar resonance decaying to a pair of Z bosons in proton-proton collisions at $\sqrt{s} =$ 13 TeV

    CMS Collaboration, “Search for a new scalar resonance decaying to a pair of Z bosons in proton-proton collisions at √s=13 TeV”,JHEP06(2018) 127, doi:10.1007/JHEP06(2018)127,arXiv:1804.01939. [Erratum: doi:10.1007/JHEP03(2019)128]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep06(2018)127 2018

  24. [24]

    Search for heavy diboson resonances in semileptonic final states in pp collisions at √s=13 TeV with the ATLAS detector

    ATLAS Collaboration, “Search for heavy diboson resonances in semileptonic final states in pp collisions at √s=13 TeV with the ATLAS detector”,Eur. Phys. J. C80(2020) 1165,doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-020-08554-y,arXiv:2004.14636

    work page doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-020-08554-y 2020

  25. [25]

    Search for heavy resonances decaying to ZZ or ZW and axion-like particles mediating nonresonant ZZ or ZH production at √s=13 TeV

    CMS Collaboration, “Search for heavy resonances decaying to ZZ or ZW and axion-like particles mediating nonresonant ZZ or ZH production at √s=13 TeV”,JHEP04(2022) 087,doi:10.1007/JHEP04(2022)087,arXiv:2111.13669

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep04(2022)087 2022

  26. [26]

    Search for heavy resonances decaying to Z(ν ν)V(q q ′)in proton-proton collisions at √s=13 TeV

    CMS Collaboration, “Search for heavy resonances decaying to Z(ν ν)V(q q ′)in proton-proton collisions at √s=13 TeV”,Phys. Rev. D106(2022) 012004, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.106.012004,arXiv:2109.08268

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.106.012004 2022

  27. [27]

    Search for diboson resonances in hadronic final states in 139 fb−1 of pp collisions at √s=13 TeV with the ATLAS detector

    ATLAS Collaboration, “Search for diboson resonances in hadronic final states in 139 fb−1 of pp collisions at √s=13 TeV with the ATLAS detector”,JHEP09(2019) 091, doi:10.1007/JHEP09(2019)091,arXiv:1906.08589. [Erratum: doi:10.1007/JHEP06(2020)042]

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep09(2019)091 2019

  28. [28]

    Search for new heavy resonances decaying to WW, WZ, ZZ, WH, or ZH boson pairs in the all-jets final state in proton-proton collisions at √s=13 TeV

    CMS Collaboration, “Search for new heavy resonances decaying to WW, WZ, ZZ, WH, or ZH boson pairs in the all-jets final state in proton-proton collisions at √s=13 TeV”, Phys. Lett. B844(2023) 137813,doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2023.137813, arXiv:2210.00043

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2023.137813 2023

  29. [29]

    Search for narrow high-mass resonances in proton-proton collisions at sqrt(s) = 8 TeV decaying to a Z and a Higgs boson

    CMS Collaboration, “Search for narrow high-mass resonances in proton-proton collisions at √s=8 TeV decaying to a Z and a Higgs boson”,Phys. Lett. B748(2015) 255,doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2015.07.011,arXiv:1502.04994. References 21

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2015.07.011 2015

  30. [30]

    Search for heavy resonances decaying into two Higgs bosons or into a Higgs boson and a W or Z boson in proton-proton collisions at 13 TeV

    CMS Collaboration, “Search for heavy resonances decaying into two Higgs bosons or into a Higgs boson and a W or Z boson in proton-proton collisions at 13 TeV”,JHEP01 (2019) 051,doi:10.1007/JHEP01(2019)051,arXiv:1808.01365

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep01(2019)051 2019

  31. [31]

    Search for resonances decaying into a weak vector boson and a Higgs boson in the fully hadronic final state produced in proton-proton collisions at√s=13 TeV with the ATLAS detector

    ATLAS Collaboration, “Search for resonances decaying into a weak vector boson and a Higgs boson in the fully hadronic final state produced in proton-proton collisions at√s=13 TeV with the ATLAS detector”,Phys. Rev. D102(2020) 112008, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.102.112008,arXiv:2007.05293

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.102.112008 2020

  32. [32]

    Study of high-transverse-momentum Higgs boson production in association with a vector boson in the qqbb final state with the ATLAS detector

    ATLAS Collaboration, “Study of high-transverse-momentum Higgs boson production in association with a vector boson in the qqbb final state with the ATLAS detector”, Phys. Rev. Lett.132(2024) 131802,doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.132.131802, arXiv:2312.07605

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.132.131802 2024

  33. [33]

    Search for heavy resonances decaying into a Z or W boson and a Higgs boson in final states with leptons and b-jets in 139 fb−1 of pp collisions at√s=13 TeV with the ATLAS detector

    ATLAS Collaboration, “Search for heavy resonances decaying into a Z or W boson and a Higgs boson in final states with leptons and b-jets in 139 fb−1 of pp collisions at√s=13 TeV with the ATLAS detector”,JHEP06(2023) 016, doi:10.1007/JHEP06(2023)016,arXiv:2207.00230

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep06(2023)016 2023

  34. [34]

    CMS Collaboration, “Search for a heavy resonance decaying into a Z and a Higgs boson in events with an energetic jet and two electrons, two muons, or missing transverse momentum in proton-proton collisions at √s=13 TeV”,JHEP02(2025) 089, doi:10.1007/JHEP02(2025)089,arXiv:2411.00202

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep02(2025)089 2025

  35. [35]

    A heavy neutral gauge boson near the Z boson mass pole via third generation fermions at the LHC

    M. Abdullah et al., “A heavy neutral gauge boson near the Z boson mass pole via third generation fermions at the LHC”,Phys. Lett. B803(2020) 135326, doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2020.135326,arXiv:1912.00102

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2020.135326 2020

  36. [36]

    Search for resonant and non-resonant Higgs boson pair production in the bbτ +τ − decay channel using 13 TeV pp collision data from the ATLAS detector

    ATLAS Collaboration, “Search for resonant and non-resonant Higgs boson pair production in the bbτ +τ − decay channel using 13 TeV pp collision data from the ATLAS detector”,JHEP07(2023) 40,doi:10.1007/JHEP07(2023)040, arXiv:2209.10910

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep07(2023)040 2023

  37. [37]

    Reconstruction and identification of boosted di-τsystems in a search for Higgs boson pairs using 13 TeV proton-proton collision data in ATLAS

    ATLAS Collaboration, “Reconstruction and identification of boosted di-τsystems in a search for Higgs boson pairs using 13 TeV proton-proton collision data in ATLAS”, JHEP11(2020) 163,doi:10.1007/JHEP11(2020)163,arXiv:2007.14811

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep11(2020)163 2020

  38. [38]

    Search for Higgs boson pair production in events with two bottom quarks and two tau leptons in proton-proton collisions at sqrt(s) = 13 TeV

    CMS Collaboration, “Search for Higgs boson pair production in events with two bottom quarks and two tau leptons in proton-proton collisions at √s=13 TeV”,Phys. Lett. B 778(2018) 101,doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2018.01.001,arXiv:1707.02909

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2018.01.001 2018

  39. [39]

    Search for heavy resonances decaying into two Higgs bosons in the bbτ τfinal state in proton-proton collisions at √s=13 TeV

    CMS Collaboration, “Search for heavy resonances decaying into two Higgs bosons in the bbτ τfinal state in proton-proton collisions at √s=13 TeV”, 2026. arXiv:2601.20011. Accepted byEur. Phys. J. C

    work page arXiv 2026

  40. [40]

    Search for nonresonant Higgs boson pair production in final state with two bottom quarks and two tau leptons in proton-proton collisions at√s=13 TeV

    CMS Collaboration, “Search for nonresonant Higgs boson pair production in final state with two bottom quarks and two tau leptons in proton-proton collisions at√s=13 TeV”,Phys. Lett. B842(2023) 137531, doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2022.137531,arXiv:2206.09401

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2022.137531 2023

  41. [41]

    Handbook of LHC Higgs Cross Sections: 4. Deciphering the Nature of the Higgs Sector

    LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, “Handbook of LHC Higgs cross sections: 4. Deciphering the nature of the Higgs sector”, CERN Report CERN-2017-002-M, 2016. doi:10.23731/CYRM-2017-002,arXiv:1610.07922. 22

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.23731/cyrm-2017-002 2017

  42. [42]

    HEPData record for this analysis, 2026.doi:10.17182/hepdata.169547

    work page doi:10.17182/hepdata.169547 2026

  43. [43]

    The CMS experiment at the CERN LHC

    CMS Collaboration, “The CMS experiment at the CERN LHC”,JINST3(2008) S08004, doi:10.1088/1748-0221/3/08/S08004

    work page doi:10.1088/1748-0221/3/08/s08004 2008

  44. [44]

    Development of the CMS detector for the CERN LHC Run 3

    CMS Collaboration, “Development of the CMS detector for the CERN LHC Run 3”, JINST19(2024) P05064,doi:10.1088/1748-0221/19/05/P05064, arXiv:2309.05466

    work page doi:10.1088/1748-0221/19/05/p05064 2024

  45. [45]

    Performance of the CMS Level-1 trigger in proton-proton collisions at √s=13 TeV

    CMS Collaboration, “Performance of the CMS Level-1 trigger in proton-proton collisions at √s=13 TeV”,JINST15(2020) P10017, doi:10.1088/1748-0221/15/10/P10017,arXiv:2006.10165

    work page doi:10.1088/1748-0221/15/10/p10017 2020

  46. [46]

    The CMS trigger system

    CMS Collaboration, “The CMS trigger system”,JINST12(2017) P01020, doi:10.1088/1748-0221/12/01/P01020,arXiv:1609.02366

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/1748-0221/12/01/p01020 2017

  47. [47]

    Performance of the CMS high-level trigger during LHC Run 2

    CMS Collaboration, “Performance of the CMS high-level trigger during LHC Run 2”, JINST19(2024) P11021,doi:10.1088/1748-0221/19/11/P11021, arXiv:2410.17038

    work page doi:10.1088/1748-0221/19/11/p11021 2024

  48. [48]

    Electron and photon reconstruction and identification with the CMS experiment at the CERN LHC

    CMS Collaboration, “Electron and photon reconstruction and identification with the CMS experiment at the CERN LHC”,JINST16(2021) P05014, doi:10.1088/1748-0221/16/05/P05014,arXiv:2012.06888

    work page doi:10.1088/1748-0221/16/05/p05014 2021

  49. [49]

    Performance of the CMS muon detector and muon reconstruction with proton-proton collisions at $\sqrt{s}=$ 13 TeV

    CMS Collaboration, “Performance of the CMS muon detector and muon reconstruction with proton-proton collisions at √s=13 TeV”,JINST13(2018) P06015, doi:10.1088/1748-0221/13/06/P06015,arXiv:1804.04528

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/1748-0221/13/06/p06015 2018

  50. [50]

    Description and performance of track and primary-vertex reconstruction with the CMS tracker

    CMS Collaboration, “Description and performance of track and primary-vertex reconstruction with the CMS tracker”,JINST9(2014) P10009, doi:10.1088/1748-0221/9/10/P10009,arXiv:1405.6569

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/1748-0221/9/10/p10009 2014

  51. [51]

    The automated computation of tree-level and next-to-leading order differential cross sections, and their matching to parton shower simulations

    J. Alwall et al., “The automated computation of tree-level and next-to-leading order differential cross sections, and their matching to parton shower simulations”,JHEP07 (2014) 79,doi:10.1007/jhep07(2014)079,arXiv:1405.0301

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep07(2014)079 2014

  52. [52]

    ZZ production at hadron colliders in NNLO QCD

    F. Cascioli et al., “ZZ production at hadron colliders in NNLO QCD”,Phys. Lett. B735 (2014) 311,doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2014.06.056,arXiv:1405.2219

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2014.06.056 2014

  53. [53]

    A New Method for Combining NLO QCD with Shower Monte Carlo Algorithms

    P . Nason, “A new method for combining NLO QCD with shower Monte Carlo algorithms”,JHEP11(2004) 040,doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2004/11/040, arXiv:hep-ph/0409146

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2004/11/040 2004

  54. [54]

    Matching NLO QCD computations with Parton Shower simulations: the POWHEG method

    S. Frixione, P . Nason, and C. Oleari, “Matching NLO QCD computations with parton shower simulations: the POWHEG method”,JHEP11(2007) 070, doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2007/11/070,arXiv:0709.2092

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2007/11/070 2007

  55. [55]

    A general framework for implementing NLO calculations in shower Monte Carlo programs: the POWHEG BOX

    S. Alioli, P . Nason, C. Oleari, and E. Re, “A general framework for implementing NLO calculations in shower Monte Carlo programs: the POWHEG BOX”,JHEP06(2010) 043,doi:10.1007/JHEP06(2010)043,arXiv:1002.2581

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep06(2010)043 2010

  56. [56]

    NLO QCD+EW predictions for HV and HV+jet production including parton-shower effects

    F. Granata, J. M. Lindert, C. Oleari, and S. Pozzorini, “NLO QCD+EW predictions for HV and HV+jet production including parton-shower effects”,JHEP09(2017) 012, doi:10.1007/JHEP09(2017)012,arXiv:1706.03522. References 23

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep09(2017)012 2017

  57. [57]

    Higgs production via gluon fusion in the POWHEG approach in the SM and in the MSSM

    E. Bagnaschi, G. Degrassi, P . Slavich, and A. Vicini, “Higgs production via gluon fusion in the POWHEG approach in the SM and in the MSSM”,JHEP02(2012) 088, doi:10.1007/JHEP02(2012)088,arXiv:1111.2854

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep02(2012)088 2012

  58. [58]

    A Positive-Weight Next-to-Leading-Order Monte Carlo for Heavy Flavour Hadroproduction

    S. Frixione, P . Nason, and G. Ridolfi, “A positive-weight next-to-leading-order Monte Carlo for heavy flavour hadroproduction”,JHEP09(2007) 126, doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2007/09/126,arXiv:0707.3088

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2007/09/126 2007

  59. [59]

    Merging meets matching in MC@NLO

    R. Frederix and S. Frixione, “Merging meets matching in MC@NLO”,JHEP12(2012) 61,doi:10.1007/jhep12(2012)061,arXiv:1209.6215

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep12(2012)061 2012

  60. [60]

    Comparative study of various algorithms for the merging of parton showers and matrix elements in hadronic collisions

    J. Alwall et al., “Comparative study of various algorithms for the merging of parton showers and matrix elements in hadronic collisions”,Eur. Phys. J. C53(2007) 473, doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-007-0490-5,arXiv:0706.2569

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-007-0490-5 2007

  61. [61]

    An Introduction to PYTHIA 8.2

    T. Sj ¨ostrand et al., “An introduction toPYTHIA8.2”,Comp. Phys. Commun.191(2015) 159,doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2015.01.024,arXiv:1410.3012

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2015.01.024 2015

  62. [62]

    Extraction and validation of a new set of CMSPYTHIA8 tunes from underlying-event measurements

    CMS Collaboration, “Extraction and validation of a new set of CMSPYTHIA8 tunes from underlying-event measurements”,Eur. Phys. J. C80(2020) 4, doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-019-7499-4,arXiv:1903.12179

    work page doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-019-7499-4 2020

  63. [63]

    Parton distributions from high-precision collider data

    NNPDF Collaboration, “Parton distributions from high-precision collider data”,Eur. Phys. J. C77(2017) 663,doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-017-5199-5, arXiv:1706.00428

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-017-5199-5 2017

  64. [64]

    GEANT4—a simulation toolkit

    GEANT4 Collaboration, “GEANT4—a simulation toolkit”,Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A506 (2003) 250,doi:10.1016/S0168-9002(03)01368-8

    work page doi:10.1016/s0168-9002(03)01368-8 2003

  65. [65]

    Particle-flow reconstruction and global event description with the CMS detector

    CMS Collaboration, “Particle-flow reconstruction and global event description with the CMS detector”,JINST12(2017) P10003,doi:10.1088/1748-0221/12/10/P10003, arXiv:1706.04965

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/1748-0221/12/10/p10003 2017

  66. [66]

    Technical proposal for the Phase-II upgrade of the Compact Muon Solenoid

    CMS Collaboration, “Technical proposal for the Phase-II upgrade of the Compact Muon Solenoid”, CMS Technical Proposal CERN-LHCC-2015-010, CMS-TDR-15-02, 2015. doi:10.17181/CERN.VU8I.D59J

    work page doi:10.17181/cern.vu8i.d59j 2015

  67. [67]

    ECAL 2016 refined calibration and Run2 summary plots

    CMS Collaboration, “ECAL 2016 refined calibration and Run2 summary plots”, CMS Detector Performance Summary CMS-DP-2020-021, 2020

    2016

  68. [68]

    The anti-k_t jet clustering algorithm

    M. Cacciari, G. P . Salam, and G. Soyez, “The anti-kT jet clustering algorithm”,JHEP04 (2008) 063,doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2008/04/063,arXiv:0802.1189

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2008/04/063 2008

  69. [69]

    FastJet user manual

    M. Cacciari, G. P . Salam, and G. Soyez, “FastJet user manual”,Eur. Phys. J. C72(2012) 1896,doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-012-1896-2,arXiv:1111.6097

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-012-1896-2 2012

  70. [70]

    Pileup mitigation at CMS in √s=13 TeV data

    CMS Collaboration, “Pileup mitigation at CMS in √s=13 TeV data”,JINST15(2020) P09018,doi:10.1088/1748-0221/15/09/p09018,arXiv:2003.00503

    work page doi:10.1088/1748-0221/15/09/p09018 2020

  71. [71]

    Pileup Per Particle Identification

    D. Bertolini, P . Harris, M. Low, and N. Tran, “Pileup per particle identification”,JHEP 10(2014) 059,doi:10.1007/JHEP10(2014)059,arXiv:1407.6013

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep10(2014)059 2014

  72. [72]

    Jet energy scale and resolution in the CMS experiment in pp collisions at 8 TeV

    CMS Collaboration, “Jet energy scale and resolution in the CMS experiment in proton-proton collisions at √s=8 TeV”,JINST12(2017) P02014, doi:10.1088/1748-0221/12/02/P02014,arXiv:1607.03663. 24

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/1748-0221/12/02/p02014 2017

  73. [73]

    Jet energy scale and resolution measurement with Run-2 legacy data collected by CMS at √s=13 TeV

    CMS Collaboration, “Jet energy scale and resolution measurement with Run-2 legacy data collected by CMS at √s=13 TeV”, CMS Detector Performance Summary CMS-DP-2021-033, 2021

    2021

  74. [74]

    Performance of missing transverse momentum reconstruction in proton-proton collisions at $\sqrt{s} =$ 13 TeV using the CMS detector

    CMS Collaboration, “Performance of missing transverse momentum reconstruction in proton-proton collisions at √s=13 TeV using the CMS detector”,JINST14(2019) P07004,doi:10.1088/1748-0221/14/07/P07004,arXiv:1903.06078

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/1748-0221/14/07/p07004 2019

  75. [75]

    Jet flavour classification using DeepJet

    E. Bols et al., “Jet flavour classification using DeepJet”,JINST15(2020) P12012, doi:10.1088/1748-0221/15/12/p12012,arXiv:2008.10519

    work page doi:10.1088/1748-0221/15/12/p12012 2020

  76. [76]

    Performance summary of AK4 jet b tagging with data from proton-proton collisions at 13 TeV with the CMS detector

    CMS Collaboration, “Performance summary of AK4 jet b tagging with data from proton-proton collisions at 13 TeV with the CMS detector”, CMS Detector Performance Summary CMS-DP-2023-005, 2023

    2023

  77. [77]

    Identification of heavy-flavour jets with the CMS detector in pp collisions at 13 TeV

    CMS Collaboration, “Identification of heavy-flavour jets with the CMS detector in pp collisions at 13 TeV”,JINST13(2018) P05011, doi:10.1088/1748-0221/13/05/P05011,arXiv:1712.07158

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/1748-0221/13/05/p05011 2018

  78. [78]

    Jet tagging via particle clouds

    H. Qu and L. Gouskos, “Jet tagging via particle clouds”,Phys. Rev. D101(2020) 056019, doi:10.1103/physrevd.101.056019,arXiv:1902.08570

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.101.056019 2020

  79. [79]

    Performance of heavy-flavour jet identification in Lorentz-boosted topologies in proton-proton collisions at √s=13 TeV

    CMS Collaboration, “Performance of heavy-flavour jet identification in Lorentz-boosted topologies in proton-proton collisions at √s=13 TeV”,JINST20(2025) P11006, doi:10.1088/1748-0221/20/11/P11006,arXiv:2510.10228

    work page doi:10.1088/1748-0221/20/11/p11006 2025

  80. [80]

    Better Jet Clustering Algorithms

    Y. L. Dokshitzer, G. D. Leder, S. Moretti, and B. R. Webber, “Better jet clustering algorithms”,JHEP08(1997) 001,doi:10.1088/1126-6708/1997/08/001, arXiv:hep-ph/9707323

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/1126-6708/1997/08/001 1997

Showing first 80 references.