Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Tabular Representation, Noisy Operators, and Impacts on Table Structure Understanding Tasks in LLMs

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2310.10358 v1 pith:JYVYVCRU submitted 2023-10-16 cs.CL cs.AI

Tabular Representation, Noisy Operators, and Impacts on Table Structure Understanding Tasks in LLMs

classification cs.CL cs.AI
keywords tabletasksllmsformatsinspiredoperationsperformancerepresentation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly applied for tabular tasks using in-context learning. The prompt representation for a table may play a role in the LLMs ability to process the table. Inspired by prior work, we generate a collection of self-supervised structural tasks (e.g. navigate to a cell and row; transpose the table) and evaluate the performance differences when using 8 formats. In contrast to past work, we introduce 8 noise operations inspired by real-world messy data and adversarial inputs, and show that such operations can impact LLM performance across formats for different structural understanding tasks.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Calibrated Confidence Estimation for Tabular Question Answering

    cs.CL 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Tabular QA LLMs are overconfident, but Multi-Format Agreement using Markdown/HTML/JSON/CSV variants improves AUROC to 0.80 and cuts calibration error by 44-63% at lower cost than sampling.