Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Tryage: Real-time, intelligent Routing of User Prompts to Large Language Models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2308.11601 v2 pith:K3DGYKTG submitted 2023-08-22 cs.LG cs.AIcs.CLcs.MA

classification cs.LGcs.AIcs.CLcs.MA
keywords modelmodelstryagedatalanguageroutingpromptsrecency
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

The introduction of the transformer architecture and the self-attention mechanism has led to an explosive production of language models trained on specific downstream tasks and data domains. With over 200, 000 models in the Hugging Face ecosystem, users grapple with selecting and optimizing models to suit multifaceted workflows and data domains while addressing computational, security, and recency concerns. There is an urgent need for machine learning frameworks that can eliminate the burden of model selection and customization and unleash the incredible power of the vast emerging model library for end users. Here, we propose a context-aware routing system, Tryage, that leverages a language model router for optimal selection of expert models from a model library based on analysis of individual input prompts. Inspired by the thalamic router in the brain, Tryage employs a perceptive router to predict down-stream model performance on prompts and, then, makes a routing decision using an objective function that integrates performance predictions with user goals and constraints that are incorporated through flags (e.g., model size, model recency). Tryage allows users to explore a Pareto front and automatically trade-off between task accuracy and secondary goals including minimization of model size, recency, security, verbosity, and readability. Across heterogeneous data sets that include code, text, clinical data, and patents, the Tryage framework surpasses Gorilla and GPT3.5 turbo in dynamic model selection identifying the optimal model with an accuracy of 50.9% , compared to 23.6% by GPT 3.5 Turbo and 10.8% by Gorilla. Conceptually, Tryage demonstrates how routing models can be applied to program and control the behavior of multi-model LLM systems to maximize efficient use of the expanding and evolving language model ecosystem.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Codifying the Judge: Scalable Evaluation via Program Distillation

    cs.AI 2026-05 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    LLM judge logic can be distilled into a committee of Python scoring programs that match mid-size LLM judge accuracy on filtered preference datasets, at orders-of-magnitude higher throughput.

  2. Training-Free versus Training-Based Intent Classification in LLMs: Accuracy, Robustness, and Failure Modes

    cs.CL 2026-08 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    Statistical classifiers built on LLM activation norms and coordinates match or beat trained MLP heads on coarse intent routing and resist camouflage better, while MLPs win on fine-grained subfield distinctions.

  3. Economic Evaluation of LLMs

    cs.AI 2025-07 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    Reasoning models and single large LLMs beat cheaper alternatives on a dollar-adjusted score once the assumed price per error exceeds roughly $0.01 to $0.20, depending on latency assumptions.

Pith tools