Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Benchmarking the Robustness of Quantized Models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2304.03968 v1 pith:K4XELP2O submitted 2023-04-08 cs.LG cs.AI

Benchmarking the Robustness of Quantized Models

classification cs.LG cs.AI
keywords modelsnoisesquantizationquantizedrobustnesscorruptionsnaturalsystematic
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Quantization has emerged as an essential technique for deploying deep neural networks (DNNs) on devices with limited resources. However, quantized models exhibit vulnerabilities when exposed to various noises in real-world applications. Despite the importance of evaluating the impact of quantization on robustness, existing research on this topic is limited and often disregards established principles of robustness evaluation, resulting in incomplete and inconclusive findings. To address this gap, we thoroughly evaluated the robustness of quantized models against various noises (adversarial attacks, natural corruptions, and systematic noises) on ImageNet. Extensive experiments demonstrate that lower-bit quantization is more resilient to adversarial attacks but is more susceptible to natural corruptions and systematic noises. Notably, our investigation reveals that impulse noise (in natural corruptions) and the nearest neighbor interpolation (in systematic noises) have the most significant impact on quantized models. Our research contributes to advancing the robust quantization of models and their deployment in real-world scenarios.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Benchmarking the Robustness of Autonomous Driving to Environmental Illusions: A Lane Perception Perspective

    cs.CV 2026-07 conditional novelty 5.0

    Environmental illusions cause 5-7% accuracy drops in lane detection models and can trigger collisions in closed-loop simulation, with a proposed defense (MIDA) recovering ~4% robustness.