REVIEW 2 cited by
Learning the black hole metric from holographic conductivity
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Learning the black hole metric from holographic conductivity
read the original abstract
We construct a neural network to learn the RN-AdS black hole metric based on the data of optical conductivity by holography. The linear perturbative equation for the Maxwell field is rewritten in terms of the optical conductivity such that the neural network is constructed based on the discretization of this differential equation. In contrast to all previous models in AdS/DL (deep learning) duality, the derivative of the metric function appears in the equation of motion and we propose distinct finite difference methods to discretize this function. The notion of the reduced conductivity is also proposed to avoid the divergence of the optical conductivity near the horizon.The dependence of the training outcomes on the location of the cutoff, the temperature as well as the frequency range is investigated in detail. This work provides a concrete example for the reconstruction of the bulk geometry with the given data on the boundary by deep learning.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Probing bulk geometry via pole skipping: from static to rotating spacetimes
Pole-skipping data encodes enough information to reconstruct the full metric of 3D rotating black holes and the radial functions of 4D separable rotating black holes, with Einstein equations becoming algebraic constra...
-
Heavy Quarkonium Spectrum and Decay Constants from a Neural-Network-Based Holographic Model
A neural-network-parametrized dilaton field reproduces the masses and leptonic decay constants of charmonium and bottomonium with 1.26% and 3.32% RMS errors, but only because those values were used as training data.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.