Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Understanding SGD with Exponential Moving Average: A Case Study in Linear Regression

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2502.14123 v1 pith:K6SCIRY4 submitted 2025-02-19 cs.LG math.OCstat.ML

classification cs.LGmath.OCstat.ML
keywords averagingaverageerrorexponentiallearninglinearmodelsmoving
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Exponential moving average (EMA) has recently gained significant popularity in training modern deep learning models, especially diffusion-based generative models. However, there have been few theoretical results explaining the effectiveness of EMA. In this paper, to better understand EMA, we establish the risk bound of online SGD with EMA for high-dimensional linear regression, one of the simplest overparameterized learning tasks that shares similarities with neural networks. Our results indicate that (i) the variance error of SGD with EMA is always smaller than that of SGD without averaging, and (ii) unlike SGD with iterate averaging from the beginning, the bias error of SGD with EMA decays exponentially in every eigen-subspace of the data covariance matrix. Additionally, we develop proof techniques applicable to the analysis of a broad class of averaging schemes.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. PADAM: Parallel averaged Adam reduces the error for stochastic optimization in scientific machine learning

    math.OC 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    PADAM runs K differently averaged Adam trajectories in parallel, selects the one with the smallest test error, and achieves the best optimization error in nearly all of 13 tested scientific machine learning problems w...

Pith tools