Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 3 minor 39 references

On Balancing Sparsity with Reliable Connectivity in Distributed Network Design with Random K-out Graphs

T0 review · 2 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-08-05 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read For derivative fractional nonlinear Schrödinger equations on the torus, the Cauchy problem is well-posed in H^s exactly when the integral condition ∫ Im F_ω(ψ, ∂_xψ, ψ̄, ∂_xψ̄) dx = 0 holds for all ψ; if it fails, some initial data admit no

desk verdict A serious dispersive PDE paper that proves the sharp well/ill-posedness condition for derivative fNLS on the torus for all α>2; the metadata mismatch is a distraction, and the only concrete glitch I found is a repairable division-by-zero. read the letter →

arxiv 2508.11863 v1 pith:KBTO4UYX submitted 2025-08-16 cs.SI cs.ITcs.LGcs.NImath.ITmath.OC

Mansi Sood , Eray Can Elumar , Osman Yagan This is my paper · ORCID
classification cs.SIcs.ITcs.LGcs.NImath.ITmath.OC MSC 35Q55
keywords fractionalSchrödingerequationwell-posednessmodifiedenergyill-posednessnon-existencetorusSobolevspace
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper pins down exactly when the Cauchy problem for a derivative fractional nonlinear Schrödinger equation on the circle has a well-posed initial-value problem in Sobolev spaces. The answer is a single structural condition on the nonlinearity: for regularity s above s*(α) = max(α/2+1, 5/2), well-posedness holds if and only if the integral of Im F_ω over the spatial domain vanishes for every test function ψ. If that integral is nonzero for some ψ, the equation is not merely unstable: no solution exists in H^s for some initial data. The result matters because it shows that on compact domains, derivative nonlinearities can only be controlled by dispersion when a resonance condition cancels the worst term, and it gives a checkable algebraic condition on the nonlinearity F.

What carries the argument

The modified energy method with correction terms L^r_{n,ε}(t) = c_n ∫ (∂$_x^{{-1}}$ Im Θ_ω)^n |⟨D⟩^{r-1-(α-2)n/2} v|^2 dx, built inductively for α ∈ (2,3), where the nth and (n+1)th correction terms cancel the derivatives lost to the fractional Leibniz rule (Lemma 3.9). A refined commutator estimate (Proposition 2.6) with the operator Com^s[f](g) = ⟨D⟩^s(fg) − f⟨D⟩^s g + s(∂_x f)⟨D⟩^{s-2}∂_x g supplies the necessary bounds. For the non-existence direction, a Cauchy–Riemann-type operator i(Im P_0 Θ_ω)∂_x in the v-equation produces exponential growth on negative frequencies.

What would settle it

For the linear case F = iω, the paper's formal solution is u(t,x) = Σ φ̂(k) $e^{{(-i|k|^α − k)t}}$ $e^{{ikx}}$, giving |û(t,k)| = |φ̂(k)| $e^{{−kt}}$. Choosing φ̂(k) = |k|^{−s−1/2} for k < 0 makes ∥u(t)∥_{H^s} grow as $e^{{t∥k∥}}$ at high negative frequencies; if any H^s solution existed for such data on any time interval, Theorem 1.4 would be false. Conversely, confirming this perpetual blow-up for one such choice would corroborate the non-existence claim.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is that the necessary and sufficient condition for well-posedness of (1.1) in H^s(T) for s > s*(α) is exactly the vanishing of ∫ Im F_ω(ψ, ∂_xψ, ψ̄, ∂_xψ̄) dx for all ψ, the same condition already known for the semi-linear case α = 2. The proof shows that the only obstruction is a resonant term that cannot be tamed by fractional dispersion; when it is absent, a modified energy method constructs solutions, and when it is present, a Cauchy–Riemann-type operator forces non-existence rather than mere ill-posedness.

Load-bearing premise

The energy argument relies on the refined commutator estimate Proposition 2.6, proved inside the paper; if that estimate fails at the stated regularity thresholds, the derivative losses in the energy estimate (3.28) cannot be absorbed, and the whole well-posedness proof collapses.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The well-posedness condition is independent of α > 2; the same resonance integral governs both α = 2 and all fractional orders.
  • For α ≥ 3 a single correction term suffices, while 2 < α < 3 requires the inductive construction; the threshold s*(α) = max(α/2+1, 5/2) is exactly where the method operates.
  • Nonlinearities like c ∂_x u with c ≠ 0 are not merely ill-posed: they admit no H^s solution for some initial data, strengthening previous norm-inflation results.
  • The sum of two individually ill-posed nonlinearities can become well-posed when the coefficients make the integral condition vanish, showing that well-posedness depends on the whole nonlinearity, not its individual terms.
  • When the condition holds, the solution map is continuous on initial data and uniqueness holds unconditionally in C([0,T];H^s).

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The inductive correction-term construction suggests a general principle for derivative dispersive equations on compact domains: as α approaches 2 from above, the number of correction terms grows indefinitely, and the gauge transformation for α = 2 can be viewed as the infinite-correction limit of the modified energy method.
  • On the real line, local smoothing is known to remove the obstruction, so one might test whether the same resonance condition governs other periodic dispersive symbols, such as higher-order linear Schrödinger operators.
  • The paper notes that real-analytic initial data are always solvable even when (1.4) fails; this hints that non-existence is tied to high-frequency concentration in Sobolev spaces, a boundary that may recur for other analytic/Sobolev thresholds.
  • The integral condition is directly computable from the polynomial F, giving an algebraic test for whether a proposed derivative nonlinearity is admissible for periodic well-posedness — a practical screening tool for models in fractional quantum mechanics.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 3 minor

Summary. The body of the manuscript studies the Cauchy problem for derivative fractional nonlinear Schrödinger equations on the torus, ∂_t u + iD^α u = F(u, ∂_x u, \bar u, \partial_x \bar u), α > 2. The main result (Theorem 1.3) states that well-posedness in H^s(T) for s > s_*(α) = max(α/2+1, 5/2) is equivalent to the cancellation condition ∫ Im F_ω(ψ, ∂_x ψ, \bar ψ, \partial_x \bar ψ) dx = 0 for every ψ; Theorem 1.4 gives non-existence of solutions when the condition fails. Well-posedness is proved by parabolic regularization and a modified energy with finitely many correction terms, using a refined commutator estimate (Proposition 2.6); ill-posedness is proved by isolating a Cauchy–Riemann-type resonant operator. The supplied front matter (title/abstract) concerns random K-out graphs and network design, which does not match the body; I assessed the mathematical content of the body.

Significance. This is a substantial advance if the proof is correct: it extends the necessary and sufficient condition of Kondo–Okamoto from α = 2 to all α > 2 in the derivative case, and provides the first well-posedness results for periodic derivative fNLS with α < 4. The modified-energy construction for 2 < α < 3, with inductively defined correction terms, is novel, and the cancellation mechanism in Lemma 3.9 is clearly explained. The ill-posedness result (non-existence rather than mere norm inflation) is strong and falsifiable. I checked the delicate point identified by the earlier reader, Proposition 2.6, and the estimate is valid: in (2.13) the exponent gap b − a − 1/2 equals ε > 0 in both regimes, so the ℓ^1 sum is controlled. The main technical defect I found is the undefined term in Eq. (4.5), which is repairable. The regularity threshold is not claimed optimal (Remark 1.7), which is a scope statement rather than a flaw.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract / front matter] The supplied title and abstract describe random K-out graphs, reliable connectivity, r-robustness, and adversarial deletions; the body is a PDE paper on derivative fractional NLS. None of the network-design results advertised in the abstract appears in the text. This mismatch means the manuscript as submitted misrepresents its content and must be corrected before any editorial decision. The technical assessment below concerns the body only.
  2. [§4.1, Eq. (4.5)] In the definition of M1(t,k), the sum over D2(k) includes (k1,k2) = (0,k) for k ≠ 0, where the denominator |k|^α − |k2|^α vanishes. The displayed formula is therefore undefined as written. The term is harmless because \widehat{P_{\ne 0}Θ_ω}(0) = 0, but the definition should be restricted to D2(k) \ {(0,k)} or the k1 = 0 term should be explicitly set to zero. The same correction applies to the corresponding decomposition of N1,2; the estimates in (4.10) are unaffected.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Various] There are several typographical errors: 'diffrential' in §3.3, 'intgrating' near (3.29), 'impiles' in §3.3, and 'H older' in §4.1. These should be corrected.
  2. [§4.2, after Eq. (4.24)] The approximation argument used to pass from Theorem 4.1 to Theorem 1.4 invokes Lemma 4.2 of [21] without reproducing it. Since [21] is an arXiv preprint, please either state the lemma or provide the short argument in an appendix.
  3. [Remark 3.4] The formal α = 2 limit with N = ∞ is illuminating, but it should be labelled explicitly as formal; the rigorous treatment for α = 2 is in [21]. A sentence to that effect would prevent readers from treating the infinite correction sum as a convergent object in the present setting.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the main iff is proven independently; the only self-citation of note is a minor technical approximation lemma from [21].

full rationale

The paper's central claim, Theorem 1.3, is a necessary-and-sufficient condition, and both directions are argued from within the paper. The well-posedness direction assumes condition (1.4) and then constructs solutions from scratch via parabolic regularization, a modified energy with inductively defined correction terms, the in-paper commutator estimate Proposition 2.6, and the Bona--Smith approximation. The ill-posedness direction does not assume (1.4); Theorem 4.1 derives, from the sign of the integral in (1.5), a higher-regularity conclusion on P_±phi, and then chooses initial data violating that regularity. Thus the condition is not built into the definition of the objects being studied. The same condition for alpha = 2 from [21] is used as motivation and as a limiting case (Remark 3.4), not as an input to the alpha > 2 proof. The paper explicitly notes that the gauge transformation for alpha = 2 cannot be used for alpha > 2 and develops a different mechanism. No uniqueness theorem is imported from the authors' prior work, and no ansatz is smuggled in by citation. The only load-bearing external reference is Lemma 4.2 in [21], used at the end of Section 4 to choose phi with P_±phi outside H^{s+delta} while keeping the integral (1.5) nonzero. This is a minor technical approximation lemma, not a statement of the target theorem, and it does not reduce the main result to the authors' prior conclusions. Other self-citations ([15], [20]) are contextual or comparative. A concrete technical defect exists in Eq. (4.5): M1 is defined over D2(k) including k1=0, k2=k, where the denominator |k|^alpha - |k2|^alpha vanishes. This is a repairable division-by-zero slip, not a circularity. Overall, the derivation is self-contained apart from a minor standard lemma, so the circularity burden is low.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No free parameters are fitted; the regularity threshold s*(α) is derived, not tuned. The proof imports standard Fourier/commutator estimates and adds one new commutator estimate (Prop 2.6) and an inductive modified energy scheme. No new physical entities are postulated.

assumptions (4)
  • standard math Standard Sobolev space and Fourier analysis on the torus
    Used throughout; definitions in Section 1.
  • standard math Bilinear and product estimates (Propositions 2.1, 2.2) from Tao [38] and Iorio [12]
    Imported, used for nonlinear term estimates in Corollary 2.3.
  • domain assumption Commutator estimates (Propositions 2.4, 2.5) are proven in the paper from known techniques
    The bounds are not machine-checked and depend on the specific form; Proposition 2.6 is a new variant.
  • domain assumption F is a polynomial in u, ∂xu, ubar, ∂xubar; real-analytic extension claimed but not proven
    Remark 1.6 states polynomial restriction avoids technical difficulties; the main theorem is stated for polynomial F.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of On Balancing Sparsity with Reliable Connectivity in Distributed Network Design with Random K-out Graphs." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/KBTO4UYX

@misc{pith2026250811863,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: On Balancing Sparsity with Reliable Connectivity in Distributed Network Design with Random K-out Graphs},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/KBTO4UYX}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2508.11863}
}
read the original abstract

In several applications in distributed systems, an important design criterion is ensuring that the network is sparse, i.e., does not contain too many edges, while achieving reliable connectivity. Sparsity ensures communication overhead remains low, while reliable connectivity is tied to reliable communication and inference on decentralized data reservoirs and computational resources. A class of network models called random K-out graphs appear widely as a heuristic to balance connectivity and sparsity, especially in settings with limited trust, e.g., privacy-preserving aggregation of networked data in which networks are deployed. However, several questions remain regarding how to choose network parameters in response to different operational requirements, including the need to go beyond asymptotic results and the ability to model the stochastic and adversarial environments. To address this gap, we present theorems to inform the choice of network parameters that guarantee reliable connectivity in regimes where nodes can be finite or unreliable. We first derive upper and lower bounds for probability of connectivity in random K-out graphs when the number of nodes is finite. Next, we analyze the property of r-robustness, a stronger notion than connectivity that enables resilient consensus in the presence of malicious nodes. Finally, motivated by aggregation mechanisms based on pairwise masking, we model and analyze the impact of a subset of adversarial nodes, modeled as deletions, on connectivity and giant component size - metrics that are closely tied to privacy guarantees. Together, our results pave the way for end-to-end performance guarantees for a suite of algorithms for reliable inference on networks.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

39 extracted references · 36 canonical work pages

  1. [21]

    Kondo, M

    T. Kondo, M. Okamoto, Well- and ill-posedness of the Cauchy problem for semi-linear Schr¨ odinger equations on the torus, arXiv:2501.04205

    arXiv

  2. [1]

    Alphonse, N

    P. Alphonse, N. Tzvetkov, A smoothing effect for the fractional Schr¨ odinger equations on the circle and observability , Int. Math. Res. Not. IMRN 2025, no. 8, Paper No. rnaf100, 20 pp

    work page 2025

  3. [2]

    Bahouri, G

    H. Bahouri, G. Perelman, Global well-posedness for the derivative nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equation with periodic boundary condition, Int. Math. Res. Not. IMRN 2024, no. 24, 14479–14518

    work page 2024

  4. [3]

    J. L. Bona, R. Smith, The initial-value problem for the Korteweg-de Vries equation , Philos. Trans. Roy. Soc. London Ser. A 278 (1975), no. 1287, 555–601

    work page 1975

  5. [4]

    E. Brun, G. Li, R. Liu, Y. Zine, Global well-posedness of one-dimensional cubic frac- tional nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equations in negative Sobolev spaces, arXiv:2311.13370

    arXiv

  6. [5]

    Chihara, The initial value problem for Schr¨ odinger equations on the torus , Int

    H. Chihara, The initial value problem for Schr¨ odinger equations on the torus , Int. Math. Res. Not. (2002), no. 15, 789–820

    work page 2002

  7. [6]

    Chihara, Fourth-order dispersive systems on the one-dimensional torus, J

    H. Chihara, Fourth-order dispersive systems on the one-dimensional torus, J. Pseudo- Differ. Oper. Appl. 6 (2015), no. 2, 237–263

    work page 2015

  8. [7]

    Y. Deng, A. R. Nahmod, H. Yue, Optimal local well-posedness for the periodic deriv- ative nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equation, Comm. Math. Phys. 384 (2021), no. 2, 1061– 1107

    work page 2021

Show all 39 references
  1. [8]

    M. B. Erdo˘ gan, T. B. G¨ urel, N. Tzirakis,Smoothing for the fractional Schr¨ odinger equation on the torus and the real line , Indiana Univ. Math. J. 68 (2019), no. 2, 369–392

    2019

  2. [9]

    Gassot, The third order Benjamin-Ono equation on the torus: well-posedness, traveling waves and stability , Ann

    L. Gassot, The third order Benjamin-Ono equation on the torus: well-posedness, traveling waves and stability , Ann. Inst. H. Poincar´ e C Anal. Non Lin´ eaire38 (2021), no. 3, 815–840

    2021

  3. [10]

    Hayashi, T

    M. Hayashi, T. Ozawa, N. Visciglia, Global H 2-solutions for the generalized derivative NLS on T, SIAM J. Math. Anal. 57 (2025), no. 2, 1483–1501

    2025

  4. [11]

    Herr, On the Cauchy problem for the derivative nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equation with periodic boundary condition , Int

    S. Herr, On the Cauchy problem for the derivative nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equation with periodic boundary condition , Int. Math. Res. Not. (2006), Art. ID 96763, 33 pp

    2006

  5. [12]

    R. J. Iorio, V. de M. Iorio, Fourier analysis and partial differential equations , Cam- bridge Stud. Adv. Math., 70, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2001. xii+411 pp

    2001

  6. [13]

    J¨ ockel,Well-posedness of the periodic dispersion-generalized Benjamin-Ono equa- tion in the weakly dispersive regime, Nonlinearity 37 (2024), no

    N. J¨ ockel,Well-posedness of the periodic dispersion-generalized Benjamin-Ono equa- tion in the weakly dispersive regime, Nonlinearity 37 (2024), no. 8, Paper No. 085002, 37 pp

    2024

  7. [14]

    Kappeler, P

    T. Kappeler, P. Topalov, Global wellposedness of KdV in H −1(T, R), Duke Math. J. 135 (2006), no. 2, 327–360

    2006

  8. [15]

    T. K. Kato, Unconditional well-posedness for the fourth-order nonlinear Schr¨ odinger- type equations on the torus , J. Evol. Equ. 25 (2025), no. 3, Paper No. 75

    2025

  9. [16]

    C. E. Kenig, D. Pilod, Local well-posedness for the KdV hierarchy at high regularity. Adv. Differential Equations 21 (2016), no. 9–10, 801–836

    2016

  10. [17]

    C. E. Kenig, G. Ponce, L. Vega, Small solutions to nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equations, Ann. Inst. H. Poincar´ e C Anal. Non Lin´ eaire10 (1993), no. 3, 255–288. 56 T.K. KATO, T. KONDO, AND M. OKAMOTO

    1993

  11. [18]

    Killip, M

    R. Killip, M. Ntekoume, M. Vi¸ san, On the well-posedness problem for the derivative nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equation, Anal. PDE 16 (2023), no. 5, 1245–1270

    2023

  12. [19]

    Kishimoto, Y

    N. Kishimoto, Y. Tsutsumi, Ill-posedness of the third order NLS equation with Raman scattering term, Math. Res. Lett. 25 (2018), no. 5, 1447–1484

    2018

  13. [20]

    Kondo, M

    T. Kondo, M. Okamoto, Norm inflation for a higher-order nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equation with a derivative on the circle , Partial Differ. Equ. Appl. 6 (2025), no. 2, Paper No. 11, 14 pp

    2025

  14. [22]

    Kwak, Low regularity Cauchy problem for the fifth-order modified KdV equations on T, J

    C. Kwak, Low regularity Cauchy problem for the fifth-order modified KdV equations on T, J. Hyperbolic Differ. Equ. 15 (2018), no. 3, 463–557

    2018

  15. [23]

    Laskin, Fractional quantum mechanics and L´ evy path integrals, Phys

    N. Laskin, Fractional quantum mechanics and L´ evy path integrals, Phys. Lett. A 268 (2000), no. 4–6, 298–305

    2000

  16. [24]

    Li, On Kato-Ponce and fractional Leibniz , Rev

    D. Li, On Kato-Ponce and fractional Leibniz , Rev. Mat. Iberoam. 35 (2019), no. 1, 23–100

    2019

  17. [25]

    Liang, Y

    R. Liang, Y. Wang, Gibbs dynamics for fractional nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equations with weak dispersion, Comm. Math. Phys. 405 (2024), no. 10, Paper No. 250, 69 pp

    2024

  18. [26]

    J. Liu, J. Zhang, The quasi-periodic solution of fractional nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equa- tion on tori , Phys. D 461 (2024), Paper No. 134102, 9 pp

    2024

  19. [27]

    Mizuhara, The initial value problem for third and fourth order dispersive equations in one space dimension , Funkcial

    R. Mizuhara, The initial value problem for third and fourth order dispersive equations in one space dimension , Funkcial. Ekvac. 49 (2006), no. 1, 1–38

    2006

  20. [28]

    Molinet, T

    L. Molinet, T. Tanaka, Unconditional well-posedness for some nonlinear periodic one- dimensional dispersive equations, J. Funct. Anal.283 (2022), no. 1, Paper No. 109490, 45 pp

    2022

  21. [29]

    Nakanishi, B

    K. Nakanishi, B. Wang, Global wellposedness of general nonlinear evolution equations for distributions on the Fourier half space , J. Funct. Anal. 289 (2025), no. 8, Paper No. 111004, 70 pp

    2025

  22. [30]

    Onodera, Local well-posedness for a fourth-order nonlinear dispersive system on the 1D torus , arXiv:2411.00452

    E. Onodera, Local well-posedness for a fourth-order nonlinear dispersive system on the 1D torus , arXiv:2411.00452

    arXiv

  23. [31]

    Roy, Local well-posedness and parabolic smoothing of solutions of fully nonlinear third-order equations on the torus , Nonlinear Anal

    T. Roy, Local well-posedness and parabolic smoothing of solutions of fully nonlinear third-order equations on the torus , Nonlinear Anal. 221 (2022), Paper No. 112845, 45 pp

    2022

  24. [32]

    Sanchez, O

    B. Sanchez, O. Ria˜ no, S. Roudenko, On the well-posedness of the periodic fractional Schr¨ odinger equation, Partial Differ. Equ. Appl. 6 (2025), no. 3, Paper No. 23, 28 pp

    2025

  25. [33]

    Schippa, Local and global well-posedness for dispersion generalized Benjamin-Ono equations on the circle , Nonlinear Anal

    R. Schippa, Local and global well-posedness for dispersion generalized Benjamin-Ono equations on the circle , Nonlinear Anal. 196 (2020), 111777, 38 pp

    2020

  26. [34]

    Segata, Refined energy inequality with application to well-posedness for the fourth order nonlinear Schr¨ odinger type equation on torus , J

    J. Segata, Refined energy inequality with application to well-posedness for the fourth order nonlinear Schr¨ odinger type equation on torus , J. Differential Equations 252 (2012), no. 11, 5994–6011

    2012

  27. [35]

    Segata, Initial value problem for the fourth order nonlinear Schr¨ odinger type equa- tion on torus and orbital stability of standing waves , Commun

    J. Segata, Initial value problem for the fourth order nonlinear Schr¨ odinger type equa- tion on torus and orbital stability of standing waves , Commun. Pure Appl. Anal. 14 (2015), no. 3, 843–859

    2015

  28. [36]

    Takaoka, Well-posedness for the one-dimensional nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equation with the derivative nonlinearity , Adv

    H. Takaoka, Well-posedness for the one-dimensional nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equation with the derivative nonlinearity , Adv. Differential Equations 4 (1999), no. 4, 561–580

    1999

  29. [37]

    Tanaka, K

    T. Tanaka, K. Tsugawa, Well-posedness and parabolic smoothing effect for higher order Schr¨ odinger type equations with constant coefficients, Osaka J. Math. 59 (2022), no. 2, 465–480

    2022

  30. [38]

    Tao, Multilinear weighted convolution of L2-functions, and applications to nonlin- ear dispersive equations, Amer

    T. Tao, Multilinear weighted convolution of L2-functions, and applications to nonlin- ear dispersive equations, Amer. J. Math. 123 (2001), no. 5, 839–908

    2001

  31. [39]

    X. Yang, J. Zhang, J. Liu, Long time stability of fractional nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equations, J. Math. Anal. Appl. 544 (2025), no. 1, Paper No. 129035, 46 pp. WELL- AND ILL-POSEDNESS FOR DERIV ATIVE FNLS ON THE TORUS 57 Takamori Kato, Mathematical Science Course, F aculty of...

    2025

Pith tools

Reviewed August 5, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.