LLMail-Inject: A Dataset from a Realistic Adaptive Prompt Injection Challenge
Reviewed by Pithpith:KEN2E3SRopen to challenge →
read the original abstract
Indirect Prompt Injection attacks exploit the inherent limitation of Large Language Models (LLMs) to distinguish between instructions and data in their inputs. Despite numerous defense proposals, the systematic evaluation against adaptive adversaries remains limited, even when successful attacks can have wide security and privacy implications, and many real-world LLM-based applications remain vulnerable. We present the results of LLMail-Inject, a public challenge simulating a realistic scenario in which participants adaptively attempted to inject malicious instructions into emails in order to trigger unauthorized tool calls in an LLM-based email assistant. The challenge spanned multiple defense strategies, LLM architectures, and retrieval configurations, resulting in a dataset of 208,095 unique attack submissions from 839 participants. We release the challenge code, the full dataset of submissions, and our analysis demonstrating how this data can provide new insights into the instruction-data separation problem. We hope this will serve as a foundation for future research towards practical structural solutions to prompt injection.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet.
Forward citations
Cited by 8 Pith papers
-
Gate AI: LLM Security Benchmark Evaluation Methodology and Results
Introduces a cross-validation-based evaluation methodology for LLM security detectors using a global threshold and group-fold leakage checks to avoid per-dataset tuning.
-
Hallucination as Exploit: Evidence-Carrying Multimodal Agents
Evidence-carrying multimodal agents decompose tool calls into predicates verified by constrained DOM/OCR/AX checkers to block hallucination-enabled unsafe actions.
-
IPI-proxy: An Intercepting Proxy for Red-Teaming Web-Browsing AI Agents Against Indirect Prompt Injection
IPI-proxy is a toolkit using an intercepting proxy to inject indirect prompt injection attacks into live web pages for testing AI browsing agents against hidden instructions.
-
Confidently Wrong: Severity-Aware Calibration of Prompt-Injection Detectors under Attack Shift
Prompt-injection detectors miss attacks with near-certainty (severity 0.99-1.00) under shifts; standard pooled calibration error fails to detect miscalibration on the attacks themselves.
-
Hallucination as Exploit: Evidence-Carrying Multimodal Agents
Evidence-carrying multimodal agents decompose tool calls into predicates, obtain certificates from DOM/OCR/AX verifiers, and use a deterministic gate to authorize actions only when certificates support them, achieving...
-
MIPIAD: Multilingual Indirect Prompt Injection Attack Defense with Qwen -- TF-IDF Hybrid and Meta-Ensemble Learning
MIPIAD reports a hybrid Qwen-TF-IDF ensemble defense that reaches F1 0.9205 and reduces the English-Bangla performance gap on a 1.43-million-sample synthetic benchmark derived from BIPIA templates.
-
Exploiting Web Search Tools of AI Agents for Data Exfiltration
Indirect prompt injection attacks remain effective on LLMs using web search tools, allowing data exfiltration and exposing ongoing weaknesses in current model defenses.
-
Toward Secure LLM Agents: Threat Surfaces, Attacks, Defenses, and Evaluation
A synthesis of 247 papers on LLM agent security identifies prompt injection and tool hijacking as dominant threats, notes weakly compositional defenses, and argues for trust boundaries and realistic evaluations.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.