Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Latent Alignment with Deep Set EEG Decoders

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2311.17968 v1 pith:KJM37U2U submitted 2023-11-29 eess.SP cs.AIcs.HCcs.LG

Latent Alignment with Deep Set EEG Decoders

classification eess.SP cs.AIcs.HCcs.LG
keywords deepalignmentlearningclassificationmodelsstatisticalaccuracyadaptation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

The variability in EEG signals between different individuals poses a significant challenge when implementing brain-computer interfaces (BCI). Commonly proposed solutions to this problem include deep learning models, due to their increased capacity and generalization, as well as explicit domain adaptation techniques. Here, we introduce the Latent Alignment method that won the Benchmarks for EEG Transfer Learning (BEETL) competition and present its formulation as a deep set applied on the set of trials from a given subject. Its performance is compared to recent statistical domain adaptation techniques under various conditions. The experimental paradigms include motor imagery (MI), oddball event-related potentials (ERP) and sleep stage classification, where different well-established deep learning models are applied on each task. Our experimental results show that performing statistical distribution alignment at later stages in a deep learning model is beneficial to the classification accuracy, yielding the highest performance for our proposed method. We further investigate practical considerations that arise in the context of using deep learning and statistical alignment for EEG decoding. In this regard, we study class-discriminative artifacts that can spuriously improve results for deep learning models, as well as the impact of class-imbalance on alignment. We delineate a trade-off relationship between increased classification accuracy when alignment is performed at later modeling stages, and susceptibility to class-imbalance in the set of trials that the statistics are computed on.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.