Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

DECAF: Learning to be Fair in Multi-agent Resource Allocation

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2502.04281 v1 pith:KKW7RLSN submitted 2025-02-06 cs.LG cs.CYcs.MA

DECAF: Learning to be Fair in Multi-agent Resource Allocation

classification cs.LG cs.CYcs.MA
keywords fairnessallocationresourcefairmethodsutilitylearningproblems
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

A wide variety of resource allocation problems operate under resource constraints that are managed by a central arbitrator, with agents who evaluate and communicate preferences over these resources. We formulate this broad class of problems as Distributed Evaluation, Centralized Allocation (DECA) problems and propose methods to learn fair and efficient policies in centralized resource allocation. Our methods are applied to learning long-term fairness in a novel and general framework for fairness in multi-agent systems. We show three different methods based on Double Deep Q-Learning: (1) A joint weighted optimization of fairness and utility, (2) a split optimization, learning two separate Q-estimators for utility and fairness, and (3) an online policy perturbation to guide existing black-box utility functions toward fair solutions. Our methods outperform existing fair MARL approaches on multiple resource allocation domains, even when evaluated using diverse fairness functions, and allow for flexible online trade-offs between utility and fairness.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Inference-Time Policy Alignment for Fair Reinforcement Learning

    cs.LG 2026-07 reject novelty 5.0

    A frozen RL policy can be reweighted at test time by a learned generalized-Gini welfare critic to improve fairness metrics, though the central equivalence mixes up two different welfare objectives.

  2. The Optimization Trilemma: Efficiency, Comfort and Fairness in Decentralized Multi-agent Coordination

    cs.MA 2026-07 conditional novelty 4.0

    A decentralized coordination algorithm can co-optimize efficiency, comfort, and fairness by minimizing the standard deviation of agents' discomfort costs at near-zero extra communication cost.