REVIEW 2 cited by
DECAF: Learning to be Fair in Multi-agent Resource Allocation
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
DECAF: Learning to be Fair in Multi-agent Resource Allocation
read the original abstract
A wide variety of resource allocation problems operate under resource constraints that are managed by a central arbitrator, with agents who evaluate and communicate preferences over these resources. We formulate this broad class of problems as Distributed Evaluation, Centralized Allocation (DECA) problems and propose methods to learn fair and efficient policies in centralized resource allocation. Our methods are applied to learning long-term fairness in a novel and general framework for fairness in multi-agent systems. We show three different methods based on Double Deep Q-Learning: (1) A joint weighted optimization of fairness and utility, (2) a split optimization, learning two separate Q-estimators for utility and fairness, and (3) an online policy perturbation to guide existing black-box utility functions toward fair solutions. Our methods outperform existing fair MARL approaches on multiple resource allocation domains, even when evaluated using diverse fairness functions, and allow for flexible online trade-offs between utility and fairness.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Inference-Time Policy Alignment for Fair Reinforcement Learning
A frozen RL policy can be reweighted at test time by a learned generalized-Gini welfare critic to improve fairness metrics, though the central equivalence mixes up two different welfare objectives.
-
The Optimization Trilemma: Efficiency, Comfort and Fairness in Decentralized Multi-agent Coordination
A decentralized coordination algorithm can co-optimize efficiency, comfort, and fairness by minimizing the standard deviation of agents' discomfort costs at near-zero extra communication cost.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.