REVIEW 2 cited by
Why Should I Trust You, Bellman? The Bellman Error is a Poor Replacement for Value Error
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Why Should I Trust You, Bellman? The Bellman Error is a Poor Replacement for Value Error
read the original abstract
In this work, we study the use of the Bellman equation as a surrogate objective for value prediction accuracy. While the Bellman equation is uniquely solved by the true value function over all state-action pairs, we find that the Bellman error (the difference between both sides of the equation) is a poor proxy for the accuracy of the value function. In particular, we show that (1) due to cancellations from both sides of the Bellman equation, the magnitude of the Bellman error is only weakly related to the distance to the true value function, even when considering all state-action pairs, and (2) in the finite data regime, the Bellman equation can be satisfied exactly by infinitely many suboptimal solutions. This means that the Bellman error can be minimized without improving the accuracy of the value function. We demonstrate these phenomena through a series of propositions, illustrative toy examples, and empirical analysis in standard benchmark domains.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Contraction-Aligned Analysis of Soft Bellman Residual Minimization with Weighted Lp-Norm for Markov Decision Problem
Soft Bellman residual minimization with weighted Lp-norm aligns the objective with Bellman contraction as p increases and yields performance error bounds.
-
Koopman-Assisted Reinforcement Learning
Koopman-assisted RL reformulates max-entropy algorithms using controlled Koopman tensors and reports SOTA performance versus neural SAC on Lorenz, fluid flow, and other systems.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.