Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1911.06155 v2 pith:KPHANSR4 submitted 2019-11-11 cs.CL cs.LG

RNN-Test: Towards Adversarial Testing for Recurrent Neural Network Systems

classification cs.CL cs.LG
keywords adversarialrnn-testcoverageinputstestinghighermodelsneural
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

While massive efforts have been investigated in adversarial testing of convolutional neural networks (CNN), testing for recurrent neural networks (RNN) is still limited and leaves threats for vast sequential application domains. In this paper, we propose an adversarial testing framework RNN-Test for RNN systems, focusing on the main sequential domains, not only classification tasks. First, we design a novel search methodology customized for RNN models by maximizing the inconsistency of RNN states to produce adversarial inputs. Next, we introduce two state-based coverage metrics according to the distinctive structure of RNNs to explore more inference logics. Finally, RNN-Test solves the joint optimization problem to maximize state inconsistency and state coverage, and crafts adversarial inputs for various tasks of different kinds of inputs. For evaluations, we apply RNN-Test on three sequential models of common RNN structures. On the tested models, the RNN-Test approach is demonstrated to be competitive in generating adversarial inputs, outperforming FGSM-based and DLFuzz-based methods to reduce the model performance more sharply with 2.78% to 32.5% higher success (or generation) rate. RNN-Test could also achieve 52.65% to 66.45% higher adversary rate on MNIST-LSTM model than relevant work testRNN. Compared with the neuron coverage, the proposed state coverage metrics as guidance excel with 4.17% to 97.22% higher success (or generation) rate.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.