Pith. sign in

REVIEW 5 major objections 5 minor 119 references

This paper extends generalized topological recursion to spectral curves with essential singularities, proving that recursive residue formulas never need to evaluate the singular point itself.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-01 17:12 UTC pith:KPXGY3B3

load-bearing objection A promising idea for essential singularities in Gen-TR, but the main theorem is asserted rather than proved and the examples rely on an unproved limit; fixable but needs work. the 5 major comments →

arxiv 2607.17711 v1 pith:KPXGY3B3 submitted 2026-07-20 math-ph hep-thmath.AGmath.CVmath.MP

Universal Correlators on Exponentially Ramified Spectral Curves

Mohamad Alameddine , Alexander Hock This is my paper
classification math-ph hep-thmath.AGmath.CVmath.MP
keywords topological recursionessential singularityexponential ramificationgeneralized topological recursionx-y dualitycontour deformationspectral curvesBouchard-Eynard recursion
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper establishes that generalized topological recursion, a machine that produces universal correlators from a spectral curve, can be extended to curves with essential singularities, such as exponential ramification points. By a contour deformation of the recursion's residue formula, it shows that the essential singularity itself never needs to be evaluated: all residues can be moved to ordinary meromorphic points. This matters because it opens the way to computing correlators for transcendental spectral curves, including the x-y dual of the Mirzakhani curve, and to treating essential singularities as limits of higher-order ramification points.

Core claim

The central claim is Theorem 2.10: on a compact spectral curve where an essential singularity of dx or dy lies in the set of key points P, the generalized topological recursion differentials ω_{g,n} are well-defined, and the recursive residue formula involves only ordinary meromorphic points with Laurent series of finite polar part. In particular, no residue at the essential singularity needs to be evaluated. The mechanism is a contour deformation (Lemma 2.4) that rewrites the sum over key points as a sum over the complementary set P∨ and the points z and z_i, using the global nature of the integrand and the Riemann bilinear identity.

What carries the argument

The argument is carried by a contour deformation of the globally defined integrand of generalized topological recursion (Lemma 2.4). Since the integrand is a meromorphic (n+1)-differential with poles only at the special points and diagonals, its residue can be moved from the set of key points P, including the essential singularity, to the complementary set P∨ and the points z and z_i. The deformation is justified by the Riemann bilinear identity together with the fact that the 1-form encountered in the recursion is exact, so the A-cycle contributions vanish.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the contour deformation of the residue formula commutes with the limit in which a ramification point acquires infinite order, so an essential singularity can be treated as a convergent limit of finite-order ramification points while the key-point set stays effectively finite.

What would settle it

For the spectral curve x = z e^z, y = z on the Riemann sphere, compute ω_{1,1} using the contour-deformed residue formula of Lemma 2.4 and compare it with the r→∞ limit of the approximating curves x_r = z(1+z/r)^r; a mismatch would contradict Theorem 2.10. Similarly, for a curve with essential singularities in both dx and dy at the same point, check whether the deformed residue formula yields convergent correlators as Remark 2.11 asserts.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • Correlators on spectral curves with exponential ramification become computable by residues at ordinary points, so existing recursive algorithms apply without modification.
  • The formalism extends to the x-y dual side, making dual correlators on curves with essential singularities, such as the Mirzakhani dual, equally computable.
  • The construction realizes essential singularities as a limiting case of higher-order Bouchard-Eynard recursion, providing a concrete bridge from finite-order ramification to infinite order.
  • Transcendental spectral curves, such as those constructed from the Riemann zeta function, now have well-defined universal correlators.
  • The same contour-deformation principle is claimed to handle cases where both dx and dy carry essential singularities, as stated in Remark 2.11.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The contour-deformation strategy should extend to any essential singularity representable as a convergent limit of finite-order ramification points, not only the exponential examples worked out here, as long as the key-point set is chosen to contain the singularity.
  • A rigorous general treatment of the infinite-order limit could lead to spectral curves encoding potential '∞-spin' intersection numbers, parallel to the role of higher-order recursion in r-spin theory.
  • The zeta-function example, which uses an infinite set of special points, hints that the finiteness condition on the key-point set might be relaxed, but this is not proven in the paper.
  • The construction suggests a route to quantize spectral curves with essential singularities, since the correlators are now well-defined and could be packaged into a wave function.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

5 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper proposes a framework for generalized topological recursion (Gen-TR) on compact spectral curves whose differentials dx or dy have essential singularities (e.g. exponential ramification points). The main claim, stated as Theorem 2.10, is that when an essential singularity is placed in the key-point set P, the recursive residue formula can be deformed so that no residue at the essential singularity is ever evaluated: all contributions are recovered from residues at ordinary meromorphic points {z, z_i, P^∨}. The authors introduce this via the global formulation of Gen-TR, relate it to limits of finite-order Bouchard–Eynard recursion, and illustrate it with examples: a logarithmic-type curve, an exponential curve with trivial dual side, a Riemann zeta-function spectral curve, and the x–y dual of the Mirzakhani curve. Section 4 lists open directions.

Significance. If the central claim were fully established, the paper would provide a genuinely useful extension of topological recursion: it would make sense of exponentially/essentially ramified spectral curves while preserving the global residue formalism and x–y duality. The explicit formulas for ω_{0,3}, ω_{1,1}, and ω_{2,1} in the examples are concrete and checkable, and the Mirzakhani dual computation is suggestive. The paper also correctly identifies that the earlier transalgebraic framework [BKW24] does not cover the case where y stays regular while x acquires an essential singularity. However, the main theorem is not proven at the level of rigor required: the paper relies on a limiting construction whose convergence for the recursively defined differentials is asserted rather than demonstrated, and several examples use infinite key-point sets or non-meromorphic data that are outside Definition 2.2. The value of the paper is therefore conditional on filling these gaps.

major comments (5)
  1. [§2.4, Theorem 2.10 and Definition 2.2] Definition 2.2 requires dx and dy to be meromorphic differentials and P to be a finite subset of special points. Theorem 2.10 assumes that dx (or dy) has an essential singularity at q∈P and, in the proof, chooses P to be 'the set of singularities given by the infinite convergent sequence'. This set is generally infinite and the differentials are not meromorphic. Thus Theorem 2.10 is not a statement within the framework previously defined; it is an extension of the framework. The paper needs either a precise definition of the extended initial data (allowing infinite P and non-meromorphic differentials) or a proof that the objects are obtained as limits of legitimate Gen-TR data in a way that preserves the recursive definition.
  2. [§2.2, Lemma 2.4 and its proof] The proof of Lemma 2.4 uses two crucial facts: that ω̄_{g,n} is a meromorphic 1-form and that it is exact 1-form because of the r≥1 in (2.14). When dx has an essential singularity, ω̄_{g,n} will in general have an essential singularity as well, and the residue theorem/contour deformation used in the proof is no longer justified. The one-line statement 'it is an exact 1-form by definition' does not apply to forms with essential singularities. The example (1.3)–(1.5) is not an adequate substitute, since it involves a single one-form with only one singularity, whereas in the recursive setting the integrand has essential singularities and moving contours changes the pole structure in an uncontrolled way.
  3. [§2.4, Proposition 2.13 and §3.2] Proposition 2.13 proves the convergence of the functions (1+g(z)/r)^r to e^{g(z)}, not the convergence of the recursively defined differentials ω^r_{g,n}. The finite-order approximants have ramification points at the zeros of 1+g(z)/r, of order r−1, and these points accumulate at the poles of g, i.e. at the would-be essential singularity. The residue contributions of these moving/accumulating points are not analyzed. Therefore the assertion in §3.2 that 'the limit lim_{r→∞} ω^r_{g,n} converges to the differentials with essential singularities defined in our main result' is not established. A convergence theorem for the differentials for all (g,n) is needed, not just for the functions x_r.
  4. [§3.3 and §3.4] The zeta-function example in §3.3 takes P to be the set of all zeros of ζ′(z) together with infinity, and the Mirzakhani dual curve in §3.4 has P={(2k+1)π/2 : k∈Z}∪{∞}. Both sets are infinite, contradicting Definition 2.2's requirement that P be finite. The paper does not explain how the Gen-TR recursion, as defined in Definition 2.3, is supposed to operate with an infinite sum of residues. This is not a minor technicality: the convergence of the infinite residue sum and the contour deformation in that setting are precisely what needs to be proved.
  5. [§3.4, symplectic transformation] The claim that the transformation y→y+cos(z) yields the same differentials for the Mirzakhani curve is argued only through the invariance of y(z)−y(σ(z)) for the original TR. Since the paper is working with Gen-TR and with essential singularities, this invariance needs to be verified for the global integrand of Gen-TR, not just for the local difference. Without this, the identification of (3.13) with the original Mirzakhani curve is an assumption.
minor comments (5)
  1. [§1.2, Eq. (1.7)] The notation R˜z and the residue formula in (1.7) are introduced informally before the precise definitions of P, P∨, and B are given. A reader unfamiliar with [ABDB+25b] cannot parse this equation at that point.
  2. [§2.2] There is a typo: 'literarily' should be 'literally'. Also, 'hat we will use' in the bullet list should be 'that we will use'.
  3. [§2.4, Example 2.12] The statement 'the set of multi-differentials computed for each r denoted ω^r_{g,n} converges in the limit' is asserted without proof. Please provide a reference to a convergence theorem or a proof for at least the listed low-order cases.
  4. [§3.2] In the displayed formula for ω∞_{g,1}, the notation a_{g,k} is introduced but not defined; the reader cannot check the claimed vanishing. Please define the coefficients or give a direct proof.
  5. [General notation] The paper consistently writes 'multi-differentials' and 'ω_{g,n}(z, z_{Jn−1K})' with mixed variables; this is acceptable but should be made uniform. Some equations, e.g. (3.5), mix z and y variables without explicitly stating the change of variables for the differentials.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: the main residue-deformation claim is a mathematical extension of Gen-TR, not a restatement of its inputs; self-citations are computational tools, not load-bearing equivalences.

full rationale

The paper's central claim (Theorem 2.10) is that when an essential singularity is put into the key-point set P, Lemma 2.4's contour-deformed recursion defines the Gen-TR differentials using only residues at ordinary meromorphic points. This is not circular: Lemma 2.4 is proved for meromorphic data from the definition of Gen-TR (Def. 2.3), and Theorem 2.10 attempts to extend it to the essential-singularity case. The conclusion does not reduce to the input by construction; rather, the proof has an unproved step—the r→∞ limit of ω^r_{g,n} and the application of the global residue theorem to non-meromorphic forms—which is a correctness gap, not a definitional or fitted equivalence. No parameter is fitted and then renamed a prediction. The paper relies on Gen-TR [ABDB+25b] as an external foundation, and uses the x–y duality formula of Cor. 2.9 citing [Hoc24b, ABDB+25a] for computations in examples; although [Hoc24b] is by one of the present authors, the formula is a prior theorem used as a tool and the central result does not depend on it. There is no circular self-citation chain forcing the conclusion. The examples (Sec. 3.2–3.4) are explicit computations with checkable formulas, and the skeptical concern about Theorem 2.10's limit is about mathematical justification, not circularity. Therefore no circular step meets the evidentiary bar.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 5 axioms · 0 invented entities

The construction introduces no new free parameters and no invented entities. It relies on Gen-TR and x–y duality as external foundations and on one contribution-specific assumption: that essential singularities can be treated as convergent infinite-order limits commuting with the recursion. The finiteness of the key-point set is also strained in the zeta-function example.

axioms (5)
  • domain assumption Gen-TR is well-defined for meromorphic spectral data and has the global integrand properties claimed in [ABDB+25b]: W_{g,n} is a polynomial combination of dx, dy and ω_{g',n'}, globally meromorphic, and ̄ω_{g,n} is exact by construction.
    The whole paper imports these properties from [ABDB+25b]; they are not reproved here.
  • domain assumption Σ is compact and connected, and B is the A-normalized Bergman kernel, so the global residue theorem and Riemann bilinear identity apply.
    Used explicitly in Lemma 2.4 and Theorem 2.10; the contour deformation argument would fail on noncompact or punctured surfaces without extra boundary terms.
  • ad hoc to paper Essential singularities of interest are limits of sequences of meromorphic functions whose correlators converge, and this limit commutes with the recursion for all (g, n).
    Proposition 2.13 proves this only for x = e^g with rational g and a specific sequence; for general essential singularities, including the zeta-function example, the convergence and commutation are assumed.
  • domain assumption The x–y swap is a purely combinatorial involution that holds even when dx or dy admit essential singularities.
    Taken from [ABDB+25a] and [Hoc23]; used to handle essential singularities in y and to justify the examples computed through the dual side.
  • standard math The global residue theorem applies to 1-forms with isolated essential singularities on compact curves, so a residue at an essential singularity can be replaced by residues at all other poles.
    This is the mechanism behind equations (1.5), (1.6), Lemma 2.4 and Theorem 2.10.

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 24984 in / 18802 out tokens · 191759 ms · 2026-08-01T17:12:36.466005+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

We investigate generalized topological recursion on compact spectral curves admitting exponential, and more generally essential, singularities as ramification points. Exploiting the global formulation of generalized topological recursion, we establish a contour deformation of the recursive residue formula that replaces contributions from these essential singularities by residues at meromorphic points. This provides a natural recursive framework for exponentially ramified spectral curves while remaining entirely within the generalized topological recursion formalism. Our formalism can also be viewed as a limiting case of the Bouchard-Eynard higher-order topological recursion, obtained when the order of a ramification point tends to infinity in a convergent manner, as occurs, for example, for exponential singularities while $dy$ remains regular and non-vanishing. We further illustrate the resulting formalism through several examples, including transcendental functions and the $x$-$y$ dual of the Mirzakhani curve.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

119 extracted references · 7 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Topological strings, strips and quivers

    Panfil, Mi osz and Su kowski, Piotr. Topological strings, strips and quivers. JHEP. 2019. doi:10.1007/JHEP01(2019)124. arXiv:1811.03556

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  2. [2]

    Les Houches lecture notes on topological recursion

    Bouchard, Vincent. Les Houches lecture notes on topological recursion. 2024. arXiv:2409.06657

    arXiv 2024

  3. [3]

    Think globally, compute locally

    Bouchard, Vincent and Eynard, Bertrand. Think globally, compute locally. JHEP. 2013. doi:10.1007/JHEP02(2013)143. arXiv:1211.2302

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  4. [4]

    Algebra Number Theory , FJOURNAL =

    Morrison, Andrew and Nagao, Kentaro , TITLE =. Algebra Number Theory , FJOURNAL =. 2011. doi:10.2140/ant.2015.9.767 , URL =. arXiv:1110.5976

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  5. [5]

    A short overview of the ``Topological recursion''

    Eynard, B. A short overview of the ``Topological recursion''. 2014. arXiv:1412.3286

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  6. [6]

    Integral and Series Representations of q -Polynomials and Functions: Part I , volume =

    Ismail, Mourad and Zhang, Ruiming , year =. Integral and Series Representations of q -Polynomials and Functions: Part I , volume =. Analysis and Applications , doi =

  7. [7]

    Invariants of algebraic curves and topological expansion

    Eynard, Bertrand and Orantin, Nicolas. Invariants of algebraic curves and topological expansion. Commun. Num. Theor. Phys. 2007. doi:10.4310/CNTP.2007.v1.n2.a4. arXiv:math-ph/0702045

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  8. [8]

    Exponential BPS Graphs and D Brane Counting on Toric Calabi-Yau Threefolds: Part I

    Banerjee, Sibasish and Longhi, Pietro and Romo, Mauricio. Exponential BPS Graphs and D Brane Counting on Toric Calabi-Yau Threefolds: Part I. Commun. Math. Phys. 2021. doi:10.1007/s00220-021-04242-4. arXiv:1910.05296

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  9. [9]

    On a q-analogue of the multiple gamma functions , volume=

    Nishizawa, Michitomo , year=. On a q-analogue of the multiple gamma functions , volume=. Lett. Math. Phys. , publisher=. doi:10.1007/bf00416023 , number=

    work page doi:10.1007/bf00416023

  10. [10]

    Functional relations for higher-order free cumulants

    Borot, Ga. Functional relations for higher-order free cumulants. 2021. arXiv:2112.12184

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  11. [11]

    On the x -- y Symmetry of Correlators in Topological Recursion via Loop Insertion Operator

    Hock, Alexander. On the x -- y Symmetry of Correlators in Topological Recursion via Loop Insertion Operator. Commun. Math. Phys. 2024. doi:10.1007/s00220-024-05043-1. arXiv:2201.05357

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  12. [12]

    Alexandrov and B

    A. Alexandrov and B. Bychkov and P. Dunin-Barkowski and M. Kazarian and S. Shadrin. A universal formula for the x-y swap in topological recursion. 2025. doi:10.4171/JEMS/1615. arXiv:2212.00320

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  13. [13]

    A simple formula for the x -- y symplectic transformation in topological recursion

    Hock, Alexander. A simple formula for the x -- y symplectic transformation in topological recursion. J. Geom. Phys. 2023. doi:10.1016/j.geomphys.2023.105027. arXiv:2211.08917

    arXiv 2023

  14. [14]

    KP integrability through the x -- y swap relation

    Alexandrov, Alexander and Bychkov, Boris and Dunin-Barkowski, Petr and Kazarian, Maxim and Shadrin, Sergey. KP integrability through the x -- y swap relation. Selecta Math. 2025. doi:10.1007/s00029-025-01035-8. arXiv:2309.12176

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  15. [15]

    Log Topological Recursion Through the Prism of x -- y Swap

    Alexandrov, Alexander and Bychkov, Boris and Dunin-Barkowski, Petr and Kazarian, Maxim and Shadrin, Sergey. Log Topological Recursion Through the Prism of x -- y Swap. Int. Math. Res. Not. 2024. doi:10.1093/imrn/rnae213. arXiv:2312.16950

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  16. [16]

    Symplectic duality via log topological recursion

    Alexandrov, Alexander and Bychkov, Boris and Dunin-Barkowski, Petr and Kazarian, Maxim and Shadrin, Sergey. Symplectic duality via log topological recursion. Commun. Num. Theor. Phys. 2024. doi:10.4310/cntp.241203001416. arXiv:2405.10720

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  17. [17]

    Any Topological Recursion on a Rational Spectral Curve is KP Integrable

    Alexandrov, Alexander and Bychkov, Boris and Dunin-Barkowski, Petr and Kazarian, Maxim and Shadrin, Sergey. Any Topological Recursion on a Rational Spectral Curve is KP Integrable. Commun. Math. Phys. 2026. doi:10.1007/s00220-026-05566-9. arXiv:2406.07391

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  18. [18]

    Degenerate and Irregular Topological Recursion

    Alexandrov, Alexander and Bychkov, Boris and Dunin-Barkowski, Petr and Kazarian, Maxim and Shadrin, Sergey. Degenerate and Irregular Topological Recursion. Commun. Math. Phys. 2025. doi:10.1007/s00220-025-05274-w. arXiv:2408.02608

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  19. [19]

    KP integrability of non-perturbative differentials

    Alexandrov, Alexander and Bychkov, Boris and Dunin-Barkowski, Petr and Kazarian, Maxim and Shadrin, Sergey. KP integrability of non-perturbative differentials. 2024. arXiv:2412.18592

    arXiv 2024

  20. [20]

    Blobbed topological recursion and KP integrability

    Alexandrov, Alexander and Bychkov, Boris and Dunin-Barkowski, Petr and Kazarian, Maxim and Shadrin, Sergey. Blobbed topological recursion and KP integrability. Selecta Math. 2026. doi:10.1007/s00029-026-01135-z. arXiv:2505.03545

    arXiv 2026

  21. [21]

    and Giacchetto, Alessandro and Shadrin, Sergey

    Bouchard, Vincent and Chidambaram, Nitin K. and Giacchetto, Alessandro and Shadrin, Sergey. Theta classes: generalized topological recursion, integrability and W -constraints. 2025. arXiv:2505.11291

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  22. [22]

    Laplace transform of the x -- y symplectic transformation formula in Topological Recursion

    Hock, Alexander. Laplace transform of the x -- y symplectic transformation formula in Topological Recursion. Commun. Num. Theor. Phys. 2023. doi:10.4310/CNTP.2023.v17.n4.a1. arXiv:2304.03032

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  23. [23]

    x -- y duality in topological recursion for exponential variables via quantum dilogarithm

    Hock, Alexander. x -- y duality in topological recursion for exponential variables via quantum dilogarithm. SciPost Phys. 2024. doi:10.21468/SciPostPhys.17.2.065. arXiv:2311.11761

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  24. [24]

    Symplectic (Non-)invariance of the Free Energy in Topological Recursion

    Hock, Alexander. Symplectic (Non-)invariance of the Free Energy in Topological Recursion. Commun. Math. Phys. 2025. doi:10.1007/s00220-025-05373-8. arXiv:2502.18115

    arXiv 2025

  25. [25]

    Holomorphic anomaly equations and the Igusa cusp form conjecture

    Oberdieck, Georg and Pixton, Aaron. Holomorphic anomaly equations and the Igusa cusp form conjecture. Invent. Math. 2018. doi:10.1007/s00222-018-0794-0. arXiv:1706.10100

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  26. [26]

    Quantum Curves in the Context of Symplectic Duality

    Hock, Alexander and Shadrin, Sergey. Quantum Curves in the Context of Symplectic Duality. 2025. arXiv:2504.14924

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  27. [27]

    Resurgence and Riemann Hilbert Problems for Elliptic Calabi Yau Threefolds

    Bridgeland, Tom and Tulli, Iv \'a n. Resurgence and Riemann Hilbert Problems for Elliptic Calabi Yau Threefolds. Commun. Math. Phys. 2025. doi:10.1007/s00220-025-05310-9. arXiv:2407.06974

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  28. [28]

    doi:10.1088/1751-8113/41/1/015203 , year =

    Eynard, B and Orantin, N , title =. doi:10.1088/1751-8113/41/1/015203 , year =

    work page doi:10.1088/1751-8113/41/1/015203

  29. [29]

    Highest weight vectors, shifted topological recursion and quantum curves

    Belliard, Rapha. Highest weight vectors, shifted topological recursion and quantum curves. 2024. arXiv:2412.09120

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  30. [30]

    Weil-Petersson volume of moduli spaces, Mirzakhani's recursion and matrix models

    Eynard, Bertrand and Orantin, Nicolas. Weil-Petersson volume of moduli spaces, Mirzakhani's recursion and matrix models. 2007. arXiv:0705.3600

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  31. [31]

    JT gravity and the ensembles of random matrix theory

    Stanford, Douglas and Witten, Edward. JT gravity and the ensembles of random matrix theory. Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 2020. doi:10.4310/ATMP.2020.v24.n6.a4. arXiv:1907.03363

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  32. [32]

    Mirzakhani, Maryam , TITLE =. Invent. Math. , FJOURNAL =. 2007 , NUMBER =. doi:10.1007/s00222-006-0013-2 , URL =

    doi:10.1007/s00222-006-0013-2 2007

  33. [33]

    Remodeling the B-model

    Bouchard, Vincent and Klemm, Albrecht and Mari \ n o, Marcos and Pasquetti, Sara. Remodeling the B-model. Commun. Math. Phys. 2009. doi:10.1007/s00220-008-0620-4. arXiv:0709.1453

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  34. [34]

    and Orantin, N

    Eynard, B. and Orantin, N. About the x -- y symmetry of the F_g algebraic invariants. 2013. arXiv:1311.4993

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  35. [35]

    Topological recursion and mirror curves

    Bouchard, Vincent and Su kowski, Piotr. Topological recursion and mirror curves. Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 2012. doi:10.4310/ATMP.2012.v16.n5.a3. arXiv:1105.2052

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  36. [36]

    Taking limits in topological recursion

    Borot, Ga. Taking limits in topological recursion. J. Lond. Math. Soc. 2025. doi:10.1112/jlms.70286. arXiv:2309.01654

    arXiv 2025

  37. [37]

    Computation of Open Gromov Witten Invariants for Toric Calabi Yau 3-Folds by Topological Recursion, a Proof of the BKMP Conjecture

    Eynard, Bertrand and Orantin, Nicolas. Computation of Open Gromov Witten Invariants for Toric Calabi Yau 3-Folds by Topological Recursion, a Proof of the BKMP Conjecture. Commun. Math. Phys. 2015. doi:10.1007/s00220-015-2361-5. arXiv:1205.1103

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  38. [38]

    Determinantal formulae and loop equations

    Berg\` e re, Michel and Eynard, Bertrand. Determinantal formulae and loop equations. 2009. arXiv:0901.3273

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  39. [39]

    From topological recursion to wave functions and PDEs quantizing hyperelliptic curves

    Eynard, Bertrand and Garcia-Failde, Elba. From topological recursion to wave functions and PDEs quantizing hyperelliptic curves. Forum Math. Sigma. 2023. doi:10.1017/fms.2023.96

    work page doi:10.1017/fms.2023.96 2023

  40. [40]

    2-Parameter -Function for the First Painlev \'e Equation: Topological Recursion and Direct Monodromy Problem via Exact WKB Analysis

    Iwaki, Kohei. 2-Parameter -Function for the First Painlev \'e Equation: Topological Recursion and Direct Monodromy Problem via Exact WKB Analysis. Commun. Math. Phys. 2020. doi:10.1007/s00220-020-03769-2. arXiv:1902.06439

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  41. [41]

    Topological recursion for irregular spectral curves

    Do, Norman and Norbury, Paul. Topological recursion for irregular spectral curves. J. Lond. Math. Soc. 2018. doi:10.1112/jlms.12112. arXiv:1412.8334

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  42. [42]

    Geometry of 2-D topological field theories

    Dubrovin, Boris. Geometry of 2-D topological field theories. Lect. Notes Math. 1996. doi:10.1007/BFb0094793. arXiv:hep-th/9407018

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1996

  43. [43]

    Quantization of hyper-elliptic curves from isomonodromic systems and topological recursion

    Marchal, Olivier and Orantin, Nicolas. Quantization of hyper-elliptic curves from isomonodromic systems and topological recursion. J. Geom. Phys. 2022. doi:10.1016/j.geomphys.2021.104407. arXiv:1911.07739

    arXiv 2022

  44. [44]

    Quantization of Classical Spectral Curves via Topological Recursion

    Eynard, Bertrand and Garcia-Failde, Elba and Marchal, Olivier and Orantin, Nicolas. Quantization of Classical Spectral Curves via Topological Recursion. Commun. Math. Phys. 2024. doi:10.1007/s00220-024-04997-6. arXiv:2106.04339

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  45. [45]

    Reconstructing WKB from topological recursion

    Bouchard, Vincent and Eynard, Bertrand. Reconstructing WKB from topological recursion. J. \'Ec. polytech. Math. , FJOURNAL =. 2017 , PAGES =. doi:10.5802/jep.58. arXiv:1606.04498

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  46. [46]

    Extending the Picard-Fuchs system of local mirror symmetry

    Forbes, Brian and Jinzenji, Masao. Extending the Picard-Fuchs system of local mirror symmetry. J. Math. Phys. 2005. doi:10.1063/1.1996441. arXiv:hep-th/0503098

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  47. [47]

    M-theory and a topological string duality

    Dijkgraaf, Robbert and Vafa, Cumrun and Verlinde, Erik. M-theory and a topological string duality. 2006. arXiv:hep-th/0602087

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  48. [48]

    Invariants of spectral curves and intersection theory of moduli spaces of complex curves

    Eynard, B. Invariants of spectral curves and intersection theory of moduli spaces of complex curves. Commun. Num. Theor. Phys. 2014. doi:10.4310/CNTP.2014.v8.n3.a4. arXiv:1110.2949

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  49. [49]

    Proceedings of the international congress of mathematicians , pages=

    Homological algebra of mirror symmetry , author=. Proceedings of the international congress of mathematicians , pages=. 1995 , organization=

    1995

  50. [50]

    Homological mirror symmetry and torus fibrations

    Kontsevich, Maxim and Soibelman, Yan. Homological mirror symmetry and torus fibrations. KIAS Annual International Conference on Symplectic Geometry and Mirror Symmetry. 2000. arXiv:math/0011041

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  51. [51]

    Membranes and sheaves

    Nekrasov, Nikita and Okounkov, Andrei. Membranes and sheaves. Algebr. Geom. 2016. doi:10.14231/AG-2016-015. arXiv:1404.2323

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  52. [52]

    The moduli space of curves , SERIES =

    Kontsevich, Maxim , TITLE =. The moduli space of curves , SERIES =. 1995 , ISBN =. doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-4264-2\_12 , URL =. hep-th/9405035 , archivePrefix=

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1995

  53. [53]

    1995 , eprint=

    Enumeration of rational curves via torus actions , author=. 1995 , eprint=

    1995

  54. [54]

    Pandharipande , year=

    R. Pandharipande , year=. Three questions in Gromov-Witten theory. math/0302077 , archivePrefix=

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  55. [55]

    Mirror symmetry

    Hori, Kentaro and Vafa, Cumrun. Mirror symmetry. 2000. arXiv:hep-th/0002222

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  56. [56]

    The Vertex on a strip

    Iqbal, Amer and Kashani-Poor, Amir-Kian. The Vertex on a strip. Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 2006. doi:10.4310/ATMP.2006.v10.n3.a2. arXiv:hep-th/0410174

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  57. [57]

    Mirror symmetry, D-branes and counting holomorphic discs

    Aganagic, Mina and Vafa, Cumrun. Mirror symmetry, D-branes and counting holomorphic discs. 2000. arXiv:hep-th/0012041

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  58. [58]

    Disk instantons, mirror symmetry and the duality web

    Aganagic, Mina and Klemm, Albrecht and Vafa, Cumrun. Disk instantons, mirror symmetry and the duality web. Z. Naturforsch. A. 2002. doi:10.1515/zna-2002-1-201. arXiv:hep-th/0105045

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  59. [59]

    Exploring 5d BPS Spectra with Exponential Networks

    Banerjee, Sibasish and Longhi, Pietro and Romo, Mauricio. Exploring 5d BPS Spectra with Exponential Networks. Annales Henri Poincaré. 2019. doi:10.1007/s00023-019-00851-x. arXiv:1811.02875

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  60. [60]

    Exponential BPS graphs and D-brane counting on toric Calabi-Yau threefolds: Part II

    Banerjee, Sibasish and Longhi, Pietro and Romo, Mauricio. Exponential BPS graphs and D-brane counting on toric Calabi-Yau threefolds: Part II. 2020. arXiv:2012.09769

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  61. [61]

    Q -operators, q -opers, and R-matrices in 5d N =1 gauge theory

    Jeong, Saebyeok and Lee, Norton. Q -operators, q -opers, and R-matrices in 5d N =1 gauge theory. 2025. arXiv:2507.15450

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  62. [63]

    Resurgence of Faddeev s quantum dilogarithm

    Garoufalidis, Stavros and Kashaev, Rinat. Resurgence of Faddeev s quantum dilogarithm. 2021. doi:10.4171/IRMA/33-1/14

    work page doi:10.4171/irma/33-1/14 2021

  63. [64]

    The Refined topological vertex

    Iqbal, Amer and Kozcaz, Can and Vafa, Cumrun. The Refined topological vertex. JHEP. 2009. doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2009/10/069. arXiv:hep-th/0701156

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  64. [65]

    Refined Invariants and Quantum Curves from Supersymmetric Localization

    Banerjee, Sibasish and Ishtiaque, Nafiz and Jeong, Saebyeok. Refined Invariants and Quantum Curves from Supersymmetric Localization. 2026. arXiv:2601.07662

    arXiv 2026

  65. [66]

    Quantum curve for strip geometries, topological recursion and open GW/DT invariants

    Banerjee, Sibasish and Hock, Alexander. Quantum curve for strip geometries, topological recursion and open GW/DT invariants. Lett. Math. Phys. 2026. doi:10.1007/s11005-026-02059-7. arXiv:2510.07146

    arXiv 2026

  66. [67]

    Quantum curves from refined topological recursion: The genus 0 case

    Kidwai, Omar and Osuga, Kento. Quantum curves from refined topological recursion: The genus 0 case. Adv. Math. 2023. doi:10.1016/j.aim.2023.109253. arXiv:2204.12431

    arXiv 2023

  67. [68]

    and Neitzke, Andrew

    Gaiotto, Davide and Moore, Gregory W. and Neitzke, Andrew. Spectral networks. Annales Henri Poincaré. 2013. doi:10.1007/s00023-013-0239-7. arXiv:1204.4824

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  68. [69]

    A-branes, Foliations and Localization

    Banerjee, Sibasish and Longhi, Pietro and Romo, Mauricio. A-branes, Foliations and Localization. Annales Henri Poincaré. 2023. doi:10.1007/s00023-022-01231-8. arXiv:2201.12223

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  69. [70]

    Modelling A -branes with foliations

    Banerjee, Sibasish and Longhi, Pietro and Romo, Mauricio. Modelling A -branes with foliations. 2023. arXiv:2309.07748

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  70. [72]

    On counting special Lagrangian homology 3-spheres

    Dominic Joyce , year=. On counting special Lagrangian homology 3-spheres. hep-th/9907013 , archivePrefix=

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  71. [74]

    Gromov-Witten, Gopakumar-Vafa, and Donaldson-Thomas invariants of Calabi-Yau threefolds

    Sheldon Katz , year=. Gromov-Witten, Gopakumar-Vafa, and Donaldson-Thomas invariants of Calabi-Yau threefolds. math/0408266 , archivePrefix=

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  72. [75]

    Wall Crossing As Seen By Matrix Models

    Ooguri, Hirosi and Su kowski, Piotr and Yamazaki, Masahito. Wall Crossing As Seen By Matrix Models. Commun. Math. Phys. 2011. doi:10.1007/s00220-011-1330-x. arXiv:1005.1293

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  73. [76]

    Attractor invariants, brane tilings and crystals

    Mozgovoy, Sergey and Pioline, Boris. Attractor invariants, brane tilings and crystals. Annales Inst. Fourier. 2025. doi:10.5802/aif.3682. arXiv:2012.14358

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  74. [77]

    Physics and geometry of knots-quivers correspondence

    Ekholm, Tobias and Kucharski, Piotr and Longhi, Pietro. Physics and geometry of knots-quivers correspondence. Commun. Math. Phys. 2020. doi:10.1007/s00220-020-03840-y. arXiv:1811.03110

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  75. [78]

    and Moore, Gregory W

    Jafferis, Daniel L. and Moore, Gregory W. Wall crossing in local Calabi Yau manifolds. 2008. arXiv:0810.4909

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  76. [79]

    and Nekrasov, N

    Maulik, D. and Nekrasov, N. and Okounkov, A. and Pandharipande, R. Gromov Witten theory and Donaldson Thomas theory, I. Compos. Math. 2006. doi:10.1112/S0010437X06002302. arXiv:math/0312059

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  77. [80]

    and Nekrasov, N

    Maulik, D. and Nekrasov, N. and Okounkov, A. and Pandharipande, R. Gromov Witten theory and Donaldson Thomas theory, II. Compos. Math. 2006. doi:10.1112/S0010437X06002314. arXiv:math/0406092

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  78. [81]

    Mathematical Structures of Non-perturbative Topological String Theory: From GW to DT Invariants

    Alim, Murad and Saha, Arpan and Teschner, Joerg and Tulli, Iv \'a n. Mathematical Structures of Non-perturbative Topological String Theory: From GW to DT Invariants. Commun. Math. Phys. 2023. doi:10.1007/s00220-022-04571-y. arXiv:2109.06878

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  79. [82]

    Exponential Networks, WKB and Topological String

    Grassi, Alba and Hao, Qianyu and Neitzke, Andrew. Exponential Networks, WKB and Topological String. SIGMA. 2023. doi:10.3842/SIGMA.2023.064. arXiv:2201.11594

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  80. [83]

    Non-commutative Donaldson–Thomas invariants and the conifold

    Szendrői, Balázs , year=. Non-commutative Donaldson–Thomas invariants and the conifold. Geometry & Topology , publisher=. doi:10.2140/gt.2008.12.1171 , number=

    doi:10.2140/gt.2008.12.1171 2008

Showing first 80 references.