Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 4 minor 113 references

Self-consistent GW theory for superconductivity in SrTiO3 models

T0 review · 4 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-01 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Fully self-consistent GW gives a finite pairing-onset scale in dilute SrTiO3 models, far below one-shot estimates.

desk verdict A technically careful, honest scGW study of dilute polar STO pairing; the quantitative numbers are vertex-dependent, but the qualitative hierarchy is well supported and the paper deserves refereeing. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.18757 v1 pith:KQ3EGAR6 submitted 2026-07-21 cond-mat.supr-con cond-mat.mtrl-scicond-mat.str-elphysics.chem-ph

Zhi-Hao Cui , John Sous , Andrew J. Millis , David R. Reichman This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.supr-concond-mat.mtrl-scicond-mat.str-elphysics.chem-ph
keywords strontiumtitanatesuperconductivityGWapproximationEliashbergtheoryFröhlichinteractionincipientferroelectricitydilutelimitpairingonset
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper tackles how doped strontium titanate can superconduct when the Fermi energy is far below the polar phonon frequencies, a regime where the usual phonon-frequency cutoffs and Coulomb pseudopotentials of Migdal-Eliashberg theory break down. Solving the finite-temperature GW equations with the full momentum and Matsubara-frequency structure, it shows that the pairing-onset temperature depends strongly on self-consistency: replacing the bare propagator by the dressed one suppresses the onset by one to two orders of magnitude, and updating the screened interaction lowers and narrows the dome further. The qualitative result is that a non-zero pairing-onset scale survives as the carrier density tends to zero, carried by the retarded frequency structure of the lattice-screened Coulomb interaction rather than by electronic plasmonic screening, and that Fermi-surface projection or Fermi-energy frequency truncation destroys it. The paper thus identifies which standard technical shortcuts wrongly erase dilute-limit superconductivity, and supplies a converged reference for testing further approximations.

What carries the argument

The central object is the dynamically screened interaction V(q,iν) = (4π/ε∞ q²) F₃(iν), where F₃ is a three-pole lattice dielectric factor whose static value is suppressed by the near-ferroelectric ε₀/ε∞ ≈ 3800 and whose crossover through the LO phonon poles produces the retarded attraction-like contrast. The argument is carried by the finite-temperature GW hierarchy—one-shot G0W0, partially self-consistent GW0, and fully self-consistent scGW—solved on the Matsubara axis without cutoffs or a Coulomb pseudopotential, and by the leading eigenvalue of the linearized gap equation, whose crossing λ(T)=1 defines the pairing-onset temperature. The key technical enabling machinery is the numerical r

What would settle it

A vertex-corrected calculation for the same one-band polar model—at the GWΓ level or with diagrammatic Monte Carlo—that finds no pairing eigenvalue crossing λ=1 in the dilute limit, or a clean SrTiO3 measurement showing the dilute transition temperature collapsing faster than the n^{2/3} phase-stiffness bound, would refute the central claim of a non-zero dilute-limit pairing onset.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

For a polar one-band model of SrTiO3 with an ab initio-parameterized three-pole lattice dielectric function, the fully self-consistent GW linearized gap equation yields a pairing-onset temperature that is 10–100 times smaller than the one-shot G0W0 prediction, survives at a finite scale as the density tends to zero, and is dominated by the retarded lattice-screened Coulomb (polar-phonon) channel. The dominant suppression comes from the Eliashberg renormalization Z ≈ 1.9 of the dressed electron Green function, which reduces the near-Fermi-surface kernel by roughly 1/Z²; updating the screening W then lowers and narrows the dome. In the dilute limit the gap eigenvalue becomes a density-independ

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that vertex corrections are modest or at least do not change the qualitative hierarchy, even though in the antiadiabatic regime the ratio ω_LO/E_F is large and the long-range polar coupling is intermediate, leaving the bare-vertex GW treatment unprotected.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Self-consistency is not a perturbative correction in this regime: the one-shot G0W0 kernel overestimates the pairing-onset temperature by one to two orders of magnitude, so quantitative statements about dilute polar superconductors require dressed propagators and, ultimately, dressed screening.
  • The dilute-limit pairing channel is the retarded lattice-screened Coulomb (polar-phonon) interaction; the strong pairing from the electronic plasmon channel alone at the one-shot RPA level is an artifact, suppressed by self-consistency.
  • Fermi-surface-projected or Fermi-energy-truncated kernels predict an exponentially small (effectively zero) dilute onset, while the full momentum-frequency equation keeps a non-zero onset; the two frameworks disagree qualitatively at low densities.
  • Measured superconducting transitions in very dilute SrTiO3 should be bounded by the phase-stiffness/renormalized Fermi scale, which vanishes as n^{2/3}, rather than by the pairing-onset scale, which stays finite.
  • The same untruncated self-consistent treatment is the methodological standard needed for other dilute polar superconductors where the adiabatic hierarchy is inverted.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If vertex corrections (which the paper leaves out) turn out to be large, the quantitative dome could shift substantially; a plausible but unproven inference is that the qualitative suppression hierarchy—self-consistency above one-shot, lattice-screened Coulomb above plasmon—is more robust than the precise Tc values.
  • The density-independent dilute kernel implies a sharp, testable distinction from Fermi-surface theories: lowering the carrier density should flatten the pairing-onset temperature rather than cause an exponential collapse, provided the phase-stiffness bound is not the limiting factor.
  • The mechanism suggests a general criterion for incipient-ferroelectric superconductors: what matters is not the huge static dielectric constant itself, but the frequency window in which the interaction crosses from lattice-screened to Coulomb-dominated; materials with a similar three-pole contrast should show analogous dilute-limit pairing.
  • A natural extension is to compute the same gap equation with an explicit vertex (GWΓ-style or diagrammatic Monte Carlo) to settle whether the residual factor-of-ten overestimate of the experimental dome is reduced or removed.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 4 minor

Summary. This paper presents finite-temperature GW calculations of the linearized pairing gap equation for a single-band, isotropic parabolic model of doped SrTiO3, with the Coulomb interaction coupled to a three-pole polar lattice dielectric function (Eq. 2). The authors compare three self-consistency levels—one-shot G0W0, partially self-consistent GW0, and fully self-consistent scGW—solving the full momentum- and frequency-dependent kernel without cutoffs or a Coulomb pseudopotential. They report that self-consistency strongly suppresses the one-shot pairing scale (Tc reduced by one to two orders of magnitude), that the low-density pairing channel is the retarded Fröhlich/lattice-screened Coulomb interaction rather than electronic plasmon fluctuations, and that the dilute-limit onset remains nonzero because pairing weight lives at momenta and frequencies far from the Fermi surface; Fermi-surface projection or frequency truncation eliminates it. The scGW dome peaks near 3.5 K at around 6×10^18 cm^-3, roughly an order of magnitude above experiment. Convergence tests, parameterization details, and open-source code are provided.

Significance. If the central results are robust, this work is an important methodological reference for pairing in dilute polar semiconductors: it quantifies the failure of one-shot G0W0 and of Fermi-surface-projected treatments in the antiadiabatic regime, and it provides a controlled numerical bridge to earlier analytic dilute-limit results (Refs. [30,31]). The explicit convergence checks (Appendix F), the careful decomposition of the pairing kernel (Fig. 3), and the release of runnable code are notable strengths that increase confidence in the qualitative hierarchy. However, the quantitative quantities (Z≈1.9, eigenvalue ratios, the Tc dome, the dilute onset scale) are all computed at bare-vertex level, and the paper itself states that the sign and size of vertex corrections are unsettled in the antiadiabatic regime. The qualitative claims likely survive, but the numerical values and the factor-of-ten comparison to experiment are contingent on an approximation whose uncontrolled nature the authors acknowledge.

major comments (4)
  1. [Sec. IV, Eqs. (8)–(12)] All central quantitative outputs—Z≈1.9, the eigenvalue ratios in Fig. 2, the Tc dome in Fig. 5, and the dilute onset ~0.8 K—are produced by the bare-vertex kernel. The paper states (Sec. IV) that “in the antiadiabatic regime nothing protects their neglect” and that “the sign and size are not settled.” This makes the quantitative content load-bearing and conditional. Because known results go both ways (Grabowski–Sham suppression for charge fluctuations, PSG enhancement for small-q Fröhlich coupling), the paper needs a concrete estimate of the leading vertex correction for this model—e.g., a ladder-dressed coupling or a GW-Γ calculation at representative densities—or at least a clear quantitative bound on how much the vertex would have to change the kernel to alter the qualitative hierarchy. Without this, the quantitative claims are an uncontrolled approximation, despite the candid caveat.
  2. [Eq. (4), Appendix A] The parameter set mixes temperatures: the static dielectric constant ε0=2.3×10^4 and the anchored lowest TO pole ω_TO,1=1.24 meV are low-temperature experimental values, while the higher TO poles and all LO poles come from 300 K DFPT/TDEP. Since the polar response of STO is strongly temperature dependent, this mixing may distort the frequency profile F3(iν) in the LO crossover window that controls the dilute-limit pairing. Appendix E tests sensitivity to density and momentum dependence of ω_TO,1, but not to this temperature inconsistency. Please justify the mixed-temperature construction quantitatively or test its sensitivity to, e.g., a 20–30% shift of the higher TO/LO poles.
  3. [Sec. IIIC, Fig. 3(A)] The dismissal of the large G0W0 pure-Coulomb eigenvalue (λ≈7.8) as an “RPA artifact” relies on the external Grabowski–Sham vertex-correction argument rather than on the paper’s own self-consistency hierarchy. The manuscript does not show the fully self-consistent no-phonon (F3=1) eigenvalue, which is the natural internal test: if scGW suppresses λ_no-phonon below 1, the artifact claim is directly supported; if not, the statement that electronic charge-fluctuation pairing is not robust is weakened. Please add the scGW no-phonon curve (at least for several densities) to Fig. 3 or as a separate panel.
  4. [Sec. IIID, Fig. 4] The “Takada projection” is defined only by citation to Ref. [20]. The projection involves specific choices (e.g., the order of frequency integration and Fermi-surface angular average, and whether the frequency window is also truncated). Since the comparison in Fig. 4 is central to the dilute-limit claim, the precise projection used in this paper must be specified in the main text or an appendix, so that the reader can verify that the projection is indeed the one of Ref. [20] and not a different over-restriction.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Fig. 5 caption] The gray line marked T=E_F^* is described as using a low-frequency extrapolation of Z(k_F,i0). Please specify the extrapolation procedure (e.g., polynomial fit to the lowest Matsubara frequencies) in the caption or text.
  2. [Sec. IIIB, Fig. 2] The notation Z(k_F,iπT) at T=1 K refers to the lowest fermionic Matsubara frequency, but the figure labels just say Z. Clarify in the caption that this is Z at the lowest discrete frequency, not the zero-frequency limit.
  3. [Throughout] Minor typographical and capitalization inconsistencies: “ScGW” vs “scGW” and “G0W0” vs “G0W0” appear in different places. Also, reference [57] is a GitHub preview; a versioned DOI or release tag would be helpful.
  4. [Appendix D, Eq. (D6)] The text below Eq. (D6) writes “Nλ∝n” but the equation shows Nλ = λ E_F^2/(2 ω_0^2), which is proportional to n^{2/3}, not n. Please check the scaling statement and make it consistent.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the scGW hierarchy and dilute-limit onset are computed outputs from stated model inputs; the acknowledged vertex-correction caveat is a robustness issue, not a circular step.

full rationale

The derivation chain is self-contained. The model (Sec. IIA) is defined by a parabolic band with m*=2.1me from DFT/Wannier data and the three-pole dielectric factor of Eq. (2), whose LO zeros and higher TO poles come from DFPT/TDEP, with the lowest TO pole 'anchored by the experimental low-temperature static dielectric constant' (Appendix A). These are inputs, not outputs of the superconducting calculation. The three self-consistency levels are defined by iterating Eqs. (8)-(10) and all solve the same linearized gap equation (12); the suppression of G0W0 by GW0/scGW is a computed consequence of dressing G and W, with the Z ~ 1.9 factor explicitly diagnosed in Sec. IIIB, not imposed. The dilute-limit survival is a property of the full momentum-frequency kernel, explicitly connected to the external analytic results of Refs. [30,31], and the paper shows that Fermi-surface projection and EF truncation remove it; this is a comparative numerical statement, not a fit. The mu* discussion cites [61,62], one of which includes co-author Millis, but the argument is also carried by the paper's own full-kernel sign-change result (Fig. 3B), so the self-citation is not load-bearing. Sec. IV candidly states 'in the antiadiabatic regime nothing protects their neglect' and 'the sign and size are not settled' for vertex corrections; this is a correctness/robustness caveat, not a circular reduction. No equation reduces to its input by construction, and no fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

All parameters are physical inputs from DFT/DFPT/experiment used in the stated model; no new particles, mediators, or forces are invented. The load-bearing domain assumptions are the bare-vertex/RPA truncation and the single-band isotropic model, both acknowledged as limitations in the paper.

free parameters (4)
  • Effective mass m* (density-of-states) = 2.1 m_e
    Taken from DFT band structure of cubic SrTiO3 via DOS mass formula m*_DOS = g_v^{2/3}(m_h m_l^2)^{1/3}; not fitted to the pairing result, but a model input. The paper checks robustness for 0.5–4 m_e.
  • High-frequency dielectric ε∞ = 6.16
    Dielectric function above phonons and below interband transitions, used in Eq. (2); from ab initio literature/DFPT, no pairing fit.
  • Static dielectric constant ε0 = 2.3×10^4
    Experimental low-temperature static dielectric constant of quantum-paraelectric STO [43]; anchors the lowest TO pole through the generalized LST relation (App. A). Since ε0 largely sets the 'incipient ferroelectricity' enhancement, the pairing strength in the low-frequency channel is sensitive to it, though it is an externally measured constant rather than fitted to the dome.
  • Three-mode phonon pole sets ω_TO, ω_LO = (1.24, 22.39, 73.24) meV; (21.80, 55.72, 102.14) meV
    TO/LO frequencies from DFPT+TDEP calculations at 300 K, with the lowest TO pole replaced by the value required by the experimental ε0. These set the retardation structure in F3(ν).
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Bare-vertex GW (RPA screening) is a sufficient approximation for the pairing kernel in the antiadiabatic dilute regime.
    The whole calculation uses Eq. (10) with a bare vertex and RPA polarization (Eq. 9). The paper acknowledges in Section IV that vertex corrections are omitted and 'nothing protects their neglect' in the antiadiabatic regime.
  • domain assumption A single isotropic parabolic band with density-of-states mass m*=2.1 m_e captures the pairing physics of doped SrTiO3.
    Justified by the authors via the DOS mass and robustness checks (0.5–4 me), but multiband effects near the experimental dome peak are discussed as a likely missing ingredient (Sec. IV).
  • domain assumption The interaction can be reduced to the frequency-dependent lattice dielectric factor F3(ν) times the Coulomb interaction (Eq. 2): all phonon branches except the three polar LO/TO pairs are negligible.
    DFPT shows other branches couple weakly; the model omits the independent transverse soft-mode propagator and nonlinear couplings, explicitly stated in Section IV.
  • domain assumption The linearized gap eigenvalue crossing λ(Tc)=1 signals the pairing onset relevant to the measured superconducting transition, modulo phase stiffness.
    Standard for Eliashberg-type analyses; the paper carefully qualifies that in the dilute nondegenerate limit the physical transition is bounded by E*_F (Sec. IIIE, Fig. 5 gray line).
  • standard math Analytic treatment of the 1/q² Coulomb head (cell-averaged diagonal) does not introduce uncontrolled errors.
    Convergence Appendix F demonstrates the cell-average treatment reduces the diagonal error to the 10^-4 level; accepted as a numerical axiom.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Self-consistent GW theory for superconductivity in SrTiO3 models." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/KQ3EGAR6

@misc{pith2026260718757,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Self-consistent GW theory for superconductivity in SrTiO3 models},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/KQ3EGAR6}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.18757}
}
abstract

Superconductivity in doped SrTiO$_3$ occurs over a wide range of carrier densities, including those for which the Fermi energy is below the polar longitudinal optical phonon scale. In this regime, the assumptions underpinning conventional implementations of Migdal-Eliashberg theory, including frequency cutoffs at the phonon scale and a Coulomb pseudopotential $\mu^\ast$, are not valid. We solve the finite-temperature $GW$ equations with full momentum and frequency dependence, without cutoffs or $\mu^\ast$, for polar one-band models of SrTiO$_3$, using effective masses and three-phonon dielectric functions parameterized from ab initio calculations. Comparing different self-consistency levels, namely $G_0W_0$, $GW_0$, and fully self-consistent $GW$, we find that the one-shot ($G_0W_0$) kernel overestimates the pairing-onset temperature by one to two orders of magnitude. The dominant suppression comes from replacing $G_0$ by $G$, thereby incorporating the phonon renormalization factor in the electron Green function. Using the self-consistently computed interaction $W$ further lowers and narrows the pairing-onset dome. In the dilute limit, our calculations identify the pairing channel as the Fr\"ohlich phonon interaction screened by the incipient ferroelectricity of the material, with plasmonic and electronic screening effects negligible. The numerical solution of the full equations reveals a pairing-onset scale that remains non-zero as the density tends to zero, whereas Fermi-surface projection or Fermi-energy frequency truncation removes it. This work highlights the relevance of incipient ferroelectricity, the importance of self-consistency, and the need for a full momentum- and frequency-dependent treatment in modeling superconductivity in SrTiO$_3$-like doped polar semiconductors.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.18757 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. (A) Electronic energy scales of the three-mode model across the density range, for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. (A) Leading eigenvalue [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. (A) Decomposition of the pairing kernel at [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (5 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Consequences of restricting the pairing kernel, all at the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Pairing-onset temperature from the crossing [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. (A) Electronic band structure of cubic SrTiO [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Sensitivity of the sc [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. Convergence of the full [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_8.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

113 extracted references · 4 linked inside Pith

  1. [20]

    L. P. Gor’kov, Phonon mechanism in the most dilute super- conductor n-type SrTiO3, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.113, 4646 (2016)

    2016

  2. [1]

    High density:E F;! pl !0 In this limit the relevant momentum transfers are of order kF and the relevant frequencies obeyj j.! 0 E F, so the polarization may be replaced by its static limit,…! m kF= 2, and W.q;i /D 4 1 F1. / q2CF1. /q2 TF ; q 2 TFD 4m kF 1 :(D1) Projecting the normal self-energy on the Fermi surface and performing the angular integrals giv...

  3. [2]

    Low density:E F<!0, Fermi-surface projection If one insists on projecting onto the Fermi surface in the dilute regime, the frequency transfers are bounded byEF 13 !0 and the polar factor is uniformly small,F1 2=!2 0 . E2 F=!2

  4. [3]

    The projected gap equation becomes †A.i!/D ˇ X j!0j<EF 1 j!0j .!! 0/2 !2 0 ln 1C 4k2 F q2 TFF1.!! 0/ †A.i!0/; (D6) with effective couplingN D E 2 F=2!2 0 /n. Optimizing a two-window ansatz over the dividing frequency!c gives !2 c=E2 FDN and T FS c DE F e1p N exp 1 N 2 ;N /n;(D7) which vanishes faster than any power ofn: a Fermi-surface theory predicts no ...

  5. [4]

    Low density: full momentum-frequency equation Thefullequationbehavesdifferentlybecausethepairpropa- gatorweightsstatesfarfromtheFermisurface. Inthe !0 C limittheinternalmomentumissetbytheMatsubarafrequency, ptyp p 2m j!mj, not bykF, and the long-range kernel pro- duces Z d3p 1 p2 1 !2mC.p2=2m /2 / 1 j!mj3=2;(D8) the dilute kernel of Refs. [30, 31]. The Ma...

  6. [5]

    J. F. Schooley, W. R. Hosler, and M. L. Cohen, Supercon- ductivity in semiconducting SrTiO3, Phys. Rev. Lett.12, 474 (1964)

    1964

  7. [6]

    C. S. Koonce, M. L. Cohen, J. F. Schooley, W. R. Hosler, and E. R. Pfeiffer, Superconducting transition temperatures of semiconducting SrTiO3, Phys. Rev.163, 380 (1967)

    1967

  8. [7]

    X. Lin, G. Bridoux, A. Gourgout, G. Seyfarth, S. Krämer, M.Nardone,B.Fauqué,andK.Behnia,Criticaldopingforthe onsetofatwo-bandsuperconductinggroundstateinSrTiO 3ı, Phys. Rev. Lett.112, 207002 (2014)

    2014

Show all 113 references
  1. [8]

    C.Collignon,X.Lin,C.W.Rischau,B.Fauqué,andK.Behnia, Metallicity and superconductivity in doped strontium titanate, Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys.10, 25 (2019)

    2019

  2. [9]

    X.Lin,Z.Zhu,B.Fauqué,andK.Behnia,Fermisurfaceofthe most dilute superconductor, Phys. Rev. X3, 021002 (2013)

    2013

  3. [10]

    Thiemann, M

    M. Thiemann, M. H. Beutel, M. Dressel, N. R. Lee-Hone, D. M. Broun, E. Fillis-Tsirakis, H. Boschker, J. Mannhart, and M. Scheffler, Single-gap superconductivity and dome of superfluid density in Nb-doped SrTiO3, Phys. Rev. Lett.120, 237002 (2018)

    2018

  4. [11]

    H.Yoon,A.G.Swartz,S.P.Harvey,H.Inoue,Y.Hikita,Y.Yu, S. B. Chung, S. Raghu, and H. Y. Hwang, Low-density super- conductivity in SrTiO3 bounded by the adiabatic criterion, arXiv preprint arXiv:2106.10802 (2021)

    2021 arXiv

  5. [12]

    C. W. Rischau, X. Lin, C. P. Grams, D. Finck, S. Harms, J.Engelmayer,T.Lorenz,Y.Gallais,B.Fauqué,J.Hemberger, andK.Behnia,Aferroelectricquantumphasetransitioninside the superconducting dome of Sr1xCaxTiO3ı, Nat. Phys. 13, 643 (2017)

    2017

  6. [13]

    C. W. Rischau, D. Pulmannova, G. W. Scheerer, A. Stucky, E.Giannini,andD.vanderMarel,Isotopetuningofthesuper- conducting dome of strontium titanate, Phys. Rev. Research4, 013019 (2022)

    2022

  7. [14]

    Phys.417, 168107 (2020)

    M.N.Gastiasoro,J.Ruhman,andR.M.Fernandes,Supercon- ductivity in dilute SrTiO3: A review, Ann. Phys.417, 168107 (2020)

    2020

  8. [15]

    J. L. M. van Mechelen, D. van der Marel, C. Grimaldi, A. B. Kuzmenko,N.P.Armitage,N.Reyren,H.Hagemann,andI.I. 16 Mazin, Electron-phonon interaction and charge carrier mass enhancement in SrTiO3, Phys. Rev. Lett.100, 226403 (2008)

    2008

  9. [16]

    J.T.Devreese,S.N.Klimin,J.L.M.vanMechelen,andD.van der Marel, Many-body large polaron optical conductivity in SrTi1xNbxO3, Phys. Rev. B81, 125119 (2010)

    2010

  10. [17]

    A. G. Swartz, H. Inoue, T. A. Merz, Y. Hikita, S. Raghu, T. P. Devereaux, S. Johnston, and H. Y. Hwang, Polaronic behavior inaweak-couplingsuperconductor,Proc.Natl.Acad.Sci.115, 1475 (2018)

    2018

  11. [18]

    Rev.125, 1263 (1962)

    P.MorelandP.W.Anderson,Calculationofthesuperconduct- ingstateparameterswithretardedelectron-phononinteraction, Phys. Rev.125, 1263 (1962)

    1962

  12. [19]

    N. N. Bogoliubov, V. V. Tolmachev, and D. V. Shirkov,A New Method in the Theory of Superconductivity(Consultants Bureau, New York, 1959)

    1959

  13. [21]

    Supercond

    S.N.Klimin,J.Tempere,J.T.Devreese,andD.vanderMarel, Multiband superconductivity due to the electron–LO-phonon interaction in strontium titanate and on a SrTiO3/LaAlO3 in- terface, J. Supercond. Nov. Magn.30, 757 (2017)

    2017

  14. [22]

    S. N. Klimin, J. Tempere, J. T. Devreese, J. He, C. Franchini, and G. Kresse, Superconductivity in SrTiO3: dielectric func- tionmethodfornon-parabolicbands,J.Supercond.Nov.Magn. 32, 2739 (2019)

    2019

  15. [23]

    Takada, Plasmon mechanism of superconductivity in two- and three-dimensional electron systems, J

    Y. Takada, Plasmon mechanism of superconductivity in two- and three-dimensional electron systems, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn.45, 786 (1978)

    1978

  16. [24]

    Takada, Theory of superconductivity in polar semiconduc- tors and its application to n-type semiconducting SrTiO3, J

    Y. Takada, Theory of superconductivity in polar semiconduc- tors and its application to n-type semiconducting SrTiO3, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn.49, 1267 (1980)

    1980

  17. [25]

    Ruhman and P

    J. Ruhman and P. A. Lee, Superconductivity at very low den- sity: The case of strontium titanate, Phys. Rev. B94, 224515 (2016)

    2016

  18. [26]

    Enderlein, J

    C. Enderlein, J. Ferreira de Oliveira, D. A. Tompsett, E. Bag- gioSaitovitch,S.S.Saxena,G.G.Lonzarich,andS.E.Rowley, Superconductivity mediated by polar modes in ferroelectric metals, Nat. Commun.11, 4852 (2020)

    2020

  19. [27]

    180, 508 (1969)

    J.Appel,Soft-modesuperconductivityinSrTiO 3-x,Phys.Rev. 180, 508 (1969)

    1969

  20. [28]

    J. M. Edge, Y. Kedem, U. Aschauer, N. A. Spaldin, and A. V. Balatsky,Quantumcriticaloriginofthesuperconductingdome in SrTiO3, Phys. Rev. Lett.115, 247002 (2015)

    2015

  21. [29]

    P.WölfleandA.V.Balatsky,Superconductivityatlowdensity near a ferroelectric quantum critical point: Doped SrTiO3, Phys. Rev. B98, 104505 (2018)

    2018

  22. [30]

    van der Marel, F

    D. van der Marel, F. Barantani, and C. W. Rischau, Possible mechanismforsuperconductivityindopedSrTiO3,Phys.Rev. Research1, 013003 (2019)

    2019

  23. [31]

    P. A. Volkov, P. Chandra, and P. Coleman, Superconductiv- ity from energy fluctuations in dilute quantum critical polar metals, Nat. Commun.13, 4599 (2022)

    2022

  24. [32]

    Y.Yu,H.Y.Hwang,S.Raghu,andS.B.Chung,Theoryofsu- perconductivity indoped quantum paraelectrics,npj Quantum Materials7, 63 (2022)

    2022

  25. [33]

    S.K.Saha,M.N.Gastiasoro,J.Ruhman,andA.Klein,Strong coupling theory of superconductivity and ferroelectric quan- tum criticality in metallic SrTiO3, npj Quantum Materials10, 82 (2025)

    2025

  26. [34]

    M. N. Gastiasoro, A. V. Chubukov, and R. M. Fernandes, Phonon-mediatedsuperconductivityinlowcarrier-densitysys- tems, Phys. Rev. B99, 094524 (2019)

    2019

  27. [35]

    D.PhanandA.V.Chubukov,Effectofrepulsiononsupercon- ductivity at low density, Phys. Rev. B105, 064518 (2022)

    2022

  28. [36]

    Rev.139, A796 (1965)

    L.Hedin,Newmethodforcalculatingtheone-particleGreen’s function with application to the electron-gas problem, Phys. Rev.139, A796 (1965)

    1965

  29. [37]

    M.S.HybertsenandS.G.Louie,Electroncorrelationinsemi- conductors and insulators: Band gaps and quasiparticle ener- gies, Phys. Rev. B34, 5390 (1986)

    1986

  30. [38]

    Aryasetiawan and O

    F. Aryasetiawan and O. Gunnarsson, TheGWMethod, Rep. Prog. Phys.61, 237 (1998)

    1998

  31. [39]

    Golze, M

    D. Golze, M. Dvorak, and P. Rinke, TheGWcompendium: A practical guide to theoretical photoemission spectroscopy, Front. Chem.7, 377 (2019)

    2019

  32. [40]

    J. Li, M. Wallerberger, N. Chikano, C.-N. Yeh, E. Gull, and H. Shinaoka, Sparse sampling approach to efficient ab initio calculations at finite temperature, Phys. Rev. B101, 035144 (2020)

    2020

  33. [41]

    C.-N. Yeh, S. Iskakov, D. Zgid, and E. Gull, Fully self- consistent finite-temperatureGWin Gaussian Bloch orbitals for solids, Phys. Rev. B106, 235104 (2022)

    2022

  34. [42]

    Marsiglio, Pairing and charge-density-wave correlations in theHolsteinmodelathalf-filling,Phys.Rev.B42,2416(1990)

    F. Marsiglio, Pairing and charge-density-wave correlations in theHolsteinmodelathalf-filling,Phys.Rev.B42,2416(1990)

    1990

  35. [43]

    Marsiglio, Eliashberg theory: A short review, Ann

    F. Marsiglio, Eliashberg theory: A short review, Ann. Phys. 417, 168102 (2020)

    2020

  36. [44]

    in ’t Veld, M

    Y. in ’t Veld, M. I. Katsnelson, A. J. Millis, and M. Rösner, Screening induced crossover between phonon- and plasmon- mediated pairing in layered superconductors, 2D Mater.10, 045031 (2023)

    2023

  37. [45]

    R. H. Lyddane, R. G. Sachs, and E. Teller, On the polar vibra- tions of alkali halides, Phys. Rev.59, 673 (1941)

    1941

  38. [46]

    A. S. Chaves and S. P. S. Porto, Generalized Lyddane-Sachs- Teller relation, Solid State Commun.13, 865 (1973)

    1973

  39. [47]

    K. A. Müller and H. Burkard, SrTiO3: An intrinsic quantum paraelectric below 4 K, Phys. Rev. B19, 3593 (1979)

    1979

  40. [48]

    Commun.16, 2301 (2025)

    B.Fauqué,S.Jiang,T.Fennell,B.Roessli,A.Ivanov,C.Roux- Byl,B.Baptiste,P.Bourges,K.Behnia,andY.Tomioka,Dop- ingdependenceofthedipolarcorrelationlengthscaleinmetal- lic SrTiO3, Nat. Commun.16, 2301 (2025)

    2025

  41. [49]

    Rev.99, 1140 (1955)

    J.BardeenandD.Pines,Electron-phononinteractioninmetals, Phys. Rev.99, 1140 (1955)

    1955

  42. [50]

    D. A. Kirzhnits, E. G. Maksimov, and D. I. Khomskii, The descriptionofsuperconductivityintermsofdielectricresponse function, J. Low Temp. Phys.10, 79 (1973)

    1973

  43. [51]

    A. Stan, N. E. Dahlen, and R. van Leeuwen, Levels of self- consistency in the GW approximation, J. Chem. Phys.130, 114105 (2009)

    2009

  44. [52]

    S. V. Faleev, M. van Schilfgaarde, and T. Kotani, All-Electron Self-ConsistentGWApproximation: ApplicationtoSi,MnO, and NiO, Phys. Rev. Lett.93, 126406 (2004)

    2004

  45. [53]

    Lei and T

    J. Lei and T. Zhu, Gaussian-Based Quasiparticle Self- ConsistentGWfor Periodic Systems, J. Chem. Phys.157, 214114 (2022)

    2022

  46. [54]

    M. S. Hybertsen and S. G. Louie, First-Principles Theory of Quasiparticles: Calculation of Band Gaps in Semiconductors and Insulators, Phys. Rev. Lett.55, 1418 (1985)

    1985

  47. [55]

    Jiang and P

    H. Jiang and P. Blaha, GW with linearized augmented plane wavesextendedbyhigh-energylocalorbitals,Phys.Rev.B93, 115203 (2016)

    2016

  48. [56]

    Holm and U

    B. Holm and U. von Barth, Fully self-consistentGWself- energy of the electron gas, Phys. Rev. B57, 2108 (1998)

    1998

  49. [57]

    Caruso, P

    F. Caruso, P. Rinke, X. Ren, M. Scheffler, and A. Rubio, Uni- fied description of ground and excited states of finite systems: Theself-consistentGWapproach,Phys.Rev.B86,081102(R) (2012). 17

    2012

  50. [58]

    Grumet, P

    M. Grumet, P. Liu, M. Kaltak, J. Klimeš, and G. Kresse, Be- yond the quasiparticle approximation: Fully self-consistent GWcalculations, Phys. Rev. B98, 155143 (2018)

    2018

  51. [59]

    Shinaoka, J

    H. Shinaoka, J. Otsuki, M. Ohzeki, and K. Yoshimi, Com- pressing Green’s function using intermediate representation between imaginary-time and real-frequency domains, Phys. Rev. B96, 035147 (2017)

    2017

  52. [60]

    T. Wang, T. Nomoto, T. Koretsune, and R. Arita, Importance ofself-consistencyinfirst-principlesEliashbergcalculationfor superconductingtransitiontemperature,J.Phys.Chem.Solids 178, 111348 (2023)

    2023

  53. [61]

    Cui, Migdal:GWand Migdal-Eliashberg solvers for polar one-band models,https://github.com/zhcui/ migdal_preview(2026)

    Z.-H. Cui, Migdal:GWand Migdal-Eliashberg solvers for polar one-band models,https://github.com/zhcui/ migdal_preview(2026)

    2026

  54. [62]

    Kandolf, C

    N. Kandolf, C. Verdi, and F. Giustino, Many-body Green’s function approaches to the doped Fröhlich solid: Exact so- lutions and anomalous mass enhancement, Phys. Rev. B105, 085148 (2022)

    2022

  55. [63]

    Rietschel and L

    H. Rietschel and L. J. Sham, Role of electron Coulomb inter- action in superconductivity, Phys. Rev. B28, 5100 (1983)

    1983

  56. [64]

    Grabowski and L

    M. Grabowski and L. J. Sham, Superconductivity from non- phonon interactions, Phys. Rev. B29, 6132 (1984)

    1984

  57. [65]

    T.Wang,X.Cai,K.Chen,B.V.Svistunov,andN.V.Prokof’ev, Origin of the Coulomb pseudopotential, Phys. Rev. B107, L140507 (2023)

    2023

  58. [66]

    X. Cai, T. Wang, S. Zhang, T. Zhang, A. Millis, B. V. Svis- tunov, N. V. Prokof’ev, and K. Chen, Superconductivity in electron liquids: Precision many-body treatment of Coulomb interaction, arXiv preprint arXiv:2512.19382 (2025)

    2025

  59. [67]

    C. D. Spataru, C. Renskers, and E. R. Margine, Quasipar- ticleGWfor superconductors: Toward a unified treatment of electron-phonon and electron-plasmon couplings, arXiv preprint arXiv:2605.21700 (2026)

    2026 arXiv

  60. [68]

    Y.Tomioka,N.Shirakawa,andI.H.Inoue,Superconductivity enhancementinpolarmetalregionsofSr0.95Ba0.05TiO3and Sr0.985Ca0.015TiO3 revealed by systematic Nb doping, npj Quantum Materials7, 111 (2022)

    2022

  61. [69]

    V. J. Emery and S. A. Kivelson, Importance of phase fluctua- tions in superconductors with small superfluid density, Nature 374, 434 (1995)

    1995

  62. [70]

    Collignon, B

    C. Collignon, B. Fauqué, A. Cavanna, U. Gennser, D. Mailly, and K. Behnia, Superfluid density and carrier concentration acrossasuperconductingdome: Thecaseofstrontiumtitanate, Phys. Rev. B96, 224506 (2017)

    2017

  63. [71]

    D. M. Eagles, Possible pairing without superconductivity at lowcarrierconcentrationsinbulkandthin-filmsuperconduct- ing semiconductors, Phys. Rev.186, 456 (1969)

    1969

  64. [72]

    J.McClain,J.Lischner,T.Watson,D.A.Matthews,E.Ronca, S. G. Louie, T. C. Berkelbach, and G. K.-L. Chan, Spectral functionsoftheuniformelectrongasviacoupled-clustertheory and comparison to the GW and related approximations, Phys. Rev. B93, 235139 (2016)

    2016

  65. [73]

    A. V. Chubukov, A. Abanov, I. Esterlis, and S. A. Kivelson, Eliashberg theory of phonon-mediated superconductivity — When it is valid and how it breaks down, Ann. Phys.417, 168190 (2020)

    2020

  66. [74]

    A. B. Migdal, Interaction between electrons and lattice vibra- tions in a normal metal, Sov. Phys. JETP7, 996 (1958)

    1958

  67. [75]

    G. M. Eliashberg, Interactions between electrons and lattice vibrationsinasuperconductor,Sov.Phys.JETP11,696(1960)

    1960

  68. [76]

    Chubukov, I

    A. Chubukov, I. Esterlis, A. Abanov, and N. Prokof’ev, Breakdown of the Migdal-Eliashberg theory for electron- phonon systems. Role of polarons/bi-polarons, arXiv preprint arXiv:2604.14294 (2026)

    2026 arXiv

  69. [77]

    Grimaldi, L

    C. Grimaldi, L. Pietronero, and S. Strässler, Nonadia- batic superconductivity: Electron-phonon interaction beyond Migdal’s theorem, Phys. Rev. Lett.75, 1158 (1995)

    1995

  70. [78]

    Pietronero, S

    L. Pietronero, S. Strässler, and C. Grimaldi, Nonadiabatic su- perconductivity. I. Vertex corrections for the electron-phonon interactions, Phys. Rev. B52, 10516 (1995)

    1995

  71. [79]

    A.L.Kutepov,ElectronicstructureofNa, K,Si, andLiFfrom self-consistent solution of Hedin’s equations including vertex corrections, Phys. Rev. B94, 155101 (2016)

    2016

  72. [80]

    van der Marel, J

    D. van der Marel, J. L. M. van Mechelen, and I. I. Mazin, Common Fermi-liquid origin ofT2 resistivity and supercon- ductivity in n-type SrTiO3, Phys. Rev. B84, 205111 (2011)

    2011

  73. [81]

    G.Binnig,A.Baratoff,H.E.Hoenig,andJ.G.Bednorz,Two- band superconductivity in Nb-doped SrTiO3, Phys. Rev. Lett. 45, 1352 (1980)

    1980

  74. [82]

    J.-J. Zhou, O. Hellman, and M. Bernardi, Electron-phonon scattering in the presence of soft modes and electron mobility inSrTiO3perovskitefromfirstprinciples,Phys.Rev.Lett.121, 226603 (2018)

    2018

  75. [83]

    Huang, D

    C.-Y. Huang, D. G. Chica, Z.-H. Cui, T. Handa, M. Thinel, N.Olsen,Y.Liu,M.E.Ziebel,G.He,Y.Shao,C.A.Occhialini, J. Pelliciari, D. N. Basov, M. Sfeir, A. Pasupathy, V. Bisogni, D. R. Reichman, X. Roy, and X. Zhu, Coupling of electronic transition to ferroelectric order in a 2D s...

    2025

  76. [84]

    M. N. Gastiasoro, M. E. Temperini, P. Barone, and J. Loren- zana, Generalized Rashba electron-phonon coupling and su- perconductivity in strontium titanate, Phys. Rev. Research5, 023177 (2023)

    2023

  77. [85]

    Ruhman and P

    J. Ruhman and P. A. Lee, Comment on superconductivity at low density near a ferroelectric quantum critical point: Doped SrTiO3, Phys. Rev. B100, 226501 (2019)

    2019

  78. [86]

    Wölfle and A

    P. Wölfle and A. V. Balatsky, Reply to comment on supercon- ductivity at low density near a ferroelectric quantum critical point: Doped SrTiO3, Phys. Rev. B100, 226502 (2019)

    2019

  79. [88]

    phonon-mediated electron attraction in SrTiO3 via the gen- eralized Fröhlich and deformation potential mechanisms

    J. Ruhman, Comment on 2501.17230 and 2502.00103 “phonon-mediated electron attraction in SrTiO3 via the gen- eralized Fröhlich and deformation potential mechanisms” and “theoryofabinitiodownfoldingwitharbitraryrangeelectron- phonon coupling”, arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.00041 (2025)

    2025 arXiv

  80. [89]

    N. M. Tubman, C. J. N. Coveney, C.-E. Hsu, A. Montoya- Castillo, M. R. Filip, J. B. Neaton, Z. Li, V. Vlcek, and A. M. Alvertis, Theory of ab initio downfolding with arbitrary-range electron-phonon coupling, Phys. Rev. B113, 245144 (2026)

    2026

  81. [90]

    K. L. Ngai, Two-phonon deformation potential and supercon- ductivity in degenerate semiconductors, Phys. Rev. Lett.32, 215 (1974)

    1974

  82. [91]

    D. E. Kiselov and M. V. Feigel’man, Theory of superconduc- tivityduetoNgai’smechanisminlightlydopedSrTiO3,Phys. Rev. B104, L220506 (2021)

    2021

  83. [92]

    Z.-H. Cui, H. Zhai, X. Zhang, and G. K.-L. Chan, Systematic electronic structure in the cuprate parent state from quantum many-body simulations, Science377, 1192 (2022)

    2022

  84. [93]

    Commun.16, 1845 (2025)

    Z.-H.Cui,J.Yang,J.Tölle,H.-Z.Ye,S.Yuan,H.Zhai,G.Park, R.Kim,X.Zhang,L.Lin,T.C.Berkelbach,andG.K.-L.Chan, Ab initio quantum many-body description of superconducting trends in the cuprates, Nat. Commun.16, 1845 (2025)

    2025

  85. [94]

    Matsushita, P

    Y. Matsushita, P. A. Wianecki, A. T. Sommer, T. H. Geballe, and I. R. Fisher, Type II superconducting parameters of Tl- 18 doped PbTe determined from heat capacity and electronic transport measurements, Phys. Rev. B74, 134512 (2006)

    2006

  86. [95]

    C. Liu, X. Yan, D. Jin, Y. Ma, H.-W. Hsiao, Y. Lin, T. M. Bretz-Sullivan, X. Zhou, J. Pearson, B. Fisher, J. S. Jiang, W. Han, J.-M. Zuo, J. Wen, D. D. Fong, J. Sun, H. Zhou, and A. Bhattacharya, Two-dimensional superconductivity and anisotropic transport at KTaO3 (111) interf...

    2021

  87. [96]

    Z. Li, G. Antonius, M. Wu, F. H. da Jornada, and S. G. Louie, Electron-phonon coupling from Ab Initio linear-response the- orywithintheGWmethod: Correlation-enhancedinteractions andsuperconductivityinBa 1xKxBiO3,Phys.Rev.Lett.122, 186402 (2019)

    2019

  88. [97]

    Li and S

    Z. Li and S. G. Louie, Two-gap superconductivity and the de- cisiveroleofrare-earthdelectronsininfinite-layernickelates, Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 126401 (2024)

    2024

  89. [98]

    J.-Y.You,C.-E.Hsu,M.DelBen,andZ.Li,Diversemanifesta- tionsofelectron-phononcouplinginakagomesuperconductor, Phys. Rev. Lett.134, 106401 (2025)

    2025

  90. [99]

    Giannozzi, S

    P. Giannozzi, S. Baroni, N. Bonini, M. Calandra, R. Car, C. Cavazzoni, D. Ceresoli, G. L. Chiarotti, M. Cococ- cioni, I. Dabo, A. Dal Corso, S. de Gironcoli, S. Fab- ris, G. Fratesi, R. Gebauer, U. Gerstmann, C. Gougoussis, A.Kokalj,M.Lazzeri,L.Martin-Samos,N.Marzari,F.Mauri, ...

    2009

  91. [100]

    Giannozzi, O

    P. Giannozzi, O. Andreussi, T. Brumme, O. Bunau, M. Buon- giorno Nardelli, M. Calandra, R. Car, C. Cavazzoni, D. Ceresoli, M. Cococcioni, N. Colonna, I. Carnimeo, A. Dal Corso, S. de Gironcoli, P. Delugas, R. A. DiStasio, Jr., A. Ferretti, A. Floris, G. Fratesi, G. Fugallo, R....

    2017

  92. [101]

    Baroni, S

    S. Baroni, S. de Gironcoli, A. Dal Corso, and P. Giannozzi, Phononsandrelatedcrystalpropertiesfromdensity-functional perturbation theory, Rev. Mod. Phys.73, 515 (2001)

    2001

  93. [102]

    J.P.Perdew,K.Burke,andM.Ernzerhof,Generalizedgradient approximation made simple, Phys. Rev. Lett.77, 3865 (1996)

    1996

  94. [103]

    D. R. Hamann, Optimized norm-conserving Vanderbilt pseu- dopotentials, Phys. Rev. B88, 085117 (2013)

    2013

  95. [104]

    M. J. van Setten, M. Giantomassi, E. Bousquet, M. J. Ver- straete, D. R. Hamann, X. Gonze, and G.-M. Rignanese, The PseudoDojo: Training and grading a 85 element optimized norm-conserving pseudopotential table, Comput. Phys. Com- mun.226, 39 (2018)

    2018

  96. [105]

    Marzari, A

    N. Marzari, A. A. Mostofi, J. R. Yates, I. Souza, and D. Van- derbilt, Maximally localized Wannier functions: Theory and applications, Rev. Mod. Phys.84, 1419 (2012)

    2012

  97. [106]

    Marzari, An updated version of wannier90: A tool for obtaining maximally-localised Wannier functions, Comput

    A.A.Mostofi,J.R.Yates,G.Pizzi,Y.-S.Lee,I.Souza,D.Van- derbilt, and N. Marzari, An updated version of wannier90: A tool for obtaining maximally-localised Wannier functions, Comput. Phys. Commun.185, 2309 (2014)

    2014

  98. [107]

    O.Hellman,I.A.Abrikosov,andS.I.Simak,Latticedynamics of anharmonic solids from first principles, Phys. Rev. B84, 180301 (2011)

    2011

  99. [108]

    Hellman, P

    O. Hellman, P. Steneteg, I. A. Abrikosov, and S. I. Simak, Temperaturedependenteffectivepotentialmethodforaccurate free energy calculations of solids, Phys. Rev. B87, 104111 (2013)

    2013

  100. [109]

    F.Knoop,N.Shulumba,A.Castellano,J.P.A.Batista,R.Far- ris, M. J. Verstraete, M. Heine, D. Broido, D. S. Kim, J. Klar- bring, I. A. Abrikosov, S. I. Simak, and O. Hellman, TDEP: Temperature dependent effective potentials, Journal of Open Source Software9, 6150 (2024)

    2024

  101. [110]

    J.-J. Zhou, J. Park, I.-T. Lu, I. Maliyov, X. Tong, and M. Bernardi, Perturbo: A software package for ab initio electron-phononinteractions,chargetransportandultrafastdy- namics, Comput. Phys. Commun.264, 107970 (2021)

    2021

  102. [111]

    Q.Sun,X.Zhang,S.Banerjee,P.Bao,M.Barbry,N.S.Blunt, N.A.Bogdanov,G.H.Booth,J.Chen,Z.-H.Cui,J.J.Eriksen, Y. Gao, S. Guo, J. Hermann, M. R. Hermes, K. Koh, P. Koval, S. Lehtola, Z. Li, J. Liu, N. Mardirossian, J. D. McClain, M. Motta, B. Mussard, H. Q. Pham, A. Pulkin, W. Purwant...

    2020

  103. [112]

    Van Houcke, I

    K. Van Houcke, I. S. Tupitsyn, A. S. Mishchenko, and N. V. Prokof’ev, Dielectric function and thermodynamic properties ofjelliumintheGWapproximation,Phys.Rev.B95,195131 (2017)

    2017

  104. [113]

    Wallerberger, S

    M. Wallerberger, S. Badr, S. Hoshino, S. Huber, F. Kakizawa, T.Koretsune,Y.Nagai,K.Nogaki,T.Nomoto,H.Mori,J.Ot- suki, S. Ozaki, T. Plaikner, R. Sakurai, C. Vogel, N. Witt, K. Yoshimi, and H. Shinaoka, sparse-ir: optimal compression andsparsesamplingofmany-bodypropagators,Softw...

    2023

  105. [114]

    Pokhilko, C.-N

    P. Pokhilko, C.-N. Yeh, and D. Zgid, Iterative subspace al- gorithms for finite-temperature solution of Dyson equation, J. Chem. Phys.156, 094101 (2022)

    2022

Pith tools

Reviewed August 1, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.