Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 3 minor 11 cited by

Merging black holes with Cauchy-characteristic matching: Computation of late-time tails

T0 review · 4 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Cauchy-characteristic matching is shown to work for fully nonlinear binary black hole mergers, producing stable, convergent waveforms on an effectively infinite domain.

desk verdict First fully nonlinear 3D CCM for BBH mergers is real, important, and honestly presented; tail measurements are interesting but not yet hardened, and the open hyperbolicity question is acknowledged rather than resolved. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.06906 v2 pith:KRYBK327 submitted 2024-12-09 gr-qc astro-ph.HEhep-th

Sizheng Ma , Mark A. Scheel , Jordan Moxon , Kyle C. Nelli , Nils Deppe , Lawrence E. Kidder , William Throwe , Nils L. Vu This is my paper · ORCID
classification gr-qcastro-ph.HEhep-th PACS 04.25.D04.30.-w
keywords Cauchy-characteristicmatchingbinaryblackholemergersnumericalrelativitylate-timetailsnullinfinitygravitationalwavesquasinormalmodespower-law
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Cauchy-characteristic matching (CCM) couples an inner Cauchy evolution of Einstein's equations to an outer characteristic evolution that reaches future null infinity, eliminating the artificial boundary errors that limit ordinary numerical-relativity waveforms. The paper reports that this scheme, previously demonstrated only for simple or perturbative systems, now runs stably and converges for nine binary black hole mergers, including a long eccentric inspiral that would be impractical with a distant boundary. The resulting waveforms agree with reference simulations whose boundaries are causally disconnected from the binary, while standard extraction without matching shows clear late-time errors. This accuracy enables the paper's key application: resolving late-time gravitational-wave tails after merger, with power-law decays characterized across the configurations. The authors frame the result as opening systematic tail studies and as a step toward the waveform accuracy needed by next-generation detectors.

What carries the argument

The central object is the decomposition of the forty incoming characteristic fields of the generalized harmonic Cauchy system into constraint, physical, and gauge subsets. Only the two physical components, tied to the Weyl scalar $\Psi_0$ and encoding backscattered radiation, must be matched; the characteristic evolution supplies their boundary values exactly, which replaces approximate absorbing boundary conditions with an effective infinite-order nonlinear condition. A characteristic code evolved in Bondi-Sachs coordinates carries the worldtube data to future null infinity, with careful gauge and tetrad transformations at the interface. For tail extraction, the key tool is the rational quasinormal-mode filter, which removes QNMs given their complex frequencies without fitting amplitudes, exposing the power-law decay underneath.

What would settle it

Take the equal-mass head-on configuration of Table I and move the CCM worldtube from 650M to, say, 300M or 1200M; if the extracted $\Psi_4$ differs from the causally disconnected reference run by more than the resolution error, the physical-subset matching is missing backscattered physics.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that Cauchy-characteristic matching (CCM) is now shown to work for fully nonlinear, dynamical binary black hole spacetimes, and not just for symmetric or perturbative testbeds. The paper presents nine simulations—head-on, quasi-head-on, eccentric, and quasi-circular binaries—and reports that all run stably, converge under resolution, and agree with reference systems whose outer boundaries are placed far enough away to be causally disconnected from the merger. In ordinary Cauchy-characteristic extraction without matching, the same configurations show systematic late-time errors; with CCM they do not. The physical payoff is the first systematic look at late-time tails after merger: the $(\ell=2,m=0)$ harmonic of $\Psi_4$ is fit to a single power law $A(u+u_0)^p$ with $p$ between $-3.51$ and $-3.79$, and the tail amplitude decreases as the pre-merger orbital angular velocity grows. The authors leave open whether these tails are the intermediate regime of the linear Price tail or a nonlinear tail driven by quadratic quasinormal modes.

Load-bearing premise

The stability argument rests on the assumption that the two physical incoming characteristic fields tied to $\Psi_0$ carry all backscattered radiation that matters at the worldtube, and that the Sommerfeld gauge boundary conditions used for the remaining fields do not contaminate the extracted waveforms; if either fails, the matching is not giving the exact infinite-domain evolution.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • CCM waveforms can serve as reference standards for calibrating surrogate and effective-one-body models, since they are free of outer-boundary systematics.
  • Late-time tails can now be mapped systematically across mass ratio, spin, and eccentricity; the paper's fits give amplitude and exponent for five configurations.
  • Smaller Cauchy domains make long simulations feasible: the reported runs use 2–3 times fewer CPU hours than reference runs, and the eccentric merger, at about 14,800M, was practical only with CCM.
  • The technique sharpens ringdown studies by separating quasinormal modes from the underlying tail with rational filters rather than by discarding early-time data.
  • If the tail's nonlinear origin is confirmed, late-time gravitational-wave emission would be a case where nonlinearity dominates linearity, affecting predictions for ringdown and memory analyses.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A direct extension would be to vary the worldtube radius for a single configuration and check that the extracted $\Psi_4$ is independent of it; the paper's comparison with distant-boundary references already suggests this, but not as a dedicated test.
  • The observed exponents clustering near $-3.7$ rather than the Price-law $-6$ imply that tail models used in data analysis should carry at least one more parameter, and that quadratic QNM contributions may need to be modeled jointly with linear tails.
  • For detector-band waveforms, the relevant $\ell=m=2$ strain tail was not seen in the quasi-circular run; a longer or louder quasi-circular simulation could settle whether that absence is physical or a sensitivity limit.
  • The same two-field matching idea could be transplanted to other Cauchy formulations, but only if the analogous physical incoming degrees of freedom can be cleanly isolated; whether that is possible is not addressed here.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper reports nine Cauchy-characteristic matching (CCM) simulations of binary black hole mergers using a hybrid SpEC/SpECTRE implementation, covering head-on, quasi-head-on, eccentric, and quasi-circular configurations. For seven (quasi-)head-on cases, the CCM waveforms are compared with large-domain reference simulations and agree at the level of numerical error, while standard CCE shows boundary contamination. The paper also extracts late-time tails from the Weyl scalar Psi_4 using QNM rational filters and fits them to a single power law A(u+u0)^p, finding p between -3.51 and -3.79, and discusses two candidate physical explanations: an intermediate linear tail regime and a QNM-driven nonlinear tail. The authors acknowledge the open weak-hyperbolicity question for CCM and cite recent work suggesting a tentative resolution.

Significance. If the claims hold, this is a substantial advance: it would be the first fully nonlinear three-dimensional CCM simulations of BBH mergers, removing outer-boundary systematics and giving access to late-time tails near null infinity. The paper's strengths are its explicit convergence tests (Figs. 3, 4, 7), constraint monitoring, and the use of independent large-domain reference runs for the head-on and quasi-head-on families, which directly address the circularity concern about boundary effects. The tail-analysis pipeline with QNM rational filters is innovative, and the authors are candid about the two possible interpretations of the power-law index. However, the general robustness claim rests on empirical stability rather than well-posedness, and the tail parameters lack uncertainty quantification. The result is therefore promising and important, but the manuscript currently overstates the degree to which it has settled the CCM feasibility question.

major comments (4)
  1. [Sec. V and Abstract] The central claim that CCM gives a "positive answer" to full nonlinear robustness is stronger than the evidence presented. The paper itself concedes in Sec. V that CCM may be only weakly hyperbolic and that the only available resolution (Ref. [92]) is a linearized well-posedness result about Schwarzschild with a conjectured generalization to arbitrary backgrounds. The nine runs are stable and convergent, which is valuable empirical evidence, but stability of nine configurations is not a demonstration of robustness for a general numerical scheme. Please either provide a well-posedness analysis for the specific GH/characteristic formulation or explicitly restate the abstract and Sec. V claims as an empirical demonstration for the simulated families, clearly separating the eccentric and quasi-circular runs (which lack reference validation) from the reference-validated head-on family.
  2. [Sec. IV, Table II] The tail exponents p, amplitudes A, and offsets u0 are reported without uncertainties, and they are extracted from fits whose inputs include the QNM content list determined from the same waveform and the per-case fitting window. The residuals shown in Figs. 11-12 are comparable to the numerical error within the chosen window, but this does not quantify the sensitivity to mode-content selection, window placement, or the rational-filter time-shift correction. Moreover, the comparison with Ref. [136] is arithmetically inconsistent as written: if Ref. [136] reports strain exponents of -3.5 to -4.2, then the corresponding Psi_4 exponents are reduced by 2, so the values in Table II do not fall within that range. Please add a sensitivity analysis, report uncertainties, and correct the comparison.
  3. [Sec. III C and III D] The eccentric and quasi-circular simulations are presented as part of the nine successful CCM runs, but unlike the head-on and quasi-head-on cases they are not checked against causally disconnected large-domain reference simulations. For the eccentric run the paper shows long-term stability and constraint convergence, but accuracy is not directly established; for the quasi-circular run the CCM and CCE waveforms agree and no tail is visible. The abstract's general claim should therefore be qualified: accuracy validation applies to the seven (quasi-)head-on configurations, while the eccentric and quasi-circular runs provide stability evidence only, and the robustness claim should be stated accordingly.
  4. [Sec. II and Ref. [109]] The treatment of the gauge subset of u1^- relies on the assertion that these four incoming fields do not affect gravitational waves after transformation to the Bondi-Sachs frame. This assertion is supported by a citation to an in-preparation paper (Ref. [109]) and by a "modulo BMS" argument. Because the late-time tail in Figs. 11-12 is roughly ten orders of magnitude below the merger peak, even small discrete gauge reflections at the worldtube could contaminate the tail. Please quantify this risk, for example by comparing at least one configuration under alternative gauge boundary conditions or by showing that the CCM-reference agreement extends to the tail floor for all reference-validated runs.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Table I] The reference CPU hours are listed in the format (Cauchy)+(characteristic), but the meaning of the "+2" suffix is not explained; please clarify in the caption.
  2. [Eq. (5) and Table II] Please state the sign convention for u0 and the range of u over which u+u0 is positive, since the power-law model A(u+u0)^p is otherwise ambiguous.
  3. [Sec. II, Eq. (1)] The sentence "CCM is unnecessary here" for the constraint subset could be misunderstood; the text later explains that manual constraint injection may cause instability, but consider rephrasing to avoid the appearance that the constraint modes are not matched.

Circularity Check

2 steps flagged · score 3.0 of 10

Central CCM claim is independently validated against large-domain reference runs, so it is not circular; the tail parameters are honestly labeled fits, with only mild residual self-reference in the QNM-from-same-waveform decomposition and an unpublished self-citation for the gauge no-contamination claim.

  1. other [Sec. IV (Tail analysis with rational filters), QNM-identification paragraph and Table II]
    "We first apply the Fourier-analysis method from Sec. III B of [132] to identify QNMs in Ψℓ=2,m=0 4 . The extracted modes are listed in Table II. After filtering out the QNMs from the ringdown regime, the resulting filtered waveforms are shown as red curves in the upper panels of Figs. 11 and 12. Using the fitting windows listed in Table II, we find that each filtered waveform can be well described by a single power law: A(u +u0)p."

    The rational filters are built from QNM complex frequencies measured by Fourier analysis of the very same Ψℓ=2,m=0 4 time series whose QNM-free residual is then fit to Eq. (5), so A, u0, and p are best-fit descriptors of a residual of a decomposition chosen from the data itself, not independent predictions. The paper consistently labels them 'extracted fitting parameters' and defers any theoretical comparison to future work ('one can make theoretical predictions for the parameters in Eq. (5)... We leave these discussions for future work'). The authors acknowledge the related circularity (amplitude fitting needs a tail model) and mitigate it with frequency-only rational filters that 'break this circular dependency'; the fit is additionally checked against resolution error.

  2. self citation load bearing [Sec. II (Summary of CCM), gauge-subset paragraph (sentence citing Ref. [109])]
    "While this subset controls the dynamics of the Cauchy grids, it does not affect GWs [109] once transformed into the Bondi-Sachs frame (modulo BMS transformations [110, 111]), which represents inertial observers at future null infinity. Therefore, for waveform modeling, CCM is not required for this subset."

    The claim that the four gauge components of u1−, set by approximate Sommerfeld conditions at the CCM worldtube, cannot contaminate extracted waveforms is load-bearing for trusting late-time tails at roughly 1e-10 of the merger amplitude. The paper's justification is delegated to Ref. [109], an in-preparation paper by overlapping authors (Sun, Ma, Scheel, Teukolsky), rather than derived here. In-paper agreement with large-domain reference runs supports the physical sector empirically, so this is minor; however, the reference runs share the same characteristic-extraction code, so the gauge no-contamination statement itself rests on an unverifiable self-citation.

full rationale

The paper's central claim — that CCM stably, convergently, and accurately evolves BBH mergers on an effectively infinite domain — is not circular. For the (quasi-)head-on families it is validated against reference runs whose outer boundaries (4672-6000M) are causally disconnected from the extraction window, and the CCM-vs-reference differences are comparable to resolution-error estimates (Figs. 1 and 6); the GH constraint energy and the characteristic constraints CΨ0,1,2 converge with resolution (Figs. 3, 4, and 7). This is a nontrivial empirical result generated within the paper, not an output of the cited algorithm. The self-citation to Paper I [93] for the matching algorithm is load-bearing, but that algorithm is parameter-free with stated assumptions that do not include the BBH target, and the present reference comparisons make it externally falsifiable, so under the review rules it counts as real evidence rather than circularity. The tail analysis is the mildest self-referential part: QNM frequencies are measured from the same Ψ4 series whose QNM-free residual is then fit to A(u+u0)p, so A, u0, and p are fit values — which the paper itself consistently labels ('extracted fitting parameters') — not predictions; the paper explicitly breaks the amplitude-fit/tail-model loop via frequency-only rational filters and defers the theoretical comparison of Eq. (5) to future work. The one genuinely load-bearing self-citation is [109], an in-preparation paper by overlapping authors, used to justify that the Sommerfeld gauge boundary subset 'does not affect GWs'; the empirical reference agreement mitigates this, but the in-paper runs share the same characteristic-extraction code, so that specific claim rests on an unverifiable citation. The weak-hyperbolicity tension flagged in Sec. V is conceded by the authors and addressed by citing external work (Gundlach [92]), not a self-citation, which is a further sign of non-circularity. Overall score 3: the central claim has independent content, with two minor self-referential steps that the authors themselves either acknowledge or mitigate.

Assumptions & free parameters 6 free parameters · 7 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The core CCM claim is validated against large-domain references, so it does not rest on fitted parameters. The tail analysis, however, introduces five fitted or hand-chosen parameters per case (A, u0, p, window, QNM list) and one hard-coded initial-data constant. The main axioms are standard GR formulations plus the physical-subset reduction and the adequacy of the chosen initial data and gauge conditions.

free parameters (6)
  • Tail amplitude A = e.g., 22.7 eta (head-on); range 0.86-22.7 eta across cases
    Fitted to the QNM-filtered Psi4 in each case (Table II); controls the overall tail normalization.
  • Tail time offset u0 = 19.1M to 55.6M
    Fitted in Eq. (5); absorbs the time origin of the power-law tail.
  • Tail decay exponent p = -3.79 to -3.51
    Fitted in Eq. (5); the central phenomenological result.
  • Fitting window start = 50M or 80M
    Chosen per case in Table II; affects the extracted p and residuals.
  • QNM content list per system = e.g., (2,0,0,+-), (2,0,0,+-;2,0,0,+-), etc.
    Identified from the same waveform via Fourier analysis (Sec. IV) and used to construct the rational filters; a data-driven model choice.
  • Bondi time integration constant = 0
    Hard-coded to zero in SpECTRE's ConformalFactor initial data (Appendix A); sets the supertranslation freedom of the first characteristic slice.
assumptions (7)
  • standard math Vacuum Einstein equations in generalized harmonic gauge
    Used for the Cauchy evolution (Sec. II).
  • standard math The Bondi-Sachs characteristic formulation and the Einstein field equations in partially flat Bondi-like coordinates
    Used for the characteristic evolution (Sec. II, Appendix A).
  • domain assumption The two physical incoming characteristic fields u1- correspond to the two polarizations of backscattered radiation Psi0
    Inherited from Paper I; basis for the CCM matching (Sec. II).
  • domain assumption Gauge boundary conditions do not affect gravitational-wave observables at future null infinity
    Used to justify Sommerfeld conditions for the gauge subset (Sec. II); cited to Ref. [109].
  • domain assumption Reference simulations with outer boundary at 6000M are causally disconnected and approximate the exact infinite-domain result
    Used as the validation baseline (Sec. IIIA); if violated, the comparison is circular.
  • ad hoc to paper Characteristic initial data ansatz J = A/r + B/r^3 with ConformalFactor coordinate mapping is adequate
    Empirical initial-data construction (Appendix A); the paper notes a comprehensive ab initio solver is beyond scope.
  • domain assumption The exterior region is a perturbed Schwarzschild spacetime for identifying the physical subset
    Motivates the decomposition into constraint/physical/gauge subsets (Sec. II).

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Merging black holes with Cauchy-characteristic matching: Computation of late-time tails." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/KRYBK327

@misc{pith2026241206906,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Merging black holes with Cauchy-characteristic matching: Computation of late-time tails},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/KRYBK327}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.06906}
}
read the original abstract

Cauchy-characteristic matching (CCM) is a numerical-relativity technique that solves Einstein's equations on an effectively infinite computational domain, thereby eliminating systematic errors associated with artificial boundary conditions. Whether CCM can robustly handle fully nonlinear, dynamical spacetimes, such as binary black hole (BBH) mergers, has remained an open question. In this work, we provide a positive answer by presenting nine successful CCM simulations of BBHs; and demonstrate a key application of this method: computing late-time tails. Our results pave the path for systematic studies of late-time tails in BBH systems, and for producing highly accurate waveforms essential to next-generation gravitational-wave detectors.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2412.06906 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Top panel: Ψ ℓ=2,m=0 4 emitted from the equal-mass (q = 1) head-on BBH collision, simulated using CCE (blue) and CCM (black). The “High” resolution is used. They are compared to a reference system (red), whose outer boundary remains causally disconnected from the binary throughout the simulation. Bottom panel: The difference between the reference and CCM results (blue), along with an estimate of the numerical error … view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. CCM-extracted Ψ ℓ=2,m=0 4 , normalized by the sym￾metric mass ratio η [Eq. (3)], for the head-on collisions with various mass ratios (q = 1, 2, 4; see Table I). late times. To validate the CCM simulation, we conduct a reference simulation without CCM, whose outer bound￾ary, positioned at 6000M, remains causally disconnected from the system. This reference result (in red) nearly overlaps the black curve. The lower pa… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. L 2−norm of the Cauchy GH constraint energy for the equal-mass head-on collision, simulated with CCM (solid curves) and CCE (dashed curves) at three resolutions. The Cauchy time t is used. Besides waveform comparisons, we also assess the ac￾curacy of our CCM simulations by monitoring constraint violations. A CCM system consists of a Cauchy sector and a characteristic sector, each with its own constraints. For the Ca… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (8 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: L 2−norm of CΨ0 , CΨ1 , and CΨ2 , as defined in Eq. (4), for the equal-mass head-on collision, simulated with CCM (solid curves) and CCE (dashed curves) at three resolu￾tions. The retarded time u is used. e.g., [123, 124]): CΨ2 ≡ Ψ˙ 2 + 1 2 ðΨ3 − 1 4 h¯Ψ4, (4a) CΨ1 ≡ Ψ…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Trajectories of the BHs in the x − y plane for the (quasi-)head-on systems listed in Table I. The initial angular velocity is along the z−axis. Each system is labeled by the dimensionless spin (χf ) of the remnant Kerr BH [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Similar to Fig [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Similar to Figs. 3 and 4, L 2−norm of the Cauchy GH constraint energy (top left) and CΨ0 , CΨ1 , CΨ2 for the system in Fig. 6d, using CCM (solid curves) and CCE (dotted curves). until the QNMs have sufficiently decayed. However, this approach often results in unnecessa…
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Trajectories of the BHs in the x − y plane for the eccentric system listed in Table I. The initial angular velocity is along the z−axis. variable projection [134, 135] by separating linear parame￾ters from nonlinear ones. This step reduces a multidimen￾sional fitting p…
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Top panel: Ψ ℓ=m=2 4 from a quasi-circular collision, simulated using CCM (black) and CCE (red). Bottom panel: The difference between the two results (blue), compared to the numerical error (orange). 10 10 10 8 10 6 10 4 10 2 ª ` = 2; m = 0 4 Raw ª4 Filtered Power-law…
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Top panel: The raw (green) and filtered (red) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_11.png]
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Similar to Fig [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_12.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 11 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Foundations of Direct Waves in Schwarzschild Ringdown

    gr-qc 2026-07 accept novelty 7.0 of 10

    Direct waves in filtered Schwarzschild ringdown are the anti-causal filter-pole contribution sourced by near-horizon trajectory dynamics and do not vanish.

  2. Probing Direct Waves in Black Hole Ringdowns

    gr-qc 2025-09 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    Merger gravitational wave signals contain a 'direct wave' from the plunging companions, screened by the remnant's potential, with frequency near the superradiant value for high-spin remnants and SNR above 10 in GW1509...

  3. From spatial to null infinity: Connecting initial data to peeling

    gr-qc 2025-07 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    For asymptotically regular spacetimes, parity-time reversal symmetry of the leading and subleading initial data implies the Weyl scalars Psi2 and Psi1 peel at null infinity with rates 1/r^3 and 1/r^4.

  4. Quasinormal modes from numerical relativity with Bayesian inference

    gr-qc 2025-10 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A catalog-trained Gaussian-process noise model converts numerical-relativity waveforms into Bayesian quasinormal-mode fits with analytic posteriors and mode significances, demonstrated on CCE simulations.

  5. GW250114 reveals black hole horizon signatures

    gr-qc 2025-10 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    The merger signal of GW250114 contains a residual 'direct wave' component whose frequency and damping match the remnant horizon's rotation frequency and surface gravity.

  6. Gravitational-wave tails and memory effect for mergers in astrophysical environments

    gr-qc 2025-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A dark matter halo around a black hole amplifies the transient tail of a perturbation but leaves the asymptotic decay and the linear memory unchanged.

  7. Constraining deviations from the Teukolsky equation with GW250114

    gr-qc 2026-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    GW250114's fundamental ringdown mode bounds theory-agnostic deviations from the Teukolsky equation to be consistent with zero at characteristic scales of 60-100 km.

  8. Analysis of late-time tails in spin-aligned eccentric binary black hole mergers

    gr-qc 2025-11 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Late-time gravitational-wave tails from eccentric, spin-aligned black hole mergers decay as t^-(l+4) for psi4 in all six modes studied, with same-l modes sharing identical exponents.

  9. Quasinormal mode content of binary black hole ringdowns

    gr-qc 2025-10 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A Bayesian, evidence-based analysis of 13 simulated black-hole ringdowns tabulates which quasinormal overtones, retrograde modes, and nonlinear (quadratic and cubic) modes are present at each start time, and finds no ...

  10. The AdS Perspective on the Nonlinear Tails in Black Hole Ringdown

    gr-qc 2025-06 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    The known t^{-(2L+2)} nonlinear ringdown tail is rederived via AdS2 x S2, with a proposed but incorrectly normalized Aretakis amplitude relation.

  11. The Nonlinear Tails in Black Hole Ringdown: the Scattering Perspective

    gr-qc 2025-07 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    Nonlinear ringdown tails in the transverse-traceless gauge decay as t^{-(2ℓ+1)}, and this paper rederives that law from in-in scattering diagrams.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

147 extracted references · 26 canonical work pages · cited by 11 Pith papers

  1. [92]

    Gundlach, Simulations of gravitational collapse in null coordinates

    C. Gundlach, Simulations of gravitational collapse in null coordinates. III. Hyperbolicity, Phys. Rev. D110, 024020 (2024), arXiv:2404.16720 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2024

  2. [136]

    De Amicis, S

    M. De Amicis, S. Albanesi, and G. Carullo, Inspiral- inherited ringdown tails, Phys. Rev. D 110, 104005 (2024), arXiv:2406.17018 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2024

  3. [109]

    D. Sun, S. Ma, M. A. Scheel, and S. Teukolsky, Gauge boundary conditions to mitigate com drift in bbh simu- lations, in preparation

  4. [1]

    (LIGOScientific, Virgo),BinaryBlack Hole Mergers in the first Advanced LIGO Observing Run, Phys

    B.P.Abbott et al. (LIGOScientific, Virgo),BinaryBlack Hole Mergers in the first Advanced LIGO Observing Run, Phys. Rev. X6, 041015 (2016), [erratum: Phys. Rev.X8,no.3,039903(2018)], arXiv:1606.04856 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2016

  5. [2]

    B. P. Abbottet al. (LIGO Scientific, Virgo), GWTC-1: A Gravitational-Wave Transient Catalog of Compact Binary Mergers Observed by LIGO and Virgo during the First and Second Observing Runs, Phys. Rev.X9, 031040 (2019), arXiv:1811.12907 [astro-ph.HE]

    arXiv 2019

  6. [3]

    Abbott et al

    R. Abbott et al. (LIGO Scientific, Virgo), GWTC-2: Compact Binary Coalescences Observed by LIGO and Virgo During the First Half of the Third Observing Run, Phys. Rev. X11, 021053 (2021), arXiv:2010.14527 [gr-qc]. 5 The Bondi J was still constructed using Eq. (A1)

    arXiv 2021

  7. [4]

    Abbott et al

    R. Abbott et al. (LIGO Scientific, VIRGO, KAGRA), GWTC-3: Compact Binary Coalescences Observed by LIGO and Virgo During the Second Part of the Third Observing Run, (2021), arXiv:2111.03606 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2021

  8. [5]

    Aasi et al

    J. Aasi et al. (LIGO Scientific), Advanced LIGO, Class. Quant. Grav.32, 074001 (2015), arXiv:1411.4547 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2015

Show all 147 references
  1. [6]

    Acernese et al

    F. Acernese et al. (Virgo), Advanced Virgo: a second- generation interferometric gravitational wave detector, Class. Quant. Grav.32, 024001 (2015), arXiv:1408.3978 [gr-qc]

    2015 arXiv

  2. [7]

    Somiya (KAGRA), Detector configuration of KA- GRA: The Japanese cryogenic gravitational-wave detector, Class

    K. Somiya (KAGRA), Detector configuration of KA- GRA: The Japanese cryogenic gravitational-wave detector, Class. Quant. Grav. 29, 124007 (2012), arXiv:1111.7185 [gr-qc]

    2012 arXiv

  3. [8]

    Y. Pan, A. Buonanno, L. T. Buchman, T. Chu, L. E. Kid- der, H. P. Pfeiffer, and M. A. Scheel, Effective-one-body waveforms calibrated to numerical relativity simulations: coalescence of non-precessing, spinning, equal-mass black holes, Phys. Rev. D81, 084041 (2010), arXiv:0912...

    2010 arXiv

  4. [9]

    Bohé et al., Improved effective-one-body model of spinning, nonprecessing binary black holes for the era of gravitational-wave astrophysics with advanced detectors, Phys

    A. Bohé et al., Improved effective-one-body model of spinning, nonprecessing binary black holes for the era of gravitational-wave astrophysics with advanced detectors, Phys. Rev. D95, 044028 (2017), arXiv:1611.03703 [gr- qc]

    2017 arXiv

  5. [10]

    Pompili et al., Laying the foundation of the effective- one-body waveform models SEOBNRv5: Improved ac- curacy and efficiency for spinning nonprecessing bi- nary black holes, Phys

    L. Pompili et al., Laying the foundation of the effective- one-body waveform models SEOBNRv5: Improved ac- curacy and efficiency for spinning nonprecessing bi- nary black holes, Phys. Rev. D 108, 124035 (2023), arXiv:2303.18039 [gr-qc]

    2023 arXiv

  6. [11]

    Nagar et al., Time-domain effective-one-body gravi- tational waveforms for coalescing compact binaries with nonprecessing spins, tides and self-spin effects, Phys

    A. Nagar et al., Time-domain effective-one-body gravi- tational waveforms for coalescing compact binaries with nonprecessing spins, tides and self-spin effects, Phys. Rev. D 98, 104052 (2018), arXiv:1806.01772 [gr-qc]

    2018 arXiv

  7. [12]

    Nagar, G

    A. Nagar, G. Riemenschneider, G. Pratten, P. Rettegno, and F. Messina, Multipolar effective one body waveform model for spin-aligned black hole binaries, Phys. Rev. D 102, 024077 (2020), arXiv:2001.09082 [gr-qc]

    2020 arXiv

  8. [13]

    Blackman, S

    J. Blackman, S. E. Field, M. A. Scheel, C. R. Galley, C. D. Ott, M. Boyle, L. E. Kidder, H. P. Pfeiffer, and B. Szilágyi, Numerical relativity waveform surrogate model for generically precessing binary black hole merg- ers, Phys. Rev.D96, 024058 (2017), arXiv:1705.07089 [gr-qc]

    2017 arXiv

  9. [14]

    Varma, S

    V. Varma, S. E. Field, M. A. Scheel, J. Blackman, L. E. Kidder, and H. P. Pfeiffer, Surrogate model of hybridized numerical relativity binary black hole waveforms, Phys. Rev. D99, 064045 (2019), arXiv:1812.07865 [gr-qc]

    2019 arXiv

  10. [15]

    Varma, S

    V. Varma, S. E. Field, M. A. Scheel, J. Blackman, D. Gerosa, L. C. Stein, L. E. Kidder, and H. P. Pfeiffer, Surrogate models for precessing binary black hole sim- ulations with unequal masses, Phys. Rev. Research.1, 033015 (2019), arXiv:1905.09300 [gr-qc]

    2019 arXiv

  11. [16]

    Yoo et al., Numerical relativity surrogate model with memory effects and post-Newtonian hybridization, Phys

    J. Yoo et al., Numerical relativity surrogate model with memory effects and post-Newtonian hybridization, Phys. Rev. D 108, 064027 (2023), arXiv:2306.03148 [gr-qc]

    2023 arXiv

  12. [17]

    Abbott et al

    R. Abbott et al. (LIGO Scientific, Virgo), Population Properties of Compact Objects from the Second LIGO- Virgo Gravitational-Wave Transient Catalog, Astrophys. J. Lett. 913, L7 (2021), arXiv:2010.14533 [astro-ph.HE]

    2021 arXiv

  13. [18]

    (LIGOScientific, Virgo),Testsofgeneral relativity with binary black holes from the second LIGO- Virgo gravitational-wave transient catalog, Phys

    R.Abbott et al. (LIGOScientific, Virgo),Testsofgeneral relativity with binary black holes from the second LIGO- Virgo gravitational-wave transient catalog, Phys. Rev. D 103, 122002 (2021), arXiv:2010.14529 [gr-qc]. 14

    2021 arXiv

  14. [19]

    Abbott et al

    R. Abbott et al. (LIGO Scientific, Virgo), GW190521: A Binary Black Hole Merger with a Total Mass of150M⊙, Phys. Rev. Lett.125, 101102 (2020), arXiv:2009.01075 [gr-qc]

    2020

  15. [20]

    Abbott et al

    R. Abbott et al. (LIGO Scientific, Virgo), GW190412: Observation of a Binary-Black-Hole Coalescence with Asymmetric Masses, Phys. Rev. D102, 043015 (2020), arXiv:2004.08342 [astro-ph.HE]

    2020 arXiv

  16. [21]

    Abbott et al

    R. Abbott et al. (LIGO Scientific, Virgo), Properties and Astrophysical Implications of the 150 M⊙ Binary Black Hole Merger GW190521, Astrophys. J.900, L13 (2020), arXiv:2009.01190 [astro-ph.HE]

    2020

  17. [22]

    Abbott et al

    R. Abbott et al. (LIGO Scientific, VIRGO, KAGRA), Search for intermediate-mass black hole binaries in the third observing run of Advanced LIGO and Ad- vanced Virgo, Astron. Astrophys. 659, A84 (2022), arXiv:2105.15120 [astro-ph.HE]

    2022 arXiv

  18. [23]

    Abbott et al

    R. Abbott et al. (LIGO Scientific, VIRGO), Search for Lensing Signatures in the Gravitational-Wave Observa- tions from the First Half of LIGO–Virgo’s Third Observ- ing Run, Astrophys. J.923, 14 (2021), arXiv:2105.06384 [gr-qc]

    2021 arXiv

  19. [24]

    Pürrer and C.-J

    M. Pürrer and C.-J. Haster, Gravitational waveform accuracy requirements for future ground-based detectors, Phys. Rev. Res.2, 023151 (2020), arXiv:1912.10055 [gr- qc]

    2020 arXiv

  20. [25]

    T. W. Baumgarte and S. L. Shapiro,Numerical Rela- tivity: Solving Einstein ’s Equations on the Computer (Cambridge University Press, 2010)

    2010

  21. [26]

    E. W. Allen, E. Buckmiller, L. M. Burko, and R. H. Price, Radiation tails and boundary conditions for black hole evolutions, Phys. Rev. D70, 044038 (2004), arXiv:gr- qc/0401092

    2004

  22. [27]

    Dafermos and I

    M. Dafermos and I. Rodnianski, A Note on bound- ary value problems for black hole evolutions, (2004), arXiv:gr-qc/0403034

    2004 arXiv

  23. [28]

    Zenginoglu, Hyperboloidal evolution with the Ein- stein equations, Class

    A. Zenginoglu, Hyperboloidal evolution with the Ein- stein equations, Class. Quant. Grav.25, 195025 (2008), arXiv:0808.0810 [gr-qc]

    2008 arXiv

  24. [29]

    Rinne and V

    O. Rinne and V. Moncrief, Hyperboloidal Einstein- matterevolutionandtailsforscalarandYang-Millsfields, Class. Quant. Grav.30, 095009 (2013), arXiv:1301.6174 [gr-qc]

    2013 arXiv

  25. [30]

    Vañó Viñuales, S

    A. Vañó Viñuales, S. Husa, and D. Hilditch, Spher- ical symmetry as a test case for unconstrained hy- perboloidal evolution, Class. Quant. Grav.32, 175010 (2015), arXiv:1412.3827 [gr-qc]

    2015 arXiv

  26. [31]

    Vañó Viñuales and S

    A. Vañó Viñuales and S. Husa, Unconstrained hyper- boloidal evolution of black holes in spherical symmetry with GBSSN and Z4c, J. Phys. Conf. Ser.600, 012061 (2015), arXiv:1412.4801 [gr-qc]

    2015 arXiv

  27. [32]

    M. D. Morales and O. Sarbach, Evolution of scalar fields surrounding black holes on compactified constant mean curvature hypersurfaces, Phys. Rev. D95, 044001 (2017), arXiv:1609.05756 [gr-qc]

    2017 arXiv

  28. [33]

    Vañó Viñuales and T

    A. Vañó Viñuales and T. Valente, Height-function-based 4D reference metrics for hyperboloidal evolution, Gen. Rel. Grav. 56, 135 (2024), arXiv:2408.08952 [gr-qc]

    2024 arXiv

  29. [34]

    Peterson, S

    C. Peterson, S. Gautam, A. Vañó Viñuales, and D. Hilditch, Spherical Evolution of the Generalized Har- monic Gauge Formulation of General Relativity on Com- pactified Hyperboloidal Slices, (2024), arXiv:2409.02994 [gr-qc]

    2024 arXiv

  30. [35]

    Friedrich, Gravitational fields near space-like and null infinity, Journal of Geometry and Physics24, 83 (1998)

    H. Friedrich, Gravitational fields near space-like and null infinity, Journal of Geometry and Physics24, 83 (1998)

    1998

  31. [36]

    Frauendiener and C

    J. Frauendiener and C. Stevens, The non-linear pertur- bation of a black hole by gravitational waves. II. Quasi- normal modes and the compactification problem, Class. Quant. Grav. 40, 125006 (2023), arXiv:2211.13276 [gr- qc]

    2023 arXiv

  32. [37]

    Frauendiener, A

    J. Frauendiener, A. Goodenbour, and C. Stevens, The non-linear perturbation of a black hole by gravitational waves. III. Newman–Penrose constants, Class. Quant. Grav. 41, 065005 (2024), arXiv:2301.05268 [gr-qc]

    2024 arXiv

  33. [38]

    Frauendiener and C

    J. Frauendiener and C. Stevens, The non-linear pertur- bation of a black hole by gravitational waves. I. The Bondi–Sachs mass loss, Class. Quant. Grav.38, 194002 (2021), arXiv:2105.09515 [gr-qc]

    2021 arXiv

  34. [39]

    Frauendiener, C

    J. Frauendiener, C. Stevens, and S. Thwala, Fully non- linear gravitational wave simulations from past to future null-infinity, (2025), arXiv:2504.02188 [gr-qc]

    2025 arXiv

  35. [40]

    Winicour, Characteristic evolution and matching, Liv- ing Reviews in Relativity15, 1 (2012)

    J. Winicour, Characteristic evolution and matching, Liv- ing Reviews in Relativity15, 1 (2012)

    2012

  36. [41]

    N.T.Bishop,Numericalrelativity: combiningthecauchy and characteristic initial value problems, Classical and Quantum Gravity10, 333 (1993)

    1993

  37. [42]

    N. T. Bishop, R. Gomez, L. Lehner, and J. Winicour, Cauchy-characteristic extraction in numerical relativity, Phys. Rev. D54, 6153 (1996), arXiv:gr-qc/9705033 [gr- qc]

    1996 arXiv

  38. [43]

    N. T. Bishop, R. Gomez, L. Lehner, M. Maharaj, and J. Winicour, High powered gravitational news, Phys. Rev. D 56, 6298 (1997), arXiv:gr-qc/9708065

    1997 arXiv

  39. [44]

    N. T. Bishop, R. Gomez, L. Lehner, B. Szilagyi, J. Wini- cour,andR.A.Isaacson,Cauchycharacteristicmatching, in Black Holes, Gravitational Radiation and the Uni- verse: Essays in Honor of C.V. Vishveshwara , edited by B. R. Iyer and B. Bhawal (1998) pp. 383–408, arXiv:gr- qc/9801070

    1998

  40. [45]

    Barkett, J

    K. Barkett, J. Moxon, M. A. Scheel, and B. Szilágyi, Spectral Cauchy-Characteristic Extraction of the Gravi- tational Wave News Function, Phys. Rev. D102, 024004 (2020), arXiv:1910.09677 [gr-qc]

    2020 arXiv

  41. [46]

    Moxon, M

    J. Moxon, M. A. Scheel, and S. A. Teukolsky, Im- proved Cauchy-characteristic evolution system for high- precision numerical relativity waveforms, Phys. Rev. D 102, 044052 (2020), arXiv:2007.01339 [gr-qc]

    2020 arXiv

  42. [47]

    Moxon, M

    J. Moxon, M. A. Scheel, S. A. Teukolsky, N. Deppe, N. Fischer, F. Hébert, L. E. Kidder, and W. Throwe, SpECTRE Cauchy-characteristic evolution system for rapid, precise waveform extraction, Phys. Rev. D107, 064013 (2023), arXiv:2110.08635 [gr-qc]

    2023 arXiv

  43. [48]

    Corkill and J

    R. Corkill and J. Stewart, Numerical relativity. ii. numer- ical methods for the characteristic initial value problem and the evolution of the vacuum field equations for space– times with two killing vectors, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. A. Mathematical and Phys...

    1983

  44. [49]

    Friedrich and J

    H. Friedrich and J. M. Stewart, Characteristic initial data and wavefront singularities in general relativity, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. A. Mathe- matical and Physical Sciences385, 345 (1983)

    1983

  45. [50]

    J. M. Stewart, The characteristic initial value problem in general relativity, inAstrophysical Radiation Hydrody- namics, edited by K.-H. A. Winkler and M. L. Norman (Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht, 1986) pp. 531–568

    1986

  46. [51]

    Frittelli and E

    S. Frittelli and E. T. Newman, Singularities of wavefronts and lightcones in the context of GR via null foliations, 15 Twistor Newslett.43, 14 (1997), arXiv:gr-qc/0006077

    1997 arXiv

  47. [52]

    Bhagwat, M

    S. Bhagwat, M. Okounkova, S. W. Ballmer, D. A. Brown, M. Giesler, M. A. Scheel, and S. A. Teukolsky, On choos- ing the start time of binary black hole ringdowns, Phys. Rev. D97, 104065 (2018), arXiv:1711.00926 [gr-qc]

    2018 arXiv

  48. [53]

    T. W. Baumgarte, B. Brügmann, D. Cors, C. Gundlach, D. Hilditch, A. Khirnov, T. Ledvinka, S. Renkhoff, and I. S. Fernández, Critical Phenomena in the Collapse of Gravitational Waves, Phys. Rev. Lett.131, 181401 (2023), arXiv:2305.17171 [gr-qc]

    2023 arXiv

  49. [54]

    R. A. Isaacson, J. S. Welling, and J. Winicour, Null cone computation of gravitational radiation, Journal of Mathematical Physics 24, 1824 (1983)

    1983

  50. [55]

    N. T. Bishop, Some aspects of the characteristic initial value problem in numerical relativity., inApproaches to Numerical Relativity, edited by R. D’Inverno (1992) pp. 20–33

    1992

  51. [56]

    J.Winicour,Newtoniangravityonthenullcone.,Journal of Mathematical Physics24, 1193 (1983)

    1983

  52. [57]

    Winicour, Null infinity from a quasi-newtonian view, Journal of Mathematical Physics25, 2506 (1984)

    J. Winicour, Null infinity from a quasi-newtonian view, Journal of Mathematical Physics25, 2506 (1984)

    1984

  53. [58]

    Papadopoulos, and J

    N.T.Bishop, R.Gómez, P.R.Holvorcem, R.A.Matzner, P. Papadopoulos, and J. Winicour, Cauchy Characteris- tic Evolution and Waveforms, Journal of Computational Physics 136, 140 (1997)

    1997

  54. [59]

    Szilagyi, Cauchy characteristic matching in general relativity, Other thesis (2000), arXiv:gr-qc/0006091

    B. Szilagyi, Cauchy characteristic matching in general relativity, Other thesis (2000), arXiv:gr-qc/0006091

    2000 arXiv

  55. [60]

    Gomez, P

    R. Gomez, P. Papadopoulos, and J. Winicour, Null cone evolution of axisymmetric vacuum space–times, Journal of Mathematical Physics35, 4184 (1994)

    1994

  56. [61]

    Gomez, Gravitational wave forms with controlled accuracy, Phys

    R. Gomez, Gravitational wave forms with controlled accuracy, Phys. Rev. D 64, 024007 (2001), arXiv:gr- qc/0103011

    2001

  57. [62]

    N. T. Bishop and S. S. Deshingkar, New approach to calculating the news, Phys. Rev. D68, 024031 (2003), arXiv:gr-qc/0303021

    2003 arXiv

  58. [63]

    Reisswig, N

    C. Reisswig, N. T. Bishop, C. W. Lai, J. Thornburg, and B. Szilagyi, Numerical relativity with characteristic evolution, using six angular patches, Class. Quant. Grav. 24, S327 (2007), arXiv:gr-qc/0610019

    2007 arXiv

  59. [64]

    Gomez, W

    R. Gomez, W. Barreto, and S. Frittelli, A Framework for large-scale relativistic simulations in the charac- teristic approach, Phys. Rev. D 76, 124029 (2007), arXiv:0711.0564 [gr-qc]

    2007 arXiv

  60. [65]

    M. C. Babiuc, N. T. Bishop, B. Szilagyi, and J. Winicour, Strategies for the Characteristic Extraction of Gravi- tational Waveforms, Phys. Rev. D79, 084011 (2009), arXiv:0808.0861 [gr-qc]

    2009 arXiv

  61. [66]

    Reisswig, N

    C. Reisswig, N. T. Bishop, and D. Pollney, General relativistic null-cone evolutions with a high-order scheme, Gen. Rel. Grav.45, 1069 (2013), arXiv:1208.3891 [gr-qc]

    2013 arXiv

  62. [67]

    Reisswig, N

    C. Reisswig, N. T. Bishop, D. Pollney, and B. Szilagyi, Unambiguous determination of gravitational waveforms from binary black hole mergers, Phys. Rev. Lett.103, 221101 (2009), arXiv:0907.2637 [gr-qc]

    2009 arXiv

  63. [68]

    Reisswig, N

    C. Reisswig, N. T. Bishop, D. Pollney, and B. Szilagyi, Characteristic extraction in numerical relativity: bi- nary black hole merger waveforms at null infinity, Class. Quant. Grav.27, 075014 (2010), arXiv:0912.1285 [gr-qc]

    2010 arXiv

  64. [69]

    M. C. Babiuc, B. Szilagyi, J. Winicour, and Y. Zlochower, A Characteristic Extraction Tool for Gravitational Wave- forms, Phys. Rev. D84, 044057 (2011), arXiv:1011.4223 [gr-qc]

    2011 arXiv

  65. [70]

    M. C. Babiuc, J. Winicour, and Y. Zlochower, Binary Black Hole Waveform Extraction at Null Infinity, Class. Quant. Grav.28, 134006 (2011), arXiv:1106.4841 [gr-qc]

    2011 arXiv

  66. [71]

    C. J. Handmer and B. Szilagyi, Spectral Characteristic Evolution: A New Algorithm for Gravitational Wave Propagation, Class. Quant. Grav. 32, 025008 (2015), arXiv:1406.7029 [gr-qc]

    2015 arXiv

  67. [72]

    C. J. Handmer, B. Szilágyi, and J. Winicour, Gauge Invariant Spectral Cauchy Characteristic Extraction, Class. Quant. Grav.32, 235018 (2015), arXiv:1502.06987 [gr-qc]

    2015 arXiv

  68. [73]

    C. J. Handmer, B. Szilágyi, and J. Winicour, Spectral Cauchy Characteristic Extraction of strain, news and gravitational radiation flux, Class. Quant. Grav. 33, 225007 (2016), arXiv:1605.04332 [gr-qc]

    2016 arXiv

  69. [74]

    S. Ma, K. C. Nelli, J. Moxon, M. A. Scheel, N. Deppe, L. E. Kidder, W. Throwe, and N. L. Vu, Ein- stein–Klein–Gordon system via Cauchy-characteristic evolution: computation of memory and ringdown tail, Class. Quant. Grav.42, 055006 (2025), arXiv:2409.06141 [gr-qc]

    2025 arXiv

  70. [75]

    Mitman, J

    K. Mitman, J. Moxon, M. A. Scheel, S. A. Teukolsky, M. Boyle, N. Deppe, L. E. Kidder, and W. Throwe, Com- putation of displacement and spin gravitational memory in numerical relativity, Phys. Rev. D102, 104007 (2020), arXiv:2007.11562 [gr-qc]

    2020 arXiv

  71. [76]

    Mitman et al., A review of gravitational memory and BMS frame fixing in numerical relativity, Class

    K. Mitman et al., A review of gravitational memory and BMS frame fixing in numerical relativity, Class. Quant. Grav. 41, 223001 (2024), arXiv:2405.08868 [gr-qc]

    2024 arXiv

  72. [77]

    Papadopoulos, and J

    N.T.Bishop, R.Gomez, P.R.Holvorcem, R.A.Matzner, P. Papadopoulos, and J. Winicour, Cauchy-characteristic matching: A new approach to radiation boundary con- ditions, Phys. Rev. Lett.76, 4303 (1996)

    1996

  73. [78]

    M. R. Dubal, R. A. d’Inverno, and J. A. Vickers, Combining cauchy and characteristic codes. v. cauchy- characteristic matching for a spherical spacetime con- taining a perfect fluid, Phys. Rev. D58, 044019 (1998)

    1998

  74. [79]

    Gomez, P

    R. Gomez, P. Laguna, P. Papadopoulos, and J. Wini- cour, Cauchy characteristic evolution of Einstein-Klein- Gordon systems, Phys. Rev. D54, 4719 (1996), arXiv:gr- qc/9603060

    1996

  75. [80]

    C. J. S. Clarke, R. A. d’Inverno, and J. A. Vickers, Com- bining cauchy and characteristic codes. i. the vacuum cylindrically symmetric problem, Phys. Rev. D52, 6863 (1995)

    1995

  76. [81]

    M. R. Dubal, R. A. d’Inverno, and C. J. S. Clarke, Com- bining cauchy and characteristic codes. ii. the interface problem for vacuum cylindrical symmetry, Phys. Rev. D 52, 6868 (1995)

    1995

  77. [82]

    R. A. d’Inverno, M. R. Dubal, and E. A. Sarkies, Cauchy characteristic matching for a family of cylindrical vac- uum solutions possessing both gravitational degrees of freedom, Class. Quant. Grav.17, 3157 (2000), arXiv:gr- qc/0002057

    2000

  78. [83]

    R. A. d’Inverno and J. A. Vickers, Combining cauchy and characteristic codes. iii. the interface problem in axial symmetry, Phys. Rev. D54, 4919 (1996)

    1996

  79. [84]

    R. A. d’Inverno and J. A. Vickers, Combining cauchy and characteristic codes. iv. the characteristic field equations in axial symmetry, Phys. Rev. D56, 772 (1997)

    1997

  80. [85]

    A. M. Abrahamset al. (Binary Black Hole Grand Chal- lenge Alliance), Gravitational wave extraction and outer boundary conditions by perturbative matching, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 1812 (1998), arXiv:gr-qc/9709082

    1998 arXiv

  81. [86]

    M. E. Rupright, A. M. Abrahams, and L. Rezzolla, 16 Cauchy perturbative matching and outer boundary con- ditions. 1. Methods and tests, Phys. Rev. D58, 044005 (1998), arXiv:gr-qc/9802011

    1998 arXiv

  82. [87]

    Rezzolla, A

    L. Rezzolla, A. M. Abrahams, R. A. Matzner, M. E. Rupright, and S. L. Shapiro, Cauchy perturbative match- ing and outer boundary conditions: Computational studies, Phys. Rev. D 59, 064001 (1999), arXiv:gr- qc/9807047

    1999

  83. [88]

    Giannakopoulos, Characteristic formulations of gen- eral relativity and applications , Other thesis (2023), arXiv:2308.16001 [gr-qc]

    T. Giannakopoulos, Characteristic formulations of gen- eral relativity and applications , Other thesis (2023), arXiv:2308.16001 [gr-qc]

    2023 arXiv

  84. [89]

    Giannakopoulos, D

    T. Giannakopoulos, D. Hilditch, and M. Zilhao, Hyper- bolicity of General Relativity in Bondi-like gauges, Phys. Rev. D 102, 064035 (2020), arXiv:2007.06419 [gr-qc]

    2020 arXiv

  85. [90]

    Zilhao, Gauge structure of the Einstein field equations in Bondi-like coordinates, Phys

    T.Giannakopoulos, N.T.Bishop, D.Hilditch, D.Pollney, and M. Zilhao, Gauge structure of the Einstein field equations in Bondi-like coordinates, Phys. Rev. D105, 084055 (2022), arXiv:2111.14794 [gr-qc]

    2022 arXiv

  86. [91]

    Zilhão, Numerical convergence of model Cauchy- characteristic extraction and matching, Phys

    T.Giannakopoulos, N.T.Bishop, D.Hilditch, D.Pollney, and M. Zilhão, Numerical convergence of model Cauchy- characteristic extraction and matching, Phys. Rev. D 108, 104033 (2023), arXiv:2306.13010 [gr-qc]

    2023 arXiv

  87. [93]

    Ma et al., Fully relativistic three-dimensional Cauchy- characteristic matching for physical degrees of freedom, Phys

    S. Ma et al., Fully relativistic three-dimensional Cauchy- characteristic matching for physical degrees of freedom, Phys. Rev. D109, 124027 (2024), arXiv:2308.10361 [gr- qc]

    2024 arXiv

  88. [94]

    R. H. Price, Nonspherical perturbations of relativistic gravitational collapse. i. scalar and gravitational pertur- bations, Phys. Rev. D5, 2419 (1972)

    1972

  89. [95]

    E.W.Leaver,Spectraldecompositionoftheperturbation response of the schwarzschild geometry, Phys. Rev. D 34, 384 (1986)

    1986

  90. [96]

    K. S. Thorne and S. J. Kovacs, The generation of gravi- tational waves. I. Weak-field sources., Astrophys. J.200, 245 (1975)

    1975

  91. [97]

    K. S. Thorne, Multipole expansions of gravitational ra- diation, Rev. Mod. Phys.52, 299 (1980)

    1980

  92. [98]

    Blanchet and T

    L. Blanchet and T. Damour, Tail-transported temporal correlations in the dynamics of a gravitating system, Phys. Rev. D37, 1410 (1988)

    1988

  93. [99]

    Lindblom, M

    L. Lindblom, M. A. Scheel, L. E. Kidder, R. Owen, and O. Rinne, A New generalized harmonic evolution system, Class. Quant. Grav.23, S447 (2006), arXiv:gr- qc/0512093 [gr-qc]

    2006

  94. [100]

    L. E. Kidder, L. Lindblom, M. A. Scheel, L. T. Buch- man, and H. P. Pfeiffer, Boundary conditions for the Ein- stein evolution system, Phys. Rev.D71, 064020 (2005), arXiv:gr-qc/0412116 [gr-qc]

    2005 arXiv

  95. [101]

    L. T. Buchman and O. C. A. Sarbach, Towards absorb- ing outer boundaries in general relativity, Class. Quant. Grav. 23, 6709 (2006), arXiv:gr-qc/0608051

    2006 arXiv

  96. [102]

    L. T. Buchman and O. C. A. Sarbach, Improved outer boundary conditions for Einstein’s field equations, Class. Quant. Grav. 24, S307 (2007), arXiv:gr-qc/0703129

    2007 arXiv

  97. [103]

    Rinne, L

    O. Rinne, L. T. Buchman, M. A. Scheel, and H. P. Pfeif- fer, Implementation of higher-order absorbing boundary conditions for the Einstein equations, Class. Quant. Grav. 26, 075009 (2009), arXiv:0811.3593 [gr-qc]

    2009 arXiv

  98. [104]

    L. T. Buchman, M. D. Duez, M. Morales, M. A. Scheel, T. M. Kostersitz, A. M. Evans, and K. Mitman, Numer- ical relativity multimodal waveforms using absorbing boundary conditions, Class. Quant. Grav.41, 175011 (2024), arXiv:2402.12544 [gr-qc]

    2024 arXiv

  99. [105]

    Rinne, Stable radiation-controlling boundary con- ditions for the generalized harmonic Einstein equa- tions, Class

    O. Rinne, Stable radiation-controlling boundary con- ditions for the generalized harmonic Einstein equa- tions, Class. Quant. Grav. 23, 6275 (2006), arXiv:gr- qc/0606053 [gr-qc]

    2006

  100. [106]

    Rinne, L

    O. Rinne, L. Lindblom, and M. A. Scheel, Testing outer boundary treatments for the Einstein equations, Class. Quant. Grav. 24, 4053 (2007), arXiv:0704.0782 [gr-qc]

    2007 arXiv

  101. [107]

    Dailey, E

    C. Dailey, E. Schnetter, and N. Afshordi, Formulating the complete initial boundary value problem in numerical relativity to model black hole echoes, Class. Quant. Grav. 42, 025002 (2025), arXiv:2409.17970 [gr-qc]

    2025 arXiv

  102. [108]

    Szilagyi, L

    B. Szilagyi, L. Lindblom, and M. A. Scheel, Simulations of Binary Black Hole Mergers Using Spectral Methods, Phys. Rev. D80, 124010 (2009), arXiv:0909.3557 [gr-qc]

    2009 arXiv

  103. [110]

    Bondi, M

    H. Bondi, M. G. J. van der Burg, and A. W. K. Metzner, Gravitational Waves in General Relativity. VII. Waves from Axi-Symmetric Isolated Systems, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series A269, 21 (1962)

    1962

  104. [111]

    R. K. Sachs, Gravitational waves in general relativity viii. waves in asymptotically flat space-time, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences270, 103 (1962)

    1962

  105. [112]

    Szilágyi, J

    B. Szilágyi, J. Blackman, A. Buonanno, A. Taracchini, H. P. Pfeiffer, M. A. Scheel, T. Chu, L. E. Kidder, and Y. Pan, Approaching the Post-Newtonian Regime with Numerical Relativity: A Compact-Object Binary Simu- lation Spanning 350 Gravitational-Wave Cycles, Phys. Rev. Lett. ...

    2015 arXiv

  106. [113]

    Deppe, W

    N. Deppe, W. Throwe, L. E. Kidder, N. L. Vu, K. C. Nelli, et al., Spectre, 10.5281/zenodo.10967177 (2024)

    2024 doi

  107. [114]

    org/SpEC.html

    The Spectral Einstein Code,http://www.black-holes. org/SpEC.html

  108. [115]

    Lovelace et al., Simulating binary black hole mergers using discontinuous Galerkin methods, Class

    G. Lovelace et al., Simulating binary black hole mergers using discontinuous Galerkin methods, Class. Quant. Grav. 42, 035001 (2025), arXiv:2410.00265 [gr-qc]

    2025 arXiv

  109. [116]

    Szilágyi, Key Elements of Robustness in Binary Black Hole Evolutions using Spectral Methods, Int

    B. Szilágyi, Key Elements of Robustness in Binary Black Hole Evolutions using Spectral Methods, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D23, 1430014 (2014), arXiv:1405.3693 [gr-qc]

    2014 arXiv

  110. [117]

    J. W. York, Jr., Conformal ’thin sandwich’ data for the initial-value problem, Phys. Rev. Lett.82, 1350 (1999), arXiv:gr-qc/9810051 [gr-qc]

    1999 arXiv

  111. [118]

    H. P. Pfeiffer and J. W. York, Jr., Extrinsic curvature and the Einstein constraints, Phys. Rev.D67, 044022 (2003), arXiv:gr-qc/0207095 [gr-qc]

    2003 arXiv

  112. [119]

    H. P. Pfeiffer, The Initial value problem in numerical rel- ativity, J. Hyperbol. Diff. Equat.2, 497 (2005), arXiv:gr- qc/0412002

    2005

  113. [120]

    Varma, M

    V. Varma, M. A. Scheel, and H. P. Pfeiffer, Comparison of binary black hole initial data sets, Phys. Rev.D98, 104011 (2018), arXiv:1808.08228 [gr-qc]

    2018 arXiv

  114. [121]

    Boyle, Transformations of asymptotic gravitational- wave data, Phys

    M. Boyle, Transformations of asymptotic gravitational- wave data, Phys. Rev. D93, 084031 (2016), arXiv:1509.00862 [gr-qc]

    2016 arXiv

  115. [122]

    De Amiciset al., Late-time tails in nonlinear evolu- tions of merging black holes, (2024), arXiv:2412.06887 [gr-qc]

    M. De Amiciset al., Late-time tails in nonlinear evolu- tions of merging black holes, (2024), arXiv:2412.06887 [gr-qc]

    2024

  116. [123]

    Ashtekar, T

    A. Ashtekar, T. De Lorenzo, and N. Khera, Compact binary coalescences: Constraints on waveforms, Gen. Rel. Grav. 52, 107 (2020), arXiv:1906.00913 [gr-qc]. 17

    2020 arXiv

  117. [124]

    D. A. B. Iozzo, M. Boyle, N. Deppe, J. Moxon, M. A. Scheel, L. E. Kidder, H. P. Pfeiffer, and S. A. Teukol- sky, Extending gravitational wave extraction using Weyl characteristic fields, Phys. Rev. D103, 024039 (2021), arXiv:2010.15200 [gr-qc]

    2021 arXiv

  118. [125]

    H. P. Pfeiffer, D. A. Brown, L. E. Kidder, L. Lindblom, G. Lovelace, and M. A. Scheel, Reducing orbital eccen- tricity in binary black hole simulations,New frontiers in numerical relativity. Proceedings, International Meet- ing, NFNR 2006, Potsdam, Germany, July 17-21, 2006 , ...

    2007 arXiv

  119. [126]

    Buonanno, L

    A. Buonanno, L. E. Kidder, A. H. Mroue, H. P. Pfeif- fer, and A. Taracchini, Reducing orbital eccentricity of precessing black-hole binaries, Phys. Rev.D83, 104034 (2011), arXiv:1012.1549 [gr-qc]

    2011 arXiv

  120. [127]

    A. H. Mroue and H. P. Pfeiffer, Precessing Binary Black Holes Simulations: Quasicircular Initial Data, (2012), arXiv:1210.2958 [gr-qc]

    2012 arXiv

  121. [128]

    S. Ma, K. Mitman, L. Sun, N. Deppe, F. Hébert, L. E. Kidder, J. Moxon, W. Throwe, N. L. Vu, and Y. Chen, Quasinormal-mode filters: A new approach to analyze the gravitational-wave ringdown of binary black-hole mergers, Phys. Rev. D106, 084036 (2022), arXiv:2207.10870 [gr-qc]

    2022 arXiv

  122. [129]

    S. Ma, L. Sun, and Y. Chen, Black Hole Spectroscopy by Mode Cleaning, Phys. Rev. Lett.130, 141401 (2023), arXiv:2301.06705 [gr-qc]

    2023 arXiv

  123. [130]

    S. Ma, L. Sun, and Y. Chen, Using rational filters to uncover the first ringdown overtone in GW150914, Phys. Rev. D 107, 084010 (2023), arXiv:2301.06639 [gr-qc]

    2023 arXiv

  124. [131]

    https://github.com/Sizheng-Ma/qnm_filter

  125. [132]

    T. May, S. Ma, J. L. Ripley, and W. E. East, Nonlinear effect of absorption on the ringdown of a spinning black hole, Phys. Rev. D110, 084034 (2024), arXiv:2405.18303 [gr-qc]

    2024 arXiv

  126. [133]

    Khera, S

    N. Khera, S. Ma, and H. Yang, Quadratic Mode Cou- plings in Rotating Black Holes and Their Detectability, (2024), arXiv:2410.14529 [gr-qc]

    2024 arXiv

  127. [134]

    D. P. O’Leary and B. W. Rust, Variable projection for nonlinear least squares problems, Computational Opti- mization and Applications54, 579 (2013)

    2013

  128. [135]

    Giesler et al., Overtones and Nonlinearities in Binary Black Hole Ringdowns, (2024), arXiv:2411.11269 [gr-qc]

    M. Giesler et al., Overtones and Nonlinearities in Binary Black Hole Ringdowns, (2024), arXiv:2411.11269 [gr-qc]

    2024 arXiv

  129. [137]

    Cardoso, G

    V. Cardoso, G. Carullo, M. De Amicis, F. Duque, T. Katagiri, D. Pereniguez, J. Redondo-Yuste, T. F. M. Spieksma, and Z. Zhong, Hushing black holes: Tails in dynamical spacetimes, Phys. Rev. D109, L121502 (2024), arXiv:2405.12290 [gr-qc]

    2024 arXiv

  130. [138]

    Okuzumi, K

    S. Okuzumi, K. Ioka, and M.-a. Sakagami, Possible Discovery of Nonlinear Tail and Quasinormal Modes in Black Hole Ringdown, Phys. Rev. D77, 124018 (2008), arXiv:0803.0501 [gr-qc]

    2008 arXiv

  131. [139]

    S. R. Green, F. Carrasco, and L. Lehner, Holographic Path to the Turbulent Side of Gravity, Phys. Rev. X4, 011001 (2014), arXiv:1309.7940 [hep-th]

    2014 arXiv

  132. [140]

    H. Yang, A. Zimmerman, A. Zenginoğlu, F. Zhang, E. Berti, and Y. Chen, Quasinormal modes of nearly extremal Kerr spacetimes: spectrum bifurcation and power-law ringdown, Phys. Rev. D88, 044047 (2013), arXiv:1307.8086 [gr-qc]

    2013 arXiv

  133. [141]

    Ma and H

    S. Ma and H. Yang, Excitation of quadratic quasinormal modes for Kerr black holes, Phys. Rev. D109, 104070 (2024), arXiv:2401.15516 [gr-qc]

    2024 arXiv

  134. [142]

    Albanesi, S

    S. Albanesi, S. Bernuzzi, T. Damour, A. Nagar, and A. Placidi, Faithful effective-one-body waveform of small- mass-ratio coalescing black hole binaries: The eccentric, nonspinning case, Phys. Rev. D 108, 084037 (2023), arXiv:2305.19336 [gr-qc]

    2023 arXiv

  135. [143]

    Islam, G

    T. Islam, G. Faggioli, G. Khanna, S. E. Field, M. van de Meent, and A. Buonanno, Phenomenology and origin of late-time tails in eccentric binary black hole mergers, (2024), arXiv:2407.04682 [gr-qc]

    2024

  136. [144]

    Szilagyi and J

    B. Szilagyi and J. Winicour, Well posed initial boundary evolution in general relativity, Phys. Rev. D68, 041501 (2003), arXiv:gr-qc/0205044

    2003 arXiv

  137. [145]

    https://spectre-code.org/structCce_1_ 1InitializeJ_1_1ConformalFactor.html

  138. [146]

    Bishop, D

    N. Bishop, D. Pollney, and C. Reisswig, Initial data transients in binary black hole evolutions, Class. Quant. Grav. 28, 155019 (2011), arXiv:1101.5492 [gr-qc]

    2011 arXiv

  139. [147]

    E. E. Flanagan and D. A. Nichols, Conserved charges of the extended Bondi-Metzner-Sachs algebra, Phys. Rev. D 95, 044002 (2017), [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 108, 069902 (2023)], arXiv:1510.03386 [hep-th]

    2017 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.