Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 3 cited by

Astrophysical halos can amplify post-merger gravitational-wave tails by an order of magnitude without changing the net memory or the late-time decay.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

A dark matter halo around a black hole amplifies the transient tail of a perturbation but leaves the asymptotic decay and the linear memory unchanged.

T0 review reviewed 2026-08-05 challenge →

load-bearing objection A clean scalar-toy-model study showing halo environments change transient tails but not asymptotic decay or linear memory; the abstract's gravitational-wave framing is stronger than the scalar computation supports. the 2 major comments →

arxiv 2508.20238 v1 pith:EMC3MLYC submitted 2025-08-27 gr-qc astro-ph.HEphysics.space-ph

Gravitational-wave tails and memory effect for mergers in astrophysical environments

Qassim Alnasheet , Vitor Cardoso , Francisco Duque , Rodrigo Panosso Macedo This is my paper
classification gr-qc astro-ph.HEphysics.space-ph
keywords gravitational-wave tailsmemory effectastrophysical environmentsdark matter haloslate-time decayscalar perturbationsblack hole mergerswave dark matter
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Late-time tails and linear memory are low-frequency gravitational-wave features that could, in principle, be shaped by structures at galactic scales. This paper tries to establish that an astrophysical halo around a black hole can strongly alter the transient, intermediate part of the tail while leaving the final asymptotic decay and the net memory unchanged. Working with scalar perturbations on a fixed, spherically symmetric halo spacetime, it finds that for a halo compactness of about 0.1 the early tail amplitude grows by at least an order of magnitude relative to vacuum, maximized for halo scales around 100–200 black-hole masses, and that source-driven tails from a plunging particle are enhanced even more. For realistic galaxies the effect is negligible, but overdense wave-dark-matter environments could make it relevant. If the scalar-to-gravitational extrapolation holds, tails become a cleaner environmental probe than memory; the paper itself notes that this extrapolation is an expectation rather than a derivation.

Core claim

The central discovery is that the tail's intermediate transient—not the asymptotic tail—is where the environment leaves its imprint. For a halo of compactness C = M_H/a_H = 0.1, the amplitude of the tail that follows the prompt ringdown is at least an order of magnitude larger than in vacuum, with the largest initial tail amplitudes occurring for halo sizes a_H ~ 100–200 black-hole masses, a preference that depends on the multipole. Larger halo masses also slow the approach to the vacuum power law. For a point scalar charge plunging radially into the halo, source-driven tails are enhanced even more relative to vacuum, while the constant plateau that is the linear memory is essentially the sa

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is a static, spherically symmetric black-hole spacetime dressed by an anisotropic-fluid halo, parameterized by halo mass M_H and scale a_H, with compactness C = M_H/a_H. A massless scalar field—or a radially plunging scalar charge—is evolved on this fixed background using hyperboloidal slicing, so the waveform is read directly at future null infinity. The argument about why the asymptotics are environment-independent rests on the expansion of the effective potential, V = ℓ(ℓ+1)/r^2 + 2(M_BH+M_H)[1−ℓ(ℓ+1)]/r^3 + O(1/r^4): the leading term matches vacuum, while the 1/r^3 correction grows with halo mass and delays, but does not change, the late-time Price decay.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that a massless scalar field is a faithful stand-in for gravitational waves: the paper solves only scalar equations and expects, but does not prove, that tensor gravitational waves behave similarly.

What would settle it

A direct test: evolve the tensor metric-perturbation equations on the same halo background, with the same Gaussian initial data and a quadrupole plunging source, and compare tail amplitudes against vacuum. If at compactness C = 0.1 there is no order-of-magnitude tail enhancement for some halo scale, the scalar-to-gravitational extrapolation collapses. A second, more complete check is a numerical-relativity binary merger inside a wave-dark-matter overdensity, with the post-merger tail measured at future null infinity rather than inferred from the scalar toy model.

Watch this falsifier. Get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • Future low-frequency gravitational-wave detectors could see boosted tail transients from mergers inside dense, compact environments; at C = 0.1 the enhancement is at least a factor of ten, and it can be far larger for source-driven tails.
  • The net linear memory and the very late power-law decay remain vacuum-like, so memory measurements would not require a detailed halo model.
  • Tails are the more sensitive environmental probe: the transient tail depends on halo compactness, scale, and multipole, whereas the memory plateau does not.
  • For ordinary galaxies (C ~ 10^-6 to 10^-7) the effect is negligible, so vacuum tail predictions remain valid; only overdensities such as wave-dark-matter clumps could make the effect observable.
  • Extrapolating the asymptotic vacuum tail to the transient part of a signal would introduce errors in environments; the transient regime must be treated separately.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The numerical experiments are scalar-field and single-particle evolutions, not tensor binary-merger simulations. If tensor tails do not inherit the same halo sensitivity—different potential, different source coupling, different zero-frequency behavior—the gravitational-wave claims fail; a direct tensor computation is the natural check.
  • The a_H ~ 100–200 tuning and its multipole dependence suggest an interference effect between ringdown wavelengths and the halo scale; a semi-analytic model of that interference could predict optimal halo scales for each multipole and might be testable in full numerical relativity.
  • Because the total memory is environment-independent while the transient tail is not, the two observables are complementary: memory can calibrate the source, and the tail transient can then isolate the environment.
  • The paper's estimate that wave-dark-matter overdensities could reach C ~ 5 x 10^-3 assumes a spherically uniform central clump; a non-spherical, dynamical clump could strengthen or weaken the tail boost, so evolving a binary in such a profile is a concrete next test.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper studies late-time tails and the linear memory effect for scalar-field perturbations on a Schwarzschild black hole surrounded by an anisotropic-fluid dark-matter halo, using two independent hyperboloidal numerical codes. The authors evolve both Gaussian initial data (tail-dominated) and a radially plunging scalar charge (source-driven tails and memory). Their main numerical findings are: (i) the transient tail amplitude and the intermediate power-law decay depend on the halo parameters, with enhancement that can exceed an order of magnitude for halo compactness C=0.1 and a maximum around halo scale a_H~100-200 M_BH; (ii) the asymptotic late-time decay always returns to the vacuum Price power law, consistent with the expansion of the effective potential in Eq. (18); (iii) the scalar linear memory plateau is approximately independent of the environment for small compactness, but appears not fully converged for the largest compactness considered. The paper frames these scalar results as expectations for gravitational-wave tails and memory from compact-object mergers, while explicitly acknowledging that only scalar perturbations were computed.

Significance. If the scalar-to-tensor transfer were established, the results would be relevant for low-frequency gravitational-wave observatories and for merger environments such as wave dark-matter overdensities. The numerical infrastructure is a clear strength: two independent hyperboloidal formulations (finite-difference and spectral) cross-check the results, the evolutions are long and stable enough to recover the known vacuum Price decay, and Eq. (18) provides a simple, concrete analytic explanation for the environment-dependent approach to the asymptotic tail. The paper is also honest about the simplified scalar model and provides realistic compactness estimates (C~1e-6 to 1e-7 for the Milky Way) that contextualize the astrophysical relevance. However, because the central abstract claims are phrased in terms of gravitational waves while the only dynamical computation is scalar, the significance depends on an extrapolation that is acknowledged but not derived.

major comments (2)
  1. [Sec. III B and Appendix A] The abstract's central claims concern gravitational-wave tails and memory from mergers, but the only dynamical calculation is for a massless scalar field (Eqs. 6-10) with a scalar-charge source (Eq. 21). The paper itself states: 'We investigate only linear, scalar tails and memory driven by a scalar charge. We expect the gravitational case to display similar features.' This expectation is not derived. Tensor perturbations obey different effective potentials (Regge-Wheeler/Zerilli) and different source couplings, and Appendix A itself shows a qualitative difference in the zero-frequency limit: for δ=0 the scalar memory is finite even at zero incoming velocity (Eq. A4), whereas gravitational linear memory requires a finite velocity change. Thus the environment-independence of the scalar memory plateau does not logically transfer to gravitational memory. A tensor perturbation computation, o
  2. [Sec. III B, Fig. 2] The abstract states categorically that the memory (the difference between the amplitude asymptotically early and late) is independent of the properties of the environment. This is weakened by the body text: 'for larger masses and compactnesses (C=0.1), the memory effect appears to not have fully converged (i.e. the initial plateau is not horizontal).' The key quantity is therefore not reliably measured in the regime where environmental effects are strongest. The conclusion should be restricted to low compactness or supplemented by explicit convergence tests, and the abstract should be adjusted accordingly.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Throughout] Several typographical errors: 'wtih' below Eq. (10), 'Chyebyshev' in Sec. II A, 'trivialy' in Sec. III B. The phrase 'independent on' (abstract, and similar places) should be 'independent of'.
  2. [Eq. (10) and below] The prime in Eq. (10) is said to denote a derivative with respect to r, but the tortoise coordinate r* was defined just above; explicitly state that the derivative is with respect to r to avoid ambiguity.
  3. [Fig. 2] The multiple panels in Fig. 2 are distinguished only by varying parameter values; adding labels within each panel (e.g., C, r0, E_p) would improve readability, since the caption does not list panel-specific parameters.
  4. [Appendix A] The Fourier convention in Eq. (A2) is not defined, and the notation δ (charge conservation factor) and primed quantities should be defined more explicitly. Also, the sentence 'We discussed fluxes, but note...' is informal for a journal article.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; central results are numerical outputs of a specified scalar-field model, with only minor self-citation of background and numerical methods.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is: specify a halo spacetime (Eqs. 1–4) taken from prior work; evolve a minimally coupled scalar field via Eq. (8) with the effective potential of Eq. (10); extract tails and memory at null infinity. The asymptotic late-time decay conclusion follows from an explicit expansion of the potential (Eq. 18) plus a cited external theorem (Refs. [6,37]) that any potential differing from vacuum by terms 1/r^α with α≥3 yields the same Price power-law. This is a deductive step, not a circular restatement. The claimed tail enhancement and the environment-insensitive memory plateau are direct outputs of the numerical evolutions, not fitted parameters and not renamed inputs. No equation defines the memory in terms of the halo parameters, and the paper explicitly qualifies the memory result at high compactness ("the memory effect appears to not have fully converged"). The scalar-to-gravitational extrapolation is explicitly flagged as an expectation ("We expect the gravitational case to display similar features"), which is a limitation of scope, not a circularity. The halo metric (Ref. [15]) and hyperboloidal framework (Refs. [30,31]) are self-cited as physical and numerical inputs; they are load-bearing as modeling choices but do not logically force the conclusions. There is no fitted parameter renamed as a prediction, no uniqueness theorem imported from the authors, and no ansatz smuggled in via citation. Thus the central results are self-contained numerical outputs, and only a minor degree of self-citation is present, warranting score 1.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

4 free parameters · 5 axioms · 0 invented entities

The ledger shows the paper rests on five structural inputs: an adopted halo background, a scalar-to-gravitational proxy that is asserted, a fixed-background linearization, a cited theorem on asymptotic decay, and a zero-frequency picture of memory. The free parameters are all scanned inputs, none fitted to data; the central new content is numerical and not forced by these inputs, though the halo model itself is self-cited from the authors' prior work. No new particles, forces, or fields are introduced; the wave-dark-matter overdensities are read from Ref. [47], and the superradiance-based speculation in Sec. IV is a conjecture about an existing mechanism, not an invented entity.

free parameters (4)
  • halo mass M_H = scanned: M_H varies with the (C, aH) combinations in Figs. 1-2
    Input parameter of the halo model (Ref. [15]); scanned, not fitted. The tail-enhancement magnitude is a function of M_H through the compactness and the 1/r^3 potential coefficient in Eq. (18).
  • halo scale a_H = 10 to 1000 M_BH
    Input length scale of the halo profile; scanned. The paper finds an optimal aH ~ 100-200 (with ell dependence) that maximizes transient tail excitation; this optimum is a numerical finding, not a fitted constant.
  • halo compactness C = M_H/a_H = 0.1, 0.01, 0.001 (plus Milky Way estimate ~1e-7)
    Derived combination used to characterize environments and to argue astrophysical irrelevance for galaxies and possible relevance for wave-dark-matter overdensities (C ~ 4e5 rho0 estimate in Sec. IV).
  • initial data and source parameters (r0, lambda, E_p) = r0 in {50, 150, 200, 2000}, lambda in {1, 10}, E_p in {1.25, 1.5, 2}
    Gaussian pulse and point-particle parameters scanned to test robustness; the claim that the aH optimum is independent of these but depends on ell is based on this scan.
axioms (5)
  • domain assumption The halo spacetime of Ref. [15] (Eqs. 1-4) is a valid background: spherically symmetric BH plus anisotropic fluid, with the given f, g, m
    Adopted from the authors' own previous work; the qualitative independence of results from the density profile is asserted, not proven.
  • ad hoc to paper A minimally coupled massless scalar field is a sufficient proxy for gravitational perturbations for the purposes of tails and linear memory
    Sec. III B: 'We investigate only linear, scalar tails and memory driven by a scalar charge. We expect the gravitational case to display similar features.' The gravitational (tensor) potential, source coupling, and zero-frequency behavior differ; this expectation is the load-bearing bridge from the numerics to the abstract's gravitational-wave claims.
  • domain assumption The background is static and unperturbed: backreaction of the scalar field and the infalling particle on the halo geometry is neglected
    Standard linear perturbation treatment; the particle's self-force and the halo's dynamical response are omitted.
  • standard math Any effective potential differing from the vacuum by terms 1/r^alpha with alpha >= 3 has the same asymptotic power-law decay
    Invoked in Sec. III A and Eq. (18), citing Refs. [6, 8, 37, 38]; the paper verifies it numerically but also shows the transient approach depends on M_H.
  • domain assumption Memory is governed by the zero-frequency component of the flux (flat spectrum at omega -> 0)
    Appendix A: flat-space scalar collision calculation, generalizing Refs. [43, 44]; used to argue the memory plateau is a genuine low-frequency observable.

reviewed 2026-08-05 · how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Gravitational-wave tails and memory effect for mergers in astrophysical environments." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/EMC3MLYC

@misc{pith2026250820238,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Gravitational-wave tails and memory effect for mergers in astrophysical environments},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/EMC3MLYC}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2508.20238}
}
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

Gravitational waves from the coalescence of compact objects carry information about their dynamics and the spacetime in regions where they are evolving. In particular, late-time tails and memory effects after the merger are two low-frequency phenomena, not detectable by current instruments, but which can be observed by future detectors. Their low-frequency nature could, in principle, make them more sensitive to larger-scale structures at galactic length scales. We show that indeed there are transient features, such as amplitude changes, in both tails and (linear) memory when the merger occurs while immersed in an astrophysical environment. For realistic galaxies, the environment's compactness is small enough that the effect is strongly suppressed, but these effects could become relevant for mergers occurring in regions with matter overdensities, like the ones recently observed numerically for wave dark matter. On the other hand, the memory (the difference between the amplitude asymptotically early and late) and asymptotically late decay are independent on the properties of the environment.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2508.20238 by Francisco Duque, Qassim Alnasheet, Rodrigo Panosso Macedo, Vitor Cardoso.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Late-time tails for ingoing Gaussian initial data as prescribed in Eqs. ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Radial infall of a particle in a BH surrounded by a galactic halo, for different halo configurations, initial radius, and [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Toward claiming a detection of gravitational memory

    gr-qc 2026-01 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    A framework using scale separation in the Isaacson description defines observable gravitational memory rise for compact binary coalescences, providing a basis for hypothesis testing in LISA data.

  2. Black hole spacetimes with dark matter spikes: Energy-momentum tensor and backreaction effects

    gr-qc 2025-11 conditional novelty 6.0

    A dark-matter spike built from the full orbital motion of its particles has ~50% more energy density near the black hole and produces metric deviations ~2.5 times larger than mass-only models.

  3. Shadow and Quasi-Normal Modes of Schwarzschild-Hernquist Black Hole

    gr-qc 2025-09 conditional novelty 4.0

    For black holes embedded in Hernquist dark matter halos, the shadow radius and quasinormal mode frequencies are redshifted by a factor 1 - C + C^2/6 in the halo compactness C, with EHT observations implying C <= 0.092.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

50 extracted references · 10 canonical work pages · cited by 3 Pith papers · 2 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Cardoso and P

    V. Cardoso and P. Pani, Testing the nature of dark com- pact objects: a status report, Living Rev. Rel.22, 4 (2019), arXiv:1904.05363 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  2. [2]

    Berti, V

    E. Berti, V. Cardoso, and A. O. Starinets, Quasinormal modes of black holes and black branes, Class. Quant. Grav.26, 163001 (2009), arXiv:0905.2975 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  3. [3]

    Bertiet al., Black hole spectroscopy: from theory to experiment, (2025), arXiv:2505.23895 [gr-qc]

    E. Bertiet al., Black hole spectroscopy: from theory to experiment, (2025), arXiv:2505.23895 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  4. [4]

    R. H. Price, Nonspherical perturbations of relativistic gravitational collapse. 1. Scalar and gravitational pertur- bations, Phys. Rev. D5, 2419 (1972)

    1972

  5. [5]

    Gundlach, R

    C. Gundlach, R. H. Price, and J. Pullin, Late time be- havior of stellar collapse and explosions: 1. Linearized perturbations, Phys. Rev. D49, 883 (1994), arXiv:gr- qc/9307009

    arXiv 1994

  6. [6]

    E. S. C. Ching, P. T. Leung, W. M. Suen, and K. Young, Wave propagation in gravitational systems: Late time behavior, Phys. Rev. D52, 2118 (1995), arXiv:gr- qc/9507035

    arXiv 1995

  7. [7]

    Blanchet and B

    L. Blanchet and B. S. Sathyaprakash, Detecting the tail effect in gravitational wave experiments, Phys. Rev. Lett. 74, 1067 (1995)

    work page 1995

  8. [8]

    Cardoso, G

    V. Cardoso, G. Carullo, M. De Amicis, F. Duque, T. Katagiri, D. Pereniguez, J. Redondo-Yuste, T. F. M. Spieksma, and Z. Zhong, Hushing black holes: Tails in dynamical spacetimes, Phys. Rev. D109, L121502 (2024), arXiv:2405.12290 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  9. [9]

    E. W. Leaver, Spectral decomposition of the perturbation response of the Schwarzschild geometry, Phys. Rev. D34, 384 (1986)

    1986

  10. [10]

    Zengino˘ glu, G

    A. Zengino˘ glu, G. Khanna, and L. M. Burko, Interme- diate behavior of Kerr tails, Gen. Rel. Grav.46, 1672 (2014), arXiv:1208.5839 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  11. [11]

    De Amiciset al., Late-time tails in nonlinear evolu- tions of merging black holes, (2024), arXiv:2412.06887 [gr-qc]

    M. De Amiciset al., Late-time tails in nonlinear evolu- tions of merging black holes, (2024), arXiv:2412.06887 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2024

  12. [12]

    Islam, G

    T. Islam, G. Faggioli, G. Khanna, S. E. Field, M. van de Meent, and A. Buonanno, Phenomenology and origin of late-time tails in eccentric binary black hole mergers, (2024), arXiv:2407.04682 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2024

  13. [13]

    De Amicis, S

    M. De Amicis, S. Albanesi, and G. Carullo, Inspiral- inherited ringdown tails, Phys. Rev. D110, 104005 (2024), arXiv:2406.17018 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  14. [14]

    S. Ma, M. A. Scheel, J. Moxon, K. C. Nelli, N. Deppe, L. E. Kidder, W. Throwe, and N. L. Vu, Merging black holes with Cauchy-characteristic matching: Computa- tion of late-time tails, (2024), arXiv:2412.06906 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  15. [15]

    Cardoso, K

    V. Cardoso, K. Destounis, F. Duque, R. P. Macedo, and A. Maselli, Black holes in galaxies: Environmental im- pact on gravitational-wave generation and propagation, Phys. Rev. D105, L061501 (2022), arXiv:2109.00005 [gr- qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  16. [16]

    Cardoso, K

    V. Cardoso, K. Destounis, F. Duque, R. Panosso Macedo, and A. Maselli, Gravitational Waves from Extreme-Mass- Ratio Systems in Astrophysical Environments, Phys. Rev. Lett.129, 241103 (2022), arXiv:2210.01133 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  17. [17]

    Duque, C

    F. Duque, C. F. B. Macedo, R. Vicente, and V. Cardoso, Extreme-Mass-Ratio Inspirals in Ultralight Dark Matter, Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 121404 (2024), arXiv:2312.06767 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  18. [18]

    Vicente, T

    R. Vicente, T. K. Karydas, and G. Bertone, A fully rela- tivistic treatment of EMRIs in collisionless environments, (2025), arXiv:2505.09715 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2025

  19. [19]

    G. M. Tomaselli, T. F. M. Spieksma, and G. Bertone, Resonant history of gravitational atoms in black hole binaries, Phys. Rev. D110, 064048 (2024), arXiv:2403.03147 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  20. [20]

    G. M. Tomaselli, T. F. M. Spieksma, and G. Bertone, Legacy of Boson Clouds on Black Hole Binaries, Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 121402 (2024), arXiv:2407.12908 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  21. [21]

    T. F. M. Spieksma, V. Cardoso, G. Carullo, M. Della Rocca, and F. Duque, Black Hole Spectroscopy in Environments: Detectability Prospects, Phys. Rev. Lett.134, 081402 (2025), arXiv:2409.05950 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  22. [22]

    Comp` ere,Advanced Lectures on General Relativity, Vol

    G. Comp` ere,Advanced Lectures on General Relativity, Vol. 952 (Springer, Cham, Cham, Switzerland, 2019)

    work page 2019

  23. [23]

    Mitmanet al., A review of gravitational memory and BMS frame fixing in numerical relativity, Class

    K. Mitmanet al., A review of gravitational memory and BMS frame fixing in numerical relativity, Class. Quant. 8 Grav.41, 223001 (2024), arXiv:2405.08868 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  24. [24]

    Y. B. Zel’dovich and A. G. Polnarev, Radiation of grav- itational waves by a cluster of superdense stars, Soviet Astronomy18, 17 (1974)

    work page 1974

  25. [25]

    Deppe, L

    N. Deppe, L. Heisenberg, L. E. Kidder, D. Maibach, S. Ma, J. Moxon, K. C. Nelli, W. Throwe, and N. L. Vu, Signatures of Quantum Gravity in Gravitational Wave Memory, (2025), arXiv:2502.20584 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  26. [26]

    Speeney, E

    N. Speeney, E. Berti, V. Cardoso, and A. Maselli, Black holes surrounded by generic matter distributions: Polar perturbations and energy flux, Phys. Rev. D109, 084068 (2024), arXiv:2401.00932 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  27. [27]

    Pezzella, K

    L. Pezzella, K. Destounis, A. Maselli, and V. Car- doso, Quasinormal modes of black holes embedded in halos of matter, Phys. Rev. D111, 064026 (2025), arXiv:2412.18651 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  28. [28]

    Figueiredo, A

    E. Figueiredo, A. Maselli, and V. Cardoso, Black holes surrounded by generic dark matter profiles: Appear- ance and gravitational-wave emission, Phys. Rev. D107, 104033 (2023), arXiv:2303.08183 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  29. [29]

    Posti and A

    L. Posti and A. Helmi, Mass and shape of the Milky Way’s dark matter halo with globular clusters from Gaia and Hubble, Astronomy & Astrophysics621, A56 (2019), arXiv:1805.01408 [astro-ph.GA]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  30. [30]

    Zenginoglu, A Geometric framework for black hole perturbations, Phys

    A. Zenginoglu, A Geometric framework for black hole perturbations, Phys. Rev. D83, 127502 (2011), arXiv:1102.2451 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  31. [31]

    Panosso Macedo, Hyperboloidal approach for static spherically symmetric spacetimes: a didactical intro- ductionand applications in black-hole physics, Phil

    R. Panosso Macedo, Hyperboloidal approach for static spherically symmetric spacetimes: a didactical intro- ductionand applications in black-hole physics, Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. Lond. A382, 20230046 (2024), arXiv:2307.15735 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  32. [32]

    Zenginoglu, Hyperboloidal foliations and scri-fixing, Class

    A. Zenginoglu, Hyperboloidal foliations and scri-fixing, Class. Quant. Grav.25, 145002 (2008), arXiv:0712.4333 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  33. [33]

    Zenginoglu and G

    A. Zenginoglu and G. Khanna, Null infinity waveforms from extreme-mass-ratio inspirals in Kerr spacetime, Phys. Rev. X1, 021017 (2011), arXiv:1108.1816 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  34. [34]

    P. A. Sundararajan, G. Khanna, and S. A. Hughes, To- wards adiabatic waveforms for inspiral into Kerr black holes. I. A New model of the source for the time domain perturbation equation, Phys. Rev. D76, 104005 (2007), arXiv:gr-qc/0703028

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  35. [35]

    Panosso Macedo and M

    R. Panosso Macedo and M. Ansorg, Axisymmetric fully spectral code for hyperbolic equations, J. Comput. Phys. 276, 357 (2014), arXiv:1402.7343 [physics.comp-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  36. [36]

    CoG,https://the-center-of-gravity.com/ documents/359/data_tails.zip

    work page

  37. [37]

    E. S. C. Ching, P. T. Leung, W. M. Suen, and K. Young, Late time tail of wave propagation on curved space-time, Phys. Rev. Lett.74, 2414 (1995), arXiv:gr-qc/9410044

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1995

  38. [38]

    R. F. Rosato and P. Pani, On the universality of late-time ringdown tail, (2025), arXiv:2505.08877 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  39. [39]

    R. J. Adler and B. Zeks, Gravitational Radiation from Supernova Explosions, Phys. Rev. D12, 3007 (1975)

    work page 1975

  40. [40]

    Cardoso, J

    V. Cardoso, J. P. S. Lemos, and S. Yoshida, Electro- magnetic radiation from collisions at almost the speed of light: An Extremely relativistic charged particle falling into a Schwarzschild black hole, Phys. Rev. D68, 084011 (2003), arXiv:gr-qc/0307104

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  41. [41]

    Smarr, Gravitational Radiation from Distant Encoun- ters and from Headon Collisions of Black Holes: The Zero Frequency Limit, Phys

    L. Smarr, Gravitational Radiation from Distant Encoun- ters and from Headon Collisions of Black Holes: The Zero Frequency Limit, Phys. Rev. D15, 2069 (1977)

    work page 2069

  42. [42]

    Berti, V

    E. Berti, V. Cardoso, T. Hinderer, M. Lemos, F. Pre- torius, U. Sperhake, and N. Yunes, Semianalytical esti- mates of scattering thresholds and gravitational radia- tion in ultrarelativistic black hole encounters, Phys. Rev. D81, 104048 (2010), arXiv:1003.0812 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  43. [43]

    M. L. M. thesis,https://blackholes. tecnico.ulisboa.pt//fp-content/attachs/ thesismadalenalemos.pdf()

    work page

  44. [44]

    R. B. M. thesis,https://blackholes.tecnico. ulisboa.pt//fp-content/attachs/thesis_ richardbrito.pdf()

    work page

  45. [45]

    Perturbative evolution of particle orbits around Kerr black holes: time domain calculation

    R. Lopez-Aleman, G. Khanna, and J. Pullin, Perturba- tive evolution of particle orbits around Kerr black holes: Time domain calculation, Class. Quant. Grav.20, 3259 (2003), arXiv:gr-qc/0303054

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  46. [46]

    J. C. Aurrekoetxea, K. Clough, J. Bamber, and P. G. Ferreira, Effect of Wave Dark Matter on Equal Mass Black Hole Mergers, Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 211401 (2024), arXiv:2311.18156 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  47. [47]

    J. C. Aurrekoetxea, J. Marsden, K. Clough, and P. G. Ferreira, Self-interacting scalar dark matter around bi- nary black holes, Phys. Rev. D110, 083011 (2024), arXiv:2409.01937 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  48. [48]

    Gravitational radiation from collisions at the speed of light: a massless particle falling into a Schwarzschild black hole

    V. Cardoso and J. P. S. Lemos, Gravitational radiation from collisions at the speed of light: A Massless particle falling into a Schwarzschild black hole, Phys. Lett. B538, 1 (2002), arXiv:gr-qc/0202019

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  49. [49]

    Sperhake, V

    U. Sperhake, V. Cardoso, F. Pretorius, E. Berti, and J. A. Gonzalez, The High-energy collision of two black holes, Phys. Rev. Lett.101, 161101 (2008), arXiv:0806.1738 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  50. [50]

    S. J. Kovacs and K. S. Thorne, The Generation of Grav- itational Waves. 4. Bremsstrahlung, Astrophys. J.224, 62 (1978)

    1978

This paper was first reviewed by deepseek-v4-flash on August 5, 2026.