Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 10 cited by

The paper constructs quadratic, exactly solvable lattice Hamiltonians for arbitrary 1+1d anomaly-free abelian chiral gauge theories, exemplified by the 34-50 U(1) theory.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-03 09:18 UTC pith:KSJ7YKKY

load-bearing objection The lattice T-duality machinery and the solvable bosonic 34-50 Hamiltonian are real and checkable; the fermionic chiral gauge theory is only sketched, and that is the load-bearing gap. the 3 major comments →

arxiv 2601.14359 v2 pith:KSJ7YKKY submitted 2026-01-20 hep-th cond-mat.str-elhep-lat

Exactly Solvable 1+1d Chiral Lattice Gauge Theories

Sahand Seifnashri This is my paper
classification hep-th cond-mat.str-elhep-lat PACS 11.15.Ha11.25.Hf11.30.Rd
keywords chiral gauge theorylattice regularizationmodified Villain modelcompact bosonT-dualityfermionizationSchwinger modelanomaly cancellation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper claims that every anomaly-free abelian chiral gauge theory in 1+1 dimensions can be written as a quadratic, exactly solvable lattice Hamiltonian. The construction starts from the modified Villain model, a lattice regularization of a compact boson that preserves chiral U(1) symmetries exactly, and then gauges an anomaly-free combination of those symmetries and fermionizes. The central worked example is the 34-50 U(1) theory, with left-moving fermions of charge 3 and 4 and right-moving fermions of charge 5 and 0, whose gauge anomaly cancels because 3^2+4^2=5^2. After a T-duality transformation, the bosonized model becomes a massive noncompact boson coupled to a massless compact boson, so it can be solved exactly. If the identification is correct, this is a concrete lattice construction of a chiral gauge theory, and a step toward similarly controlled treatments of more realistic chiral theories.

Core claim

By starting with N copies of the modified Villain compact boson, gauging a chiral U(1) symmetry whose charges (n_m,n_w) satisfy sum n_m n_w = 0, and then applying lattice fermionization, the paper derives explicit quadratic Hamiltonians for anomaly-free abelian chiral gauge theories. For the 34-50 theory, the charge vector (8,4,-1,2) at radius R=1/sqrt(2) is identified with bosonized fermions of charges 3,4 on the left and 5,0 on the right. An O(2,2;Z) T-duality transformation maps the gauged Hamiltonian into a form where the gauge fields and one bosonic sector decouple, leaving a solvable theory of one massive noncompact boson coupled to one massless compact boson. The N=1 case is solved ex

What carries the argument

The central object is the modified Villain lattice Hamiltonian for N compact bosons, a lattice regularization whose noncompact variables and Gauss-law constraints make the chiral momentum and winding symmetries exact. Gauging a general integer combination of these symmetries is performed by coupling to a compact U(1) electric-field degree of freedom and modifying the constraints, with anomaly freedom encoded in the condition sum n_m n_w = 0. The paper's new tool is the exact realization of the O(N,N;Z) T-duality group on the lattice, explicitly constructed for N=2; an O(2,2;Z) transformation is what turns the (8,4,-1,2) model into a decoupled, quadratic Hamiltonian. Fermionization is then im

Load-bearing premise

Everything rests on the identification of the two-boson model at radius 1/sqrt(2) with charge vector (8,4,-1,2), after fermionic gauging of one Z2, as exactly the 34-50 chiral fermion theory; if that bosonization dictionary mis-assigns charges, the solved Hamiltonian is a different theory.

What would settle it

Diagonalize the final quadratic Hamiltonian (3.42) on small chains after imposing the constraints, fermionize the resulting low-energy theory, and read off the left- and right-moving charge operators; if the charges are not 3,4 and 5,0, or if the T-duality transformation (3.39) does not map the original constraints (3.37) to the simplified constraints (3.41), the claimed identification fails.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • If the construction is correct, the 34-50 chiral gauge theory is exactly solvable on the lattice: its spectrum is described by one massive noncompact boson and one massless compact boson, allowing exact computation of mass gaps and correlation functions.
  • The recipe extends to arbitrary anomaly-free abelian chiral gauge theories in 1+1d: choose integer charge vectors with vanishing mixed product, gauge them as described, and fermionize.
  • The N=1 limit gives an exact lattice realization of the massless Schwinger model, with the known continuum boson mass reproduced, providing a check that the lattice model flows correctly.
  • Exact lattice T-duality, established for N copies, becomes a practical tool for simplifying and solving gauged bosonic lattice models beyond the examples worked out here.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A direct next step would be to construct the fermionic side of the 34-50 model explicitly and check that the resulting charge operators are exactly 3 and 4 on left-movers and 5 and 0 on right-movers; the paper stops at the constraint level, so this remains an open verification.
  • The Pythagorean structure behind the example suggests a broader classification: every integer solution of a^2+b^2=c^2 may give an exactly solvable chiral gauge theory of this type, with the bosonized charge vectors determined by the bosonization dictionary.
  • The exact O(N,N;Z) action on the lattice could be used to identify dual presentations of other gauged theories, potentially exposing phases or solvable limits that would be hard to see in the original variables.
  • The same quadratic solvability might extend to open chains or systems with boundaries, where exact spectra could illuminate chiral edge physics and anomaly inflow in a nonperturbative setting.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper proposes a lattice Hamiltonian framework for 1+1d abelian chiral gauge theories. Starting from the modified Villain Hamiltonian for N compact bosons, it gauges an anomaly-free chiral U(1) symmetry, presenting two equivalent forms of the gauged Hamiltonian. It then specializes to the 34-50 theory: two Dirac fermions with left-moving charges 3,4 and right-moving charges 5,0. After reviewing bosonization, it identifies a bosonic model with charges (n_m^1,n_m^2,n_w^1,n_w^2)=(8,4,-1,2), applies an O(2,2;Z) T-duality transformation to simplify the Hamiltonian, and concludes that the resulting quadratic model is exactly solvable. The N=1 case is solved explicitly and matched to the massless Schwinger model. The fermionic realization of the 34-50 theory is only sketched at the level of Gauss-law constraints in §3.5.

Significance. If the central equivalence is established, the result would be a notable advance: a quadratic, exactly solvable lattice Hamiltonian for a chiral gauge theory, together with an exact lattice realization of the O(N,N;Z) T-duality group. The N=1 Schwinger-model analysis is explicit and reproduces the known boson mass M=e_cont/√π, and the O(2,2;Z) charge action of the T-duality matrix M in (3.38) is consistent with the anomaly-free condition and the (8,4,-1,2) charge vector. These are real strengths. However, the manuscript as submitted leaves the load-bearing connection to the actual fermionic 34-50 theory uncompleted: §3.5 stops at constraint-level equations (3.46), with no fermionic Hamiltonian, no charge operators, and no spectrum. The T-duality operator action (3.39) that simplifies the bosonic model is asserted rather than derived. The paper is therefore best read as a promising construction that needs a completed argument before the claims 'we construct arbitrary 1+1d anomaly-free abelian chiral gauge theories' and 'exactly solvable' are fully supported.

major comments (3)
  1. [§3.5, Eqs. (3.34)–(3.46)] The fermionic 34-50 theory is never actually constructed. After the bosonized model is discussed in §3.4, §3.5 introduces Majorana fermions and writes two Gauss-law constraints (3.46), but gives no fermionic Hamiltonian, no U(1) current operators realizing charges (3,4) on the left and (5,0) on the right, no proof that the bosonization dictionary (3.34)–(3.35) maps the gauged bosonic symmetry to the correct chiral charges, and no spectrum. The central claim 'we construct arbitrary 1+1d anomaly-free abelian chiral gauge theories on the lattice' therefore rests on an unverified identification between the solved bosonic model and the fermionic theory. The manuscript itself defers the required analysis to reference [43]; this is not a presentation issue but a missing load-bearing argument.
  2. [§3.4, Eq. (3.39)] The action of the T-duality transformation T_M is asserted without derivation. Appendix A constructs generators for the O(2,2;Z) group, but the operator action corresponding to the specific product M in (3.38) is not computed. In particular, the paper does not show that (3.39) preserves the canonical commutation relations and all constraints, nor does it derive the mapped Hamiltonian (3.40) step by step. Since (3.40)–(3.42) are the basis for the claimed solvability of the 34-50 model, this step needs either a direct derivation or an explicit verification, not just an assertion.
  3. [§3.4, after Eq. (3.42)] The model is described as 'quadratic and therefore exactly solvable', but no solution is presented for the 34-50 theory. The only explicit diagonalizations are those of the modified Villain model (§2.2) and the N=1 Schwinger model (§3.3). For (3.42), there is no mode expansion, no dispersion relation, no zero-mode analysis, and the claimed massive boson of mass of order e^2 is not computed. For a paper whose abstract advertises an 'exactly solvable' chiral gauge theory, the solution of the concrete example must be exhibited or the claim should be substantially reworded.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Introduction/Abstract] The abstract and introduction claim 'arbitrary 1+1d anomaly-free abelian chiral gauge theories', but the body proves the construction only for the single 34-50 example and the N=1 case. Please state a precise general theorem (with hypotheses and proof sketch) or temper the claim to what is actually demonstrated.
  2. [§3.5, Eq. (3.46)] The fermionization in §3.5 adds Majorana fermions ψ_j, ψ̃_j at each site, while Appendix B formulates fermionic gauging with link Majorana fermions. The relation between the two conventions is not explained; also the ordering of ψ_j and ψ̃_{j+1} in (3.46) is important for anticommutation and should be specified.
  3. [§3.3, Eqs. (3.15), (3.30)] The relation between the dimensionless lattice coupling e and the dimensionful continuum coupling e_cont appears in (3.15) as e=e_cont a/√(2π), and the mass formula (3.30) is M=n_w e_cont/(√(2π) R). Please verify the factors of 2π and the lattice spacing convention, and state the convention explicitly to avoid ambiguity.
  4. [Appendix A] The generators of O(2,2;Z) are presented, but the action of arbitrary products is only checked on charge vectors, not on local operators. For the main text's use of T_M, at least one nontrivial example of operator conjugation by a product should be worked out, so that the reader can verify the chain rule used in (3.39).

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No exhibited circular reduction: Schwinger mass and compact-boson spectrum are derived in-text and externally benchmarked; the self-cited gauging framework [29] is reproduced in the paper, and the fermionic 34-50 gaps are incompleteness, not circularity.

full rationale

Walking the derivation chain, no step makes a claimed output equal to an input by construction. The modified Villain Hamiltonian (2.1) is solved in Section 2.2 and matched to the c=1 compact-boson CFT spectrum, an external check. The N=1 gauged model (3.21)-(3.26) is diagonalized to yield the dispersion (3.28)-(3.29) and the boson mass M = n_w e_cont/(√(2π)R) (3.30), which for n_w=1, R=1/√2 reproduces the known Schwinger mass e_cont/√π: this is derived from the lattice Hamiltonian with no fitted parameter, not a prediction forced by an input. The anomaly-free condition (3.7), Σ n_m n_w = 0, is an input guaranteeing the Gauss-law constraints commute, and (8,4,-1,2) satisfies it via the standard bosonization dictionary (3.34)-(3.35) starting from 3²+4²=5²; the dictionary is external (cited to [54]), not an output of this paper. The O(N,N;ℤ) T-duality generators of Appendix A are explicit unitaries checked against the charge action (A.10)-(A.11) and the R→1/R map (A.3); the specific composite action (3.39) is asserted rather than decomposed into generators, which is a derivation gap (correctness risk) but not a circular reduction. The gauging formalism is attributed to the author's own prior work [29] and the detailed analysis is deferred to future work [43]; however, Section 3.1-3.2 reproduces the gauging procedure in full, so the argument does not reduce to the self-citation, and [29] is peer-reviewed evidence independent of the present paper's fitted values. The principal weakness is incompleteness, not circularity: Section 3.5 stops at the constraint level (3.46) with no fermionic Hamiltonian and no check that the U(1) charges are 3,4 (left) and 5,0 (right), so the identification of the solved bosonic model with the 34-50 fermionic theory is asserted rather than demonstrated. That gap, explicitly acknowledged ('We leave the detailed analysis of this model and its generalizations for future work [43]'), should be weighed as correctness risk, not as the claimed output being equivalent to the input.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

4 free parameters · 6 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on: the modified Villain model being a valid lattice regularization of the compact boson CFT (prior literature, argued in §2.2); the gauging framework of [29] (author's prior published work) being the correct lattice implementation of gauging non-on-site anomaly-free symmetries; the 2d bosonization/fermionization dictionary (standard, with lattice version in [29,57]); and a handful of asserted algebraic facts (the T-duality operator action (A.1)/(3.39), the well-definedness of T_{1/2}, the claimed simplifications of constraints). The only hand-chosen element specific to the 34-50 solution is the duality matrix M (3.38), which is not derived. No data-fitting is used anywhere; R, e, θ are physical inputs.

free parameters (4)
  • Compact boson radius R = 1/√2 (34-50); √2 or 1/√2 (bosonization map)
    Compact boson radius R is a coupling of the modified Villain model, not a fitted value; the values 1/√2 and √2 are the standard self-dual/fermionization radii from 2d bosonization (Section 3.4).
  • Electric coupling e
    Electric coupling of the gauged U(1); the relation to the continuum coupling is given in (3.15). It is the physical coupling, not a fit parameter.
  • Theta angle θ
    Topological theta angle, θ∼θ+2π; physical input. It does not enter the massless N=1 spectrum, consistent with the massless Schwinger model.
  • T-duality matrix M = [[-1,2,8,4],[0,-1,-4,0],[0,0,-1,0],[0,0,-2,-1]] (Eq. 3.38)
    The O(2,2;Z) matrix M is chosen by hand so that M·(8,4,-1,2)=(0,0,1,0), reducing the chiral gauge coupling to a single winding charge. Its derivation is not shown; the simplification of the 34-50 model depends on this choice.
axioms (6)
  • domain assumption The modified Villain Hamiltonian (2.1) with constraints (2.3) is a lattice regularization of the c=1 compact boson CFT whose low-energy spectrum matches the CFT (Section 2.2, Eq. (2.15)).
    Established in the cited modified Villain literature [20-24]; the paper argues the low-energy spectrum matches the compact boson CFT via the explicit computation in Section 2.2.
  • domain assumption The gauging prescription of [29] — defect insertion (3.10), modified constraints (3.12), Gauss law (3.13) — correctly gauges non-on-site anomaly-free U(1) symmetries, with anomaly-free iff Σ n_m n_w = 0 (Eq. (3.7)).
    The gauging prescription is taken from the author's prior work [29]; the anomaly-free condition is computed from the local charge commutators.
  • standard math The T-duality transformation T (A.1) is a unitary of the modified Villain Hilbert space preserving the constraint algebra (claims (A.2)-(A.3)).
    An explicit unitary representation (A.4)-(A.5) is given, but the well-definedness of the half-translation T_{1/2} on a finite periodic chain and the claimed operator action are asserted rather than proven.
  • standard math O(N,N;Z) is generated by individual T-dualities, GL(N,Z) reparametrizations, and integer B-field shifts (A.7)-(A.9).
    Standard background from string theory, cited [55,56]; used to conclude that the N=2 generators of Appendix A exhaust the T-duality group.
  • domain assumption Bosonization at R=1/√2 (or √2) maps Dirac fermions to compact bosons with the charge dictionary (3.34), and fermionic Z_2 gauging (Appendix B) implements the inverse (Sections 3.4-3.5).
    Standard 2d bosonization, with the lattice version from [29,57]; the identification of the solved bosonic model with the fermionic 34-50 theory depends entirely on this dictionary and is not independently checked in the paper.
  • domain assumption The continuum limit: low-momentum modes ω_k≈k/L reproduce the CFT spectrum (Eq. (2.15)) and the dispersion (3.29) yields the continuum Schwinger mass (3.30).
    The low-momentum approximation and the continuum dispersion limit are standard but asserted; they are the bridge between lattice results and continuum physics.

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 17924 in / 43058 out tokens · 387555 ms · 2026-08-03T09:18:45.740645+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

Using the modified Villain lattice Hamiltonian formulation of the 1+1d compact boson theory, we construct exactly solvable abelian chiral lattice gauge theories in two spacetime dimensions. As a concrete example, we derive an explicit quadratic lattice Hamiltonian for the "34-50" chiral gauge theory. We further show that $N$ copies of the modified Villain theory realize the $O(N,N;\mathbb{Z})$ T-duality transformations, which we then use to solve and analyze these lattice gauge theories.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 10 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Lattice Realizations of Flat Gauging and T-duality Defects at Any Radius

    hep-th 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 8.0

    Modified Villain lattice realizations of flat-gauged interfaces and T-duality defects in the 2D compact boson are constructed at arbitrary radii, yielding non-compact edge modes with continuous spectrum and infinite q...

  2. Symmetric mass generation of interacting chiral fermions on a one-dimensional lattice without fermion doubling

    hep-th 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    A tangent-fermion lattice with Hubbard interactions realizes symmetric mass generation in the 3-4-5-0 model without fermion doubling or ground-state degeneracy.

  3. Infinite-Order Lattice Chiral Anomalies and CPT

    hep-th 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Lattice CPT symmetry upgrades the Onsager chiral symmetry anomaly from order two to infinite order, better matching the continuum chiral anomaly, with discussion of associated 2+1d SPT phases.

  4. Exotic theta terms in 2+1d fractonic field theory

    hep-th 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Exotic theta terms in 2+1d fractonic φ-theory induce generalized Witten effects, with vortex operators gaining momentum subsystem charge (quadrupolar for the foliated case).

  5. Lattice chiral symmetry from bosons in 3+1d

    hep-th 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    A bosonic lattice model realizes exact chiral symmetry and its anomaly in 3+1d, with the continuum limit a compact boson theory with axion-like coupling.

  6. Bosonization versus the Nielsen-Ninomiya theorem

    hep-th 2026-07 accept novelty 6.5

    In the 2D modified Villain model, bosonized chiral lattice fermion operators yield a doubler-free but non-local reconstructed Dirac operator, consistent with Nielsen-Ninomiya, while the microscopic theory remains ultr...

  7. Lattice chiral non-Abelian gauge symmetry via bosonization

    hep-lat 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Proposes a bosonized lattice construction of anomaly-free 2D non-Abelian chiral gauge theories in which left and right bulk contributions cancel at finite spacing when quadratic indices match.

  8. When Symmetries Twist: Anomaly Inflow on Monodromy Defects

    hep-th 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Monodromy defects for anomalous symmetries are defined as domain walls between symmetry generators and anomaly-induced topological orders, resulting in protected chiral edge modes and adiabatic pumping of gapless degr...

  9. Bosonization versus the Nielsen-Ninomiya theorem

    hep-th 2026-07 conditional novelty 5.0

    The 2D modified Villain model's Weyl operators reproduce free Dirac correlations in the continuum, and their no-doubler Dirac kernel is non-local, showing exactly how bosonization evades the Nielsen-Ninomiya theorem.

  10. When Symmetries Twist: Anomaly Inflow on Monodromy Defects

    hep-th 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Anomaly inflow on monodromy defects in anomalous symmetry theories defines them as domain walls inducing topological order, yielding protected chiral edge modes and adiabatic pumping of gapless degrees of freedom, ver...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

57 extracted references · 42 linked inside Pith · cited by 8 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    H. B. Nielsen and M. Ninomiya,Absence of Neutrinos on a Lattice. 1. Proof by Homotopy Theory,Nucl. Phys. B185(1981) 20. [Erratum: Nucl.Phys.B 195, 541 (1982)]

    1981

  2. [2]

    D. B. Kaplan,Chiral Symmetry and Lattice Fermions, inLes Houches Summer School: Session 93: Modern perspectives in lattice QCD: Quantum field theory and high performance computing, pp. 223–272, 12, 2009.arXiv:0912.2560

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  3. [3]

    Eichten and J

    E. Eichten and J. Preskill,Chiral Gauge Theories on the Lattice,Nucl. Phys. B268 (1986) 179–208

    1986

  4. [4]

    Poppitz and Y

    E. Poppitz and Y. Shang,Chiral Lattice Gauge Theories Via Mirror-Fermion Decoupling: A Mission (im)Possible?,Int. J. Mod. Phys. A25(2010) 2761–2813, [arXiv:1003.5896]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  5. [5]

    C. Chen, J. Giedt, and E. Poppitz,On the decoupling of mirror fermions,JHEP04 (2013) 131, [arXiv:1211.6947]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  6. [6]

    Wang and X.-G

    J. Wang and X.-G. Wen,Nonperturbative regularization of (1+1)-dimensional anomaly-free chiral fermions and bosons: On the equivalence of anomaly matching conditions and boundary gapping rules,Phys. Rev. B107(2023), no. 1 014311, [arXiv:1307.7480]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  7. [7]

    DeMarco and X.-G

    M. DeMarco and X.-G. Wen,A Novel Non-Perturbative Lattice Regularization of an Anomaly-Free1 + 1dChiralSU(2)Gauge Theory,arXiv:1706.04648

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  8. [8]

    Wang and X.-G

    J. Wang and X.-G. Wen,A Solution to the 1+1D Gauged Chiral Fermion Problem, Phys. Rev. D99(7, 2018) 111501, [arXiv:1807.05998]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  9. [9]

    Tong,Comments on symmetric mass generation in 2d and 4d,JHEP07(2022) 001, [arXiv:2104.03997]

    D. Tong,Comments on symmetric mass generation in 2d and 4d,JHEP07(2022) 001, [arXiv:2104.03997]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  10. [10]

    M. Zeng, Z. Zhu, J. Wang, and Y.-Z. You,Symmetric Mass Generation in the 1+1 Dimensional Chiral Fermion 3-4-5-0 Model,Phys. Rev. Lett.128(2022), no. 18 185301, [arXiv:2202.12355]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  11. [11]

    Wang and Y.-Z

    J. Wang and Y.-Z. You,Symmetric Mass Generation,Symmetry14(2022), no. 7 1475, [arXiv:2204.14271]. 24 [12]Lattice Strong DynamicsCollaboration, A. Hasenfratz and O. Witzel,Symmetric Mass Generation, in2025 European Physical Society Conference on High Energy Physics, 11, 2025.arXiv:2511.22678

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  12. [13]

    D. B. Kaplan,A Method for simulating chiral fermions on the lattice,Phys. Lett. B 288(1992) 342–347, [hep-lat/9206013]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1992

  13. [14]

    Narayanan and H

    R. Narayanan and H. Neuberger,A Construction of lattice chiral gauge theories,Nucl. Phys. B443(1995) 305–385, [hep-th/9411108]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1995

  14. [15]

    Luscher,Abelian chiral gauge theories on the lattice with exact gauge invariance, Nucl

    M. Luscher,Abelian chiral gauge theories on the lattice with exact gauge invariance, Nucl. Phys. B549(1999) 295–334, [hep-lat/9811032]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  15. [16]

    Neuberger,Exact chiral symmetry on the lattice,Ann

    H. Neuberger,Exact chiral symmetry on the lattice,Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci.51 (2001) 23–52, [hep-lat/0101006]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  16. [17]

    Bhattacharya, M

    T. Bhattacharya, M. R. Martin, and E. Poppitz,Chiral lattice gauge theories from warped domain walls and Ginsparg-Wilson fermions,Phys. Rev. D74(2006) 085028, [hep-lat/0605003]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  17. [18]

    D. B. Kaplan,Chiral Gauge Theory at the Boundary between Topological Phases, Phys. Rev. Lett.132(2024), no. 14 141603, [arXiv:2312.01494]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  18. [19]

    Morikawa, S

    O. Morikawa, S. Onoda, and H. Suzuki,Yet Another Lattice Formulation of 2D U(1) Chiral Gauge Theory via Bosonization,PTEP2024(2024), no. 6 063B01, [arXiv:2403.03420]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  19. [20]

    D. J. Gross and I. R. Klebanov,ONE-DIMENSIONAL STRING THEORY ON A CIRCLE,Nucl. Phys. B344(1990) 475–498

    1990

  20. [21]

    Sulejmanpasic and C

    T. Sulejmanpasic and C. Gattringer,Abelian gauge theories on the lattice:θ-Terms and compact gauge theory with(out) monopoles,Nucl. Phys. B943(2019) 114616, [arXiv:1901.02637]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  21. [22]

    Gorantla, H

    P. Gorantla, H. T. Lam, N. Seiberg, and S.-H. Shao,A modified Villain formulation of fractons and other exotic theories,J. Math. Phys.62(2021), no. 10 102301, [arXiv:2103.01257]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  22. [23]

    Cheng and N

    M. Cheng and N. Seiberg,Lieb-Schultz-Mattis, Luttinger, and ’t Hooft - anomaly matching in lattice systems,SciPost Phys.15(2023), no. 2 051, [arXiv:2211.12543]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  23. [24]

    Fazza and T

    L. Fazza and T. Sulejmanpasic,Lattice quantum Villain Hamiltonians: compact scalars, U(1) gauge theories, fracton models and quantum Ising model dualities,JHEP 05(2023) 017, [arXiv:2211.13047]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  24. [25]

    Chatterjee, S

    A. Chatterjee, S. D. Pace, and S.-H. Shao,Quantized Axial Charge of Staggered Fermions and the Chiral Anomaly,Phys. Rev. Lett.134(2025), no. 2 021601, [arXiv:2409.12220]. 25

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  25. [26]

    Gioia and R

    L. Gioia and R. Thorngren,Exact Chiral Symmetries of 3+1D Hamiltonian Lattice Fermions,arXiv:2503.07708

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  26. [27]

    D. V. Else and C. Nayak,Classifying symmetry-protected topological phases through the anomalous action of the symmetry on the edge,Phys. Rev. B90(2014), no. 23 235137, [arXiv:1409.5436]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  27. [28]

    Kawagoe and M

    K. Kawagoe and M. Levin,Anomalies in bosonic symmetry-protected topological edge theories: Connection to F symbols and a method of calculation,Phys. Rev. B104 (2021), no. 11 115156, [arXiv:2105.02909]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  28. [29]

    Seifnashri,Lieb-Schultz-Mattis anomalies as obstructions to gauging (non-on-site) symmetries,SciPost Phys.16(2024), no

    S. Seifnashri,Lieb-Schultz-Mattis anomalies as obstructions to gauging (non-on-site) symmetries,SciPost Phys.16(2024), no. 4 098, [arXiv:2308.05151]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  29. [30]

    Kapustin and N

    A. Kapustin and N. Sopenko,Anomalous Symmetries of Quantum Spin Chains and a Generalization of the Lieb–Schultz–Mattis Theorem,Commun. Math. Phys.406 (2025), no. 10 238, [arXiv:2401.02533]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  30. [31]

    Seifnashri and W

    S. Seifnashri and W. Shirley,Disentangling anomaly-free symmetries of quantum spin chains,arXiv:2503.09717

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  31. [32]

    A. Bols, W. De Roeck, M. De Wilde, and B. d. O. Carvalho,Classification of Locality Preserving Symmetries on Spin Chains,Commun. Math. Phys.407(2026), no. 1 10, [arXiv:2503.15088]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  32. [33]

    S. D. Pace, M. L. Kim, A. Chatterjee, and S.-H. Shao,Parity Anomaly from a Lieb-Schultz-Mattis Theorem: Exact Valley Symmetries on the Lattice,Phys. Rev. Lett.135(2025), no. 23 236501, [arXiv:2505.04684]

    arXiv 2025

  33. [34]

    Kapustin and S

    A. Kapustin and S. Xu,Higher symmetries and anomalies in quantum lattice systems, arXiv:2505.04719

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  34. [35]

    Kawagoe and W

    K. Kawagoe and W. Shirley,Anomaly diagnosis via symmetry restriction in two-dimensional lattice systems,arXiv:2507.07430

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  35. [36]

    Y.-T. Tu, D. M. Long, and D. V. Else,Anomalies of global symmetries on the lattice, arXiv:2507.21209

    arXiv

  36. [37]

    Shirley, C

    W. Shirley, C. Zhang, W. Ji, and M. Levin,Anomaly-free symmetries with obstructions to gauging and onsiteability,arXiv:2507.21267

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  37. [38]

    Seiberg, S.-H

    N. Seiberg, S.-H. Shao, and W. Zhang,LSM and CPT,JHEP11(2025) 116, [arXiv:2508.17115]

    arXiv 2025

  38. [39]

    Y. Feng, R. Kobayashi, Y.-A. Chen, and S. Ryu,Higher-Form Anomalies on Lattices, arXiv:2509.12304

    arXiv

  39. [40]

    A. M. Czajka, R. Geiko, and R. Thorngren,Anomalies on the Lattice, Homotopy of Quantum Cellular Automata, and a Spectrum of Invertible States,arXiv:2512.02105. 26

    arXiv

  40. [41]

    Seiberg and W

    N. Seiberg and W. Zhang,Tori, Klein Bottles, and Modulo 8 Parity/Time-reversal Anomalies of 2+1d Staggered Fermions,arXiv:2601.01191

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  41. [42]

    Berkowitz, A

    E. Berkowitz, A. Cherman, and T. Jacobson,Exact lattice chiral symmetry in 2D gauge theory,Phys. Rev. D110(2024), no. 1 014510, [arXiv:2310.17539]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  42. [43]

    Seiberg and S

    N. Seiberg and S. Seifnashri. Work in progress

  43. [44]

    Jacobson and T

    T. Jacobson and T. Sulejmanpasic,Modified Villain formulation of Abelian Chern-Simons theory,Phys. Rev. D107(2023), no. 12 125017, [arXiv:2303.06160]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  44. [45]

    Jacobson and T

    T. Jacobson and T. Sulejmanpasic,Canonical quantization of lattice Chern-Simons theory,JHEP11(2024) 087, [arXiv:2401.09597]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  45. [46]

    Fidkowski, C

    L. Fidkowski, C. Xu, and C. Zhang,Non-invertible bosonic chiral symmetry on the lattice,arXiv:2510.17969

    arXiv

  46. [47]

    Chen,Instanton density operator in lattice QCD from higher category theory, SciPost Phys.19(2025), no

    J.-Y. Chen,Instanton density operator in lattice QCD from higher category theory, SciPost Phys.19(2025), no. 6 158, [arXiv:2406.06673]

    arXiv 2025

  47. [48]

    Thorngren, J

    R. Thorngren, J. Preskill, and L. Fidkowski,Chiral Lattice Gauge Theories from Symmetry Disentanglers,arXiv:2601.04304

    arXiv

  48. [49]

    Berenstein,Staggered bosons,Phys

    D. Berenstein,Staggered bosons,Phys. Rev. D108(2023), no. 7 074509, [arXiv:2303.12837]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  49. [50]

    Berenstein and P

    D. Berenstein and P. N. T. Lloyd,One dimensional staggered bosons, clock models, and their noninvertible symmetries,Phys. Rev. D110(2024), no. 5 054508, [arXiv:2311.00057]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  50. [51]

    S. R. Coleman, R. Jackiw, and L. Susskind,Charge Shielding and Quark Confinement in the Massive Schwinger Model,Annals Phys.93(1975) 267

    1975

  51. [52]

    S. R. Coleman,More About the Massive Schwinger Model,Annals Phys.101(1976) 239

    1976

  52. [53]

    Dempsey, I

    R. Dempsey, I. R. Klebanov, S. S. Pufu, and B. Zan,Discrete chiral symmetry and mass shift in the lattice Hamiltonian approach to the Schwinger model,Phys. Rev. Res. 4(2022), no. 4 043133, [arXiv:2206.05308]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  53. [54]

    Karch, D

    A. Karch, D. Tong, and C. Turner,A Web of 2d Dualities:Z 2 Gauge Fields and Arf Invariants,SciPost Phys.7(2019) 007, [arXiv:1902.05550]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  54. [55]

    Giveon, M

    A. Giveon, M. Porrati, and E. Rabinovici,Target space duality in string theory,Phys. Rept.244(1994) 77–202, [hep-th/9401139]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1994

  55. [56]

    Polchinski,String theory

    J. Polchinski,String theory. Vol. 1: An introduction to the bosonic string. Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics. Cambridge University Press, 12, 2007. 27

    2007

  56. [57]

    S. D. Pace, A. Chatterjee, and S.-H. Shao,Lattice T-duality from non-invertible symmetries in quantum spin chains,SciPost Phys.18(2025), no. 4 121, [arXiv:2412.18606]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  57. [58]

    Seiberg and S.-H

    N. Seiberg and S.-H. Shao,Majorana chain and Ising model - (non-invertible) translations, anomalies, and emanant symmetries,SciPost Phys.16(2024), no. 3 064, [arXiv:2307.02534]. 28

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024