Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

LLaVA-MORE: A Comparative Study of LLMs and Visual Backbones for Enhanced Visual Instruction Tuning

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2503.15621 v2 pith:KTAFXDMD submitted 2025-03-19 cs.CV cs.AIcs.CLcs.MM

classification cs.CVcs.AIcs.CLcs.MM
keywords visualmodelcomparisonslanguagellava-moremllmsmodelsarchitectures
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Recent progress in Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) has highlighted the critical roles of both the visual backbone and the underlying language model. While prior work has primarily focused on scaling these components to billions of parameters, the trade-offs between model size, architecture, and performance remain underexplored. Additionally, inconsistencies in training data and evaluation protocols have hindered direct comparisons, making it difficult to derive optimal design choices. In this paper, we introduce LLaVA-MORE, a new family of MLLMs that integrates recent language models with diverse visual backbones. To ensure fair comparisons, we employ a unified training protocol applied consistently across all architectures. Our analysis systematically explores both small- and medium-scale LLMs -- including Phi-4, LLaMA-3.1, and Gemma-2 -- to evaluate multimodal reasoning, generation, and instruction following, while examining the relationship between model size and performance. Beyond evaluating the LLM impact on final results, we conduct a comprehensive study of various visual encoders, ranging from CLIP-based architectures to alternatives such as DINOv2, SigLIP, and SigLIP2. Additional experiments investigate the effects of increased image resolution and variations in pre-training datasets. Overall, our results provide insights into the design of more effective MLLMs, offering a reproducible evaluation framework that facilitates direct comparisons and can guide future model development. Our source code and trained models are publicly available at: https://github.com/aimagelab/LLaVA-MORE.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. LLaSO: A Foundational Framework for Reproducible Research in Large Language and Speech Model

    cs.CL 2025-08 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    LLaSO releases a 3.8B speech-language model, 25.5M training instances, and an evaluation benchmark, claiming a normalized score of 0.72.

  2. Towards integrated sensors for optimized OCT with undetected photons

    quant-ph 2025-08 unverdicted novelty 5.0 of 10

    The authors show that an induced-coherence scheme outperforms the standard SU(1,1) scheme for integrated OCT sensors with undetected photons, achieving 28 micrometer axial resolution.

  3. MoDA: Modulation Adapter for Fine-Grained Visual Grounding in Instructional MLLMs

    cs.CV 2025-06 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    An instruction-conditioned channel gate on pre-aligned visual tokens improves grounding in LLaVA-style models on most reported benchmarks, but the mechanism is undercut by the paper's own ablation and the abstract ove...

Pith tools