Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 2 minor 6 cited by

Numerical simulations of density perturbation and gravitational wave production from cosmological first-order phase transition

T0 review · 2 major / 2 minor · reviewed 2026-05-23 · grok-4.3

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Lattice simulations show bubble wall motion dominates density perturbations for strong first-order phase transitions while vacuum decay delays dominate for weak ones.

desk verdict The simulations report an α-dependent switch in the main source of density perturbations plus specific power-law slopes, but the abstract gives no resolution or convergence details. read the letter →

arxiv 2502.20166 v4 pith:KU65E6ZS submitted 2025-02-27 hep-ph astro-ph.COhep-th

Jintao Zou , Zhiqing Zhu , Zizhuo Zhao , Ligong Bian This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-phastro-ph.COhep-th
keywords first-orderphasetransitiondensityperturbationgravitationalwaveslatticesimulationbubblewallvacuumdecayprimordialblackholescosmology
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper conducts three-dimensional lattice simulations to study density perturbations and gravitational waves produced during cosmological first-order phase transitions. It determines that the phase transition strength alpha controls the primary source of density perturbations, with bubble wall forward motion taking over for alpha greater than 1 and the delay of vacuum decay for alpha less than 1. The power spectrum of density perturbations scales as k cubed at small wavenumbers and k to the power of negative 1.5 at large wavenumbers. The gravitational wave power spectra scale as k cubed at small wavenumbers and k to the power of negative 2 at large wavenumbers. These results confirm that slow phase transitions can generate primordial black holes and supply predictions for gravitational wave detection.

What carries the argument

Three-dimensional lattice simulations of bubble wall motion and vacuum decay in first-order phase transitions.

What would settle it

An observation of gravitational waves from a first-order phase transition whose spectrum does not show the k cubed to k to the minus 2 transition would falsify the simulated results.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

In three-dimensional lattice simulations of first-order phase transitions, for phase transition strength alpha greater than 1 the forward motion of bubble walls is the primary source of density perturbation while for alpha less than 1 the dominant contribution comes from the delay of vacuum decay; the density perturbation power spectrum has slope k cubed at small k and k to the minus 1.5 at large k while the gravitational wave spectrum has slope k cubed at small k and k to the minus 2 at large k.

Load-bearing premise

The lattice simulations accurately capture the non-linear dynamics of bubble wall motion and vacuum decay without significant numerical artifacts or missing physical effects like friction or plasma interactions.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Primordial black holes can be produced by slow phase transitions.
  • Gravitational wave spectra from phase transitions follow specific power laws that can be searched for in observations.
  • Density perturbation spectra from phase transitions exhibit k cubed behavior at small scales transitioning to k to the minus 1.5 at large scales.
  • The switch in dominant mechanism occurs at alpha equal to 1.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The simulations indicate that non-linear effects in bubble dynamics require numerical treatment for accurate spectra.
  • These findings may help interpret potential signals in gravitational wave detectors as coming from early universe phase transitions.
  • Extending the simulations to include additional effects like plasma friction could refine the high-k behavior of the spectra.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports results from three-dimensional lattice simulations of cosmological first-order phase transitions, claiming that bubble-wall forward motion dominates density perturbations for transition strength α > 1 while delayed vacuum decay dominates for α < 1. It further states that the density-perturbation power spectrum follows k³ at small k and k^{-1.5} at large k, while the GW spectrum follows k³ at small k and k^{-2} at large k. The work concludes that slow phase transitions can produce primordial black holes and supplies GW spectral predictions for observational support.

Significance. If the simulation results prove robust, the α-dependent source attribution and the reported spectral indices would supply concrete numerical benchmarks for density-perturbation and GW production in first-order transitions, directly relevant to primordial-black-hole formation scenarios and to the interpretation of future gravitational-wave data. The three-dimensional treatment of non-linear bubble dynamics is a methodological strength that can anchor analytic approximations in the literature.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the claims that forward wall motion is primary for α > 1 and vacuum-decay delay is primary for α < 1, together with the specific indices k³ / k^{-1.5} (density) and k³ / k^{-2} (GW), are presented without any mention of lattice resolution, convergence tests, or error estimates. These attributions and slopes are load-bearing for the central numerical conclusions; their validity cannot be assessed from the given information.
  2. [Numerical-methods / results sections] Numerical-methods / results sections: no cross-check against known analytic limits (e.g., thin-wall or runaway-wall regimes) or against runs that include friction/plasma back-reaction is described, leaving open the possibility that the reported source dominance and power-law indices shift when those effects are restored.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the range of α values actually simulated and the bubble-wall velocities employed should be stated explicitly so readers can judge the domain of applicability of the reported transition in source dominance.
  2. Figure captions for power spectra should indicate the fitting procedure and any quoted uncertainties on the extracted slopes.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading of our manuscript and for highlighting important points regarding the presentation of our numerical results. We address each major comment below and outline the revisions we will make to strengthen the paper.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the claims that forward wall motion is primary for α > 1 and vacuum-decay delay is primary for α < 1, together with the specific indices k³ / k^{-1.5} (density) and k³ / k^{-2} (GW), are presented without any mention of lattice resolution, convergence tests, or error estimates. These attributions and slopes are load-bearing for the central numerical conclusions; their validity cannot be assessed from the given information.

    Authors: We agree that the abstract would benefit from explicit reference to the numerical validation to support the reported source attributions and spectral indices. Details on lattice resolution, convergence tests, and error estimates are already contained in the Numerical Methods and Results sections. We will revise the abstract to include a concise statement summarizing the simulation parameters and validation procedures performed. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Numerical-methods / results sections] Numerical-methods / results sections: no cross-check against known analytic limits (e.g., thin-wall or runaway-wall regimes) or against runs that include friction/plasma back-reaction is described, leaving open the possibility that the reported source dominance and power-law indices shift when those effects are restored.

    Authors: Our simulations are performed in the vacuum-dominated regime without plasma friction to isolate the gravitational effects of bubble dynamics. While parameter choices allow partial consistency with thin-wall expectations, we acknowledge that explicit cross-checks against analytic limits and friction-inclusive runs are not described. In the revised manuscript we will add a discussion paragraph comparing the obtained spectral indices to known analytic expectations in the thin-wall and runaway regimes and will explicitly note the limitations arising from the omission of plasma back-reaction. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: results are direct outputs of lattice simulations

full rationale

The paper reports outcomes from three-dimensional lattice simulations of first-order phase transitions. Claims regarding source dominance (bubble-wall motion for α>1 versus vacuum-decay delay for α<1) and extracted power-law slopes (k^3 / k^{-1.5} for density perturbations; k^3 / k^{-2} for GWs) are produced by the numerical evolution itself. No load-bearing step reduces by construction to a fitted parameter, self-citation chain, or ansatz imported from prior work by the same authors. The derivation chain is self-contained; the simulations constitute independent computational evidence rather than a renaming or re-derivation of inputs.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 1 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper uses numerical methods on top of standard assumptions in high energy physics and cosmology; no new free parameters or entities introduced in the abstract.

assumptions (1)
  • domain assumption Standard model of cosmology and first-order phase transition dynamics in quantum field theory.
    The simulations rely on established theoretical framework for FOPT.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Numerical simulations of density perturbation and gravitational wave production from cosmological first-order phase transition." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/KU65E6ZS

@misc{pith2026250220166,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Numerical simulations of density perturbation and gravitational wave production from cosmological first-order phase transition},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/KU65E6ZS}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2502.20166}
}
abstract

We conducted three-dimensional lattice simulations to study the density perturbation and gravitational waves (GWs) during first-order phase transition (FOPT). We find that for phase transition strength $\alpha > 1$, the forward motion of bubble walls becomes the primary source, whereas for $\alpha < 1$, the dominant contribution to the density perturbation comes from the delay of vacuum decay. Additionally, the power spectrum of density perturbations generated by the phase transition exhibits a slope of $k^3$ at small wavenumbers and $k^{-1.5}$ at large wavenumbers. Furthermore, we calculated the GW power spectra, which exhibit the slope of $k^3$ at small wavenumbers and $k^{-2}$ at large wavenumbers. Our numerical simulations confirm that slow PTs can produce PBHs and provide predictions for the GW power spectrum, offering theoretical support for GW detection.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2502.20166 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Equation of state (EOS) evolution for weak phase transition strength (top, solid line [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. The PBH abundance variation with respect to the PT strength parameter [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Evolution of σδ for weak phase transition strength (top, solid line α=0.5, dash-dotted line α=1) and strong phase transition strength (bottom, solid line α=5, dash-dotted line α=10) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (9 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Variation of the standard deviation σδ of accumulated overdensity perturbations with respect to the PT parameters α and β/H. when t/R∗ ∼ 1.2 mostly come from the energy transformation in the simulation volume, which is influenced by the forward motion of bubble walls. …
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: The power spectra of density perturbations for different [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: The energy density spectra of GWs for different [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: GW spectra for three scenarios: (α = 1, β/H = 10, T = 10−2 GeV), (α = 1, β/H = 10, T = 103 GeV), and (α = 10, β/H = 20, T = 107 GeV). The sensitivity curves including EPTA [98], PPTA [99], NANOGrav [100], µAres [101], SKA [97], LISA [34], Taiji [37], DECIGO [102], LIGO…
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: The mean field evolution under weak phase transition strength (left, solid line [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: The bubble slice diagram for β/H = 6 and α = 5. The dashed lines are presented to devide the simulation box to 64 Hubble volumes [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_9.png]
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: The energy density ρ under weak phase transition strength (left, α = 1, solid line β/H = 6, dash-dotted line β/H = 10) and strong phase transition strength (right, α = 10 solid line β/H = 6, dash￾dotted line β/H = 10) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_10.png]
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: δ of the last 16 delayed-decayed regions. The β/H from left to right are 6, 8, 10, and 12, the α from top to bottom are 0.5, 1, 5, and 10, respectively. We numerically analyze the evolution of local energy overdensities δ induced by delayed vacuum decay during FOPTs i…
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: From left to right, the GW power spectra correspond to [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_12.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 6 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Can the universe be matter-dominated after a supercooled first-order phase transition?

    hep-ph 2026-07 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    After a supercooled first-order phase transition, the scalar field's equation of state is set by the bubble-wall Lorentz factor γ*, and matter domination is delayed until a/a* ≃ γ* in the free-streaming limit.

  2. Gravitational Waves from Black Hole Reheating: The Scalar-Induced Component

    hep-ph 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0 of 10

    Accounting for the minimal mass spread of primordial black holes from gravitational collapse suppresses the Poltergeist GW background to the level of generic scalar-induced signals and reopens ultra-light PBH parameter space.

  3. Boiling After the Dust Settles: Constraining First-Order Phase Transitions During Dark Energy Domination

    hep-ph 2025-09 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    CMB anisotropies from stochastic bubble nucleation constrain late-time phase transitions to release less than ~1% of dark energy when β/H⋆≲25, much tighter than Hubble-budget limits.

  4. Numerical simulations of primordial black hole formation via delayed first-order phase transitions

    gr-qc 2026-01 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Spherically symmetric numerical relativity shows false-vacuum domains from delayed first-order phase transitions form type B (baby-universe) or type A (direct-collapse) primordial black holes, separated by a robust t_...

  5. Acoustically driven dark matter freeze-out

    hep-ph 2025-06 accept novelty 6.0 of 10

    Thermal dark matter freeze-out under small-scale acoustic density perturbations requires about a 10 percent larger annihilation cross section to match the observed relic abundance.

  6. Curvature Perturbations from First-Order Phase Transitions: Implications to Black Holes and Gravitational Waves

    hep-ph 2025-03 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    Covariant analysis of curvature perturbations from first-order phase transitions reveals gauge-dependent overestimation of primordial black holes and gravitational waves in prior non-covariant calculations, leading to...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

111 extracted references · 111 canonical work pages · cited by 6 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    As more and more bubbles form and collide, the initially uniform spatial structure is disrupted, resulting in an asymmetric energy distribution

    (15) During a FOPT, vacuum bubbles are generated throughout space via quantum tunneling and then rapidly expand. As more and more bubbles form and collide, the initially uniform spatial structure is disrupted, resulting in an asymmetric energy distribution. The walls of these bubbles carry high energy, and when they collide, this energy is intensely relea...

    work page

  2. [2]

    S. W. Hawking, I. G. Moss, and J. M. Stewart, Bubble Collisions in the Very Early Universe, Phys. Rev. D26, 2681 (1982)

    work page 1982

  3. [3]

    Crawford and D

    M. Crawford and D. N. Schramm, Spontaneous Generation of Density Perturbations in the Early Universe, Nature298, 538 (1982)

    work page 1982

  4. [4]

    Kodama, M

    H. Kodama, M. Sasaki, and K. Sato, Abundance of Primordial Holes Produced by Cosmological First Order Phase Transition, Prog. Theor. Phys.68, 1979 (1982)

    work page 1979

  5. [5]

    M. C. Johnson, H. V. Peiris, and L. Lehner, Determining the outcome of cosmic bubble collisions in full General Relativity, Phys. Rev. D85, 083516 (2012), arXiv:1112.4487 [hep-th]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2012

  6. [6]

    M. Y. Khlopov, R. V. Konoplich, S. G. Rubin, and A. S. Sakharov, Formation of black holes in first order phase transitions (1998), arXiv:hep-ph/9807343

    work page Pith review arXiv 1998

  7. [7]

    B. J. Carr and J. E. Lidsey, Primordial black holes and generalized constraints on chaotic inflation, Phys. Rev. D48, 543 (1993)

    work page 1993

  8. [8]

    Ivanov, P

    P. Ivanov, P. Naselsky, and I. Novikov, Inflation and primordial black holes as dark matter, Phys. Rev. D50, 7173 (1994)

    work page 1994

Show all 111 references
  1. [9]

    S. W. Hawking, Black Holes From Cosmic Strings, Phys. Lett. B231, 237 (1989)

    1989

  2. [10]

    R. R. Caldwell and P. Casper, Formation of black holes from collapsed cosmic string loops, Phys. Rev. D53, 3002 (1996), arXiv:gr-qc/9509012. 17

    1996 arXiv

  3. [11]

    A. C. Jenkins and M. Sakellariadou, Primordial black holes from cusp collapse on cosmic strings (2020), arXiv:2006.16249 [astro-ph.CO]

    2020

  4. [12]

    J. J. Blanco-Pillado, K. D. Olum, and A. Vilenkin, No black holes from cosmic string cusps (2021), arXiv:2101.05040 [astro-ph.CO]

    2021

  5. [13]

    Vachaspati, Lunar Mass Black Holes from QCD Axion Cosmology (2017), arXiv:1706.03868 [hep- th]

    T. Vachaspati, Lunar Mass Black Holes from QCD Axion Cosmology (2017), arXiv:1706.03868 [hep- th]

    2017 arXiv

  6. [14]

    Ferrer, E

    F. Ferrer, E. Masso, G. Panico, O. Pujolas, and F. Rompineve, Primordial Black Holes from the QCD axion, Phys. Rev. Lett.122, 101301 (2019), arXiv:1807.01707 [hep-ph]

    2019 arXiv

  7. [15]

    G. B. Gelmini, A. Simpson, and E. Vitagliano, Catastrogenesis: DM, GWs, and PBHs from ALP string-wall networks, JCAP02, 031, arXiv:2207.07126 [hep-ph]

  8. [16]

    G. B. Gelmini, J. Hyman, A. Simpson, and E. Vitagliano, Primordial black hole dark matter from catastrogenesis with unstable pseudo-Goldstone bosons, JCAP06, 055, arXiv:2303.14107 [hep-ph]

  9. [17]

    Gouttenoire and E

    Y. Gouttenoire and E. Vitagliano, Domain wall interpretation of the PTA signal confronting black hole overproduction, Phys. Rev. D110, L061306 (2024), arXiv:2306.17841 [gr-qc]

    2024

  10. [18]

    Gouttenoire and E

    Y. Gouttenoire and E. Vitagliano, Primordial black holes and wormholes from domain wall networks, Phys. Rev. D109, 123507 (2024), arXiv:2311.07670 [hep-ph]

    2024

  11. [19]

    Dolgov and J

    A. Dolgov and J. Silk, Baryon isocurvature fluctuations at small scales and baryonic dark matter, Phys. Rev. D47, 4244 (1993)

    1993

  12. [20]

    Kasai, M

    K. Kasai, M. Kawasaki, and K. Murai, Revisiting the Affleck-Dine mechanism for primordial black hole formation, JCAP10, 048, arXiv:2205.10148 [astro-ph.CO]

  13. [21]

    Cotner and A

    E. Cotner and A. Kusenko, Primordial black holes from supersymmetry in the early universe, Phys. Rev. Lett.119, 031103 (2017), arXiv:1612.02529 [astro-ph.CO]

    2017 arXiv

  14. [22]

    Martin, T

    J. Martin, T. Papanikolaou, and V. Vennin, Primordial black holes from the preheating instability in single-field inflation, JCAP01, 024, arXiv:1907.04236 [astro-ph.CO]

    1907

  15. [23]

    J. H. Chang, D. Egana-Ugrinovic, R. Essig, and C. Kouvaris, Structure Formation and Exotic Compact Objects in a Dissipative Dark Sector, JCAP03, 036, arXiv:1812.07000 [hep-ph]

    arXiv

  16. [24]

    M. M. Flores and A. Kusenko, Primordial Black Holes from Long-Range Scalar Forces and Scalar Radiative Cooling, Phys. Rev. Lett.126, 041101 (2021), arXiv:2008.12456 [astro-ph.CO]

    2021

  17. [25]

    Dom` enech, D

    G. Dom` enech, D. Inman, A. Kusenko, and M. Sasaki, Halo formation from Yukawa forces in the very early Universe, Phys. Rev. D108, 103543 (2023), arXiv:2304.13053 [astro-ph.CO]

    2023

  18. [26]

    Chakraborty, P

    A. Chakraborty, P. K. Chanda, K. L. Pandey, and S. Das, Formation and Abundance of Late-forming Primordial Black Holes as Dark Matter, Astrophys. J.932, 119 (2022), arXiv:2204.09628 [astro- ph.CO]

    2022

  19. [27]

    Sasaki, T

    M. Sasaki, T. Suyama, T. Tanaka, and S. Yokoyama, Primordial Black Hole Scenario for the Gravitational-Wave Event GW150914, Phys. Rev. Lett.117, 061101 (2016), [Erratum: Phys.Rev.Lett. 121, 059901 (2018)], arXiv:1603.08338 [astro-ph.CO]. 18

    2016 arXiv

  20. [28]

    S. Bird, I. Cholis, J. B. Mu˜ noz, Y. Ali-Ha¨ ımoud, M. Kamionkowski, E. D. Kovetz, A. Raccanelli, and A. G. Riess, Did LIGO detect dark matter?, Phys. Rev. Lett.116, 201301 (2016), arXiv:1603.00464 [astro-ph.CO]

    2016 arXiv

  21. [29]

    Clesse and J

    S. Clesse and J. Garc´ ıa-Bellido, The clustering of massive Primordial Black Holes as Dark Mat- ter: measuring their mass distribution with Advanced LIGO, Phys. Dark Univ.15, 142 (2017), arXiv:1603.05234 [astro-ph.CO]

    2017 arXiv

  22. [30]

    H¨ utsi, M

    G. H¨ utsi, M. Raidal, V. Vaskonen, and H. Veerm¨ ae, Two populations of LIGO-Virgo black holes, JCAP03, 068, arXiv:2012.02786 [astro-ph.CO]

    2012

  23. [31]

    A. Hall, A. D. Gow, and C. T. Byrnes, Bayesian analysis of LIGO-Virgo mergers: Primordial vs. as- trophysical black hole populations, Phys. Rev. D102, 123524 (2020), arXiv:2008.13704 [astro-ph.CO]

    2020

  24. [32]

    Franciolini, V

    G. Franciolini, V. Baibhav, V. De Luca, K. K. Y. Ng, K. W. K. Wong, E. Berti, P. Pani, A. Riotto, and S. Vitale, Searching for a subpopulation of primordial black holes in LIGO-Virgo gravitational-wave data, Phys. Rev. D105, 083526 (2022), arXiv:2105.03349 [gr-qc]

    2022

  25. [33]

    J. He, H. Deng, Y.-S. Piao, and J. Zhang, Implications of GWTC-3 on primordial black holes from vacuum bubbles, Phys. Rev. D109, 044035 (2024), arXiv:2303.16810 [astro-ph.CO]

    2024

  26. [34]

    Armanoet al., Sub-Femto- g Free Fall for Space-Based Gravitational Wave Observatories: LISA Pathfinder Results, Phys

    M. Armanoet al., Sub-Femto- g Free Fall for Space-Based Gravitational Wave Observatories: LISA Pathfinder Results, Phys. Rev. Lett.116, 231101 (2016)

    2016

  27. [35]

    Amaro-Seoaneet al.(LISA), Laser Interferometer Space Antenna (2017), arXiv:1702.00786 [astro- ph.IM]

    P. Amaro-Seoaneet al.(LISA), Laser Interferometer Space Antenna (2017), arXiv:1702.00786 [astro- ph.IM]

    2017 arXiv

  28. [36]

    P. A. Seoaneet al.(LISA), Astrophysics with the Laser Interferometer Space Antenna, Living Rev. Rel.26, 2 (2023), arXiv:2203.06016 [gr-qc]

    2023

  29. [37]

    Hu and Y.-L

    W.-R. Hu and Y.-L. Wu, The Taiji Program in Space for gravitational wave physics and the nature of gravity, Natl. Sci. Rev.4, 685 (2017)

    2017

  30. [38]

    Ruan, Z.-K

    W.-H. Ruan, Z.-K. Guo, R.-G. Cai, and Y.-Z. Zhang, Taiji program: Gravitational-wave sources, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A35, 2050075 (2020), arXiv:1807.09495 [gr-qc]

    2020

  31. [39]

    Wuet al.(Taiji Scientific), China’s first step towards probing the expanding universe and the nature of gravity using a space borne gravitational wave antenna, Commun

    Y.-L. Wuet al.(Taiji Scientific), China’s first step towards probing the expanding universe and the nature of gravity using a space borne gravitational wave antenna, Commun. Phys.4, 34 (2021)

    2021

  32. [40]

    Luoet al.(TianQin), TianQin: a space-borne gravitational wave detector, Class

    J. Luoet al.(TianQin), TianQin: a space-borne gravitational wave detector, Class. Quant. Grav.33, 035010 (2016), arXiv:1512.02076 [astro-ph.IM]

    2016 arXiv

  33. [41]

    Luoet al., The first round result from the TianQin-1 satellite, Class

    J. Luoet al., The first round result from the TianQin-1 satellite, Class. Quant. Grav.37, 185013 (2020), arXiv:2008.09534 [physics.ins-det]

    2020

  34. [42]

    Meiet al.(TianQin), The TianQin project: current progress on science and technology, PTEP 2021, 05A107 (2021), arXiv:2008.10332 [gr-qc]

    J. Meiet al.(TianQin), The TianQin project: current progress on science and technology, PTEP 2021, 05A107 (2021), arXiv:2008.10332 [gr-qc]

    2021

  35. [43]

    J. Liu, L. Bian, R.-G. Cai, Z.-K. Guo, and S.-J. Wang, Primordial black hole production during first-order phase transitions, Phys. Rev. D105, L021303 (2022), arXiv:2106.05637 [astro-ph.CO]

    2022

  36. [44]

    M. B. Hindmarsh, M. L¨ uben, J. Lumma, and M. Pauly, Phase transitions in the early universe, SciPost Phys. Lect. Notes24, 1 (2021), arXiv:2008.09136 [astro-ph.CO]. 19

    2021

  37. [45]

    Kosowsky, M

    A. Kosowsky, M. S. Turner, and R. Watkins, Gravitational waves from first order cosmological phase transitions, Phys. Rev. Lett.69, 2026 (1992)

    2026

  38. [46]

    Kosowsky and M

    A. Kosowsky and M. S. Turner, Gravitational radiation from colliding vacuum bubbles: envelope approximation to many bubble collisions, Phys. Rev. D47, 4372 (1993), arXiv:astro-ph/9211004

    1993 arXiv

  39. [47]

    Kosowsky, M

    A. Kosowsky, M. S. Turner, and R. Watkins, Gravitational radiation from colliding vacuum bubbles, Phys. Rev. D45, 4514 (1992)

    1992

  40. [48]

    H. L. Child and J. T. Giblin, Jr., Gravitational Radiation from First-Order Phase Transitions, JCAP 10, 001, arXiv:1207.6408 [astro-ph.CO]

    arXiv

  41. [49]

    Cutting, M

    D. Cutting, M. Hindmarsh, and D. J. Weir, Gravitational waves from vacuum first-order phase tran- sitions: from the envelope to the lattice, Phys. Rev. D97, 123513 (2018), arXiv:1802.05712 [astro- ph.CO]

    2018 arXiv

  42. [50]

    Cutting, E

    D. Cutting, E. G. Escartin, M. Hindmarsh, and D. J. Weir, Gravitational waves from vacuum first order phase transitions II: from thin to thick walls, Phys. Rev. D103, 023531 (2021), arXiv:2005.13537 [astro-ph.CO]

    2021

  43. [51]

    Y. Li, Y. Jia, and L. Bian, Numerical simulation of domain wall and first-order phase transition in an expanding universe, JCAP02, 038, arXiv:2304.05220 [hep-ph]

  44. [52]

    Z. Zhao, Y. Di, L. Bian, and R.-G. Cai, Probing the electroweak symmetry breaking history with gravitational waves, JHEP10, 158, arXiv:2204.04427 [hep-ph]

  45. [53]

    Y. Di, J. Wang, R. Zhou, L. Bian, R.-G. Cai, and J. Liu, Magnetic Field and Gravitational Waves from the First-Order Phase Transition, Phys. Rev. Lett.126, 251102 (2021), arXiv:2012.15625 [astro- ph.CO]

    2021

  46. [54]

    J. T. Giblin, Jr. and J. B. Mertens, Vacuum Bubbles in the Presence of a Relativistic Fluid, JHEP 12, 042, arXiv:1310.2948 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  47. [55]

    Hindmarsh, S

    M. Hindmarsh, S. J. Huber, K. Rummukainen, and D. J. Weir, Numerical simulations of acoustically generated gravitational waves at a first order phase transition, Phys. Rev. D92, 123009 (2015), arXiv:1504.03291 [astro-ph.CO]

    2015 arXiv

  48. [56]

    Hindmarsh, S

    M. Hindmarsh, S. J. Huber, K. Rummukainen, and D. J. Weir, Shape of the acoustic gravitational wave power spectrum from a first order phase transition, Phys. Rev. D96, 103520 (2017), [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 101, 089902 (2020)], arXiv:1704.05871 [astro-ph.CO]

    2017

  49. [57]

    Hindmarsh, S

    M. Hindmarsh, S. J. Huber, K. Rummukainen, and D. J. Weir, Gravitational waves from the sound of a first order phase transition, Phys. Rev. Lett.112, 041301 (2014), arXiv:1304.2433 [hep-ph]

    2014 arXiv

  50. [58]

    Cutting, M

    D. Cutting, M. Hindmarsh, and D. J. Weir, Vorticity, kinetic energy, and suppressed gravita- tional wave production in strong first order phase transitions, Phys. Rev. Lett.125, 021302 (2020), arXiv:1906.00480 [hep-ph]

    2020

  51. [59]

    Cutting, E

    D. Cutting, E. Vilhonen, and D. J. Weir, Droplet collapse during strongly supercooled transitions, Physical Review D106, 10.1103/physrevd.106.103524 (2022). 20

    2022 doi

  52. [60]

    J. T. Giblin and J. B. Mertens, Gravitional radiation from first-order phase transitions in the presence of a fluid, Phys. Rev. D90, 023532 (2014), arXiv:1405.4005 [astro-ph.CO]

    2014 arXiv

  53. [61]

    Kosowsky, A

    A. Kosowsky, A. Mack, and T. Kahniashvili, Gravitational radiation from cosmological turbulence, Phys. Rev. D66, 024030 (2002), arXiv:astro-ph/0111483

    2002 arXiv

  54. [62]

    Kamionkowski, A

    M. Kamionkowski, A. Kosowsky, and M. S. Turner, Gravitational radiation from first order phase transitions, Phys. Rev. D49, 2837 (1994), arXiv:astro-ph/9310044

    1994 arXiv

  55. [63]

    Neronov, A

    A. Neronov, A. Roper Pol, C. Caprini, and D. Semikoz, NANOGrav signal from magnetohydrodynamic turbulence at the QCD phase transition in the early Universe, Phys. Rev. D103, 041302 (2021), arXiv:2009.14174 [astro-ph.CO]

    2021

  56. [64]

    Roper Pol, S

    A. Roper Pol, S. Mandal, A. Brandenburg, T. Kahniashvili, and A. Kosowsky, Numerical simu- lations of gravitational waves from early-universe turbulence, Phys. Rev. D102, 083512 (2020), arXiv:1903.08585 [astro-ph.CO]

    2020

  57. [65]

    Caprini, R

    C. Caprini, R. Durrer, and G. Servant, The stochastic gravitational wave background from turbulence and magnetic fields generated by a first-order phase transition, JCAP12, 024, arXiv:0909.0622 [astro- ph.CO]

    arXiv

  58. [66]

    Kahniashvili, L

    T. Kahniashvili, L. Campanelli, G. Gogoberidze, Y. Maravin, and B. Ratra, Gravitational Radiation from Primordial Helical Inverse Cascade MHD Turbulence, Phys. Rev. D78, 123006 (2008), [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 79, 109901 (2009)], arXiv:0809.1899 [astro-ph]

    2008 arXiv

  59. [67]

    Kahniashvili, L

    T. Kahniashvili, L. Kisslinger, and T. Stevens, Gravitational Radiation Generated by Magnetic Fields in Cosmological Phase Transitions, Phys. Rev. D81, 023004 (2010), arXiv:0905.0643 [astro-ph.CO]

    2010 arXiv

  60. [68]

    Capriniet al., Science with the space-based interferometer eLISA

    C. Capriniet al., Science with the space-based interferometer eLISA. II: Gravitational waves from cosmological phase transitions, JCAP04, 001, arXiv:1512.06239 [astro-ph.CO]

    arXiv

  61. [69]

    Wansleben, Y

    M. Wansleben, Y. Kayser, P. H¨ onicke, I. Holfelder, A. W¨ ahlisch, R. Unterumsberger, and B. Beckhoff, Experimental determination of line energies, line widths and relative transition probabilities of the gadolinium l x-ray emission spectrum, Metrologia56, 065007 (2019)

    2019

  62. [70]

    Athron, C

    P. Athron, C. Bal´ azs, A. Fowlie, L. Morris, and L. Wu, Cosmological phase transitions: From perturbative particle physics to gravitational waves, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys.135, 104094 (2024), arXiv:2305.02357 [hep-ph]

    2024

  63. [71]

    Caldwellet al., Detection of early-universe gravitational-wave signatures and fundamental physics, Gen

    R. Caldwellet al., Detection of early-universe gravitational-wave signatures and fundamental physics, Gen. Rel. Grav.54, 156 (2022), arXiv:2203.07972 [gr-qc]

    2022

  64. [72]

    Bianet al., The Gravitational-wave physics II: Progress, Sci

    L. Bianet al., The Gravitational-wave physics II: Progress, Sci. China Phys. Mech. Astron.64, 120401 (2021), arXiv:2106.10235 [gr-qc]

    2021

  65. [73]

    S. R. Coleman, The Fate of the False Vacuum. 1. Semiclassical Theory, Phys. Rev. D15, 2929 (1977), [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 16, 1248 (1977)]

    1977

  66. [74]

    Enqvist, J

    K. Enqvist, J. Ignatius, K. Kajantie, and K. Rummukainen, Nucleation and bubble growth in a first order cosmological electroweak phase transition, Phys. Rev. D45, 3415 (1992). 21

    1992

  67. [75]

    Adshead, J

    P. Adshead, J. T. Giblin, M. Pieroni, and Z. J. Weiner, Constraining axion inflation with gravitational waves from preheating, Phys. Rev. D101, 083534 (2020), arXiv:1909.12842 [astro-ph.CO]

    2020

  68. [76]

    Musco, J

    I. Musco, J. C. Miller, and L. Rezzolla, Computations of primordial black hole formation, Class. Quant. Grav.22, 1405 (2005), arXiv:gr-qc/0412063

    2005 arXiv

  69. [77]

    Harada, C.-M

    T. Harada, C.-M. Yoo, and K. Kohri, Threshold of primordial black hole formation, Phys. Rev. D88, 084051 (2013), [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 89, 029903 (2014)], arXiv:1309.4201 [astro-ph.CO]

    2013 arXiv

  70. [78]

    Musco, Threshold for primordial black holes: Dependence on the shape of the cosmological pertur- bations, Phys

    I. Musco, Threshold for primordial black holes: Dependence on the shape of the cosmological pertur- bations, Phys. Rev. D100, 123524 (2019), arXiv:1809.02127 [gr-qc]

    2019

  71. [79]

    Escriv` a, C

    A. Escriv` a, C. Germani, and R. K. Sheth, Universal threshold for primordial black hole formation, Phys. Rev. D101, 044022 (2020), arXiv:1907.13311 [gr-qc]

    2020

  72. [80]

    Jedamzik and J

    K. Jedamzik and J. C. Niemeyer, Primordial black hole formation during first order phase transitions, Phys. Rev. D59, 124014 (1999), arXiv:astro-ph/9901293

    1999 arXiv

  73. [81]

    A. M. Green, A. R. Liddle, K. A. Malik, and M. Sasaki, A New calculation of the mass fraction of primordial black holes, Phys. Rev. D70, 041502 (2004), arXiv:astro-ph/0403181

    2004 arXiv

  74. [82]

    Musco and J

    I. Musco and J. C. Miller, Primordial black hole formation in the early universe: critical behaviour and self-similarity, Class. Quant. Grav.30, 145009 (2013), arXiv:1201.2379 [gr-qc]

    2013 arXiv

  75. [83]

    Harada, C.-M

    T. Harada, C.-M. Yoo, T. Nakama, and Y. Koga, Cosmological long-wavelength solutions and primor- dial black hole formation, Phys. Rev. D91, 084057 (2015), arXiv:1503.03934 [gr-qc]

    2015 arXiv

  76. [84]

    Gon¸ calves, A

    D. Gon¸ calves, A. Kaladharan, and Y. Wu, Primordial black holes from first-order phase transition in the singlet-extended SM, Phys. Rev. D111, 035009 (2025), arXiv:2406.07622 [hep-ph]

    2025

  77. [85]

    Hashino, S

    K. Hashino, S. Kanemura, and T. Takahashi, Primordial black holes as a probe of strongly first-order electroweak phase transition, Phys. Lett. B833, 137261 (2022), arXiv:2111.13099 [hep-ph]

    2022

  78. [86]

    A. S. Josan, A. M. Green, and K. A. Malik, Generalised constraints on the curvature perturbation from primordial black holes, Phys. Rev. D79, 103520 (2009), arXiv:0903.3184 [astro-ph.CO]

    2009 arXiv

  79. [87]

    K. Ando, K. Inomata, and M. Kawasaki, Primordial black holes and uncertainties in the choice of the window function, Phys. Rev. D97, 103528 (2018), arXiv:1802.06393 [astro-ph.CO]

    2018 arXiv

  80. [88]

    Z. J. Weiner, Stencil solvers for pdes on gpus: An example from cosmology, Computing in Science & Engineering23, 55 (2021)

    2021

  81. [89]

    Kawana, T

    K. Kawana, T. Kim, and P. Lu, PBH formation from overdensities in delayed vacuum transitions, Phys. Rev. D108, 103531 (2023), arXiv:2212.14037 [astro-ph.CO]

    2023

  82. [90]

    Cai, Y.-S

    R.-G. Cai, Y.-S. Hao, and S.-J. Wang, Primordial black holes and curvature perturbations from false vacuum islands, Sci. China Phys. Mech. Astron.67, 290411 (2024), arXiv:2404.06506 [astro-ph.CO]

    2024

  83. [91]

    Gouttenoire and T

    Y. Gouttenoire and T. Volansky, Primordial black holes from supercooled phase transitions, Phys. Rev. D110, 043514 (2024), arXiv:2305.04942 [hep-ph]

    2024

  84. [92]

    Gouttenoire, First-Order Phase Transition Interpretation of Pulsar Timing Array Signal Is Consis- tent with Solar-Mass Black Holes, Phys

    Y. Gouttenoire, First-Order Phase Transition Interpretation of Pulsar Timing Array Signal Is Consis- tent with Solar-Mass Black Holes, Phys. Rev. Lett.131, 171404 (2023), arXiv:2307.04239 [hep-ph]. 22

    2023

  85. [93]

    Gouttenoire, Primordial black holes from conformal Higgs, Phys

    Y. Gouttenoire, Primordial black holes from conformal Higgs, Phys. Lett. B855, 138800 (2024), arXiv:2311.13640 [hep-ph]

    2024

  86. [94]

    J. Liu, L. Bian, R.-G. Cai, Z.-K. Guo, and S.-J. Wang, Constraining First-Order Phase Transitions with Curvature Perturbations, Phys. Rev. Lett.130, 051001 (2023), arXiv:2208.14086 [astro-ph.CO]

    2023

  87. [95]

    Falkowski and J

    A. Falkowski and J. M. No, Non-thermal Dark Matter Production from the Electroweak Phase Tran- sition: Multi-TeV WIMPs and ’Baby-Zillas’, JHEP02, 034, arXiv:1211.5615 [hep-ph]

    arXiv

  88. [96]

    Konstandin and G

    T. Konstandin and G. Servant, Natural Cold Baryogenesis from Strongly Interacting Electroweak Symmetry Breaking, JCAP07, 024, arXiv:1104.4793 [hep-ph]

    arXiv

  89. [97]

    Aasiet al.(LIGO Scientific), Advanced LIGO, Class

    J. Aasiet al.(LIGO Scientific), Advanced LIGO, Class. Quant. Grav.32, 074001 (2015), arXiv:1411.4547 [gr-qc]

    2015 arXiv

  90. [98]

    C. L. Carilli and S. Rawlings, Science with the Square Kilometer Array: Motivation, key science projects, standards and assumptions, New Astron. Rev.48, 979 (2004), arXiv:astro-ph/0409274

    2004 arXiv

  91. [99]

    Lentatiet al.(EPTA), European Pulsar Timing Array Limits On An Isotropic Stochastic Gravitational-Wave Background, Mon

    L. Lentatiet al.(EPTA), European Pulsar Timing Array Limits On An Isotropic Stochastic Gravitational-Wave Background, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.453, 2576 (2015), arXiv:1504.03692 [astro-ph.CO]

    2015 arXiv

  92. [100]

    R. M. Shannonet al., Gravitational waves from binary supermassive black holes missing in pulsar observations, Science349, 1522 (2015), arXiv:1509.07320 [astro-ph.CO]

    2015 arXiv

  93. [101]

    Arzoumanianet al.(NANOGRAV), The NANOGrav 11-year Data Set: Pulsar-timing Constraints On The Stochastic Gravitational-wave Background, Astrophys

    Z. Arzoumanianet al.(NANOGRAV), The NANOGrav 11-year Data Set: Pulsar-timing Constraints On The Stochastic Gravitational-wave Background, Astrophys. J.859, 47 (2018), arXiv:1801.02617 [astro-ph.HE]

    2018 arXiv

  94. [102]

    Sesanaet al., Unveiling the gravitational universe atµ-Hz frequencies, Exper

    A. Sesanaet al., Unveiling the gravitational universe atµ-Hz frequencies, Exper. Astron.51, 1333 (2021), arXiv:1908.11391 [astro-ph.IM]

    2021 arXiv

  95. [103]

    Kawamuraet al., The Japanese space gravitational wave antenna: DECIGO, Class

    S. Kawamuraet al., The Japanese space gravitational wave antenna: DECIGO, Class. Quant. Grav. 28, 094011 (2011)

    2011

  96. [104]

    Reitzeet al., Cosmic Explorer: The U.S

    D. Reitzeet al., Cosmic Explorer: The U.S. Contribution to Gravitational-Wave Astronomy beyond LIGO, Bull. Am. Astron. Soc.51, 035 (2019), arXiv:1907.04833 [astro-ph.IM]

    2019 arXiv

  97. [105]

    Punturoet al., The Einstein Telescope: A third-generation gravitational wave observatory, Class

    M. Punturoet al., The Einstein Telescope: A third-generation gravitational wave observatory, Class. Quant. Grav.27, 194002 (2010)

    2010

  98. [106]

    G. Elor, R. Jinno, S. Kumar, R. McGehee, and Y. Tsai, Finite Bubble Statistics Constrain Late Cosmological Phase Transitions, Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 211003 (2024), arXiv:2311.16222 [hep-ph]

    2024

  99. [107]

    Bai and M

    Y. Bai and M. Korwar, Cosmological constraints on first-order phase transitions, Phys. Rev. D105, 095015 (2022), arXiv:2109.14765 [hep-ph]

    2022

  100. [108]

    Deng and L

    S. Deng and L. Bian, Constraints on new physics around the MeV scale with cosmological observations, Phys. Rev. D108, 063516 (2023), arXiv:2304.06576 [hep-ph]

    2023

  101. [109]

    Lewicki, P

    M. Lewicki, P. Toczek, and V. Vaskonen, Black Holes and Gravitational Waves from Slow First-Order Phase Transitions, Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 221003 (2024), arXiv:2402.04158 [astro-ph.CO]. 23

    2024

  102. [110]

    Dom` enech, S

    G. Dom` enech, S. Pi, and M. Sasaki, Induced gravitational waves as a probe of thermal history of the universe, JCAP08, 017, arXiv:2005.12314 [gr-qc]

    2005

  103. [111]

    R.-G. Cai, S. Pi, and M. Sasaki, Universal infrared scaling of gravitational wave background spectra, Phys. Rev. D102, 083528 (2020), arXiv:1909.13728 [astro-ph.CO]

    2020

Pith tools

Reviewed May 23, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.