REVIEW 5 cited by
Measuring the Carbon Intensity of AI in Cloud Instances
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Measuring the Carbon Intensity of AI in Cloud Instances
read the original abstract
By providing unprecedented access to computational resources, cloud computing has enabled rapid growth in technologies such as machine learning, the computational demands of which incur a high energy cost and a commensurate carbon footprint. As a result, recent scholarship has called for better estimates of the greenhouse gas impact of AI: data scientists today do not have easy or reliable access to measurements of this information, precluding development of actionable tactics. Cloud providers presenting information about software carbon intensity to users is a fundamental stepping stone towards minimizing emissions. In this paper, we provide a framework for measuring software carbon intensity, and propose to measure operational carbon emissions by using location-based and time-specific marginal emissions data per energy unit. We provide measurements of operational software carbon intensity for a set of modern models for natural language processing and computer vision, and a wide range of model sizes, including pretraining of a 6.1 billion parameter language model. We then evaluate a suite of approaches for reducing emissions on the Microsoft Azure cloud compute platform: using cloud instances in different geographic regions, using cloud instances at different times of day, and dynamically pausing cloud instances when the marginal carbon intensity is above a certain threshold. We confirm previous results that the geographic region of the data center plays a significant role in the carbon intensity for a given cloud instance, and find that choosing an appropriate region can have the largest operational emissions reduction impact. We also show that the time of day has notable impact on operational software carbon intensity. Finally, we conclude with recommendations for how machine learning practitioners can use software carbon intensity information to reduce environmental impact.
Forward citations
Cited by 5 Pith papers
-
The Hidden Cost of Thinking: Energy Use and Environmental Impact of LMs Beyond Pretraining
Full development of 7B and 32B Olmo 3 models used 12.3 GWh datacenter energy and emitted 4,251 tCO2eq, with development overheads accounting for 82% of compute and reasoning models costing 17x more to post-train than ...
-
How Creatives Approach GenAI Image Generation: Tensions Between Structured Guidance, Self-Experimentation, and Creative Autonomy
Creatives prefer self-experimentation over structured guidance for GenAI image tools to preserve creative freedom, even when guidance aids AI literacy.
-
Assessing the Carbon Emissions and Energy Consumption of U.S. Hyperscale Data Centers
US hyperscale data centers consumed 68-99 TWh electricity and emitted 37-54 Mt CO2, representing 1.8% of US electricity use with average carbon intensity 48% above the national grid average.
-
How Creatives Approach GenAI Image Generation: Tensions Between Structured Guidance, Self-Experimentation, and Creative Autonomy
Qualitative studies show creatives prefer self-experimentation over structured guidance for GenAI image tools to preserve creative autonomy despite terminology barriers.
-
Assessing the Energy and Carbon Emissions of Neural Speaker Verification Model in Training and Inference
Empirical study finds diminishing accuracy returns against steep energy growth for deeper and wider ResNet speaker verification models on VoxCeleb2.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.