Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2205.06979 v1 pith:KVJTD6PN submitted 2022-05-14 math.OC cs.GT

Distributed coordination for seeking the optimal Nash equilibrium of aggregative games

classification math.OC cs.GT
keywords equilibriumnashdistributedgameproblemalgorithmcoordinationoptimal
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

This paper aims to design a distributed coordination algorithm for solving a multi-agent decision problem with a hierarchical structure. The primary goal is to search the Nash equilibrium of a noncooperative game such that each player has no incentive to deviate from the equilibrium under its private objective. Meanwhile, the agents can coordinate to optimize the social cost within the set of Nash equilibria of the underlying game. Such an optimal Nash equilibrium problem can be modeled as a distributed optimization problem with variational inequality constraints. We consider the scenario where the objective functions of both the underlying game and social cost optimization problem have a special aggregation structure. Since each player only has access to its local objectives while cannot know all players' decisions, a distributed algorithm is highly desirable. By utilizing the Tikhonov regularization and dynamical averaging tracking technique, we propose a distributed coordination algorithm by introducing an incentive term in addition to the gradient-based Nash equilibrium seeking, so as to intervene players' decisions to improve the system efficiency. We prove its convergence to the optimal Nash equilibrium of a monotone aggregative game with simulation studies.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.