Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 2 cited by

For a spinning source, the N-point energy correlator's full angular dependence is universal; all dynamics live in spinning correlators confined to a bounded region by unitarity and energy positivity.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-03 15:21 UTC pith:KWFBFFLL

load-bearing objection A genuinely new framework for the angular structure of energy correlators, with clean positivity bounds and a first QCD calculation; the IR-insensitivity claim needs a sharper argument about soft multiplicity. the 2 major comments →

arxiv 2512.16985 v2 pith:KWFBFFLL submitted 2025-12-18 hep-ph

Energy Correlators of Spinning Sources

Marc Riembau , Minho Son This is my paper
classification hep-ph
keywords energy correlatorsspinning correlatorsangular momentumpositivity boundsenergy-energy correlatorenergy-charge correlatorQCDsum rules
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper establishes that the full angular dependence of an N-point energy correlator produced by a spinning source is fixed by rotation symmetry, so measuring only the inclusive correlator throws away exactly the angular-momentum information of both the source and the detector array. The remaining physics is carried by spinning correlators H^J_{h'-h,m'-m}(z_ij), one per angular-momentum channel, which depend only on the internal detector angles. Positivity of the energy flux and unitarity confine these functions to a sharply bounded region; the boundary is realized by pure spin states, and any theory in the interior is a convex mixture of such extremal configurations. The paper then computes the two-point spinning correlators in QCD and shows that their ratios to the inclusive correlator are largely infrared-insensitive, making them direct probes of the hard scattering, and it extends the analysis to energy-charge correlators and to spin-resolved sum rules.

Core claim

For a vector current—and by extension any spin-J source—the density matrix of the N-point energy correlator decomposes into a universal part fixed by rotational D-matrices plus a sum over spinning correlators H^J_{h'-h,m'-m}(z_ij) that carry all dynamical information. Unitarity and energy positivity confine these correlators to a bounded region whose extremal points are generated by pure spin states; in the two-point case the two independent structures c(z) and b(z) must lie in a triangle whose vertices are saturated by back-to-back or collinear configurations with definite spin projections. In QCD, the ratios of these spinning correlators to the inclusive correlator are computed at leading

What carries the argument

The central objects are the spinning energy correlators H^J_{h'-h,m'-m}(z_ij), the coefficients of the rotational D-matrix decomposition of the hadronic tensor; they carry all dynamics beyond the inclusive singlet. Positivity of the hadronic tensor, following from unitarity and energy positivity, bounds these functions inside a convex region—for the two-point correlator, a triangle in the (c(z), b(z)) plane—with pure spin states on the boundary. Soft and collinear factorization then makes the ratios H^J/H^1 infrared-insensitive, so normalized spinning correlators can be computed at fixed order in QCD.

Load-bearing premise

The claim that the normalized spinning correlators are insensitive to infrared physics assumes the energy detector annihilates the soft sector, which requires the number of soft quanta to stay below roughly 1/theta^2; the paper flags this explicitly in Section 3.1 around Eq. (59) and footnote 7, noting black-hole evaporation as a case where it can fail.

What would settle it

Measure the two-point spinning ratios a_EE^(2,0)(z) and a_EE^(2,2)(z) at high energy with precision in the mid-z bulk; if they differ systematically from the paper's fixed-order prediction beyond perturbative corrections, or if they depend visibly on the soft or hadronization cutoff, the claimed infrared insensitivity of these observables is falsified.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • The complete Euler-angle dependence of any N-point correlator is now determined by symmetry, leaving only the 2N-3 internal detector angles as dynamical variables.
  • The positivity bounds provide a spin-J, N-point generalization of the conformal-collider bounds, so any calculation or model of spinning correlators must land inside the allowed bounded region.
  • Ratios of spinning to inclusive correlators are stable under hadronization and can be computed at fixed order, offering new precision observables for the hard part of electron-positron and hadron-collider processes.
  • Energy-charge spinning correlators introduce J=1 structures sensitive to polarization and charge asymmetries, while the J=2 components are infrared-safe and match hadron-level simulations.
  • The generalized sum rules determine lower-point spinning correlators from higher-point ones, including endpoint terms, separately in each angular-momentum channel.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the same decomposition is applied to spin-2 sources such as gravitational energy flux, the positivity framework would bound gravitational correlators; the paper's collinear analysis already notes a transverse-spin h=4 candidate in gravity, suggesting the machinery extends beyond QCD.
  • The spin-resolved sum rules imply that future track-based detectors could access the Euler-angle dependence without full event reconstruction, making these observables experimentally practical.
  • The bounded regions for higher-spin sources could be used to constrain OPE data in conformal field theories, an application the paper leaves open.
  • The infrared-insensitive ratios may provide a cleaner handle on electroweak boson polarization than conventional event-shape observables, since the hard spin structure survives hadronization.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. This paper develops a general framework for the fully differential N-point energy correlator of a spinning source. The authors show that the dependence on the Euler angles of the detector configuration is fixed by symmetry and organized in Wigner D-matrices, while the dynamical content is carried by 'spinning correlators' H^J_{h'-h,m'-m}(z_ij). They derive positivity bounds from the spectral representation, extend the one-point Hofman-Maldacena bounds to arbitrary spin and to higher points, and compute the two-point spinning energy and energy-charge correlators in perturbative QCD at first order. They also derive generalized sum rules connecting N- and (N-1)-point correlators and provide Pythia-based Monte Carlo comparisons supporting the claim that the normalized spinning correlators are insensitive to infrared dynamics.

Significance. The symmetry decomposition itself is a substantive and useful contribution: it provides a parameter-free organization of the full angular structure of energy correlators, and the positivity argument from the spectral representation (Eq. 15) is clean. The two-point positivity triangle (Eq. 36) is correctly derived. The generalized sum rules and the explicit one-loop QCD expressions, if correct, open new observables that may indeed be robustly computable. The paper's main new physical claim—that ratios of spinning to inclusive correlators directly probe the hard dynamics—is plausible and well-motivated, but as discussed below the current evidence for it is not yet fully controlled.

major comments (2)
  1. [§3.1, Eq. (59), footnote 7, Fig. 5] The claim that a^(2,0)_EE and a^(2,2)_EE directly probe the hard part rests on the assertion that E_n annihilates the soft sector. The stated sufficient condition is N_s ≲ 1/θ². Using the paper's own estimate N_s ∼ exp(√(16N_c/b ln(Q/Λ))) with Q=91 GeV, b=9 and Λ∼0.2 GeV gives N_s∼300, while the z-range displayed in Fig. 5 (z≳0.01, so θ≳0.2 rad) has 1/θ² ≲25. The condition is therefore violated over most of the plotted range, so the factorization argument does not parametrically cover the numerical comparison. The agreement with Pythia is encouraging, but it is a single hadronization model with only statistical uncertainties (footnote 9). To support the 'direct probe of hard dynamics' claim, either add a direct test of soft sensitivity (e.g. comparing with and without soft/hadronized particles, applying an energy cut, or varying the hadronization model), or restrict the IR-insensitivity
  2. [§3.1–3.3, Eqs. (63), (72), (73)] Several fixed-order coefficients appear to be typos and should be rechecked. In Eq. (63), the δ(z) coefficient 53/579 in H_c^EE has an unexplained denominator. In Eq. (72), the coefficient −7π/120 in H_x^EQ and in Eq. (73) the coefficient π/15 in H_-^EQ are surprising: one-loop QCD δ(z) coefficients are expected to be rational combinations of ζ(2), and no mechanism for a π coefficient is given. These coefficients enter the sum-rule checks in Appendix A (e.g. Eq. (98)) and the analytic predictions in Eqs. (64) and (74). Please verify all expressions, correct any typos, or provide more detail on how the calculations were validated.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Fig. 5 and Fig. 7] The z-axis is not labeled and the binning is not described. Please specify the range, binning, and whether the axis is linear or logarithmic.
  2. [Sec. 3.3, p. 37] The sentence 'the statistical uncertainty associated to the spinning energy-charge correlators is larger than the statistical uncertainty associated with the spinning energy-charge correlator' contains an apparent typo; the second instance should refer to the energy-energy correlator.
  3. [Eq. (59)] The factorization notation is under-specified. The soft matrix element ⟨α_s|S|0⟩ and the sum over operators O in the collinear factor should be defined more explicitly, and the relationship between the sets {p_i,j} and {p_s,j} should be stated.
  4. [Footnote 8] The definition of the normalized spinning correlators at the endpoints (as ratios of δ-function coefficients) is relegated to a footnote. Since the functions in Eqs. (60) and (64) are distribution-valued, it would help to state this definition in the main text.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: the symmetry decomposition, positivity bounds and QCD spinning-correlator ratios are derived from first principles; self-citations are consistency checks and context, not inputs.

full rationale

The central derivation is self-contained. The angular structure (Eqs. 5 and 14) follows from rotational covariance: Euler-angle dependence is carried by Wigner D matrices, and the remaining coefficients are defined as the spinning correlators, so no fitted input is being relabeled as a prediction. The positivity bounds (Eqs. 36 and 39) come from the spectral representation in Eq. 15, where every weight w_{i,k} is non-negative and the source matrix elements are positive definite; the bounds are consequences of unitarity/energy positivity, not inputs that reproduce the conclusion. The QCD predictions in Eq. 60 are computed as fixed-order contractions of the hadronic tensor (Eqs. 54–58) and compared directly with an independent Pythia8 simulation in Fig. 5 without tuned parameters; the agreement is an external check, not a fit. Appendix A derives the one-point a_E and a_Q from the two-point correlators through sum rules that follow from the detector definition (Eq. 75) and momentum conservation (Eq. 79); matching known values is a consistency check, not an assumption. The self-citations [54] and [62] are used for context (UV→IR flow of one-point correlators) and for further discussion of charge-correlator IR safety, but the load-bearing arguments are restated or derived in the present text, so they do not form a self-citation chain. The explicitly flagged 'hidden assumption' around Eq. 59/footnote 7—that E_n annihilates the soft sector only if the number of soft quanta is ≲1/θ²—is a validity limitation on the claimed IR insensitivity, not a circular step: it does not make the prediction equivalent to an input or to a fit.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 5 axioms · 0 invented entities

No data-fitting free parameters are introduced: the QCD predictions depend on α_s and standard kinematics, and the one-point coefficients a_E/a_Q are outputs of the sum rules rather than fitted inputs. The central scientific content rests on standard QCD factorization, massless kinematics, and the spectral positivity representation, plus the explicit soft-quanta-count assumption.

axioms (5)
  • domain assumption The energy flow operator action E_n|α⟩ = Σ_i E_i δ^(2)(Ω_i−Ω_n)|α⟩ and its light-ray representation as a null integral of the stress tensor accurately model calorimeter measurements (Eqs. 1–2).
    This is the standard identification between the formal operator and real energy measurements; all correlator claims inherit it.
  • domain assumption The hadronic tensor can be written as a positive spectral sum over intermediate states: H^ab = Σ_α (2π)^4δ^4(p−p_α) w... ⟨0|J^a†|α⟩⟨α|J^b|0⟩ (Eq. 15), so the matrix is positive definite.
    Unitarity and positive-energy particles justify the positivity bounds; if this representation fails for a given theory, the bounds need re-examination.
  • domain assumption Soft and collinear factorization of the form Eq. (59) holds, and energy/charge detectors annihilate the soft sector, which requires the number of soft quanta to be ≲1/θ² (footnote 7).
    This is the load-bearing premise for the claimed IR insensitivity of the normalized spinning correlators.
  • domain assumption Final-state hadrons are treated as massless, E_i ≃ |p_i|, with violations of order Λ²_QCD/Q² (Section 4, around Eq. 79).
    The momentum-conservation sum rules in Section 4 use this approximation; the authors note the leading correction is J=1-suppressed for unpolarized sources.
  • domain assumption The collinear OPE of energy operators is controlled by light-ray operators with transverse spin, as in Eq. (50) and Refs. [15,48].
    The interpretation of the azimuthal phase in terms of transverse spin and the collinear-limit structure of spinning correlators depends on this existing OPE framework.

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 41911 in / 10993 out tokens · 117957 ms · 2026-08-03T15:21:40.421071+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

The $N$-point energy correlator measures the energy flux through $N$ detectors. We present a general framework that characterizes its full angular dependence in a series of \textit{spinning energy correlators}. These spinning correlators resurrect the angular momentum structure of both the source and the detector configuration, lost otherwise in inclusive measurements. We demonstrate that unitarity and energy positivity confine these correlators to a sharply bounded region, with the boundary realized by extremal correlators generated by pure spin states. We present a first calculation of spinning energy correlators in QCD as well as spinning energy-charge correlators. Their enhanced insensitivity to infrared dynamics opens up a new set of observables that directly probe the hard part of the scattering. Finally, we provide generalized sum rules, extended to spinning correlators and to conserved charges beyond energy.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2512.16985 by Marc Riembau, Minho Son.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Example of the kinematics of a 5 point correlator. The 2 × 5 = 10 coordinates that specify the location of the detectors can be split into 2 × 5 − 3 = 7 internal angles fixing the configuration, and 3 Euler angles locating the rigid body of detectors. The 7 internal angles are obtained by a triangulation of the detectors. Measuring the Euler angles requires an external coordinate system to embed the rigid … view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Bounds on the normalized coefficients H2/H0 and H4/H0 of the spinning energy correlator for various values of the spin-J of the source operator. that the expression in Eq. 28 can be reorganized as ϵ ∗ab λ′ H ab,cd E ϵ cd λ = Q  1 +  t2 − 4 7 t4  ϵ ∗abϵ acn bn c − 1 3  + t4  |ϵ abn an b | 2 − 2 15 . (29) Using the representation of the dotted hadronic tensors in terms of the Clebsh-Gordan coefficien… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Generic configuration of the two-point energy correlator. The single rigid body angle is given by θ. The remaining angles Θ, Φ and ϕ are Euler angles. point correlator, it is particularly convenient to work in a frame where the ˆz-axis coincides with the center of mass direction of the detector configuration, given by 1 2 (n µ 1 + n µ 2 ). In this frame, the two detector directions are written as ⃗n1 = (√ … view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Allowed space for the c(z) and b(z) functions of the two point correlator. The hadronic tensor at special points are explicitly shown, together with some example of theories that generates them. In the collinear (z → 0) and back-to-back (z → 1) limits, the allowed space collapses to the lines at b(0) = 0 and c(1) = 0, respectively. Three vertices at (c, b) = (1, 0), (0, 1), (−1, −1) correspond to the situa… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Spinning Energy-Energy correlators as a function of z in QCD for an unpolarized vector current. The solid line is the analytical result in Eq. 60, while the data points are the result of a simulation of parton shower and hadronization via Pythia8. In pink and blue, the spinning correlators a (2,0) EE and a (2,2) EE , respectively. into account to get an accurate prediction [82]. The uncertainty of the data… view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Allowed space of spinning correlators, as in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p032_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: J = 2 components of the Spinning Energy-Charge correlator as a function of the internal angle z, normalized to the inclusive correlators. The solid line is the analytical result in Eq. 74, while the data points are the result of a simulation of parton shower and hadronization via Pythia8. In blue, purple and green, the spinning correlators a (2,0) EQ , a (2,1) EQ and a (2,2) EQ , respectively. of the corre… view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Representative of the network of sum rules between the different two-point ⟨EE⟩, ⟨EQ⟩ and ⟨QQ⟩ spinning correlators and the one-point ⟨E⟩ and ⟨Q⟩ spinning correlators. Blue arrows indicate the integration over an energy detector, red ones over a charge detector. The doubling of blue arrows are associated to the bonus sum rule due to momentum conservation. so the only quantity fixed by the bulk contribution… view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Bump Hunting Inside Jets with Energy Correlators

    hep-ph 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Energy correlators can convert scaling violations into angular bump hunting for new physics, yielding projected competitive LHC sensitivity for a light hadrophilic Z'.

  2. Hydrodynamics and Energy Correlators

    hep-ph 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Energy-energy correlators in heavy-ion collisions exhibit classical hydrodynamic scaling from collective flow at large angles within the small-angle regime, collective modes at smaller angles, and light-ray OPE at eve...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

83 extracted references · 69 linked inside Pith · cited by 2 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    C. L. Basham, L. S. Brown, S. D. Ellis, and S. T. Love,Electron-positron annihilation energy pattern in quantum chromodynamics: Asymptotically free perturbation theory,Phys. Rev. D17 (May, 1978) 2298–2306

    1978

  2. [2]

    C. L. Basham, L. S. Brown, S. D. Ellis, and S. T. Love,Energy correlations in electron-positron annihilation: Testing quantum chromodynamics,Phys. Rev. Lett.41(Dec, 1978) 1585–1588

    1978

  3. [3]

    Moult and H

    I. Moult and H. X. Zhu,Energy Correlators: A Journey From Theory to Experiment, arXiv:2506.09119

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  4. [4]

    D. M. Hofman and J. Maldacena,Conformal collider physics: Energy and charge correlations, JHEP05(2008) 012, [arXiv:0803.1467]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  5. [5]

    N. A. Sveshnikov and F. V. Tkachov,Jets and quantum field theory,Phys. Lett. B382(1996) 403–408, [hep-ph/9512370]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1996

  6. [6]

    P. S. Cherzor and N. A. Sveshnikov,Jet observables and energy momentum tensor, in12th International Workshop on High-Energy Physics and Quantum Field Theory (QFTHEP 97), pp. 402–407, 9, 1997.hep-ph/9710349

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1997

  7. [7]

    G. P. Korchemsky, G. Oderda, and G. F. Sterman,Power corrections and nonlocal operators, AIP Conf. Proc.407(1997), no. 1 988, [hep-ph/9708346]. 48

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1997

  8. [8]

    Belitsky, G

    A. Belitsky, G. Korchemsky, and G. Sterman,Energy flow in qcd and event shape functions, Physics Letters B515(2001), no. 3 297–307

    2001

  9. [9]

    C. W. Bauer, S. P. Fleming, C. Lee, and G. F. Sterman,Factorization of e+e- Event Shape Distributions with Hadronic Final States in Soft Collinear Effective Theory,Phys. Rev. D78 (2008) 034027, [arXiv:0801.4569]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  10. [10]

    A. V. Belitsky, S. Hohenegger, G. P. Korchemsky, E. Sokatchev, and A. Zhiboedov,Event shapes inN= 4super-Yang-Mills theory,Nucl. Phys. B884(2014) 206–256, [arXiv:1309.1424]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  11. [11]

    A. V. Belitsky, S. Hohenegger, G. P. Korchemsky, E. Sokatchev, and A. Zhiboedov,From correlation functions to event shapes,Nucl. Phys. B884(2014) 305–343, [arXiv:1309.0769]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  12. [12]

    Kravchuk and D

    P. Kravchuk and D. Simmons-Duffin,Light-ray operators in conformal field theory,JHEP11 (2018) 102, [arXiv:1805.00098]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  13. [13]

    Kologlu, P

    M. Kologlu, P. Kravchuk, D. Simmons-Duffin, and A. Zhiboedov,The light-ray OPE and conformal colliders,JHEP01(2021) 128, [arXiv:1905.01311]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  14. [14]

    P. T. Komiske, I. Moult, J. Thaler, and H. X. Zhu,Analyzing N-Point Energy Correlators inside Jets with CMS Open Data,Phys. Rev. Lett.130(2023), no. 5 051901, [arXiv:2201.07800]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  15. [15]

    H. Chen, I. Moult, J. Sandor, and H. X. Zhu,Celestial blocks and transverse spin in the three-point energy correlator,JHEP09(2022) 199, [arXiv:2202.04085]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  16. [16]

    H. Chen, P. F. Monni, Z. Xu, and H. X. Zhu,Scaling Violation in Power Corrections to Energy Correlators from the Light-Ray Operator Product Expansion,Phys. Rev. Lett.133(2024), no. 23 231901, [arXiv:2406.06668]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  17. [17]

    K. Lee, A. Pathak, I. W. Stewart, and Z. Sun,Nonperturbative Effects in Energy Correlators: From Characterizing Confinement Transition to Improvingαs Extraction,Phys. Rev. Lett.133 (2024), no. 23 231902, [arXiv:2405.19396]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  18. [18]

    H. Chen, H. Ruan, and H. X. Zhu,Energy-Energy Correlator at Hadron Colliders: Celestial Blocks and Singularities,arXiv:2505.16753

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  19. [19]

    Chang, H

    C.-H. Chang, H. Chen, D. Simmons-Duffin, and H. X. Zhu,Seeing through the confinement screen: DGLAP/BFKL mixing and light-ray matching in QCD,arXiv:2506.06431

    arXiv

  20. [20]

    Chang, H

    C.-H. Chang, H. Chen, X. Liu, D. Simmons-Duffin, F. Yuan, and H. X. Zhu,Quantum Scaling in Energy Correlators Beyond the Confinement Transition,arXiv:2507.15923

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  21. [21]

    H. Chen, P. F. Monni, Z. Pang, G. Vita, and H. X. Zhu,Correlation Function/Wilson Loop Duality in Gauge Theory from EFT,arXiv:2510.07377

    arXiv

  22. [22]

    H. Chen, I. Moult, X. Zhang, and H. X. Zhu,Rethinking jets with energy correlators: Tracks, resummation, and analytic continuation,Phys. Rev. D102(2020), no. 5 054012, [arXiv:2004.11381]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  23. [23]

    Jaarsma, Y

    M. Jaarsma, Y. Li, I. Moult, W. J. Waalewijn, and H. X. Zhu,From DGLAP to Sudakov: Precision Predictions for Energy-Energy Correlators,arXiv:2512.11950

    arXiv

  24. [24]

    W. Chen, J. Gao, Y. Li, Z. Xu, X. Zhang, and H. X. Zhu,NNLL resummation for projected three-point energy correlator,JHEP05(2024) 043, [arXiv:2307.07510]. [25]CMSCollaboration, A. Hayrapetyan et al.,Measurement of Energy Correlators inside Jets and Determination of the Strong CouplingαS(mZ),Phys. Rev. Lett.133(2024), no. 7 071903, 49 [arXiv:2402.13864]. [2...

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  25. [28]

    Holguin, I

    J. Holguin, I. Moult, A. Pathak, and M. Procura,New paradigm for precision top physics: Weighing the top with energy correlators,Phys. Rev. D107(2023), no. 11 114002, [arXiv:2201.08393]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  26. [29]

    Holguin, I

    J. Holguin, I. Moult, A. Pathak, M. Procura, R. Sch¨ ofbeck, and D. Schwarz,Using the W Boson as a Standard Candle to Reach the Top: Calibrating Energy-Correlator-Based Top Mass Measurements,Phys. Rev. Lett.134(2025), no. 23 231903, [arXiv:2311.02157]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  27. [30]

    Liu and H

    X. Liu and H. X. Zhu,Nucleon Energy Correlators,Phys. Rev. Lett.130(2023), no. 9 091901, [arXiv:2209.02080]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  28. [31]

    H.-Y. Liu, X. Liu, J.-C. Pan, F. Yuan, and H. X. Zhu,Nucleon Energy Correlators for the Color Glass Condensate,Phys. Rev. Lett.130(2023), no. 18 181901, [arXiv:2301.01788]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  29. [32]

    Liu and H

    X. Liu and H. X. Zhu,TMDs from Semi-inclusive Energy Correlators,arXiv:2403.08874

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  30. [33]

    M¨ antysaari, Y

    H. M¨ antysaari, Y. Tawabutr, and X.-B. Tong,Nucleon energy correlators for the odderon,Phys. Rev. D112(2025), no. 11 114027, [arXiv:2503.20157]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  31. [34]

    Gao, Z.-B

    M.-S. Gao, Z.-B. Kang, W. Li, and D. Y. Shao,Accessing nucleon transversity with one-point energy correlators,arXiv:2509.15809

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  32. [35]

    Q.-H. Cao, Z. Yu, C. P. Yuan, S. Zhang, and H. X. Zhu,Collins-type fragmentation energy correlator in semi-inclusive deep inelastic lepton-hadron scattering,arXiv:2509.18892

    arXiv

  33. [36]

    Huang, X.-B

    Y. Huang, X.-B. Tong, and H.-L. Wang,Nucleon energy correlators as a probe of light-quark dipole operators at the EIC,arXiv:2508.08516

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  34. [37]

    Y. J. Zhu,Energy Correlators in Semi-Inclusive Electron-Positron Annihilation, arXiv:2509.01652

    arXiv

  35. [38]

    J. Gao, H. T. Li, and Y. J. Zhu,Energy Correlators Resolving Proton Spin,arXiv:2509.17596

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  36. [39]

    Andres, F

    C. Andres, F. Dominguez, R. Kunnawalkam Elayavalli, J. Holguin, C. Marquet, and I. Moult, Resolving the Scales of the Quark-Gluon Plasma with Energy Correlators,Phys. Rev. Lett.130 (2023), no. 26 262301, [arXiv:2209.11236]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  37. [40]

    Barata, P

    J. Barata, P. Caucal, A. Soto-Ontoso, and R. Szafron,Advancing the understanding of energy-energy correlators in heavy-ion collisions,JHEP11(2024) 060, [arXiv:2312.12527]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  38. [41]

    Ricci and M

    L. Ricci and M. Riembau,Energy correlators of hadronically decaying electroweak bosons,Phys. Rev. D106(2022), no. 11 114010, [arXiv:2207.03511]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  39. [42]

    Alipour-fard and W

    S. Alipour-fard and W. J. Waalewijn,Energy correlators beyond angles,JHEP07(2025) 043, [arXiv:2501.17218]

    arXiv 2025

  40. [43]

    Z.-B. Kang, K. Lee, D. Y. Shao, and F. Zhao,Probing transverse momentum dependent 50 structures with azimuthal dependence of energy correlators,JHEP03(2024) 153, [arXiv:2310.15159]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  41. [44]

    G. C. Fox and S. Wolfram,TWO AND THREE POINT ENERGY CORRELATIONS IN HADRONIC E+ E- ANNIHILATION,Z. Phys. C4(1980) 237–256. [45]OP ALCollaboration, G. Abbiendi et al.,Measurement of the longitudinal cross-section using the direction of the thrust axis in hadronic events at LEP,Phys. Lett. B440(1998) 393–402, [hep-ex/9808035]. [46]DELPHICollaboration, P. Ab...

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1980

  42. [47]

    Mateu and G

    V. Mateu and G. Rodrigo,Oriented Event Shapes at N 3LL+O(α 2 S),JHEP11(2013) 030, [arXiv:1307.3513]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  43. [48]

    Chang, M

    C.-H. Chang, M. Kologlu, P. Kravchuk, D. Simmons-Duffin, and A. Zhiboedov,Transverse spin in the light-ray OPE,JHEP05(2022) 059, [arXiv:2010.04726]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  44. [49]

    Faulkner, R

    T. Faulkner, R. G. Leigh, O. Parrikar, and H. Wang,Modular Hamiltonians for Deformed Half-Spaces and the Averaged Null Energy Condition,JHEP09(2016) 038, [arXiv:1605.08072]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  45. [50]

    Hartman, S

    T. Hartman, S. Kundu, and A. Tajdini,Averaged Null Energy Condition from Causality,JHEP 07(2017) 066, [arXiv:1610.05308]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  46. [51]

    D. M. Hofman, D. Li, D. Meltzer, D. Poland, and F. Rejon-Barrera,A Proof of the Conformal Collider Bounds,JHEP06(2016) 111, [arXiv:1603.03771]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  47. [52]

    D. Li, D. Meltzer, and D. Poland,Conformal Collider Physics from the Lightcone Bootstrap, JHEP02(2016) 143, [arXiv:1511.08025]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  48. [53]

    Zhiboedov,On Conformal Field Theories With Extremal a/c Values,JHEP04(2014) 038, [arXiv:1304.6075]

    A. Zhiboedov,On Conformal Field Theories With Extremal a/c Values,JHEP04(2014) 038, [arXiv:1304.6075]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  49. [54]

    Riembau and M

    M. Riembau and M. Son,Flow between extremal one-point energy correlators in QCD, arXiv:2509.02669

    arXiv

  50. [55]

    Bhattacharya, Z.-B

    S. Bhattacharya, Z.-B. Kang, D. Padilla, and J. Penttala,Probing the Sivers Asymmetry with Transverse Energy-Energy Correlators in the Small-xRegime,arXiv:2504.10475

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  51. [56]

    S. D. Chowdhury, J. R. David, and S. Prakash,Constraints on parity violating conformal field theories ind= 3,JHEP11(2017) 171, [arXiv:1707.03007]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  52. [57]

    Cordova, J

    C. Cordova, J. Maldacena, and G. J. Turiaci,Bounds on OPE Coefficients from Interference Effects in the Conformal Collider,JHEP11(2017) 032, [arXiv:1710.03199]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  53. [58]

    Meltzer,Higher Spin ANEC and the Space of CFTs,JHEP07(2019) 001, [arXiv:1811.01913]

    D. Meltzer,Higher Spin ANEC and the Space of CFTs,JHEP07(2019) 001, [arXiv:1811.01913]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  54. [59]

    Hartman and G

    T. Hartman and G. Mathys,Averaged null energy and the renormalization group,JHEP12 (2023) 139, [arXiv:2309.14409]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  55. [60]

    Dempsey, R

    R. Dempsey, R. Karlsson, S. S. Pufu, Z. Zahraee, and A. Zhiboedov,Conformal collider bootstrap inN= 4SYM,arXiv:2512.10796

    arXiv

  56. [61]

    Me¸ caj, I

    B. Me¸ caj, I. Moult, M. T. Walters, and Y. Xin,Energy Correlator Conformal Blocks and Positivity,arXiv:2512.09986. 51

    arXiv

  57. [62]

    Riembau and M

    M. Riembau and M. Son,One-point correlators of conserved and nonconserved charges in QCD, Phys. Rev. D111(2025), no. 1 014004, [arXiv:2407.12082]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  58. [63]

    Spencer,A note on the decomposition of tensors into traceless symmetric tensors, International Journal of Engineering Science8(1970), no

    A. Spencer,A note on the decomposition of tensors into traceless symmetric tensors, International Journal of Engineering Science8(1970), no. 6 475–481

    1970

  59. [64]

    Belin, D

    A. Belin, D. M. Hofman, and G. Mathys,Einstein gravity from ANEC correlators,JHEP08 (2019) 032, [arXiv:1904.05892]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  60. [65]

    Kologlu, P

    M. Kologlu, P. Kravchuk, D. Simmons-Duffin, and A. Zhiboedov,Shocks, Superconvergence, and a Stringy Equivalence Principle,JHEP11(2020) 096, [arXiv:1904.05905]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  61. [66]

    H. Chen, I. Moult, and H. X. Zhu,Spinning gluons from the QCD light-ray OPE,JHEP08 (2022) 233, [arXiv:2104.00009]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  62. [67]

    Panico, F

    G. Panico, F. Riva, and A. Wulzer,Diboson interference resurrection,Phys. Lett. B776(2018) 473–480, [arXiv:1708.07823]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  63. [68]

    Gonzo and A

    R. Gonzo and A. Pokraka,Light-ray operators, detectors and gravitational event shapes,JHEP 05(2021) 015, [arXiv:2012.01406]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  64. [69]

    L. J. Dixon, I. Moult, and H. X. Zhu,Collinear limit of the energy-energy correlator,Phys. Rev. D100(2019), no. 1 014009, [arXiv:1905.01310]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  65. [70]

    Del Duca, C

    V. Del Duca, C. Duhr, A. Kardos, G. Somogyi, Z. Szar, Z. Trocsanyi, and Z. Tulipant,Jet production in the CoLoRFulNNLO method: event shapes in electron-positron collisions,Phys. Rev. D94(2016), no. 7 074019, [arXiv:1606.03453]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  66. [71]

    Moult and H

    I. Moult and H. X. Zhu,Simplicity from Recoil: The Three-Loop Soft Function and Factorization for the Energy-Energy Correlation,JHEP08(2018) 160, [arXiv:1801.02627]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  67. [72]

    L. J. Dixon, M.-X. Luo, V. Shtabovenko, T.-Z. Yang, and H. X. Zhu,Analytical Computation of Energy-Energy Correlation at Next-to-Leading Order in QCD,Phys. Rev. Lett.120(2018), no. 10 102001, [arXiv:1801.03219]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  68. [73]

    M. A. Ebert, B. Mistlberger, and G. Vita,The Energy-Energy Correlation in the back-to-back limit at N3LO and N3LL’,JHEP08(2021) 022, [arXiv:2012.07859]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  69. [74]

    C. Duhr, B. Mistlberger, and G. Vita,Four-Loop Rapidity Anomalous Dimension and Event Shapes to Fourth Logarithmic Order,Phys. Rev. Lett.129(2022), no. 16 162001, [arXiv:2205.02242]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  70. [75]

    U. G. Aglietti and G. Ferrera,Energy-energy correlation in the back-to-back region at N3LL+NNLO in QCD,Phys. Rev. D110(2024), no. 11 114004, [arXiv:2403.04077]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  71. [76]

    Catani and M

    S. Catani and M. Grazzini,Infrared factorization of tree level QCD amplitudes at the next-to-next-to-leading order and beyond,Nucl. Phys. B570(2000) 287–325, [hep-ph/9908523]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  72. [77]

    Feige and M

    I. Feige and M. D. Schwartz,An on-shell approach to factorization,Phys. Rev. D88(2013), no. 6 065021, [arXiv:1306.6341]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  73. [78]

    Agarwal, L

    N. Agarwal, L. Magnea, C. Signorile-Signorile, and A. Tripathi,The infrared structure of perturbative gauge theories,Phys. Rept.994(2023) 1–120, [arXiv:2112.07099]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  74. [79]

    Y. L. Dokshitzer, V. A. Khoze, A. H. Mueller, and S. I. Troian,Basics of perturbative QCD. 1991

    1991

  75. [80]

    Alwall, R

    J. Alwall, R. Frederix, S. Frixione, V. Hirschi, F. Maltoni, O. Mattelaer, H. S. Shao, T. Stelzer, 52 P. Torrielli, and M. Zaro,The automated computation of tree-level and next-to-leading order differential cross sections, and their matching to parton shower simulations,JHEP07(2014) 079, [arXiv:1405.0301]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  76. [81]

    Bierlich et al.,A comprehensive guide to the physics and usage of PYTHIA 8.3,SciPost Phys

    C. Bierlich et al.,A comprehensive guide to the physics and usage of PYTHIA 8.3,SciPost Phys. Codeb.2022(2022) 8, [arXiv:2203.11601]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  77. [82]

    S. T. Schindler, I. W. Stewart, and Z. Sun,Renormalons in the energy-energy correlator,JHEP 10(2023) 187, [arXiv:2305.19311]. [Erratum: JHEP 10, 175 (2024)]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  78. [83]

    P. F. Monni, G. Vita, Z. Xu, and H. X. Zhu,On the Edge of Safety: Charge-Charge Correlation in the Back-to-Back Limit,arXiv:2508.00977

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  79. [84]

    Kats,Measuring polarization of light quarks at ATLAS and CMS,Phys

    Y. Kats,Measuring polarization of light quarks at ATLAS and CMS,Phys. Rev. D92(2015) 071503, [arXiv:1505.06731]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  80. [85]

    Kats,Kinked tracks fromΣ + baryons as a probe of light quark polarizations,JHEP07(2023) 018, [arXiv:2301.06188]

    Y. Kats,Kinked tracks fromΣ + baryons as a probe of light quark polarizations,JHEP07(2023) 018, [arXiv:2301.06188]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

Showing first 80 references.